Original Article Diabetic Retinopathy and its Risk Factors at the University Hospital in Jamaica Lizette Mowatt

Access this article online

ABSTRACT Purpose: To determine the frequency of diabetic retinopathy and its risk factors in diabetic patients attending the eye clinic at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of diabetic outpatients attending the Eye Clinic at the UHWI. Data were collected on age, gender, type of diabetes mellitus (DM), type of diabetic retinopathy, other ocular diseases, visual acuity, blood glucose and blood pressure. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 19.0) was used for data analysis. Results: There were 104 patients (208 eyes) recruited for this study. There were 58.6% (61/104) females (mean age 53.6 ± 11.9 years) and 41.4% (43/104) males (mean age 61.7 ± 12.1 years). Type II DM was present in 68.3% (56% were females) of the patients and Type I DM was present in 31.7% (69.7% were females). Most patients (66%) were compliant with their diabetic medications. The mean blood glucose was 11.4 ± 5.3 mmol/L. Elevated blood pressure (>130/80) was present in 82.7% of patients. The mean visual acuity was 20/160 (logMAR 0.95 ± 1.1). The frequency of diabetic retinopathy was 78%; 29.5% had background retinopathy, and 50.5% of eyes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) of which 34% had tractional retinal detachments. The odds ratio of developing PDR was 1.88  (95% confidence intervals  (CI): 1.02-3.3) for Type  I DM compared to 0.74  (95% CI: 0.55-0.99) for Type II DM. PDR was more prevalent in females (χ2, P = 0.009) in both Type I and II DM. Conclusions: Jamaica has a high frequency of PDR which is more common in Type I diabetics and females. This was associated with poor glucose and blood pressure control.

Website: www.meajo.org DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.120017 Quick Response Code:

Key words: Compliance, Diabetic Control, Diabetic Retinopathy, Hypertension, Jamaica



iabetic retinopathy can result in ocular complications leading to poor vision in the working age group. It is one of the leading causes of blindness in the 20-74 years age group.1 There are approximately 34 million people in America with Diabetes Mellitus (DM).2 Jamaica, a developing country, is the largest English speaking country in the Caribbean with a population of 2,709,300.3 The gender adjusted prevalence of DM in Jamaica is 9.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 7.0-12.0) for males and 15.7% (95% CI: 13.2-18.3) for females. 4 Eighty‑one percent of Jamaican patients in a diabetic study had a body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2,

77% had a HbA1C > 6.5% and a 63% had a systolic blood pressure > 130 mmHg.5,6 The median HbA1C was 8.3 in the Jamaican study population.7 Uncontrolled diabetic patients particularly with associated hypertension are more likely to have diabetic retinopathy, which increases with the duration of their diabetes. There is literature on the glycemic control and barriers to diabetic care in Jamaica but none on the frequency of diabetic retinopathy. This prospective observational study was designed to look at the present frequency of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic control of patients in the Eye Clinic at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.

Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica Corresponding Author: Dr. Lizette Mowatt, Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica. E‑mail: [email protected]

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 20, Number 4, October - December 2013


Mowatt: DR and its risk factors in Jamaica

MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and four consecutive patients were recruited from the Retina Clinic at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica over a two‑month period. The inclusion criteria were diabetic patients from the Retina Clinic, who were able to answer the questions and gave voluntary informed consent. Patients were excluded if they had previous ocular trauma or were unable to communicate. All patients were dilated with topical tropicamide 1% and topical phenylephrine 2.5% and underwent mydriatic funduscopy examination at the slit lamp. Background diabetic retinopathy (BDR) was defined according to the presence of dot and blot hemorrhages, hard exudates or retinal thickening. Pre‑proliferative changes were defined as the presence of cotton wool spots, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA) and vascular dilatation and beading. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) was defined as the presence of neovascularization at the disc or elsewhere, or the presence of a tractional retinal detachment or vitreous hemorrhage. Macula edema was defined as retinal thickening involving the fovea. Patients were assessed to determine if they were compliant with their medications. They were graded as fully compliant if they adhered to their medication routinely and not compliant if they didn’t take all their medications daily. A questionnaire was completed by the ophthalmologist seeing the patient. Each patient gave informed consent; anonymity and confidentiality was maintained during the study in keeping with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2000. Data were collected on age, gender, type of diabetes mellitus (DM), duration, retinal status, other ocular diseases, visual acuity, blood glucose and blood pressure, compliance with medications and ophthalmic management plan. Ethics approval was obtained from the University Hospital of the West Indies Ethics Committee. Descriptive statistical analysis, means test with the chi square test (χ2) were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 19.0).

RESULTS There were 104 patients (208 eyes) recruited for this study. There were 58.6% (61/104) females (mean age 53.6 ± 11.9 years; range 28-83 years) and 41.4% (43/104) males (mean age 61.7 ± 12.1 years; range 31-85 years). Females were statistically significantly younger than males (P 60 years old) and good glucose control (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = –0.154; P = 0.06). Blood pressure levels

Elevated blood pressure was defined as >130 mmHg (systolic) and >80 mmHg (diastolic) in 82.7% of the entire study population. There were 66.7% hypertensives in the IDDM group and 88.7% in the NIDDM group. The systolic values ranged from 100 to 230 mmHg and the diastolic values ranged from 64 to 160 mmHg for the entire study population. In both groups the mean systolic and diastolic values were higher than the accepted blood pressure for a diabetic (BP 130/80). The Type IDDM group had a mean BP of 154/93 and 164/85 for males and females, respectively. However, all males in the IDDM group had BP > 130/80, compared with 75% of females [Table 4]. In the NIDDM group the mean BP was 151/90 and 154/90 in males and females, respectively [Table 4]. In the NIDDM, 87% of both males and females had a systolic blood pressure of >130 mmHg. Visual acuity: (According to type of diabetes and gender)

Visual acuity ranged from 6/6 to no light perception with a mean of 0.89 ± 1.1 logMAR for the entire study population group [Figure 2]. The IDDM group had statistically significant better mean visual acuity (0.73 ± 0.9 logMAR) compared to the NIDDM group (0.95 ± 1.1 logMAR) (P = 0.02). Females had better visual acuity than males in both group [Figure 2]. With respect to gender, for the IDDM group, the mean visual acuity was 0.61 ± 0.8 logMAR in females and 1.0 ± 1.2 logMAR in males (P = 0.79). In the NIDDM group, the mean visual acuity was 0.81 ± 1.0 logMAR versus 1.17 ± 1.2 logMAR for females and males, respectively (P = 0.54). Frequency of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy was present in 78% of the patients. Background DR was present in 29.5% of patients with DR [Figure 3]. Macular edema was present in 19% of patients. Pre‑proliferative diabetic retinopathy was the least frequently occurring type of DR, occurring in 13% of cases. However, 50.5% of eyes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage and/or tractional retinal detachment. Of the patients with PDR, 34% had tractional retinal detachments and 14% had vitreous hemorrhages. The remaining 52% of

Figure 1: Percentage compliance according to gender in Type I vs. Type II Diabetes Mellitus  










7RWDO ,,



7130 mmHg % with diastolic BP >80 mmHg

Type I DM

Type II DM





154 (146-185) 93 (88-112) 100% 100%

164 (107-214) 85 (66-103) 75% 75%

151 (124-219) 90 (72-160) 87% 67%

154 (100-230) 90 (73-140) 87% 80%

BP: Blood pressure, DM: Diabetes mellitus

Table 5: Odds ratio of developing visual threatening diabetic retinopathy (i.e., proliferative diabetic retinopathy or macula edema) Group (DM) Type I Type II

Odds ratio for developing proliferative diabetic retinopathy (95% confidence interval) 1.88 0.74

(1.02-3.3) (0.55-0.99)

Odds ratio for developing diabetic macular edema (95% confidence interval) Type I Type II

1.4 0.83

(0.7-2.6) (0.65-1.2)

DM: Diabetes mellitus

Although our study showed that patients in the IDDM group were more likely to get diabetic macula edema compared to the Type II NIDDM group (odds ratio: 1.4 versus 0.83), this was not statistically significant (Fisher’s exact test P = 0.21) [Table 5]. Other comorbidities

Cataracts were present in 39.4% (26/66 eyes) of the IDDM group and 55.6% (79/142 eyes) of the NIDDM group. Further cross tabulation analysis was performed within each group according to gender and age (in 2 groups: 60 years old). Females 60 years (χ2; P = 0.001). Glaucoma was present in 18.2% (12/66 eyes) in the IDDM group and 13.4% (19/142 eyes) in the NIDDM group, one with rubeotic glaucoma. Treatment

Forty percent (83/208) of eyes had previous laser treatment. Further treatment was required in 33.6% (70/208 eyes) of patients. Of these, 12.9% (9/70) required cataract surgery, 47.1% (33/70) required laser treatment and 40% (28/70 eyes) required vitrectomy.

DISCUSSION Diabetes is an increasing healthcare problem, with the majority of those affected in the 40-59 years old age group, with low and middle income countries carrying a greater burden of the disease.8 Loss of vision can have a significant impact on the independence and psychosocial aspect of a young adult, affecting their productivity. The prevalence of DR is variable according to the country.8 The global prevalence of DR is 34.6%.9 The prevalence of 324

DR at first screening in the United Kingdom is 35% and in Scotland 19%.10,11 Other studies have reported prevalences at 42% (Cairo), 54.9% (Yemen) and 64.1% (Jordan).12‑14 Low rates of DR have been reported in Oman (14.5%), Lebanon (17%) and the United Arab Emirates (19%).15‑17 This variation can be due to lifestyles, culture, diet and free accessibility to health care (e.g., Oman).[15]The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study on Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) showed that the prevalence was more common in the younger onset group compared to the older onset group; 23% versus 10%.18 In the USA, the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in adults >40 years was 40.3%; however, the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in all age groups was 3.4%.19 Our study showed that 78% of our study population had diabetic retinopathy, which is comparable to African/Afro‑Caribbean rates in the UK with a prevalence of 54% for diabetic retinopathy and 11.5% sight threatening diabetic retinopathy.20 However, the frequency of sight threatening disease was much higher. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) includes neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage and tractional retinal detachments, which can lead to visual loss. Patients with PDR have a 4 year increased risk of visual loss, cardiac, kidney disease and death.18 PDR requires early intervention which ranges from laser treatment (panretinal photocoagulation, PRP) to complex vitreoretinal procedures for tractional retinal detachments. The prevalence of PDR globally is 6.9% and in the USA (adults > 40 years old) it is 8.2%. These values contrast greatly to the prevalence in our clinic of 50.5% for PDR.9 The prevalence of diabetic macular edema varies from 0.85 to 12.3% worldwide, which is lower than our prevalence of 19%.9,15 The increased prevalence of PDR and diabetic macula edema may be related to our study population’s systemic factors and culture. The Jamaican study patients had a 63% compliance with their diabetic medication and their mean blood glucose levels were elevated in both groups. The IDDM patients who had both a higher mean blood glucose and blood pressure were more likely to develop PDR and diabetic macula edema. Poor compliance leading to elevated blood glucose (uncontrolled diabetes) are well recognized risk factors for progression of DR.

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 20, Number 4, October - December 2013

Mowatt: DR and its risk factors in Jamaica

The blood pressure was elevated in 82.7% of the entire study population in the current study. The prevalence of hypertension was 30.8% in our experience for patients >15 years old and is more commonly seen in females, diabetics and obese patients.21,22 Diabetics had twice the risk of developing hypertension compared with non‑diabetics from the Jamaican Hypertension prevalence study.22 In our study, with respect to hypertension in the IDDM group, 100% of males and 75% of females had blood pressure > 130/80 (BP 130/80 is recommended by the UKPDS study).10 Poor blood pressure control could be one of the risk factors for the severity of DR.10 In previous studies of the Jamaican population, >80% of diabetic patients had a BMI > 25 kg/m2 and 77% had an HBA1c > 6.5%, with a median HBA1c of 8.0.5‑7 Obesity and poor glucose control are significant factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. Our study did not assess the BMI, but should be evaluated in future studies. Ethnicity may also have a role in the prevalence of DR, which is more aggressive in blacks compared to whites.20,23‑28 Emanuele et al. studied the effect of ethnicity and other factors on diabetic retinopathy but did not find that it was directly related to the traditional risk factors of duration, HbA1C and blood pressure.23 However, there is agreement that duration of diabetes, high blood pressure, microalbuminuria, fibrinogen and having had amputations were associated with more severe diabetic retinopathy (proliferative and macular edema) in black patients.23,27,28 Hispanics have a higher prevalence of macula edema, three times higher than whites, whereas Afro‑Americans had a ×2.5 higher prevalence compared to whites.23 Wong et al.’s multi‑ethnic US cohort study showed that the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was higher in Afro‑Americans versus whites (36.7% vs. 24.8%) and that they had a ×5 higher risk of clinically significant macula edema over whites.29 Significant eye disease require significant hospital resources and 33.6% of the eyes in our study needed surgical intervention. This high percentage may be due to the fact that the sampled patients are from an eye clinic in a tertiary institution, University Hospital, which is the only hospital with a specialist retina eye clinic on the island (pop 2.7 million). Therefore, the more severe cases would have been included in our sample. With 47.1% requiring laser and 40% requiring vitrectomy surgery, this has a significant impact on limited hospital resources in our region. The prevalence of DR worsens with increasing duration, poor control and associated comorbidities such as hypertension. Our Jamaican patients are more likely to have higher BMIs, uncontrolled hypertension and elevated HBA1C. These may be risk factors for the significantly high percentage of PDR in our

country, which impacts our health resources and productivity of our visual‑impaired diabetic patients in the working age group. If this is not controlled we can expect that prevalence of DR will increase. The prevalence of DR is decreasing in the USA and this has been linked to the increasing DR surveillance programs, intensive risk factor control and improving health care systems.[23,24] Underdeveloped nations should be doing more to control diabetes, in order to prevent the progression to visually threatening macular edema or PDR. This puts a strain on limited hospital resources (equipment; i.e., vitrectomy machine and laser procurement and maintenance). Efforts should be aimed towards diabetes screening (early detection and referral) and education on diabetic control and the modifiable risk factor controls (glucose, hypertension, obesity and dyslipidemia). In this study, blood cholesterol was not assessed, but could also help to highlight or correlate the increasing ischemia and poor vision from macular edema and PDR. The burden and cost of the disease is heavy for an underdevelopment country. In addition to this, the impact of visual impairment in our country that neither recognizes nor has government policies that compensate for low vision, blindness or any visual disability can be significant. Diabetic eye screening is important and public awareness amongst both the general population and family physicians can result in an earlier referral to the ophthalmologists for management, thereby, reducing the risk of visual morbidity.








Bloomgarden ZT.Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1080‑3. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995‑2005: Prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1414‑31. Government of Jamaica.Statistics: Demography: Population, 2012. Available from: http://statinja.gov.jm/Demo_SocialStats/ population.aspx[Last accessed 2012 Dec 14]. Barcelo A, Rajpathak S. Incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the America.Rev Panam Salud Publica 2001;10:300‑8. Wint YB, Duff EM, McFarlane‑Anderson N, O’Connor A, Bailey EY, Wright‑Pascoe RA.Knowledge, motivation and barriers to Diabetic control in Adults in Jamaica. West Indian Med J 2006;55:330‑3. O’ConnorA, McFarlane‑Anderson N, Duff EM, Wright Pascoe R, Wint YB. High levels of F2‑Isoprostanes in Jamaican adults with diabetes mellitus. Int J Diabetes Metab 2006;14:51‑4. Duff E, O’Connor A, McFarlane‑Anderson N, Wint YB, Bailey EY, Wright Pascoe RA. Self care, compliance and glycaemic control in Jamaican adults with diabetes mellitus. West Indian Med J 2006;55:232‑6. The Global Burden of the Disease. The International Diabetes Federation, Diabetes Atlas, 5thed. 2012. Available from: http:// www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/5e/the‑global‑burden [Last accessed on 2012 Jun 16].

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 20, Number 4, October - December 2013


Mowatt: DR and its risk factors in Jamaica 9.







16. 17.

18. 19.



Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Meta‑Analysis for Eye Disease (META‑EYE) Study Group. Diabetes Care 2012;35:556‑64. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38.BMJ 1998;317:703‑13. Looker HC, Nyangoma SO, Cromie D, Olson JA, Leese GP, Black M, et al. The Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Collaborative and the Scottish Diabetes Research Network Epidemiology Group. Diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in Scotland. Diabetologia 2012;55:2335‑42. Herman WH, Aubert RE, Engelgau MM, Thompson TJ, Ali MA, Sous ES, et al. Diabetes mellitus in Egypt: Glycaemic control and microvascular and neuropathic complications. Diabetes Med 1998;15:1045‑51. Bamashmus M, Gunaid A, Khandekar R.Diabetic retinopathy, visual impairment and ocular status among patients with diabetes mellitus in Yemen: A hospital‑based study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:293‑8. Al‑Till MI, Al‑Bdour MD, Ajlouni KM.Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment among Jordanian diabetics. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005;15:62‑8. Khandekar R, Al Lawatii J, Mohammed AJ, Al Raisi A.Diabetic retinopathy in Oman: A hospital based study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1061‑4. Waked N, Nacouzi R, Haddad N, Zaini R. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy in Lebanon. J Fr Ophthalmol 2006;29:289‑95. Al‑Maskari F, El‑Sadig M. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United Arab Emirates: A cross‑sectional survey. BMC Ophthalmol 2007;7:11. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. Epidemiology of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1875‑91. The Eye Diseases Research Prevalence Research Group.The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. ArchOphthalmol 2004;122:552‑63, Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Gulliford MC, Dodhia H, Mohamed M, Nagi D, et al.Ethnic variations in the prevalence of diabetic






26. 27.



retinopathy in people with diabetes attending screening in the United Kingdom (DRIVE UK). PLoS One 2012;7:e39608. Lalljie GR, Lalljie SE Characteristics and control of severe hypertension in a specialist, private practice in Jamaica. West Indian Med J 2005;54:315‑8. Ragoobirsingh D, McGrowder D, Morrison EY, Johnson P, Lewis‑Fuller E, Fray J. The Jamaican hypertension prevalence study. J Natl Med Assoc 2002;94:561‑5. Emanuele N, Sacks J, Klein R, Reda D, Anderson R, Duckworth W, et al. Ethnicity, race, and baseline retinopathy correlates in the veterans affairs diabetes trial. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1954‑8. Cruickshank JK, Alleyne SA. Black West Indian and matched white diabetics in Britain compared with diabetics in Jamaica: Body mass, blood pressure, and vascular disease. Diabetes Care 1987;10:170‑9. Klein R, Sharrett AR, Klein BE, Moss SE, Folsom AR, Wong TY, et al.The association of atherosclerosis, vascular risk factors, and retinopathy in adults with diabetes: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1225‑34. Rabb MF, Gagliano DA, Sweeney HE. Diabetic retinopathy in blacks. Diabetes Care1990;13:1202‑6. Egede LE, Mueller M, Echols CL, Gebregziabher M. Longitudinal differences in glycemic control by race/ethnicity among veterans with type 2 diabetes. Med Care 2010;48:527‑33. Emanuele N, Moritz T, Klein R, Davis MD, Glander K, Khanna A, et al. Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial Study Group. Ethnicity, race, and clinically significant macular edema in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT). Diabetes Res Clin Pract2009;86:104‑10. Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM, Cotch MF, Folsom AR, Klein BE, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in multi‑ethnic cohort in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol2006;141:446‑55.

Cite this article as: Mowatt L. Diabetic retinopathy and its risk factors at the University Hospital in Jamaica. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2013;20:321-6. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 20, Number 4, October - December 2013

Copyright of Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology is the property of Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Diabetic retinopathy and its risk factors at the university hospital in Jamaica.

To determine the frequency of diabetic retinopathy and its risk factors in diabetic patients attending the eye clinic at the University Hospital of th...
513KB Sizes 1 Downloads 0 Views

Recommend Documents

Knowledge, Beliefs and Practices of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica.
To determine the knowledge, beliefs and practices of patients with diabetic retinopathy attending the Retina Eye Clinic at the University Hospital of the West Indies. A prospective study was done using a questionnaire with a sample population of 150

Risk factors associated with diabetic retinopathy among type 2 diabetes patients at teaching hospital in Malaysia.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness in the United States and it is the leading cause of new cases of blindness in adults aged 20-74. It is estimated that about 20% of patients with type 2 DM have evidence of diabetic retinopat

A Review of Clostridium difficile Infection at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica.
This study examined the frequency of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among hospital admission and diarrhoeal stool samples over a six-year period.

Diabetic retinopathy risk factors: plasma erythropoietin as a risk factor for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether any stage of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is associated with levels of plasma erythropoietin and other plasma parameters.

Precipitating factors, outcomes, and recurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis at a university hospital in Damascus.
To study precipitating factors, outcomes, and recurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at a University hospital at Damascus, the capital of Syria.

The Role of Systemic Risk Factors in Diabetic Retinopathy.
Diabetic retinopathy is an increasingly common medical issue in the United States. The risk of developing the disease or having the disease progress is caused by many systemic health factors. This article examines the existing literature on the links

Diabetic retinopathy in Tanzania: prevalence and risk factors at entry into a regional screening programme.
The number of adults with diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is expected to almost double by 2035. This study investigated the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and its risk factors at entry into a community-based screening programme.

Prevalence and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy among diabetic patients at Arbaminch General Hospital, Ethiopia: Cross sectional study.
Currently 93 million people are estimated as living with diabetic retinopathy worldwide. The prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in developed countries have been well documented; but in Ethiopia, data on prevalence and associated fact

Risk factors for the delivery of macrosomic infants at the University Hospital of the West Indies.
The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors for the delivery of macrosomic infants at the University Hospital of the West Indies over a 3-year period.

Risk factors of retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus at a tertiary care hospital, Bahawalpur Pakistan.
To find out the risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.