YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 1/6 Journal of Infection (2013) xx, 1e6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/jinf
Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections Q7
Chidi N. Obasi a,*, Bruce Barrett a, Roger Brown b, Rose Vrtis c, Shari Barlow a, Daniel Muller d, James Gern c a
Q2
Q3
Department of Family Medicine, University of WisconsineMadison, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Ct., Madison, WI 53715, USA b Schools of Nursing, Medicine and Public Health, Research Design & Statistics Unit, University of WisconsineMadison, USA c School of Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of WisconsineMadison, USA d Department of Medicine e Rheumatology, University of WisconsineMadison, School of Medicine and Public Health, USA Accepted 31 October 2013 Available online - - -Summary: We tested whether bacterial pathogens were associated with ARI illness and inflammation. Bacteria were detected more often in nasal secretions during ARI, especially in samples without detectable viruses, and were associated with increased airway inflammation, but not increased symptoms.
KEYWORDS Upper respiratory infections; Bacteria; Common cold; Inflammation
Summary Objectives: The role of bacteria in acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) of adults and interactions with viral infections is incompletely understood. This study tested the hypothesis that bacterial co-infection during ARI adds to airway inflammation and illness severity. Methods: Two groups of 97 specimens each were randomly selected from multiplex-PCR identified virus-positive and virus-negative nasal specimens obtained from adults with new onset ARI, and 40 control specimens were collected from healthy adults. All specimens were analyzed for Haemophilus influenzae(HI ), Moraxella catarrhalis(MC ) and Streptococcus pneumoniae(SP) by quantitative-PCR. General linear models tested for relationships between respiratory pathogens, biomarkers (nasal wash neutrophils and CXCL8), and ARI-severity. Results: Nasal specimens from adults with ARIs were more likely to contain bacteria (37% overall; HI Z 28%, MC Z 14%, SP Z 7%) compared to specimens from healthy adults (5% overall; HI Z 0%, MC Z 2.5%, SP Z 2.5%; p < 0.001). Among ARI specimens, bacteria were more likely to be detected among virus-negative specimens compared to virus-positive specimens (46% vs. 27%; p Z 0.0046). The presence of bacteria was significantly associated with increased CXCL8 and neutrophils, but not increased symptoms. Conclusion: Pathogenic bacteria were more often detected in virus-negative ARI, and also associated with increased inflammatory biomarkers. These findings suggest the possibility that bacteria may augment virus-induced ARI and contribute to airway inflammation. ª 2013 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (C.N. Obasi). 0163-4453/$36 ª 2013 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013 Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 2/6
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Introduction Viruses are the major cause of acute respiratory infections (ARI) in both adults and children.1 ARI, including both influenza and the common cold, is a worldwide problem that accounts for significant loss of productivity and financial burden on the healthcare system.2e4 Although various experimental5 and epidemiological6,7 studies have identified viruses as the pathogens for most ARI, a significant number of ARI episodes have unknown etiologies despite improved diagnostic procedures.8e10 It has been suggested that bacterial pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis contribute to ARI, however; results from studies have been inconclusive.11,12 Detection of bacteria is increased in symptomatic children13,14 and adults11 compared to healthy controls.15,16 In a study involving 507 ARI sufferers11 Heald et al. (1993) reported 56% positive bacteria cultures from nasopharyngeal secretions of adults with ARI illness, but found no bacteria in healthy controls. However, Winther et al. (1984) found no difference in nasal bacterial between healthy and ARI ill conditions.12 Even so, antibiotics are often prescribed for uncomplicated ARI,17 and widespread inappropriate use of antibiotics contributes to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and therefore to increased health care costs.18 There is evidence that virus-induced inflammation contributes to respiratory symptoms. During the course of viral illnesses, there are significant correlations between interleukin-8 (CXCL8)7 levels and neutrophil counts19 in nasal secretions and cold symptom severity. There is some evidence that detection of bacterial pathogens during ARI may be associated with increased inflammatory biomarkers.11 Given these findings, we hypothesized that during viral ARI, detection of specific bacterial pathogens would be associated with increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers and greater measures of severity of illness. A secondary goal was to examine nasal secretions for pathogenic bacteria in ARI adult sufferers with and without detectable viruses. The rationale for this stratified analysis is to determine if bacterial co-infection would lead to greater ARI illness severity compared to viral only or no pathogen detection. Stratification enabled us to determine whether symptoms were greater for “bacteria plus virus” vs. “virus alone”, and also to determine whether symptoms were greater for “bacteria alone” compared to “no pathogen detected”. As a control group, we also evaluated the frequency of the same bacteria in nasal wash specimens from healthy adults. Finally, we assessed the relationship between these respiratory pathogens, inflammatory biomarkers and selfreported severity of illness.
Design and methods Study populations The study protocol was approved by the University of WisconsineMadison Institutional Review Board. The ARI specimens were obtained from a subset of participants in
C.N. Obasi et al. the NIH-sponsored randomized clinical trial, the “Physician, Echinacea, Placebo (PEP)” study.20 A total of 712 nasal wash specimens were obtained from adults at the beginning of an ARI and were tested for viral nucleic acid by multiplex PCR multiplex.21 Of these, 395 were found to be positive for virus and 317 found to be negative. For this study, 97 specimens per group were randomly selected (www.randomizer. org) from each of 2 groups: those with detectable respiratory viruses and those without detectable respiratory viruses. This sample size was selected based on 2-sided testing, with a Z 0.05, power Z 80%, and hypothesized 20% difference in bacterial detection rates (effect size). The PEP trial spanned from January 2004 to August 2008 and enrolled 719 participants of whom 713 completed the study (one participant had missing viral nucleic acid result).22 The study rationale and methods have been described previously.23 Briefly, the pill arm of the PEP trial examined placebo and Echinacea. Participants were eligible if they acknowledged having a cold, had 2 points on the Jackson symptom scale24 and included 1 of the following symptoms within 36 h of enrollment: nasal discharge, obstruction, sneezing or sore-throat. Reasons for exclusion included active symptoms of allergy and asthma observed at enrollment, or use of antibiotics or other excluded medications. Additional specimens were obtained from adults (n Z 40) with no evidence of cold symptoms.
Outcome assessments Global ARI severity was calculated using area-under-thecurve trapezoidal approximations with duration on the xaxis and symptom scores on the y-axis. Duration of illness was defined as time from symptom onset until the participant responded with “No” to the question “Do you think you still have a cold?” Symptom scores were self-reported on the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-21).25 The WURSS-21 consists of 10 symptom and 9-quality of life items used in severity estimations. Two remaining items assessing global severity “(How sick do you feel today?”) and daily change of illness (“Compared to yesterday, I think my cold is.”) were assessed separately. PEP findings showed no significant between-group differences in severity and duration of illness between treatment groups. Nasal wash specimens were also analyzed for interleukin-8 (CXCL8) and neutrophils as described previously.23,26
Pathogen detection Viral pathogens from nasal secretions collected on day-1 were identified using multiplex PCR (Respiratory MultiCodePLx Assay, EraGen Biosciences, Madison WI). This assay detects all common respiratory viruses including; rhinovirus, coronavirus, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, adenovirus, bocavirus, metapneumovirus, and enterovirus.21 Nasal wash specimens were analyzed for specific bacterial pathogens. DNA was extracted from 300 ml of nasal wash specimens (BiOstic Bacteremia DNA isolation kit, MO
Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 3/6
Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA). To prevent potential degradation of the bacteria DNA, 0.1 mM of EDTA was added to the samples. Quantitative PCR was performed for H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae. The detection range for each bacterium was from 10 to 1 million colony-forming units (CFU), and the standard curve consisted of DNA extracted from bacteria assayed using the McFarland technique. Multiplex q-PCR employing P6 and copB genes were used for the detection of H. influenzae27 and for M. catarrhalis28 respectively, and PCR for lytA29 was conducted separately for detection of S. pneumoniae (Table 1). All primers and probes were purchased from Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA.
Statistical analysis Differences between bacterial prevalence were tested using chi-square (c2) test. The general linear model (GLM) was used to examine the relationship between pathogens, CXCL8 and neutrophils and severity of illness on day-1. BoxeCox transformations were used to normalize the highly skewed distributions of the biomarkers CXCL8 and neutrophil count. Square-root transformation was employed to normalize the distribution of WURSS severity scores on day-1 (LAMBDA Z 0.36), while natural log (LN) transformations were used to normalize distributions of the biomarkers (Lambda: CXCL8 Z 0.04; neutrophils Z 0.02). Covariates included age, gender and season of the year (spring, summer, fall and winter). NCSS 2007 statistical program was used for analyses.30
Results Study subjects and virology Nasal wash specimens were obtained from a total of 40 healthy adults and 194 participants during acute colds (Table 2). The average age, income and proportion with college education were higher among the healthy group compared to the ARI group. The samples from symptomatic participants were collected during fall (35%), winter (39%) spring (17%) and summer (9%) seasons, during the years 2004e2008, while samples from healthy adults were collected in AugusteSeptember 2012. Among the virus positive specimens, the most common viral agents were rhinovirus (72%) and coronavirus (10%). Ninety-
Table 1
five percent of this group contained only one type of virus while the remaining 5% contained two different viruses.
Bacterial detection during illness vs. health The frequency of bacterial detection was significantly greater among participants with ARI illness (37%; 71 out of 194 samples) compared to healthy participants (5%; 2 out of 40 samples, p < 0.001). Among the 194 nasal specimens from symptomatic adults, bacteria were detected significantly more often from the virus-negative samples compared to the virus-positive (47% vs. 27%, p Z 0.0046). Overall, in subjects with ARI regardless of viral etiology, H. influenzae was identified in 22% (n Z 43) of the nasal specimens, M. catarrhalis in 14% (n Z 27) and S. pneumoniae in 7% (n Z 13).
Bacterial detection in viral vs. non-viral ARI Bacterial detection varied depending on the presence of virus (Fig. 1); virus-negative specimens were more likely to have bacterial pathogens detected (46% overall, including H. influenzae 29%, M. catarrhalis 22% and S. pneumoniae 9%) compared to virus-positive nasal specimens (27% overall, including H. influenzae 19%, M. catarrhalis 6% and S. pneumoniae 4%).
ARI severity of illness Within the ARI group, the severity of illness (mean; 95% confidence interval) was similar with bacteria only (6.5; 5e7.1), combination of bacteria and virus (6.5; 5.7e7.2), virus only (6.3; 5.8e6.7), or no pathogen (6.1; 5.5e6.6). Adjusting for age, gender and season of year did not significantly alter these trends (Table 3). In addition, patterns of pathogen detection were not associated with differences in individual rhinitis symptoms (results not shown).
CXCL8 and neutrophil biomarkers Detection of a bacterial pathogen was associated with higher levels of CXCL8 and greater numbers of neutrophils (Table 3). The combination of virus and bacteria had the highest levels (mean; 95% CI) of CXCL8 (6.4, 5.8e6.9) and neutrophil counts (3.8, 3.2e4.4); and were significantly different compared with viral only specimens (each p Z 0.01).
Q6
Primers and probes for H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae
Forward primer
Reverse primer
Probe
3
(37)
Hi P6 F 50 -CCA GCT GCT AAA GTA TTA GTA GAA G-30 (302-326) Hi P6 R 50 -TTC ACC GTA AGA TAC TGT GCC-30 (477-457) Hi P6 VIC 50 -CAG ATG CAG TTG AAG GTT ATT TAG- MGB-‘3
Moraxella catarrhalis
(38)
Mc copB F 50 -GTG AGT GCC GCT TTT ACA ACC-30 (50-70) Mc copB R 50 -TGT ATC GCC TGC CAA GAC AA-30 (121-102) Mc copB NED 50 -TGC TTT TGC AGC TGT TAG CCA GCC TAA-30 -MGB (73-99)
Streptococcus pneumoniae
(27)
LytA F 50 -ACG CAA TCT AGC AGA TGA AGC A-30 LytA R 50 -TCG TGC GTT TTA ATT CCA GCT-30 LytA TaqMan probe FAM FAM-50 -TGC CGA AAA CGC TTG ATA CAG GGA G-30 -MGB
Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 4/6
4 Table 2
Demographic characteristics of study population. Participants with ARI
Healthy participants No-detectable virus group (n Z 97) Detectable virus group (n Z 97) (n Z 40)
Age, mean (years) (SD) 35 Female n (%) 61 Non-smokers’ n (%) 66 Race, white n (%) 81 College graduate or higher, n (%) 43 Income > $50,000, n (%) 35
(14) (63)% (68%) (84%) (44%) (36%)
34 63 63 91 50 48
Discussion
(14) (65%) (65%) (94%) (52%) (49%)
50 28 25 37 30 22
(12) (70%) (63%) (93%) (75%) (55%)
When pathogens were identified among the group with ARI, the most frequent finding was detection of a virus alone (n Z 71), consistent with the accepted concept that viruses are the most common cause of common colds. In the virus-negative samples, increased detection of bacteria suggests the possibility that bacteria contribute to illness pathogenesis. This concept is also supported by results of double-blinded randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment of ARI, in which beneficial effects were demonstrated in the subgroup of participants with detectable bacteria pathogens.33,34 In our analysis, samples that were positive for both bacteria and virus were associated with increased inflammatory changes in nasal secretions, as indicated by greater amounts of CXCL8 and neutrophils. Despite the increase in inflammation associated with detection of viruses plus bacteria, severity of illness was not increased compared to illnesses associated only with a virus. In most studies of ARI, markers of neutrophilic inflammation are positively correlated with symptoms during respiratory illnesses.7,11 The lack of correlation between biomarkers and symptoms in our study may be due to the relatively low range in illness severity. In the PEP clinical protocol from which these subjects were selected, the participants needed to have a threshold level of symptoms to meet eligibility criteria. Most illnesses were mild to moderate in severity, and exclusion of asymptomatic infections and the limited number of more severe infections may have obscured relationships between etiology, inflammation, and symptoms of illness.
Bacterial pathogens cause respiratory illnesses such as sinusitis and pneumonia, but their role in the common cold is controversial. To test the hypothesis that bacterial co-infection during ARI adds to airway inflammation and the severity of illness, we examined the frequency of pathogenic bacteria in nasal wash specimens from healthy adults and adults with ARI. We also included further exploratory analysis based on the presence or absence of detectable respiratory viruses. Overall, bacteria were detected more often during illnesses. Within the ARI group, bacterial detection was significantly greater among samples without detectable viruses compared to samples with viruses. Furthermore, airway inflammation, but not illness severity, was increased with combined presence of bacterial and viral pathogens. These findings suggest that bacterial pathogens may contribute to a subset of ARI and that bacterial pathogens may augment airway inflammation during viral ARI. Previous studies of bacterial pathogen detection during ARI have reported varied results.11,12,31,32 In support of our results, Han et al. detected increased bacterial pathogens from nasal swabs obtained from symptomatic participants.32 Similar findings have also been reported in a study of nasopharyngeal wall aspirates from adults with upper respiratory tract infection.11 Other studies of experimentally33 or naturally12 acquired ARI have not found illness-related changes in bacterial frequency during ARI. None of these studies stratified based on the presence of viral pathogens. 35 30 Frequency (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
C.N. Obasi et al.
*P=0.13
25
*P=0.002
20
*P=0.2
15
virus negative specimens virus positive specimens
10 5 0
Hemophilus influenza
Moraxella catarhalis
Streptococcus pneumonia
Types of bacteria
Figure 1
Type of bacteria detected during acute respiratory infections. *c2 test of bacteria estimates.
Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 5/6
Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
5
Table 3 Relationship between pathogen detection and illness severity, inflammatory markers during acute respiratory infections. Outcomes
No pathogen (n Z 52)
Virus only (n Z 71)
Bacteria only (n Z 45)
Virus and bacteria (n Z 26)
Mean severity of illnessa (95% CI) Mean CXCL8 pg/mlb (95% CI) Mean neutrophil countsb (95% CI)
37 (30, 44) 203 (134, 309) 10 (6, 14)
40 (34, 45) 235c (179, 309) 15c (10, 21)
43 (36, 50) 303 (177, 521) 20 (11, 35)
43 (32, 52) 591c (320, 1092) 45c (23, 92)
a b c
Square root means. Geometric means. Two-sided p-value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/jinf
Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections Q7
Chidi N. Obasi a,*, Bruce Barrett a, Roger Brown b, Rose Vrtis c, Shari Barlow a, Daniel Muller d, James Gern c a
Q2
Q3
Department of Family Medicine, University of WisconsineMadison, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Ct., Madison, WI 53715, USA b Schools of Nursing, Medicine and Public Health, Research Design & Statistics Unit, University of WisconsineMadison, USA c School of Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of WisconsineMadison, USA d Department of Medicine e Rheumatology, University of WisconsineMadison, School of Medicine and Public Health, USA Accepted 31 October 2013 Available online - - -Summary: We tested whether bacterial pathogens were associated with ARI illness and inflammation. Bacteria were detected more often in nasal secretions during ARI, especially in samples without detectable viruses, and were associated with increased airway inflammation, but not increased symptoms.
KEYWORDS Upper respiratory infections; Bacteria; Common cold; Inflammation
Summary Objectives: The role of bacteria in acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) of adults and interactions with viral infections is incompletely understood. This study tested the hypothesis that bacterial co-infection during ARI adds to airway inflammation and illness severity. Methods: Two groups of 97 specimens each were randomly selected from multiplex-PCR identified virus-positive and virus-negative nasal specimens obtained from adults with new onset ARI, and 40 control specimens were collected from healthy adults. All specimens were analyzed for Haemophilus influenzae(HI ), Moraxella catarrhalis(MC ) and Streptococcus pneumoniae(SP) by quantitative-PCR. General linear models tested for relationships between respiratory pathogens, biomarkers (nasal wash neutrophils and CXCL8), and ARI-severity. Results: Nasal specimens from adults with ARIs were more likely to contain bacteria (37% overall; HI Z 28%, MC Z 14%, SP Z 7%) compared to specimens from healthy adults (5% overall; HI Z 0%, MC Z 2.5%, SP Z 2.5%; p < 0.001). Among ARI specimens, bacteria were more likely to be detected among virus-negative specimens compared to virus-positive specimens (46% vs. 27%; p Z 0.0046). The presence of bacteria was significantly associated with increased CXCL8 and neutrophils, but not increased symptoms. Conclusion: Pathogenic bacteria were more often detected in virus-negative ARI, and also associated with increased inflammatory biomarkers. These findings suggest the possibility that bacteria may augment virus-induced ARI and contribute to airway inflammation. ª 2013 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (C.N. Obasi). 0163-4453/$36 ª 2013 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013 Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 2/6
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Introduction Viruses are the major cause of acute respiratory infections (ARI) in both adults and children.1 ARI, including both influenza and the common cold, is a worldwide problem that accounts for significant loss of productivity and financial burden on the healthcare system.2e4 Although various experimental5 and epidemiological6,7 studies have identified viruses as the pathogens for most ARI, a significant number of ARI episodes have unknown etiologies despite improved diagnostic procedures.8e10 It has been suggested that bacterial pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis contribute to ARI, however; results from studies have been inconclusive.11,12 Detection of bacteria is increased in symptomatic children13,14 and adults11 compared to healthy controls.15,16 In a study involving 507 ARI sufferers11 Heald et al. (1993) reported 56% positive bacteria cultures from nasopharyngeal secretions of adults with ARI illness, but found no bacteria in healthy controls. However, Winther et al. (1984) found no difference in nasal bacterial between healthy and ARI ill conditions.12 Even so, antibiotics are often prescribed for uncomplicated ARI,17 and widespread inappropriate use of antibiotics contributes to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and therefore to increased health care costs.18 There is evidence that virus-induced inflammation contributes to respiratory symptoms. During the course of viral illnesses, there are significant correlations between interleukin-8 (CXCL8)7 levels and neutrophil counts19 in nasal secretions and cold symptom severity. There is some evidence that detection of bacterial pathogens during ARI may be associated with increased inflammatory biomarkers.11 Given these findings, we hypothesized that during viral ARI, detection of specific bacterial pathogens would be associated with increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers and greater measures of severity of illness. A secondary goal was to examine nasal secretions for pathogenic bacteria in ARI adult sufferers with and without detectable viruses. The rationale for this stratified analysis is to determine if bacterial co-infection would lead to greater ARI illness severity compared to viral only or no pathogen detection. Stratification enabled us to determine whether symptoms were greater for “bacteria plus virus” vs. “virus alone”, and also to determine whether symptoms were greater for “bacteria alone” compared to “no pathogen detected”. As a control group, we also evaluated the frequency of the same bacteria in nasal wash specimens from healthy adults. Finally, we assessed the relationship between these respiratory pathogens, inflammatory biomarkers and selfreported severity of illness.
Design and methods Study populations The study protocol was approved by the University of WisconsineMadison Institutional Review Board. The ARI specimens were obtained from a subset of participants in
C.N. Obasi et al. the NIH-sponsored randomized clinical trial, the “Physician, Echinacea, Placebo (PEP)” study.20 A total of 712 nasal wash specimens were obtained from adults at the beginning of an ARI and were tested for viral nucleic acid by multiplex PCR multiplex.21 Of these, 395 were found to be positive for virus and 317 found to be negative. For this study, 97 specimens per group were randomly selected (www.randomizer. org) from each of 2 groups: those with detectable respiratory viruses and those without detectable respiratory viruses. This sample size was selected based on 2-sided testing, with a Z 0.05, power Z 80%, and hypothesized 20% difference in bacterial detection rates (effect size). The PEP trial spanned from January 2004 to August 2008 and enrolled 719 participants of whom 713 completed the study (one participant had missing viral nucleic acid result).22 The study rationale and methods have been described previously.23 Briefly, the pill arm of the PEP trial examined placebo and Echinacea. Participants were eligible if they acknowledged having a cold, had 2 points on the Jackson symptom scale24 and included 1 of the following symptoms within 36 h of enrollment: nasal discharge, obstruction, sneezing or sore-throat. Reasons for exclusion included active symptoms of allergy and asthma observed at enrollment, or use of antibiotics or other excluded medications. Additional specimens were obtained from adults (n Z 40) with no evidence of cold symptoms.
Outcome assessments Global ARI severity was calculated using area-under-thecurve trapezoidal approximations with duration on the xaxis and symptom scores on the y-axis. Duration of illness was defined as time from symptom onset until the participant responded with “No” to the question “Do you think you still have a cold?” Symptom scores were self-reported on the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-21).25 The WURSS-21 consists of 10 symptom and 9-quality of life items used in severity estimations. Two remaining items assessing global severity “(How sick do you feel today?”) and daily change of illness (“Compared to yesterday, I think my cold is.”) were assessed separately. PEP findings showed no significant between-group differences in severity and duration of illness between treatment groups. Nasal wash specimens were also analyzed for interleukin-8 (CXCL8) and neutrophils as described previously.23,26
Pathogen detection Viral pathogens from nasal secretions collected on day-1 were identified using multiplex PCR (Respiratory MultiCodePLx Assay, EraGen Biosciences, Madison WI). This assay detects all common respiratory viruses including; rhinovirus, coronavirus, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, adenovirus, bocavirus, metapneumovirus, and enterovirus.21 Nasal wash specimens were analyzed for specific bacterial pathogens. DNA was extracted from 300 ml of nasal wash specimens (BiOstic Bacteremia DNA isolation kit, MO
Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 3/6
Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA). To prevent potential degradation of the bacteria DNA, 0.1 mM of EDTA was added to the samples. Quantitative PCR was performed for H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae. The detection range for each bacterium was from 10 to 1 million colony-forming units (CFU), and the standard curve consisted of DNA extracted from bacteria assayed using the McFarland technique. Multiplex q-PCR employing P6 and copB genes were used for the detection of H. influenzae27 and for M. catarrhalis28 respectively, and PCR for lytA29 was conducted separately for detection of S. pneumoniae (Table 1). All primers and probes were purchased from Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA.
Statistical analysis Differences between bacterial prevalence were tested using chi-square (c2) test. The general linear model (GLM) was used to examine the relationship between pathogens, CXCL8 and neutrophils and severity of illness on day-1. BoxeCox transformations were used to normalize the highly skewed distributions of the biomarkers CXCL8 and neutrophil count. Square-root transformation was employed to normalize the distribution of WURSS severity scores on day-1 (LAMBDA Z 0.36), while natural log (LN) transformations were used to normalize distributions of the biomarkers (Lambda: CXCL8 Z 0.04; neutrophils Z 0.02). Covariates included age, gender and season of the year (spring, summer, fall and winter). NCSS 2007 statistical program was used for analyses.30
Results Study subjects and virology Nasal wash specimens were obtained from a total of 40 healthy adults and 194 participants during acute colds (Table 2). The average age, income and proportion with college education were higher among the healthy group compared to the ARI group. The samples from symptomatic participants were collected during fall (35%), winter (39%) spring (17%) and summer (9%) seasons, during the years 2004e2008, while samples from healthy adults were collected in AugusteSeptember 2012. Among the virus positive specimens, the most common viral agents were rhinovirus (72%) and coronavirus (10%). Ninety-
Table 1
five percent of this group contained only one type of virus while the remaining 5% contained two different viruses.
Bacterial detection during illness vs. health The frequency of bacterial detection was significantly greater among participants with ARI illness (37%; 71 out of 194 samples) compared to healthy participants (5%; 2 out of 40 samples, p < 0.001). Among the 194 nasal specimens from symptomatic adults, bacteria were detected significantly more often from the virus-negative samples compared to the virus-positive (47% vs. 27%, p Z 0.0046). Overall, in subjects with ARI regardless of viral etiology, H. influenzae was identified in 22% (n Z 43) of the nasal specimens, M. catarrhalis in 14% (n Z 27) and S. pneumoniae in 7% (n Z 13).
Bacterial detection in viral vs. non-viral ARI Bacterial detection varied depending on the presence of virus (Fig. 1); virus-negative specimens were more likely to have bacterial pathogens detected (46% overall, including H. influenzae 29%, M. catarrhalis 22% and S. pneumoniae 9%) compared to virus-positive nasal specimens (27% overall, including H. influenzae 19%, M. catarrhalis 6% and S. pneumoniae 4%).
ARI severity of illness Within the ARI group, the severity of illness (mean; 95% confidence interval) was similar with bacteria only (6.5; 5e7.1), combination of bacteria and virus (6.5; 5.7e7.2), virus only (6.3; 5.8e6.7), or no pathogen (6.1; 5.5e6.6). Adjusting for age, gender and season of year did not significantly alter these trends (Table 3). In addition, patterns of pathogen detection were not associated with differences in individual rhinitis symptoms (results not shown).
CXCL8 and neutrophil biomarkers Detection of a bacterial pathogen was associated with higher levels of CXCL8 and greater numbers of neutrophils (Table 3). The combination of virus and bacteria had the highest levels (mean; 95% CI) of CXCL8 (6.4, 5.8e6.9) and neutrophil counts (3.8, 3.2e4.4); and were significantly different compared with viral only specimens (each p Z 0.01).
Q6
Primers and probes for H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae
Forward primer
Reverse primer
Probe
3
(37)
Hi P6 F 50 -CCA GCT GCT AAA GTA TTA GTA GAA G-30 (302-326) Hi P6 R 50 -TTC ACC GTA AGA TAC TGT GCC-30 (477-457) Hi P6 VIC 50 -CAG ATG CAG TTG AAG GTT ATT TAG- MGB-‘3
Moraxella catarrhalis
(38)
Mc copB F 50 -GTG AGT GCC GCT TTT ACA ACC-30 (50-70) Mc copB R 50 -TGT ATC GCC TGC CAA GAC AA-30 (121-102) Mc copB NED 50 -TGC TTT TGC AGC TGT TAG CCA GCC TAA-30 -MGB (73-99)
Streptococcus pneumoniae
(27)
LytA F 50 -ACG CAA TCT AGC AGA TGA AGC A-30 LytA R 50 -TCG TGC GTT TTA ATT CCA GCT-30 LytA TaqMan probe FAM FAM-50 -TGC CGA AAA CGC TTG ATA CAG GGA G-30 -MGB
Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 4/6
4 Table 2
Demographic characteristics of study population. Participants with ARI
Healthy participants No-detectable virus group (n Z 97) Detectable virus group (n Z 97) (n Z 40)
Age, mean (years) (SD) 35 Female n (%) 61 Non-smokers’ n (%) 66 Race, white n (%) 81 College graduate or higher, n (%) 43 Income > $50,000, n (%) 35
(14) (63)% (68%) (84%) (44%) (36%)
34 63 63 91 50 48
Discussion
(14) (65%) (65%) (94%) (52%) (49%)
50 28 25 37 30 22
(12) (70%) (63%) (93%) (75%) (55%)
When pathogens were identified among the group with ARI, the most frequent finding was detection of a virus alone (n Z 71), consistent with the accepted concept that viruses are the most common cause of common colds. In the virus-negative samples, increased detection of bacteria suggests the possibility that bacteria contribute to illness pathogenesis. This concept is also supported by results of double-blinded randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment of ARI, in which beneficial effects were demonstrated in the subgroup of participants with detectable bacteria pathogens.33,34 In our analysis, samples that were positive for both bacteria and virus were associated with increased inflammatory changes in nasal secretions, as indicated by greater amounts of CXCL8 and neutrophils. Despite the increase in inflammation associated with detection of viruses plus bacteria, severity of illness was not increased compared to illnesses associated only with a virus. In most studies of ARI, markers of neutrophilic inflammation are positively correlated with symptoms during respiratory illnesses.7,11 The lack of correlation between biomarkers and symptoms in our study may be due to the relatively low range in illness severity. In the PEP clinical protocol from which these subjects were selected, the participants needed to have a threshold level of symptoms to meet eligibility criteria. Most illnesses were mild to moderate in severity, and exclusion of asymptomatic infections and the limited number of more severe infections may have obscured relationships between etiology, inflammation, and symptoms of illness.
Bacterial pathogens cause respiratory illnesses such as sinusitis and pneumonia, but their role in the common cold is controversial. To test the hypothesis that bacterial co-infection during ARI adds to airway inflammation and the severity of illness, we examined the frequency of pathogenic bacteria in nasal wash specimens from healthy adults and adults with ARI. We also included further exploratory analysis based on the presence or absence of detectable respiratory viruses. Overall, bacteria were detected more often during illnesses. Within the ARI group, bacterial detection was significantly greater among samples without detectable viruses compared to samples with viruses. Furthermore, airway inflammation, but not illness severity, was increased with combined presence of bacterial and viral pathogens. These findings suggest that bacterial pathogens may contribute to a subset of ARI and that bacterial pathogens may augment airway inflammation during viral ARI. Previous studies of bacterial pathogen detection during ARI have reported varied results.11,12,31,32 In support of our results, Han et al. detected increased bacterial pathogens from nasal swabs obtained from symptomatic participants.32 Similar findings have also been reported in a study of nasopharyngeal wall aspirates from adults with upper respiratory tract infection.11 Other studies of experimentally33 or naturally12 acquired ARI have not found illness-related changes in bacterial frequency during ARI. None of these studies stratified based on the presence of viral pathogens. 35 30 Frequency (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
C.N. Obasi et al.
*P=0.13
25
*P=0.002
20
*P=0.2
15
virus negative specimens virus positive specimens
10 5 0
Hemophilus influenza
Moraxella catarhalis
Streptococcus pneumonia
Types of bacteria
Figure 1
Type of bacteria detected during acute respiratory infections. *c2 test of bacteria estimates.
Please cite this article in press as: Obasi CN, et al., Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections, J Infect (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.013
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
YJINF3214_proof ■ 12 November 2013 ■ 5/6
Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in acute respiratory infections 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
5
Table 3 Relationship between pathogen detection and illness severity, inflammatory markers during acute respiratory infections. Outcomes
No pathogen (n Z 52)
Virus only (n Z 71)
Bacteria only (n Z 45)
Virus and bacteria (n Z 26)
Mean severity of illnessa (95% CI) Mean CXCL8 pg/mlb (95% CI) Mean neutrophil countsb (95% CI)
37 (30, 44) 203 (134, 309) 10 (6, 14)
40 (34, 45) 235c (179, 309) 15c (10, 21)
43 (36, 50) 303 (177, 521) 20 (11, 35)
43 (32, 52) 591c (320, 1092) 45c (23, 92)
a b c
Square root means. Geometric means. Two-sided p-value
