Vol.
167,
March
No.
30,
:3, 1990
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Pages
1990
DETECTION
Masakazu
OF TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR ALPHA HUMAN URINE AND PLASMA
Katohl,
Hirofumi
Mieko Laboratories Laboratories, 3Department
Received
Inagaki2p3,
Katsuura2
Kayoko
and Shigeaki
Tanaka2 Pharma Research Kawagoe, Saitama
of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, JAPAN 7,
IN
Kurosawa-Ohsawal,
for ICell Biology and 'Biochemistry, Hoechst Japan Limited, l-3-2 Minamidai, 350, JAPAN
December
1065-1072
School,
l-l-5
1989
A sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system for human transforming growth factor alpha (TGFa) was developed in combination with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Employing this assay s:ystem, we detected TGFU like activity in normal human plasma as well as in cancer patients' urine and plasma. These TGFa were analyzed by chromatography, inununoreactivity, and EGF-TGFa receptor binding assay and found to be identical to authentic human TGFa. The presence of TGFa circulating in normal adult plasma suggests a new role of TGFa in the human body. 01990 Academic Press, Inc.
Transforming polypeptide cell with
with
types. epidermal
and
induces
human
body found
is composed growth factor
fluids, in
the
mouse
Subsequently,
(4).
various
and/or detected placenta
disulfide
in
tumor malignant
been
milk, in
(5-61, tissues
cells.
saliva,
because
a potent
a
single-chain
mitogen
for
various
50 amino acids and shares 40% homology (EGF). TGFa binds to EGF-TGFa receptors
detected
fibroblasts
(TGFa),
is
of epithelial
conditioned
cells
alpha bonds,
of
urine,
TGFa has not
transformed of
It
three
factor
DNA synthesis
contrast, first
growth
medium and
platelets normal
was termed
(lo),
the and
urine
etc.
adult
of Moloney
TGFa was found in
EGF was found
the of
because
growth
culture
cancer
In
TGFa was
sarcoma
"sarcoma
in
most
(l-3).
tissues.
murine
in
virusfactor"
supernatants patients
TGFa like
(7-g),
activity
in normal embryonic tissues, mouse embryo (11-131, and (14), TGFa was considered to be the oncofetal counterpart
was human of
growth factor alpha; EGF, The abbreviations used are: TGFa, transforming epidermal growth factor; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; MeCN, liquid acetonitrile; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid; HPLC, high performance chromatography; NHK, normal rat kidney; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine serum albumin. 0006-291x/90 1065
$1.50
Copyright 0 1990 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
Vol.
167,
No.
BIOCHEMICAL
3, 1990
Recently,
EGF .
(15-16),
however,
human
reported
indispensable. of
NRK 49F
cells
definition
of
from
and
EGF,
In order
specific In the
TGFa
and
early
in
bovine
(17),
TGFa.
system,
BIOPHYSICAL
untransformed
keratinocytes
to secrete
mammalian
AND
soft
(4).
additional
the
to clarify
transformation In were
this
have
regard,
quantitative
to
studies
Recently
we
immunosorbent sensitivity
been
employed
However,
this
assay
in human urine
of TGFa in the of
TGFa is
formation was
not
now assay
used
as
distinguish
TGFa by gel
the TGFa
filtration
during
through
development
studies
against
at
the
synthetic
TGFa from
EGF and
or
cell
mRNA level.
TGFU peptides are
used
also
for
on TGFa. have
assay (19).
were
performance liquid chromatography of TGFU. Therefore most data
antibodies
distinguish
role
and did
of
TGFa
obtained
cells (18)
of TGFa, a colony
characterization
specific
acknowledged
the
was
of
pituitary
analysis
agar
expression
COMMUNICATIONS
hepatocytes
quantitative
chromatography or reverse-phase high (HPLC) was required for identification concerning
anterior
and/or
studies
RESEARCH
established (ELISA)
Employing
a
sandwich-type
specific this
ELISA,
for
human
we examined
enzyme-linked TGFa the
with
nature
high of TGFa
and plasma.
Human native TGFa was prepared from the culture supernatant of a human melanoma cell line (20), as described previously SEKI (C24), (21) and was shown to be identical to recombinant human TGFa (Earth Chemical Co., JAPAN). Recombinant EGF was purchased from Wakunaga pharmaceuticals, JAPAN. Urine and plasma from cancer patients (gastric cancer, colon cancer, and hepatoma) were supplied by Dr. Imai (Saitama Medical School, Saitama, JAPAN). Urine and plasma from healthy donors were collected from 15 volunteers from our laboratory. Urine samples were pooled (1OOml from cancer patients and 1,OOOml from healthy donors) and centrifuged at 800xg for 10 min. Acetic acid was added to the supernatant at a final concentration of 1M and dialyzed against 1M acetic acid. Samples were concentrated by lyophilization and dissolved in 5ml of 1M acetic acid. Concentrated samples were stored at -2O'C prior to use. The pooled plasma of cancer patients (1Oml) and healthy donors (1OOm.l) was acidified with acetic acid at a final concentration of 3% and centrifuged to removed insoluble materials. Acidified supernatants were diluted with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) by lofold and applied to Sep-Pak Cls cartridges (Waters associates, U.S.A.). The cartridges were washed with 10% acetonitrile (MeCN) containing 0.1% TFA. TGFa was eluted with 40% MeCN containing 0.1% TFA. The eluate was lyophilized and dissolved in a small volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, phosphate lOmM, pH7.2, NaCl 0.15M). Concentrated samples were stored at -20°C prior to assay.
(19).
ELISA for Briefly,
TGFa was 96-well
performed microtiter
according plates
1066
to the described method (Falcon, Becton-Dickinson,
Vol.
167,
No.
BIOCHEMICAL
3, 1990
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
U.S.A.) were coated with SOWl/well of lOug/ml of anti-C-terminal peptide [human TGFa (34-50)] rabbit polyclonal antibody in PBS for 1 hr at room temperature. Wells were washed with PBS three times and were blocked with 300pl/well of 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min. After the blocking solution was removed, samples or standard TGFa (O,O.l-long/ml) dissolved in 1% BSA in PBS were applied at 5O@/well and incubated for 1 hr. Following washing with PBS, 2pg/ml of antisynthetic human TGFa monoclonal antibodies was added to the wells at 50&l/well and incubated for 1 hr. Wells were washed with PBS three times, and then appropriately diluted peroxidase-labeled rabbit antibody against mouse immunoglobulins (Dakopatts, Denmark) in 1% BSA in PBS was added at 50pl/well and incubated for 1 hr. After the wells were washed extensively with PBS, calorimetric reaction was performed by adding SOpl/well of substrate solution for peroxidase (lmg/ml ophenylenediamine in O.lM Na citrate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.006% H202). The reaction was stopped by adding 50~1 of 2M HZS04 after incubation for 20 min. Finally, the absorbance at 490 nm was measured with an ELISA autoreader (Dynatech, U.S.A.). The amounts of immunoreactive material were expressed as equivalents of the natural TGFa purified from the culture supernatant of SEKI. Human EGF was measured by two-site sandwich of monoclonal antibodies as described previously EGF-Tvradio-receDtor
ELISA (22).
with
two
kinds
ama&!
Radio-receptor assay for EGF-TGFa was performed according to the method described previously using membrane fractions of A431 cells, human epidermoid carcinoma (23). lz51-TGFa (2x105Bq/pmole) as a tracer was prepared according to the chloramine-T method.
AND DISCUSSION TCFa
in
urine
Pooled
urine
carcinoma, under
and
donors the
both to
is
void
precursor
Also
a minor
volume
immunoreactive
conditions
used.
approximately Bio-Gel showed
P series various
acid.
in
urine,
peak
to
As shown
The
apparent
which gel
activity
molecular
was consistent
chromatography (24).
of
the
under
with
Fig.
On the cancer
EGF in
same
acidic
hand, urine.
estimated
previous conditions
EGF-TGFa
EGF,
authentic under the
as
(SEKI),
was the
close
other
patients'
the line
1,
ELISA
large-form
TGFa fractions
1251-TGFCi in the 1067
in
human
this
weight with
Immunoreactive
healthy
by EGF
authentic
be determined. in
Rad,
EGF was observed
nature
only
(Bio
from
was detected
of immunoreactive The
P-30
Urine
to
colon
as described
to Bio-Gel
corresponding
remains
sources
competing
concentrated
of urinary TGFa was exactly from human melanoma cell
9,000
carcinoma,
same way as controls.
was detected
TGFa
volume purified
and
1M acetic
(Nos.20-23).
or aggregate,
(gastric
subjected
to be abundant
(Nos.46-51)
The elution human TGFa
from
in
in the
known
fractions
cases. the
then
chromatography
was processed
patients
was acidified
and Methods,
gel
EGF, which
10 cancer
hepatoma)
Mat.erials
U.S.A.)
in
from
to
be
report
on
of
TGFa
(Nos.39-45) radio-receptor
Vol.
167,
No.
3, 1990
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
1 .o 0.6 0.6
0.1 0.0
F^
0.2
s ii 2
0.0 43K
z 2
0.4
zl E.
1.5
f
22K
t
12K
6K
t
f
s
.
4.0
5.0
3.0 1.0
I? p
4.0 3.0
2.0
I
2.0 0.5
1.0
1.0
t
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Fractions Bio-Gel P-30 gel chromatography of urine from cancer patients (a) and healthy donors (b). Ten ml of concentrated urine was applied on a Bio-Gel P-30 column (25~45Omm) in l.OM acetic acid at the flow rate of 0.25ml/min. Fractions of 4ml were collected and subjected to TGFa (0) and EGF (0) ELISA. Arrows indicate eluting positions for molecular markers (43kd, ovalbumin; 22kd, cytochrome C; 12kd, soybean trypsin inhibitor; 6kd, insulin) and authentic human TGFa and human EGF.
.Lb-l
assay.
:n
ELISA,
which
ELISA
detected
(SEKI). be
was
In
our
different
patients' the
TGFa
by
TGFa
ELISA
was
found
to
will
be
reported
TCFa
in
pl&%na
Pooled
ruled its ELISA
in
various
by
out.
EGF
in
significantly
high
it
exists,
around
the
explained
TGFa
is
TGFa
in
confirmed
was
patients. tumor
of
ELISA
of were
urinary
the
presence TGFa
presence
tumor
void by
The by
donors
in
appears
supernatants.
ELISA.
healthy
of
line
be
the
proved,
types
TGFa
cell
detected
Since
absence
This
activity
be
TGFa
(24). if
possibly
cannot
by
melanoma
culture
binding can
was
,
melanoma
detected
TGFa
be
TGFU
the
detected
measured The
patients'
level details
elsewhere.
plasma as
and
of
by
in
which be
urine
usefulness
directly
cannot
report
produced
and
was
was
previous
receptor
activity
TGFa
urinary
shown)
EGF
like it
a TGFa
detected
not
large-form
but
cancer
(data
TGFa
unlikely,
pretreated
that EGF-TGFa
low
of
additional
from
large-form
from
was
large-form
human
the
preparation,
activity
no
large-form
different
volume
of
preparation,
Therefore,
to
and
our
described
from
cancer under
patients Materials
1068
or and
healthy Methods.
donors To
eliminate
was
Vol.
167,
No.
3, 1990
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
0.3
0.25 0.20
0.2
0.15 0.10
0.1
0.05 0.0
TGFu
1 .o
t
t
EGF
2.5
2.5
2
2.0
2.0
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.5 0.0
1.0
1 .o
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0 10
20
30
40
50
Fractions Bio-Gel P-30 gel chromatography of plasma from cancer patients (a) and healthy donors (b). One ml of concentrated plasma was applied on a Bio-Gel P-30 column (lOx3OOmm) in l.OM acetic acid at the flow rate of 0.25ml/min. Fractions of lml were collected and subjected to 'PGFa (0) and EGF (0) ELISA. Molecular markers were same as described in the legend for w.
0.8
0.6
I 2
4.0
TGFa
J
1
EGF
4.0
6 n
3.0
0
8
0.4
E 2 T
2.0
F?
2 0.2
73
1.0
E 0.0
0.0 0
20
60
40
Retention
time
( min.)
Reverse-phase HPLC of plasma TGFa. Pooled fractions (Nos.34Fio. 38) of gel filtration were concentrated and applied to a Vydac Cls column (5pm particle size, 4.6x25Omm) . The mobile phase was 0.10% TFA and the mobile-phase modifier was MeCH3 containing 0.08% TFA. The concentration of M&H3 was increased linearly from 0% to 40% during 1 hr at the flow rate of O.Sml/min. Fractions of lml were collected and sub2ected to TGFU (0) and EGF (0) ELISA.
1069
Vol.
BIOCHEMICAL
167, No. 3, 1990 abundant
plasma
proteins
reverse-phase cartridge. through fraction and eluate
was analyzed
TGFa ELISA, also
in
in
cancer
donors'
When platelet indicating normal
plasma
far
analyzed
obtained those to
the
by
authentic
concentration in culture for isolation,
Fig.
series
between 4,
the of
dilutions
found (data
in
plasma
is
and high
and
O.O28ng/ml
plasma
derived
TGFa
limit. amount
at the
TGFa found
HPLC (Fig.
be
There
were TGFa and curves
superimposed
functionally to
in
on
identical The
vitro.
stimulate
cell
growth
with like
acid TGFB
(dilution) 104
103
102
10'
100
0
Authentic Innnunoreactivity
TGFa
(rig/ml)
(a) and EGF-TGFa Fia. (b) of plasma derived TGFa. HPLC fractions were dialyzed against PBS and then directly titration curve of plasma derived TGFa (0) corresponding curve of authentic TGFa (0).
1070
The
to that
TGFU was proved
enough
in
3).
TGFU and plasma
TGFa can
of
same level,
not shown), but as the sample was treated TGFa in plasma might exist in a latent form
Human
and
detection
with antibodies The titration
plasma
TGFU immunochemically
plasma
normal
supernatants.
shown.
plasma
Therefore,
in
to be identical
interaction are
but
a reasonable
urinary
By
plasma
TGFa and EGF.
SEKI culture
2).
patients' be
by reverse-phase
receptor
TGFa.
a disposable
(Fig.
the
TGFa remained of
properties
EGF-TGFU
of authentic
to
was below
TGFa was shown
from
In
cancer
estimated
while
of plasma-derived
examined. with
were
was further
in
in
or serum was prepared,
TGFa purified
to
chromatography
The EGF level
plasma
applied
The TGFa levels
localization
no differences
gel
only
plasma.
different
time
binding
not
was recovered
the
of authentic so
P-30
plasma
rich
platelets
was
proteins were recovered in the flowTGFa was eluted with 40% meCNj. The
by Bio-Gel
respectively.
retention
sample
Most retained
patients'
O.O5lng/ml EGF in
the
TGFa was detected
healthy
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
--ereceptor binding activity containing TGFa activity applied on each assay. was superimposed onto
The the
Vol.
167,
No.
BIOCHEMICAL
3, 1990
The presence
(25). concept
of
TGFa
endocrinological
of
TGFa in
being
an
role
in
the
AND
normal
body.
of
TGFa in
reports
on the
presence
(15-16),
normal
keratinocytes
the help which
distribution shares
the
the
role
plasma
contrary
into anterior normal
factor.
viva
in
to
suggests
bovine
and sensitive
of TGFa in
COMMUNICATIONS
and/or
growth
specific
is and
Taking
(17),
ubiquitous
of TGFa with
us to understand
RESEARCH
protein,
human
cells
TGFa may be a rather
adult
oncofetal
recent (18),
BIOPHYSICAL
the some
account
the
pituitary hepatocytes
Investigation assay connection
methods with
of will EGF,
same receptor.
some clinical samples. We We thank Dr. Y. Imai for providing also thank Drs. E. Konz, H. B. Maruyama, and T. Matsuishi for their support and encouragement during this work.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.
Elder, J. B., Williams, G., Lacey, E., and Gregory, H. (1978) Nature (London) a, 466-467 Oka, Y., and Orth, D. N. (1983) J. Clin. Invest. Z?., 249-259 Petrides, P. E., Hosang, M., Shooter, E., Esch, F. S., and Bo:hlen, P. (1985) FEBS letters LBz, 89-95 De Larco, J. E., and Todaro, G. J. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA z, 4001-4005 Smith, J. J., Derynck, R., and Korc, M. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7567-7570 Derynck, R., Goeddel, D. V., Ullrich, A., Gutterman, J. U., Williams, R. D., Bringman, T. S., and Berger, W. H. (1987) Cancer Res. 92, 707-712 Stromberg, K., Hudgins, W. R., and Orth, D. N. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. ;L49, 1059-1068 H-W., Tsai,J-H., Yeh, Y-C., Tsai,J-F., Chuang, L-Y., Yeh, Florine, D. L., and Tam, J. P. (1987) Cancer Res. 92, 896-901 Gregory, H., Thomas, C. E., Willshire, I. R., Young, J. A., Anderson, H., Baildam, A., and Howell, A. (1989) Br. J. Cancer 3, 605-609 Arteaga, C. L., Hanauske, A. R., Clark, G. M., Osborne, C. K., Hazarika, P., Pardue, R. L., Tio, F., and Von Hoff, D. D. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 5023-5028 Twardzik, D. R., Ranchalis, J. R., and Todaro, G. J. (1982) Cancer Res. 42, 590-593 Matrisian, L. M., Pathak, M., and Magun, B. E. ( .982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. l.Ql, 761-769 Twardzik, D. R. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 5413-5416 Stromberg, K., Pigott, D. A., Ranchalis, J. E., and Twardzik, D. R. (1982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. Le6, 354-361 Samsoondar, J., Kobrin, M. S., and Kudlow, J. E. (1986) J. Bio. Chem. 26;L, 14408-14413 Kobrin, M. S., Samsoondar, J., and Kudlow, J. E. (1986) J. Bio. Chem. Z& 14414-14419 Coffey Jr, R. J., Derynck, R., Wilcox, J. N., Bringman, T. S., Goustin, A, S., Moses, H. L., and Pittelkow, M. R. (1987) Nature (Lond.) m, 817-820 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Mead, J. E., and Fausto, N. (1989) USA a, 1558-1562 Inagaki, H., Katoh, M., Kurosawa-Ohsawa, K., and Tanaka, S., (in press) J. Immun. Method 1071
Vol.
167,
No.
20.
Kondo, Y., Sato, K., Ueyama, Y., and Ohsawa, N. (1981) Cancer Res. fi, 2912-2916 Marquardt, H., Hunkapiller M. W., Hood, L. E., Twardzik, D. R., De Larco, J. E., Stephenson, J. R., and Todaro, G. J. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA &Q, 4684-4688 Katsuura, M., and Tanaka, S. (1989) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) ULh, 87-92 Kimball, E. S., and Warren, T. C. (1984) Biochem. Byophys. Acta. m, 82-88 Sherwin, S. A., Twardzik, D. R., Bohn, W. H., Cockley, K. D., and Todaro G. J. (1983) Cancer Res. Q, 403-407 Pircher, R., Jullien, P., and Lawrence, D. A. (1986) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. j&, 30-37
21. 22. 23. 24. 25.
3, 1990
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
1072
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS