John
P Foreyt,
Amelie
ABSTRACT
Your
Cuidando
Heart)
turally
G Ramirez,
adapted
achieving
and
El Corazon
was designed weight
the
H Cousins
Taking
Care
effectiveness
and loss
Jennifer
(CEC;
to assess
weight-reduction
long-term
weight-reduction Americans 1-3
exercise
in Mexican
of
of a culprogram
sive,
for
Americans.
and
modified
information
techniques
and
traditional
group that received the and attended year-long classes; or 3) a family group a manual and attended classes that emphasized
for making
habits.
The
changes
family
and
in the
family’s
individual
eating
groups
greater weight losses than the information-only loss was greatest in the family-involvement the
information-only
comparison
had group
and
exer-
significantly
group. and
Am
group.
Weight least in
J Clin
obesity,
Obesity,
weight
reduction,
Mexican
American
culturally
adapted
Studies
treatment
obesity
greater
obesity status obesity
conducted
in south
have
in the United States is inversely (SES), at least in women (1-4), in Mexican
Americans
of this population of most
Texas
of
treatment
Mexican
program,
is related
United
States
El Corazon
(CEC;
Taking
Care ofYour
study,
to assess the effectiveness and exercise program
weight
The
(5).
CEC
program
the effectiveness of three different tions. One group of individuals 90-mm classes covering nutrition, during
a family-oriented and parenting changes. Both
low SES
in the research
the
year-long
intervention, strategies spouses
is one
(2).
was
ofthe
intervention.
developed
few pro-
to compare
sensitive intervena total of 24 weekly and behavioral techA second
which
included
partner
group
or participating
Am J C/in Nuir
with
family eating and exercising took part in the educational
l991;53:1639S-4lS.
family
members.
Printed
in USA.
The
these
changes
individuals
who
participated
in
support.
Interventions 1 participants eating
ofexercise; including
plan;
received
a weight-loss
information
and a description self-monitoring,
about
manual
nutrition
ofbehavior stimulus
and
modification control, and
containing the benefits principles, contingency
3, 6, and
12 mo and
to schedule
annual
measurements
after
the
first year. Reminder cards, telephone contact, and home visits were used to encourage this group to attend all measurement sessions. A summary and interpretation of their results were mailed and each family was given a stipend of $50 when they completed a measurement session. Group 2 participants attended 24 weekly 90-mm classes that nutrition
instruction
and
was provided ment focus maintenance Measurements
instruction, activities,
and
food
demonstrations,
behavioral
education.
exercise Child
care
but spouses were not encouraged to attend. Treatfor this group was on the individual. Six monthly classes were provided to enhance compliance. at 0, 3, 6, and 12 mo were taken, with annual thereafter. Each person received a summary, in-
measurements
terpretation,
and
$25
for completing
each
measurement
session.
was
support
sessions. These two approaches were compared with a group that received only the weight-loss manual, without attending classes
weight
maintain
Participants were married Mexican American women with at one child between the ages of 3 and 6 y. All the women were between the ages of 18 and 45 y and were 20% above their ideal body weight. Most ofthe participants lived in households with an annual income of < $20 000 and the mean educational level for the population was tenth grade.
included
Heart)
ofa culturally adapted for achieving long-term
culturally attended exercise,
for making and children
is
characteristics
of the relatively
designed weight-reduction loss
obesity
Americans
a demonstration
grams
that
The reasons for uncertain. Because
to specific
would family
greater
management. Booklets were mailed after the initial assessment visit with a cover letter inviting participants to call the patient coordinator with any questions concerning the eating plan. Participants were then asked to return for measurement sessions at
related to socioeconomic it may be that greater
or is a consequence
The Cuidando
niques
found
risk factor for Mexican Americans. obesity in Mexican Americans are
and would
the inten-
achieve
methods
and
Group
Introduction
a major
than
without
who received
would
least
the CEC
WORDS
reductions
successfully program
Subjects
Nutr
l99l;53:l639S-4lS.
KEY
serum-lipid
the
individuals
intervention
recipes
2) an individual
in fat content;
same manual that received cising
exercise
and
was that obese
family-oriented
more
CEC
used a family-oriented approach to achieve lifestyle change in behavior. Participants were assigned to 1) a booklet-only cornparison group that received a manual including behavior change, nutrition,
for the study
hypothesis
© 1991 American
I From Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, and Administration and Community Health Promotion, South Texas Health Research Center, University ofTexas Health Science Center at San Antonio. 2 Supported by National Institutes of Health HL-27341.
3
6535 Society
Address
reprint
Fannin,
Mail
for Clinical
requests Station
Nutrition
to JP Foreyt, F-i#{174},Houston,
Nutrition Research TX 77030.
Clinic,
1639S
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/6/1639S/4732423 by East Carolina University user on 05 January 2019
Cuidando El Corazon-a intervention for Mexican
FOREYT
1 640S Group 3 participants attended group 2 with the same nutrition vided. However, the classes were band,
wife,
and
preschool-age
size was limited classes.
The
more
healthful
cising work
attending
with
children
encouraged
eating
and
each
Class
habits
in the
children.
toward
DiClemente’s
behavioral
Participants
were
encouraged
improved
to
dietary
habits
the
Six monthly classes.
period,
followed
incorporated
survey
measured
Relapse
(7). The
problem-solving
skills
needed
for losing
weight
(6). treatment
may
of
be different
from
those needed to maintain weight loss (8). The most sucweight-loss programs appear to be those that gradually increase the responsibility of the participants for maintaining
cessful
high-risk
2) problem
playing wards
classes
such
as holidays
situations,
solving
specific
developing
maintenance to
cope
situations
cognitive
and regular
with
techniques
and
high-risk
in which
exercise
focused
social
1) idenevents;
3) role and 4)
situations;
a slip had occurred;
for handling
were
on
setbacks.
Self-re-
also emphasized.
All questionnaires
were
research-staff information
educational employment,
achievement, and marital
initial
individually members. questionnaire
family status.
administered A
by trained
brief self-administered was developed to assess
income, Sex and
language preference, age were also assessed
measurement.
An acculturation rating scale for Mexican Americans, which has been tested for reliability and validity (9), was used. Acculturation is a composite of variables, including language spoken in the
home,
educational
Wide
achievement,
variability
exists
and
generation
in acculturation
to assess the perceptions garding obesity, weight
and practices of adult loss, and nutrition.
The Family Adaptability (FACES) III questionnaire report,
of family adaptability that well-functioning middle
range
ofboth
1985)
in this
for
people of has been corre-
Mexican origin living in the United States and lated negatively with obesity in Mexican American A knowledge, attitudes, and behavior questionnaire
published
women (10). was given participants
re-
and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (DH Olson, J Portner, Y Lavee, unwas
administered
and cohesion. families, that adaptability
and
to assess
The study is, families cohesion,
the
nature
hypothesis was scoring in the would
be more
at making changes in the family program than would the individuals, whereas the reverse would be true for families who scored outside the middle range of these dimensions. A family-structure questionnaire provided information about the number of individuals living in the household, the relationship of each person in the household, and the importance of successful
and
Prochaska
and
measurement
Nutrition
used
Examination
population called
group
200
randomly
re-
food
Survey
over the selected
in the community the respondent’s 1) knowledge
annually. The and awareness risk factors; 2) sources of
cardiovascular-disease nutrition,
exercise,
and
cardiovascular
characteristics.
measurements in the CEC project were lipid changes. Glucose-tolerance tests because of the relationship between obesity and diabetes in this population (12). We monitored blood pressure and measured fitness level by using the Bruce submaximal treadmill protocol performed by exercise physiologists. specialists
In dealing with any population, cultural factors need to be investigated first. Cultural subgroups within the United States vary with respect to attitudes regarding obesity and attitudes toward certain foods. Some foods may be linked to traditions or religious rituals; other foods may be strictly taboo or restricted by men
only.
For
example,
advertising
agencies
use sex to sell products to the Anglo population, but because we know that sexuality is not publicly discussed by many Mexican Americans, a better approach is to focus on the family. Obesity and a high-fat diet are linked with hypercholesterolemia and other health problems. But Mexican American women are often uncomfortable doing something for themselves (even if it typically
bilingual background
country.
for
stages
(1 1). Seven-day
families
concerning
for consumption
Assessment
at the
It also
self-efficacy and
by following
interviewers
and 3) demographic Physiological-outcome weight loss and plasma were conducted annually
Cultural
behavioral changes. Discussions in these tifying
and
support,
a food-frequency and
decisions. consumption.
changes,
model
health;
the 6 mo of weekly
specific
to try to minimize relapse after treatment is a serious problem in the behavioral
strategies obesity
classes
sessions
social
obtained
Health
American
and and
behavior
and
bilingual
information
maintenance
These
were
collected
Hispanic
Mexican
sessions
subjects’
exercise
(HHANES) was administered. To monitor changes in the target
of obesity
Maintenance
information purchasing
stages-of-change
were
study
and increased activity levels into their lifestyles. Measurement sessions and rewards were the same as those for group 2.
and
of change
cords in
ofthe
eating
processes
health on food
Measurements making
to adopt
The
for
questions
separate
habits.
incorporating
members
members
was expanded to include partner-support techniques training aimed at developing good eating and exer-
as a family
family included
attending
all family
exercising
session.
AL
is for their
health),
such
as losing
weight
by eating
a low-fat
diet.
A persuasive approach was used for this group that focused on the benefits oflosing weight to the family. In CEC the primary objective ofthe exercise component was to encourage participants to begin a program of brisk walking three or more times per week, with a gradual increase in the distance walked. Instructions for adults included: 1) beginning an exercise program; 2) monitoring physical activity through heart rate; 3) exercises for stretching, warming up, and cooling down; 4) cardiovascular benefits ofexercise; 5) indoor exercises; and 6) exercising precautions during periods of high heat and humidity, which occur most ofthe year in the project area. The children ofgroup 3 families were taught game-oriented exercises and were urged to walk together. Walking is an activity that can be done without stepping out of cultural norms in an obvious way. However, some participants reported that their husbands were jealous and kept them from walking around the neighborhood. To solve this problem, the church hall was used regularly for walking and exercising with videotapes. Ethics The study was approved by the Institutional Review for Human Research at Baylor College of Medicine.
Board
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/6/1639S/4732423 by East Carolina University user on 05 January 2019
component and parent
child
to six couples,
intervention
the same number of classes as and exercise information prodesigned for families, with hus-
ET
CUIDANDO
and discussion
Results
In a primary obese
study
females
in the
of weight three
loss in the CEC
treatment
groups
project,
were
available
for
assessment
did
weight
or demographic
is typical
for low-income
needs
to be done
not
differ
from
variables. minority
to improve
assessed this
subjects,
1
(including Those un-
those
Although
for
work
in
attrition obviously
participation.
The weight
family and individual groups had significantly greater losses than the information-only comparison group. Of importance for the cultural, family-related hypothesis of the project
was
pothesis
the
that
ment
group
univariate
weight
loss would
followed
by the
information-only clinically our
considering subjects
that was
not
this the
most
with
population
the
hy-
and
Although other
least
not.
However,
behavioral
middle-class
in the
a few achieved did
research,
ethnic white
minority volunteers
in other weight-loss research projects. Perhaps the study planted a seed in the community that, if nurtured by health educators in the school
nouncements, True
cultural
system
could change
and
reinforced
have requires
a more years
by media
significant or decades.
public-service
effect
over
2. DieM AK, Stern MP. Social health problems of Mexican Americans: obesity, gallbladder disease, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. Adv Intern Med 1989;34:73-96. 3. Garn SM, Bailey SM, Cole PE, et al. Level of education, level of income, and level of fatness in adults. Am I Clin Nutr 1977;30: 72 1-5. 4. Goldblatt PB, Moore ME, Stunkard Al. Social factors in obesity.
JAMA
1965;l92:
an-
time. U
References 1. Burnight RG, Brownell KD. Behavioral modification: the state of the art. In: Frankle RT, Yang MU, eds. Obesity and weight control: the health professional’s guide to understanding and treatment. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc, 1987:225-40.
1039-44.
5. Foreyt JP, Goodrick GK, Bolton MP, Cousins JH, Ramirez AG. Weight control: Cuidando El Corazon. In: White L, Tursky B, Schwartz GE, eds. Psychology in health care: role, achievements, and challenges in interdisciplinary programs. New York: Erlbaum (in press). 6. Marlatt GA, Gordon JR. Determinants the maintenance of behavior change.
SM, eds. Behavioral
in the family-involve-
oflow-income,
as the
supported
group
participants
favorably same
that
be greater
group.
losses,
compared
analysis
individual
comparison
significant
results
trend
1 64 1 S
CORAZON
medicine:
changing
of relapse: In: Davidson
implications for P0, Davidson health lifestyles. New York:
Brunner/Mazel, 1980:410-52. 7. Foreyt JP, Goodrick GK, Gotto AM. Limitations of behavioral treatment ofobesity: review and analysis. J Behav Med 198 l;4:l5974. 8. Abrams DB, Follick MI. Behavioral weight-loss intervention at the worksite: feasibility and maintenance. I Consult Gin Psychol l983;8l:226-33. 9. Cuellar I, Harris L, lasso R. An acculturation scale for Mexican American normal and clinical population. Hispan I Behav 5th 1980;2:l99-2l7. 10. Hazuda HP, Haffner SM, Stern MP, Eifler CW. Effects of acculturation and socioeconomic status on obesity and diabetes in Mexican Americans. Am I Epidemiol l988;128:l289-30l. 1 1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach: crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1984. 12. Stern MP, Gaskill SP, Hazuda HP, Gardner LI, Haffner SN. Does obesity explain prevalence ofdiabetes among Mexican Americans?
Results 272-7.
of the San Antonio
Health
Study.
Diabetologia
1983;24:
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/6/1639S/4732423 by East Carolina University user on 05 January 2019
initial
168
tracked
y. Ofthese, only 86 came in for complete assessment fasting blood glucose and lipids) at 6 and 12 mo.
rate
EL