CORRECTION published: 13 February 2017 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00182
Corrigendum: Exploring Selective Exposure and Confirmation Bias as Processes Underlying Employee Work Happiness: An Intervention Study Paige Williams *, Margaret L. Kern and Lea Waters Edited and reviewed by: Radha R. Sharma, Management Development Institute, India *Correspondence: Paige Williams
[email protected] Centre for Positive Psychology, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Keywords: work happiness, attitudes, psychological capital, organization culture, organizational virtuousness, selective exposure, confirmation bias
A corrigendum on
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Exploring Selective Exposure and Confirmation Bias as Processes Underlying Employee Work Happiness: An Intervention Study by Williams, P., Kern, M. L., and Waters, L. (2016). Front. Psychol. 7:878. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016. 00878
Received: 11 January 2017 Accepted: 27 January 2017 Published: 13 February 2017
There was a mistake in the Intervention group values at Times 1 and 2 in Table 1. The correct version of Table 1 appears below. The authors apologize for the mistake. This error does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Citation: Williams P, Kern ML and Waters L (2017) Corrigendum: Exploring Selective Exposure and Confirmation Bias as Processes Underlying Employee Work Happiness: An Intervention Study. Front. Psychol. 8:182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00182
Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org
Conflict of Interest Statement: PW was employed at the research site at the time of the study. The other authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Copyright © 2017 Williams, Kern and Waters. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
1
February 2017 | Volume 8 | Article 182
Williams et al.
Processes Underlying Work Happiness
TABLE 1 | Demographic data for the samples at each time-point. Time 1 Treatment (n = 51)
Time 2 Control (n = 18)
Treatment (n = 51)
Time 3 Control (n = 11)
Treatment (n = 38)
Control (n = 9)
ROLE Teaching
24
4
24
2
24
2
Non-teaching
27
14
27
9
14
7
GENDER Male
27
6
27
3
18
3
Female
24
12
24
8
20
6
25–34 years
3
3
3
3
2
3
35–44 years
12
2
12
0
9
0
45–54 years
15
5
15
3
11
2
55–64 years
17
7
17
4
13
3
65+ years
4
1
4
1
3
1
New this year
25
0
25
0
19
0
1–5 years
19
4
19
4
13
3
6–10 years
5
4
5
3
3
3
11–15 years
0
2
0
1
0
1
16–20 years
1
1
1
1
1
1
20+ years
2
7
2
2
2
1
AGE
TENURE
Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org
2
February 2017 | Volume 8 | Article 182