CORRECTION

Correction: A Computerized Test of Design Fluency The PLOS ONE Staff

In Table 2, the rows "Experiment," "Exp. 1," "Exp. 2/3," and "Exp. 4" are erroneously duplicated within the table. Please see the correct Table 2 here. The publisher apologizes for the error.

Table 2. Participant characteristics. Experiment

Group

N

Ages (yrs)

Education (yrs)

C-use scale Male (%)

Exp. 1

Control/ Normative

180

18–82; 41.6 (21.4)

10–20; 14.6(2.1)

5.09

Exp. 2/3

Control/ Malinger

55/52

18–46; 26.2 (5.5)

12–18; 14.8 (1.4)

5.86

59% 51%

Exp.4

mTBI

24

20–61; 34.1(11.5)

10–18; 13.5(1.4)

5.04

100%

sTBI

4

35–52;45.0(7.1)

12–16; 13.0(1.2)

5.25

75%

C-use = computer-use scale; mTBI = mild TBI. sTBI = severe TBI. Range, mean, and variance are shown for age and education. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158933.t001

Reference 1.

Woods DL, Wyma JM, Herron TJ, Yund EW (2016) A Computerized Test of Design Fluency. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0153952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153952 PMID: 27138985

a11111

OPEN ACCESS Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2016) Correction: A Computerized Test of Design Fluency. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0158933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158933 Published: July 5, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0158933 July 5, 2016

1/1

Correction: A Computerized Test of Design Fluency.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153952.]...
93KB Sizes 3 Downloads 7 Views