Published June 24, 2014
Journal of Environmental Quality
TECHNICALERRATA REPORTS
Controlling Runoff from Subtropical Pastures Has Differential Effects on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads Patrick J. Bohlen* and Odi R. Villapando J. Environ. Qual. 40:989–998 Table 3 on page 995 should be replaced by the following table: Table 3. Average nutrient concentrations (±1 SE) in manual grab samples collected on five dates in 2005 and three dates in 2006 (N = 8) during flow events in pastures with unobstructed flow and pastures with reduced flow. There were no significant differences between pasture water management treatments for any variable (P > 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test). Variable† NH4+ (mg L-1) NOx (mg L-1) TN (mg L-1) TP (mg L-1) SRP (mg L-1) SRP/TP
Pasture water management treatment Unobstructed flow Reduced flow 0.131 ± 0.027 0.019 ± 0.002 3.390 ± 0.165 0.809 ± 0.094 0.609 ± 0.106 0.66 ± 0.04
0.119 ± 0.025 0.015 ± 0.002 3.309 ± 0.248 0.786 ± 0.077 0.563 ± 0.068 0.67 ± 0.03
† SRP, soluble reactive phosphorus; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
Copyright © American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA. All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. J. Environ. Qual. 42:1281 (2013) doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0127er *Corresponding author ([email protected]).
1281
Journal of Environmental Quality
TECHNICALERRATA REPORTS
Controlling Runoff from Subtropical Pastures Has Differential Effects on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads Patrick J. Bohlen* and Odi R. Villapando J. Environ. Qual. 40:989–998 Table 3 on page 995 should be replaced by the following table: Table 3. Average nutrient concentrations (±1 SE) in manual grab samples collected on five dates in 2005 and three dates in 2006 (N = 8) during flow events in pastures with unobstructed flow and pastures with reduced flow. There were no significant differences between pasture water management treatments for any variable (P > 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test). Variable† NH4+ (mg L-1) NOx (mg L-1) TN (mg L-1) TP (mg L-1) SRP (mg L-1) SRP/TP
Pasture water management treatment Unobstructed flow Reduced flow 0.131 ± 0.027 0.019 ± 0.002 3.390 ± 0.165 0.809 ± 0.094 0.609 ± 0.106 0.66 ± 0.04
0.119 ± 0.025 0.015 ± 0.002 3.309 ± 0.248 0.786 ± 0.077 0.563 ± 0.068 0.67 ± 0.03
† SRP, soluble reactive phosphorus; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
Copyright © American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA. All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. J. Environ. Qual. 42:1281 (2013) doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0127er *Corresponding author ([email protected]).
1281
