JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, May 1979, p. 552-558 0021-9193/79/05-0552/07$02.00/0

Vol. 138, No. 2

Comparative Ultrastructure of Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepraemurium Cell Envelopes HOANG-THUY NGUYEN,' DANG DUC TRACH,1 NGUYEN VAN MAN,' TRAN HOU NGOAN,1 I. DUNIA,2 M. A. LUDOSKY-DIAWARA,2 AND E. L. BENEDET1I`* National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, 1, Pho Yersin, Hanoi, Viet Nam,' and Laboratoire de Microscopie Electronique, Institut de Recherche en Biologie Moleculaire du C.N.R.S., Universite Paris VII, Cedex 05-Paris, France2 Received for publication 12 February 1979

The structural properties of the cell envelopes of Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepraemurium were investigated by freeze-fracture, freeze-etching, and negative-staining techniques. Freeze-fracture split the cell wall and exposed the internal features of the peptidoglycolipid mycosidic filamentous network. The cell membrane was also split into two asymmetric faces. The external fracture face was characterized by linear arrays of intramembranous particles, whereas the protoplasmic fracture face showed randomly distributed clusters of particulate entities. Comparative analysis of the ultrastructural features observed in M. leprae and M. lepraemurium indicated that the organization of the cell envelope in these two species differed particularly with respect to the amount and complexity of the superficial peptidoglycolipid and mycosidic integument, which is poorly developed in the mycobacterium responsible for human disease.

Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepraemurium are obligate parasites well adapted to survival within the phagocyte cells of human and rodent tissues (11). In these microorganisms the envelope consists of a basal structure of mucopeptides covalently linked to arabinogalactane mycolates (2, 17). Beyond this rigid polymeric layer the microorganism is further protected by an elaborated integument which has been said to be of peptidoglycolipids and mycosidic in nature (2, 6, 14, 17). The morphological definition of these superficial layers has been accomplished mainly by electron microscopy of negatively stained preparations (2, 10). The results of these studies lead to the conclusion that the peptidoglycolipid mycosidic components form a superficial complex filamentous network which is believed to be a characteristic property of the genus Mycobacterium (2, 14). However, differences between the organization of the surface network in M. leprae and in other Mycobacterium species growing in artificial cultures have been described by Gordon

fractured and etched exposed surfaces the threedimensional organization of the cell envelopes can be characterized. It is shown that the superficial tubular network exposed by deep etching and negative staining correlates and reflects the complexity of the internal organization of the cell envelopes revealed by the fracture. Moreover, some evidence is provided that the ultrastructural features of the cell envelopes in M. leprae differ from those in M. lepraemurium in regard to the extension and assembly of the peptidoglycolipid and mycosidic pattern.

MATERUILS AND METHODS

Human material was obtained from several biopsies of 10 patients presenting the lepromatous type of the disease and under chemotherapy treatment. Swiss female mice, 3 weeks old, were injected in the footpad with 10 p1 of a suspension of M. lepraemurium Hawaii containing about 2.5 x 107 bacilli per ml. Human tissue, and mouse nodular lepromas, which developed 5 to 6 months after injection, were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline at pH 7.2 in a tight glass tissue grinder. The crude suspension was centrifuged and White (10). 1,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were It is the purpose of this report to present the at at 40,000 x g for 30 min. The pellets were sedimented comparative surface ultrastructure of two spe- either suspended saline or cut in cies of mycobacterium which have not previ- into small fragments.phosphate-buffered Some of these fragments were ously been extensively studied by freeze-fracture placed on gold-coated specimen holders, rapidly frozen and by freeze-etching. The advantage of these in liquid freon 22, and subsequently stored in liquid methods compared with other techniques of nitrogen. Other pellet fragments were fixed in 2% specimen preparations is that from the study of glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 552

VOL. 138, 1979

M. LEPRAE AND M. LEPRAEMURIUM CELL ENVELOPES

553

30 min and progressively impregnated with a 25% glycerol-water solution. Small drops of glycerol-impregnated samples were rapidly frozen as described above. Freeze-fracture and freeze-etching were carried out in Balzers 360 and 301 apparatuses. The stage temperature was -140°C for freeze-fracture experiments and -100°C when etching was desired. Etching was carried out for 1 min 45 s. The replicas obtained by carbon and platinum evaporation were cleaned by repeated washings with sodium hypochlorite and 70% sulfuric acid and, if necessary, with 1 M sodium hydroxide, and fmally with twice-distilled water. For negative staining, 1% uranyl acetate or ammonium molybdate was applied to microorganism suspensions spread on carbon-coated grids. Some bacterial samples were sonicated for 1 min in an MSE ultrasonic disintegrator at maximum frequency prior to negative staining. Electron microscopic observations were carried out with a Philips 400 electron microscope operating at 80 kV. Electron micrographs were taken at various magnifications (6,000 to 64,000).

The outer cleavage plane splits the cell wall also into two halves. The convex inner fracture face, outwardly directed and close to the mycobacterium body (CWIF), is characterized by the presence of linear depressions and a few ridges (Fig. 2 and 11). Most of the ridges remain associated with the concave, inwardly directed, outer fracture face (CWOF) (Fig. 2 and 12). The ridges exist as discontinuous but aligned segments (Fig. 2 and 12). The average diameter of the depressions is 10 nm, and that of the ridges is 15 nm. In most of the M. leprae the cell envelope shows a loss of the linear depressions and ridges. Hence, the convex and concave fracture faces have a rather smooth appearance (Fig. 3 and 4). Occasionally, individual mycobacteria possess a rather elaborate filamentous network although never as developed as in M. lepraemurium (Fig. 2).

RESULTS Freeze-etching applied to M. leprae shows that the outer cell surface has a rather smooth appearance (Fig. 1). Conversely, most of the M. lepraemurium studied by freeze-etching were characterized by an elaborated superficial integument. Figure 7 shows that the outer cell surface is wrapped round by ribbon- and rodlike forms. Negative staining of M. lepraemurium clearly reveals that the outer surface of the cell wall comprises ribbon- and rodlike projections which after sonication appear to consist of fragmented tubular elements (Fig. 13). The negative staining of M. leprae shows instead that the ribbons and tubules are undetectable even after sonication and only small patches of a filamentous network are visible (Fig. 6). Freeze-fracture provides further evidence concerning the tubular nature of the material accumulated at the surface of M. lepraemurium. Figure 12 shows that ribbon- and rodlike projections are cleaved along their major axis, and convex and concave elongated surfaces are exposed. Adjacent tubules are also seen to be twisted about each other. Freeze-cleavage occurs at different levels of the cell envelopes and produces four fracture faces. The inner cleavage plane splits the cell membrane. In M. lepraemurium the convex fracture face outwardly directed and close to the cytoplasm (PF) contains clusters of intramembranous particles (Fig. 9 and 10). The concave, inwardly directed fracture face (EF) is studded with linear arrays and small clusters of particles (Fig. 8). In M. leprae the PF (Fig. 5) and EF fracture faces are characterized by the presence of very few particulate clusters.

In gram-positive microorganisms, the localization of the freeze-cleavage plane within the cell wall is still a matter of controversy (2, 14, 16, 18). If, as is believed, the cell wall constituents form a network through covalent and hydrogen bonds (9), then the site of the fracture within the cell is not easily identifiable, since at low temperature these bonds may still be sufficiently strong to hinder cleavage (4). However, this assumption suffers from uncertainties related to possible differences in cell wall configuration and molecular organization among various species and types of gram-positive bacteria, in particular mycobacteria. Actually, analytical data bring the true gram-positive state of mycobacteria into question and indicate a striking chemical and structural complexity in the cell wall of these microorganisms (1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 14, 17). From these interesting studies a multilayered model for the structure of the mycobacterial cell wall has been proposed (2, 14). In agreement with the observations of Kim et al. (14) and Barksdale and Kim (2), our results on M. leprae and M. lepraemurium give a strong indication that the cell wall and the cell membrane both contain a preferential site of freeze-cleavage, producing convex and concave fracture faces. Hence, the cell wall in mycobacteria could comprise a planar hydrophobic continuum where peptidoglycolipid and mycosidic filaments are assembled. Furthermore, these components could accumulate at the outermost cell surface and form the ribbon-like and tubular elements revealed by negative staining, freeze-fracture, and freeze-etching. This assumption is supported by the morphological evidence that the filamentous network visualized on outer and in-

DISCUSSION

554

NGUYEN ET AL.

J. BACTERIOL.

VOL. 138, 1979

M. LEPRAE AND M. LEPRAEMURIUM CELL ENVELOPES

555

FIG. 6. Negative staining of M. leprae after sonication. Small patches of ramified fibrous projections are visualized at the outer cell surface (arrows).

ner fracture faces, respectively, as linear ridges and depressions is decreased in M. leprae to the same extent as the reduction of the external peptidoglycolipid and mycosidic accumulation. It is striking that these cell wall components have some structural resemblance to the tubular forms of Gaucher's disease cerebrosides (15) and also to the peptidoglycolipid complexes extracted from the myelin (21). We have also observed that the particulate entities visualized on the EF fracture face of the cell membrane, particularly in M. lepraemurium, form rows and arrays extending along linear patterns allusive to those of the fibrillar network found within the outer cell wall. The interpretation of these structural features probably resides in the knowledge that, in other types of biological membranes and envelopes, linear arrays of particulate entities, ridges, and complementary depressions exposed on fracture faces are usually markers for membrane assembly and differentiation (cf. ref. 3, 13, and 19). For instance, particulate arrays at fracture faces of the outer membrane of Acetobacter

xylinum are believed to be the synthetic sites of cellulose microfibrils organized at the surface of the microorganism (5). Evidence has been provided that in the gram-positive Streptoccocus faecalis the cell wall is cleaved and rows of globules are visualized on the freeze-fracture faces. Tentatively, the latter particulate entities have been identified with assembly units of the outer cell envelope (20). It is therefore tempting to set side by side the observation that the filamentous and tubular network is poorly developed in M. leprae and the finding that the intramembranous particles are represented only by a few clusters. There is probably more than one alternative to explain the differences between the features of the cell envelopes of M. leprae and M. lepraemurium. The superficial mycosidic integument and peptidoglycolipid filamentous network are shown to occur in a wide variety of mycobacterial species (2, 14). It seems that these components of the cell wall display very few differences among the various species of myco-

FIG. 1. Freeze-etching and fracture view of M. leprae. The cell wall surface (CWS) exposed by deep etching is smooth. Note the lack of ribbon-like projections. The convex cell wall inner face (CWIF) exposed by the fracture is also amooth. FIG. 2. Freeze-fracture of M. leprae. The cleavage exposes both the cell wall outer and inner fracture faces (CWOF and CWIF). Note that only a few ridges are visible on the concave fracture face (CWOF) and correspondingly very few linear depressions are present on the convex fracture face (CWIF). FIG. 3 and 4. Concave (CWOF) and convex (CWIF) fracture faces of the M. leprae cell wall. Note that both faces are smooth. The perpendicular beltlike ridges in Fig. 4 and the grooves in Fig. 3 correspond to septa. FIG. 5. Freeze-fracture of M. leprae. Two fracture planes are visible. The inner one, characterized by smooth areas with a few particulate clusters, corresponds to the cell membrane inner fracture face (PF). The outer cleavage plane exposes the convex fracture face of the cell wall (CWIF). Note the deep cleavage step between the two fracture planes.

556

NGUYEN ET AL.

J. BACTERIOL.

FIG. 7. Freeze-etching of the outer cell wall surface of M. lepraemurium. The etched surface shows the accumulation of ribbon-like and filamentous projections (arrows). FIG. 8. Outer fracture face (EF) of M. lepraemurium. The intramembranous particles form linear arrays and small clusters (arrows). FIG. 9. Inner fracture face (PF) ofM. lepraemurium. The cleavage has exposed numerous intramembranous particles forming large clusters interspaced by smooth areas. FIG. 10. Freeze-fracture and etching of M. lepraemurium. The etching has exposed the outermost surface of the microorganism (CWS), while a fortunate cleavage event has exposed the inner fracture face of the cytoplasmic membrane (PF) (arrow). This latter surface shows clusters and rows of intramembranous particles. The cleavage step across the cell wall required to expose the inner plasma membrane core is remarkably deep.

FIG. 11. Inner cell wall fracture face (CWIF) of M. lepraemurium. The surface is characterized by the presence of several linear depressions gently twisted around the bacterial body. Arrow points to ribbon-like projections exposed by the etching. FIG. 12. Freeze-fracture of M. lepraemurium. Multiple segmented ridges are visualized on the cell wall concave fracture face (CWOF). The cleavage has exposed tubular structures twisted along each other (arrow heads). Tubular elements have also been fractured along their major axis (arrows). FIG. 13. Negative staining of M. lepraemurium after sonication. The outermost surface components appear as fragmented tubular and ramified projections (arrows).

VOL. 138, 1979 --l :..X. J

M. LEPRAE AND M. LEPRAEMURIUM CELL ENVELOPES

I

\

-

:

I-F AL'

100nn

C),.:,.

557

558

NGUYEN ET AL.

bacteria so far investigated (2, 14). The variations that have been detected are believed to correlate with the mycobacterium cell cycle. The accumulation both of peptidoglycolipids and mycosidic components would be an inherent feature of actively growing cells (2). One possible explanation for the fact that the cell wall features of M. leprae differ from those of M. lepraemurium could therefore be that the adaptive processes of mycobacterium phenotypes living in different environments lead to alterations in cell wall morphopoiesis. It should also be recalled that all of the M. leprae used in the present investigation originated from lesions in patients receiving chemotherapy. A study is in progress on the M. leprae found in human lesions before and after treatment with antibiotics. Similar comparative investigations will also be carried out using M. lepraemurium. On the other hand, we cannot rule out that the different surface ultrastructure of these two species of mycobacteria could rely upon the existence of species-specific variations among mycobacteria. Striking differences in the composition of the mycosidic integument of Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants compared with that of the wild type have been already found by Furuchi and Tokunaga (8) and by Goren et al. (12). To our knowledge these interesting data have not been supplemented with ultrastructural studies, which could be highly significant to a better interpretation of the results here reported. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our deep appreciation and thanks to Francois Gros, Director of Institut Pasteur, who helped make this work possible by his encouragement and criticism. This work has been aided by the International Cell Research Organization and UNESCO. E.L.B. expresses his deep appreciation for the generous support received from the State Committee for Sciences and Techniques of the Republic of Viet Nam and from the Service de Cooperation Culturelle et Technique du Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres. LITERATURE CITED 1. Azuma, I., Y. Yamamura, Y. Tanaka, K. Kohsaka, T. Mori, and T. Itoh. 1973. Cell wall of Mycobacterium lepraemurium strain Hawaii. J. Bacteriol. 113:515-518. 2. Barksdale, L., and K. S. Kim. 1977. Mycobacterium. Bacteriol. Rev. 41:217-372. 3. Benedetti, E. L., I. Dunia, J. Cartaud, T. Hatae, C. Favard-Sereno, C. J. Bentzel, M. Kibbelaar, and H. Bloemendal. 1977. Cell surface specialized domains, p. 305-328. In J. Dumont and J. Nunez (ed.), Hormones and cell regulation, vol. 2. North Holland, Amsterdam. 4. Branton, D. 1973. The fracture process of freeze-etching,

J. BACTERIOL.

5.

6. 7. 8. 9.

10. 11.

12.

13.

14.

15. 16. 17.

p. 107-112. In E. L. Benedetti and P. Favard (ed.), Freeze-etching techniques and applications. Soc. Francaise de Microsc. Elec., Paris, France. Brown, R. M., J. H. M. Willison, and C. L. Richardson. 1976. Cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum: visualization of the site of synthesis and direct measurement of the in vivo process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73:4565-4569. Cummins, C. S., G. Atfield, R. J. W. Rees, and R. C. Valentine. 1967. Cell wall composition in Mycobacterium lepraemurium. J. Gen. Microbiol. 49:377-384. Draper, P. 1976. Cell walls of Mycobacterium leprae. Int. J. Leprosy 44:95-98. Furuchi, A., and T. Tokunaga. 1972. Nature of the receptor substance of Mycobacterium smegmatis for D4 bacteriophage adsorption. J. Bacteriol. 111:404-411. Ghuysen, J. M., and G. D. Shockman. 1973. Biosynthesis of peptidoglycan, p. 37-130. In L. Leive (ed.), Bacterial membranes and walls, vol. 2. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. Gordon, J., and G. White. 1971. Surface peptido-glycolipid filaments on Mycobacterium leprae. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 9:539-547. Goren, M. B. 1977. Phagocyte lysosomes: interactions with infectious agents, phagosomes and experimental perturbations in function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 31: 507-533. Goren, M. B., J. K. McClatchy, B. Martens, and 0. Brokl. 1972. Mycosides C: behavior as receptor site substance for mycobacteriophage D4. J. Virol. 9:9991003. Irvin, R. T., A. K. Chatterjee, K. E. Sanderson, and J. W. Costerton. 1975. Comparison of the cell envelope structure of a lipopolysaccharide-defective (heptose-deficient) strain and a smooth strain of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 124:930-941. Kim, K. S., M. R. J. Salton, and L. Barksdale. 1976. Ultrastructure of superficial mycosidic integuments of Mycobacterium sp. J. Bacteriol. 125:739-743. Lee, R. E. 1968. The fine structure of the cerebroside occurring in Gaucher's disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 61:484-489. Nanninga, N. 1971. Uniqueness and location of the fracture plane in the plasma membrane of Bacillus subtilis. J. Cell Biol. 49:564-570. Petit, J. F., and E. Lederer. 1978. Structure and immunostimulant properties of mycobacterial cell walls, p. 177-199. In R. Y. Stainer, H. J. Rogers, and J. B. Ward (ed.), Relation between structure and function in the prokaryotic cell. Series: Society for General Microbiology Symposium 28. Cambridge University Press, Cam-

bridge, England. 18. Salton, M. R. J., and P. Owen. 1976. Bacterial membrane structure. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 30:451-482. 19. Smit, J., Y. Kamio, and H. Nikaido. 1975. Outer membrane of Salmonella typhimurium: chemical analysis and freeze-fracture studies with lipopolysaccharide mutants. J. Bacteriol. 124:942-958. 20. Tsien, H. C., G. D. Schockman, and M. L. Higgins. 1978. Structural arrangement of polymers within the wall of Streptoccocus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 133:372386. 21. Vasquez, C., F. J. Barrantes, J. L. La Torre, and E. de Robertis. 1970. Electron microscopy of proteolipid macromolecules from cerebral cortex. J. Mol. Biol. 52: 221-226.

Comparative ultrastructure of Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepraemurium cell envelopes.

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, May 1979, p. 552-558 0021-9193/79/05-0552/07$02.00/0 Vol. 138, No. 2 Comparative Ultrastructure of Mycobacterium leprae and...
3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views