Biol Trace Elem Res (2014) 162:46–57 DOI 10.1007/s12011-014-0123-4

Comparative Study of Trace Elements in Blood, Scalp Hair and Nails of Prostate Cancer Patients in Relation to Healthy Donors Muhammad Abdul Qayyum & Munir H. Shah

Received: 10 July 2014 / Accepted: 7 September 2014 / Published online: 18 September 2014 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Abstract Prostate cancer is the most common fatal cancers in men, and exposure to toxic elements is the most important factor in the aetiology for prostate cancer. Selected elements (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) were analyzed in the blood, scalp hair and nails of prostate cancer patients and counterpart healthy donors by atomic absorption spectrometry. Average concentrations of Cd, Mn, Ni and Pb were found to be significantly higher (pZn>Pb>Cu> Mn>Cr>Cd. Basic statistical parameters for the distribution of trace elements in the blood of controls are also shown in Table 3. Predominantly higher mean concentrations were found for Fe (464.3 μg/g), followed by relatively lower concentrations of Zn (6.571 μg/g), Ni (2.687 μg/g), Pb (2.248 μg/ g) and Cu (1.951 μg/g). The lowest average concentrations were recorded for Cr (0.976 μg/g), Mn (0.895 μg/g) and Cd (0.774 μg/g). On the average basis, trace elements revealed the following order in their concentrations in the blood of controls: Fe>Zn>Ni>Pb>Cu>Cr>Mn>Cd. Relatively larger dispersion in terms of SE was shown by Fe; however, a noticeably higher asymmetry was observed for Zn and Fe in the blood of controls. Overall, most of the elements manifested random distribution in the blood of both donor groups, although comparatively higher dispersion was observed for the patients.

Table 2 Characteristics of the subjects Characteristics

n Age (years) Range Mean Diet (n, %) Vegetarian Nonvegetarian Habitat (n, %) Urban Rural Tobacco use (smoking) (n, %) No use Use Types of prostate cancer (n, %) Adenocarcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Transitional cell carcinoma Small cell carcinoma Stages of prostate cancer (n, %) Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV

Blood

Scalp hair

Nails

Cancer patients

Controls

Cancer patients

Controls

Cancer patients

Controls

74

66

67

67

60

60

32–75 56.77

27–68 47.76

38–72 56.01

31–68 47.13

32–75 55.18

27–68 46.58

43 (58) 31 (42)

38 (58) 28 (42)

39 (58) 28 (42)

42 (63) 25 (20)

37 (62) 23 (38)

36 (60) 24 (40)

36 (49) 38 (51)

36 (55) 30 (45)

33 (49) 34 (51)

33 (49) 34 (51)

32 (53) 28 (47)

35 (58) 25 (42)

43 (58) 31 (42)

37 (56) 29 (44)

39 (58) 28 (42)

39 (58) 28 (42)

34 (73) 26 (27)

32 (53) 28 (47)

42 (57) 14 (19)

– –

37 (55) 12 (18)

– –

34 (57) 10 (16)

– –

10 (14) 08 (10)

– –

10 (15) 08 (12)

– –

09 (15) 07 (12)

– –

19 (26) 20 (27) 12 (16) 23 (31)

– – – –

17 (25) 16 (24) 10 (15) 24 (36)

– – – –

19 (32) 15 (25) 08 (13) 18 (30)

– – – –

50

Qayyum and Shah

Table 3 Statistical distribution parameters for trace element concentrations (μg/g) in the blood, scalp hair and nails of the prostate cancer patients and healthy donors/controls Patients

Blood

Scalp hair

Nails

p value

Controls

Min

Max

Mean

SE

Skew

Min

Max

Mean

SE

Skew

Fe

222.5

2188

850.8

46.52

1.272

106.1

1604

464.3

27.38

3.167

Mn>Cd. Average concentrations of Mn, Ni, Cr and Cd were found to be significantly higher (p0.371 or ≤0.371 are significant at pstage I> stage IV. Mean concentrations of Cu, Mn and Ni were comparable at stage I and stage II, whereas Fe, Zn and Cr concentrations were almost equivalent at stage I and stage IV. Some of the elements (Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn and Fe) exhibited the lowest blood concentrations at stage III. Average concentrations of Fe, Mn, Pb and Cd in the scalp hair were relatively higher at stage IV, while mean concentrations of Ni and Cr were relatively higher at stage III and those of Zn and Cu were relatively higher at stage I. Among the elements, Cu, Mn and Ni concentrations were not significantly different at stage I and stage II. The average concentrations of Pb, Cd, Cr and Zn exhibited almost a similar trend for different stages of the cancer. In case of nail samples, mean concentrations of Cu and Mn were comparatively higher at stage I, while elevated concentrations of Ni, Cr and Cd were observed at stage II. Likewise, elevated concentrations of Zn and Pb were found at stage IV; however, the average concentrations of Fe and Cd were more or less similar at stages I and IV. Mean concentrations of Pb in the nails were nearly comparable at stage I and stage III (Fig. 3). Oxidative stress has been associated with prostate cancer development and progression due to an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, the precise mechanism whereby ROS participate in the cancer progression is poorly understood. ROS are derived from endogenous and exogenous sources [21]. Increased ROS generation has been associated with tissue injury or DNA damage which are general manifestations of pathological conditions associated with infection, mitochondrial DNA mutations and cellular proliferation [22]. However, the actual effects of oxidative stress may depend on the cellular genetic background, the types of ROS involved, and the extent and time of interference [23]. Various elements (such as, Cr, Ni, Pb, Cd) are reported as catalysts in the oxidative damage of biological systems, and therefore, the toxicity associated with these elements may be due to their ability to generate the free radicals [24, 25]. It is also well established that free radicals are known to react with all

Stage I

Stage II

Stage III

Stage IV

1000

100

10

1

0.1 Fe

Zn

Cu

Mn

Ni

Cr

Cd

Pb

10000 Stage I

Stage II

Stage III

Stage IV

1000 M e ta l L e v e l ( µ g / g ) i n S c a lp H a i r

Comparison Based on Stages of Prostate Cancer

10000

100

10

1

0.1 Fe

Zn

Cu

Mn

Ni

Cr

Cd

Pb

10000 Stage I

Stage II

Stage III

Stage IV

1000 Metal Level (µg/g) in Nails

markedly higher in transitional cell carcinoma patients. Conversely, some of the elements (Zn, Pb, Mn and Ni) exhibited the lowest concentrations in the nails of small cell carcinoma patients.

Qayyum and Shah

100

10

1

0.1 Fe

Zn

Cu

Mn

Ni

Cr

Cd

Pb

Fig. 3 Comparative average concentrations of trace elements (±SE) in the blood, scalp hair and nails of the patients based on cancer stages

components of DNA, thus damaging its bases and the deoxyribose backbone causing mutations in crucial genes, which ultimately may lead to cancer [26, 27]. Exposure to high concentrations of Cd has been suggested to increase prostate cancer risk factor due to its ability to simulate the growth of human prostate epithelial cells even at low concentration and to induce their malignant transformation [28]. It may induce free radical toxicity as a result of reaction with thiols or enzymes, which normally protect against the reactive species. The results of present study were consistent with the other reports in which Cd concentrations in the blood, scalp hair and nails of prostate cancer patients were higher than those of

Comparative Study of Trace Elements of Prostate Cancer Patients

healthy donors [14, 16, 24, 29]. West et al. [30] reported a statistically significant positive association with ingested Cd and prostate cancer risk. Armstrong and Kazantzis [31] and Platz et al. [32] analyzed data from two separate US cohort studies and reported no association between high Cd exposure and prostate cancer risk. Kazantzis et al. [33] found no association between occupational exposure to Cd and prostate cancer mortality in a British cohort. In contrast, Sorahan and Watherhouse [34] observed a statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer mortality among Ni-Cd alloy workers in the UK. Similarly, Vinceti et al. [35] also reported an elevated Cd concentration in the nails of prostate cancer patients in comparison with the healthy subjects. Epidemiological studies showed that exposure to Ni and its compounds produced a high risk of various types of cancer [24, 36–38]. Sorahan and Watherhouse [34] reported a statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer mortality with relatively high occupational Ni exposure. Average concentrations of Ni and other elements (Cu and Fe) in the blood of prostate cancer patients were reported to be higher than those of controls [39]. Concentration of Cr was also reported to be significantly higher in prostate cancer patients than that in normal subjects [40]. In a previous study, the blood, hair and nail Pb concentrations were reported to be significantly higher in prostate cancer patients than those in controls [41]. Generally, Mn is not considered carcinogenic to humans [42]; however, Prasad et al. [43] reported that Mn toxicity damages the brain and may have caused prostate cancer. Kwiatek et al. [44] reported an increase of Mn, Ni and Co concentrations in prostate cancer. Zinc plays a key role in maintaining antioxidant defences and DNA repair systems, failure to which may result in human carcinogenesis [45]. It has been known that Zn concentration in the prostate gland is much higher than that in any other organ, which suggested that Zn may play a role in prostate function and health. Zinc is well known to induce production of metallothionein, which is very rich in cysteine, and this is an excellent scavenger of hydroxyl radical. Epidemiological studies provided contradictory findings on the effectiveness of Zn in prevention against prostate cancer; there were studies that showed that Zn reduces the risk of developing prostate cancer [46], while others showed that there were neither beneficiary nor potential adverse effects of Zn on prostate cancer risk [47]. However, many studies showed that Zn deficiency was considered as possible risk factor for prostate cancer [48]. It is notable that the hair Zn concentration between patients with malignancy was also significantly lower than that in normal patients [1, 4]. In the present study, Zn concentrations in the blood, scalp hair and nails were considerably lower in prostate cancer patients than those in healthy donors. It is important to note that oxidative stress markers are prognostically important in prostate cancer, but these biomarkers are not analyzed in the present study. Although

55

accumulation of some elements has been clearly demonstrated in the cancer patients, it is still unclear whether this is a consequence of the disease or a need for its development. It was also observed in the present study that socioeconomic factors also play a role in higher mortality rates in patients, such as poor nutrition, irregular screening, late diagnosis and unequal access to health care. The cost factor of cancer treatment is also very high. The local hygiene centre facilities are poor in Pakistan, and there are no any routine monitoring and screening carried out for those people living in small towns. Trace element analysis of the cancer patients could become a powerful diagnostic tool. Considering risk assessment of metal toxicology, future research should be focused on the relevance of respective mechanisms in experimental animals and exposed humans, especially with respect to effective metal concentrations. Further study having a large number of subjects is warranted to more clearly define the risks associated with specific exposures with different histological types of prostate cancer. A better understanding of the molecular basis for the development and progression of prostate cancer is needed. The fact that the risk factors of prostate cancer are uncertain provides additional setbacks and halts the search for preventative measures that could benefit for potential patients. Although, further studies are required in this area, these reports, nevertheless, raised concern for potential detrimental outcomes of long-term exposure of trace elements in human.

Conclusions The concentration of trace elements in the blood, scalp hair and nails of the cancer patients in comparison with that in the controls were considerably divergent. In the blood and scalp hair of prostate cancer patients, Pb, Cd, Ni, Mn and Fe were significantly higher compared to those of the controls, but the concentration of Zn was considerably lower in the patients than that in the controls. The average concentrations of Fe, Zn and Cu were appreciably higher in the scalp hair and nails of controls; nonetheless, some of the elements (Cd, Ni and Mn) were significantly higher in the nails of patients than those of controls, thus indicating the imbalance of these elements in the patients. Likewise, the average concentration of Cr was not significantly different in the blood, scalp hair and nails of patients and controls. Trace elements also exhibited significant disparities in the blood, scalp hair and nails of the patients and controls based on abode, food habits, smoking habits, cancer types and stages. The correlation study revealed appreciably different mutual variations of the elements in the blood, scalp hair and nails of the two groups. CA revealed different apportionment mechanisms of trace elements in the blood, scalp hair and nails of the cancer patients and controls which

56

evidenced that the carcinogenic processes were significantly affecting the trace element balance in humans. Acknowledgments The funding by Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan, to carry out this project is thankfully acknowledged. We are also grateful to the administration of Nuclear Oncology & Radiotherapy Institute (NORI), Islamabad, Pakistan, for their invaluable help during sample collection. Technical and financial help by Quaid-iAzam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, to execute this project is also acknowledged.

References 1. Tan C, Chen H (2011) Screening of prostate cancer by analyzing trace elements in hair and chemometrics. Biol Trace Elem Res 144: 97–108 2. Zaichick V, Nosenko S, Moskvina I (2012) The effect of age on 12 chemical element contents in the intact prostate of adult men investigated by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Biol Trace Elem Res 147:49–58 3. Bracarda S, de Cobelli O, Greco C, Prayer-Galetti T, Valdagni R, Gatta G, de Braud F, Bartsch G (2005) Cancer of the prostate. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 56:379–396 4. Guo JK, Deng W, Zhang L, Li C, Wu P, Mao P (2007) Prediction of prostate cancer using hair trace element concentration and support vector machine method. Biol Trace Elem Res 116:257–271 5. Zaichick S, Zaichick V, Nosenko S, Moskvina I (2012) Mass fractions of 52 trace elements and zinc/trace element content ratios in intact human prostates investigated by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Biol Trace Elem Res 149:171–183 6. Pasha Q, Malik SA, Shaheen N, Shah MH (2010) Investigation of trace metals in the blood plasma and scalp hair of gastrointestinal cancer patients in comparison with controls. Clin Chim Acta 411: 531–539 7. Rodrigues JL, Batista BL, Nunes JA, Passos CJS, Barbosa F Jr (2008) Evaluation of the use of human hair for biomonitoring the deficiency of essential and exposure to toxic elements. Sci Total Environ 405:370–376 8. Schiffer E (2007) Biomarkers for prostate cancer. World J Urol 25: 557–562 9. Polkowska Z, Kozlowska K, Namiesnik J, Przyjazny A (2004) Biological fluids as a source of information on the exposure of man to environmental agents. Crit Rev Anal Chem 34:105–119 10. Przybylowicz A, Chesy P, Herman M, Parczewski A, Walas S, Piekoszewski W (2012) Examination of distribution of trace elements in hair, fingernails and toenails as alternative biological materials. Application of chemometric methods. Cent Eur J Chem 10: 1590–1599 11. Rodushkin I, Axelsson MD (2000) Application of double focusing sector field ICP-MS for multielemental characterization of human hair and nails. Part II. A study of the inhabitants of northern Sweden. Sci Total Environ 262:21–36 12. Guzel S, Kiziler L, Aydemir B, Alici B, Ataus S, Aksu A, Durak H (2012) Association of Pb, Cd, and Se concentrations and oxidative damage-related markers in different grades of prostate carcinoma. Biol Trace Elem Res 145:23–32 13. Gray MA, Centeno JA, Slaney DP, Ejnik JW, Todorov T, Nacey JN (2005) Environmental exposure to trace elements and prostate cancer in three New Zealand ethnic groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2:374–384

Qayyum and Shah 14. Silvera SAN, Rohan TE (2007) Trace elements and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Cancer Causes Control 18:7– 27 15. Yaman M, Atici D, Bakırdere S, Akdeniz I (2005) Comparison of trace metal concentrations in malign and benign human prostate. J Med Chem 48:630–634 16. Wu CC, Pu YS, Wu HC, Yang CY, Chen YC (2011) Reversed association between levels of prostate specific antigen and levels of blood cadmium and urinary cadmium. Chemosphere 83:1188–1191 17. Were FH, Njue W, Murungi J, Wanjau R (2008) Use of human nails as bio-indicators of heavy metals environmental exposure among school age children in Kenya. Sci Total Environ 393:376–384 18. Moses MF, Prabakaran JJ (2011) Evaluation of occupational exposure to toxic metals using fingernails as biological indicators. Res J Environ Toxicol 5:65–70 19. StatSoft (1999) STATISTICA for Windows, computer program manual. StatSoft, Tulsa 20. Jobson JD (1991) Applied multivariate data analysis. Springer, New York 21. Jomova K, Valko M (2011) Advances in metal-induced oxidative stress and human disease. Toxicology 283:65–87 22. Khandrika L, Kumar B, Koul S, Maroni P, Koul HK (2009) Role of oxidative stress in prostate cancer. Cancer Lett 282(2):125–136 23. Kumar B, Koul S, Khandrika L, Meacham RB, Koul HK (2008) Oxidative stress is inherent in prostate cancer cells and is required for aggressive phenotype. Cancer Res 68:1777–1785 24. Mulware SJ (2013) Trace elements and carcinogenicity: a subject in review. 3. Biotech 3:85–96 25. Henkler F, Brinkmann J, Luch A (2010) The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis induced by metals and xenobiotics. Cancers 2:376– 396 26. Rahman K (2007) Studies on free radicals, antioxidants and cofactors. Clin Interv Aging 2:219–236 27. Dizdaroglu M, Jaruga P, Birincioglu M, Rodriguez H (2002) Freeradical-induced damage to DNA: mechanisms and measurement. Free Rad Bio Med 32:1102–1115 28. Brys M, Nawrocka AD, Miekod E, Zydek C, Foksinski M, Barecki A, Krajewska WM (1997) Zinc and cadmium analysis in human prostate neoplasms. Biol Trace Elem Res 59:145–152 29. Chen YC, Pu YS, Wu HC, Wu TT, Lai MK, Yang CY, Sung FC (2009) Cadmium burden and the risk and phenotype of prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 9:429 30. West DW, Slattery ML, Robison LM, French TK, Mahoney AW (1991) Adult dietary intake and prostate cancer risk in Utah: a case– control study with special emphasis on aggressive tumors. Cancer Causes Control 2:85–94 31. Armstrong BG, Kazantzis G (1985) Prostatic cancer and chronic respiratory and renal disease in British cadmium workers: a case– control study. Br J Ind Med 42:540–545 32. Platz EA, Helzlsouer KJ, Hoffman SC, Morris JS, Baskett CK, Comstock GW (2002) Prediagnostic toenail cadmium and zinc and subsequent prostate cancer risk. Prostate 52:288–296 33. Kazantzis G, Lam TH, Sullivan KR (1988) Mortality of cadmiumexposed workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 14:220–223 34. Sorahan T, Watherhouse JAH (1983) Mortality study of nickel– cadmium battery workers by the method of regression models in life tables. Br J Ind Med 40:293–300 35. Vinceti M, Venturelli M, Sighinolfi C, Trerotoli P, Bonvicini F, Ferrari A, Bianchi G, Serio G, Bergomi M, Vivoli G (2007) Case– control study of toenail cadmium and prostate cancer risk in Italy. Sci Total Environ 373:77–81 36. Salnikow K, Zhitkovich A (2008) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium. Chem Res Toxicol 21:28–44 37. IARC (1990) Chromium, nickel and welding. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, nickel and nickel

Comparative Study of Trace Elements of Prostate Cancer Patients

38.

39.

40.

41.

42.

compounds, vol 49. World Health Organization – International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon Boffetta P (1993) Carcinogenicity of trace elements with reference to evaluations made by the International Agency Research on cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:67–70 Ozmen H, Erulas FA, Karatas F, Cukurovali A, Yalcin O (2006) Comparison of the concentration of trace metals (Ni, Zn, Co, Cu and Se), Fe, vitamins A, C and E, and lipid peroxidation in patients with prostate cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 44:175–179 Guntupalli JN, Padala S, Gummuluri AV, Muktineni PK, Byreddy SR, Sreerama L, Kedarisetti PC, Angalakuduru DP, Satti BR, Venkatathri V, Pullela VB, Gavarasana S (2007) Trace elemental analysis of normal, benign hypertrophic and cancerous tissues of the prostate gland using the particle-induced X-ray emission technique. Eur J Cancer Prev 16:108–115 Siddiqui MKJ, Srivastava S, Mehrotra PK (2002) Environmental exposure to lead as a risk for prostate cancer. Biomed Environ Sci 15:298–305 Pearson GF, Greenway GM (2005) Recent developments in manganese speciation. Trends Anal Chem 24:803–809

57 43. Prasad AS, Sandstead HH, Frederickson C (2010) Vitamin and mineral use and risk of prostate cancer: misleading? Letter to the Editor. Cancer Causes Control 21:1743–1744 44. Kwiatek WM, Banas A, Gajda M, Galka M, Pawlicki B, Falkenberg G, Cichocki T (2005) Cancerous tissues analyzed by SRIXE. J Alloys Compd 401:173–177 45. Lin Y, Caffrey JL, Lin J, Bayliss D, Faramawi MF, Bateson TF, Sonawane B (2013) Increased risk of cancer mortality associated with cadmium exposures in older americans with low zinc intake. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 76:1–15 46. Epstein MM, Kasperzyk JL, Andren O, Giovannucci EL, Wolk A, Hakansson N, Andersson SO, Johansson JE, Fall K, Mucci LA (2011) Dietary zinc and prostate cancer survival in a swedish cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 93:586–593 47. Andersson SO, Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Giovannucci E, Lindgren C, Baron J, Adami HO (1996) Energy, nutrient intake and prostate cancer risk: a population-based case–control study in Sweden. Int J Cancer 68:716–722 48. Zaichick V, Sviridova TV, Zaichick SV (1997) Zinc in the human prostate gland: normal, hyperplastic and cancerous. Int Urol Nephrol 29:565–574

Comparative study of trace elements in blood, scalp hair and nails of prostate cancer patients in relation to healthy donors.

Prostate cancer is the most common fatal cancers in men, and exposure to toxic elements is the most important factor in the aetiology for prostate can...
355KB Sizes 0 Downloads 5 Views