Vol. 178, No. 2, 1991 July 31, 1991
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 480-485
BIOCHEMICAL
Cell-density Dependent Expression of the c-w Gene in Primary Cultured Rat Hepatocytes* Atsushi
Kumatori,
Toshikazu
Nakamural
and Akira
Ichihara
Institute for Enzyme Research, University Tokushima, Tokushima 770 and lDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyusyu University, Fukuoka 812, Japan
of
Received June 7, 1991 SUMMARY: During culture of mature rat hepatocytes as monolayers, c-myc mRNA was found to be expressed transiently within 2 h, decreasing rapidly to the basal level at 10 h. Then its level increased again to over lo-fold the basal level at 24 h, and remained at this high level during culture. The increase of c-myc mRNA in the second phase was shovm by nuclear run-off experiments tobeduetoanincrease of its transcription. The second, but not the first, increase in c-m c expression was inversely proportional to the cell density in cu 35ture. The expression of c-myc mRNA was not affected by various hormones including growth factors. These results indicate that hepatocytes in culture at lower cell density tend to move from the Go phase to the Gl phase, but remain in the Go phase when cultured at high cell density. 0 1991 Academic Press, Inc.
Mature specific partial of
liver
hepatocytes functions
fully,
hepatectomy. functions
cultures
of
insulin,
epidermal
to the
in vivo
medium
rat
but
are
quiescent
they
The complex
proliferate mechanisms
and regeneration
markedly
Moreover
we found
dependent
on cell
that
actively
Additions
factor(EGF)
hepatocyte
growth
in
DNA synthesis
expression
in primary
or hepatocyte DNA synthesis
density[5-81:
in
of mitogens
stimulated
liver after
involved
can be studied
hepatocytes[l-41. growth
and express
of
culture
such as
growth the
cells.
was strictly
was stimulated
*This work was supported by a Grant for Cancer Research from Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. Abbreviations:EGF, epidermal growth factor;TGF-8, transforming growth factor-% ;IL-18, interleukin-18. 0006-291X/91 $1.50 Copyright 0 1991 by Academic Press, Inc. Ail rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
480
factor
more the
Vol.
178, No. 2, 1991
BIOCHEMICAL
at
lower
than
cell
expression
density
of
density
than
mature at
liver
low cell
cell
contact
controls
that
mature
hepatocytes
cell
density,
but
cent
cultures
of
Gl arrest, culture the
rather are
Gl
expression gene liver
is
is
expressed
strictly
in
regulated
in rat
this gene
the
in
early
lower
shift,
stage
cell
of the
by cell
second
phase
of
the
the
expression
high
state
of
primary
the
Go to
changes
in
because
Gl phase[ll
of its
in
from
we show that
hepatocytes,expression the
in
shift
and
As quies-
hepatocytes of
cell-
at
density.
hepatocytes,
Here
that
reciprocally,
we measured
cultured
vivot9,lOl.
suggest
are usually
study
cell
when cultured
mature
for
at high
functions
lines
Go state,
Conversely,
results
Go state at
useful
at
and that
the
cell
the
c-m=
of mature
These
Gl state
than
density.
and mature
established
regeneration
biphasic
was greater
To investigate of the
cultures
functions
are
particularly
state.
cell
density.
the
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
at higher
growth
in
AND BIOPHYSICAL
this
and during in primary c-=
gene is
density.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
used for isolation and culture of Materials --- The materials adult rat hepatocytes were as described before[ll]. The materials used for measurement of transcription were also as reported[l2]. exon 3 of the rat c-w gene(pSmBH; Plasmid pSP65, which contains 830 bp insert), was a gift from Dr. Kenshi Hayashi, National Cancer Center, Tokyo. Isolation and Primary Culture of Adult Rat Hepatocytes --- Adult male Wistar rats, weighing 200 g, were used. Their liver was perfused with collagenase and isolated hepatocytes were cultured in Corning plastic dishes(l0 cm diameter) as described[8]. A few hours after plating the medium supplemented with serum was replaced by medium supplemented with 5 ug/ml aprotinin and 1 nM insulin. Northern Blot Analysis of c-myc --- Samples of about 200 ug of RNA were extracted from lo7 hepatocytes, aliquots of 10 pg were denatured, electrophoresed and hybridiz&d ~~fae;~~~]l~~e;~~~r~~~b~=~~~r~~ describedI81, by the multiprime DNA labeling method[l3], The membrane was then washed, dried in air, and subjected to autoradiography and densitometric scanning for quantification of RNA. Assay of Transcription by the Nuclear, Run-off Method --- Nuclei (lo71 were isolated from cultured hepatocytes and incubated with 0.5 mM NTPS containing 100 uCi of [a-32P]UTP at 25OC for 40 min as described[l2]. The transcribed RNA was extracted by the hot phenol method and hybridized with linearized pSmBH on a nitroThe filter was washed, dried and radioautocellulose filter. The average efficiency of hybridization was 22%. graphed. 481
Vol.
178,
No.
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1991
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION When hepatocytes
were isolated
culture
dishes,
ntially
undetectable(Fig.
5 x lo4
cells/cm’
over
This
the at
l), 2 h,
basal
until
gene at
at
40 h of
Next
cultured
lo4
with
2 ;ri
0
2
4
6
8
C-E
Time 10
markedly
at
the
for density
either
of hepatocyte
after of
isolated
2).
c-myc 3,
gene in
culture
expression
of
range
with
of
15 - 2.5 X
previous
results
growth[5-71.
(h ) 12
14
16
20
24
40
28s ias
Culture
Time
(h)
Biq. 1. Time COUrSe of change in expression of c-w mRBAduring primary culture of adult rat hepatocytes. Isolated hepatocytes were cultured at 5 x 104 cells/cm* in serum-free medium. RNA was extrtimes, acted at the indicated separated by electrophoresis and probe. (A) Radioautograph of the blots. hybridized with c-myc 28s and 18s indicate ribosomal IWAs. (B) Quantification of the blots by densitometry. Values are means for triplicate experiments. 482
the
20 h or 40 h increased
in the
are consistent
20 h.
in transcription, in nuclei
As shown in Fig.
in cell
to a very
expression
liver(Fig.
of
of to
a plateau
mRNA levels
and normal
culture
density-dependency
increased
The increased
expression
These results
Culture
A
after
mRNA level
was due to increase
the
esse-
at a density
reaching
in
initially
to the maximum level
40 h.
density.
decrease
cells/cm2.
showing
least
whether
mRNA by cells
markedly
again,
and plated
culture
decreased
was similar
of
by cell
during c-myc
rats
mRNA was
c-myc
Then it
hepatocytes
we examined
was regulated c-myc
their
culture
as shown by comparison 40-h
but
level.
which
level,
2 h, persisted
from
of
10 h and increased
plateau
c-myc
expression
for
lo-fold
low level
their
from adult
Vol.
178,
No.
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1991
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Fiq. 2. Stimulation of transcription of the c-w gene in adult hepatocytes during culture. (A) Transcription after culture for h. Culture conditions were as for Fig. 1. After 40 h, the nuclei were isolated and transcription of the c-w gene was measured. Transcription in nuclei from normal liver. pSP65 is a control vector.
As we
in the ced the density. ml)
not
expression
of
We found
that
controlled
rig/ml),
pg/ml)
shown).
density-dependent
of mitogens,
presence
IL-lf3(2
gon(0.5
observed
previously
c-myc
whether
mitogens
cultured
hepatocytes
at
insulin(O.1
5% calf
serum,
had no influence
Therefore, entirely
PM),
expression by cell
expression
of the
density.
c-myc
There
are
only influen-
low
EGF(10 rig/ml),
dexamethasone(1
on the
(B)
DNA synthesis
we examined by
rat 40
cell
TGF-(3(1
).IM) and glucaof
gene
c-myc(data seems
several
to
be
recent
20 h 40 h
O312.5 Cell
Density
(X10GL91cm2)
Fiq. 3. Effect of cell density on expression of c-myc mRNA in Cells were cultured at the ifiaicated cell cultured hepatocytes. densities for 20 h and 40 h, then total RNA was extracted and c-Myc mRNA was measured by Northern separated by electrophoresis. blot hybridization analysis as described in Materials and Methods. 28s and 18s indicate ribosomal RNAs. 2.5 Kb (A) Radioautograms. indicates c-z mRNA. (B) Quantitative analysis of results of (A). Values are means for triplicate l , 40 h culture. 0, 20 h culture; experiments. 483
ng/
Vol.
178,
No.
reports
of
but
regulation
the
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1991
c-myc
expression of
expression is
previously.
suppress
expression
of
suppress
stimulated
DNA synthesis
suggest late
is that
these
of c-this
ing
from
their
attachment
to
finding (data
that not
liver
in --
and cultured they
mechanism(s) involve
growth
phase
from
also
present
of
changes
this of
the
was not
cell
that
on cells
culture
in of
is
vivo is
the
expressunknown.
hepatocytes,
affected
result-
and their
supported
by the
by cell
present
that
move from
the
growth
shift
membrane
shown to
findings
phase
--in
are
not
density
at
low levels
hepatocytes
isolated
culture[l7-201.
to various cycle
been
these
explanation
iS likely
density
cell
the
contact
during
results,it
sensitive
of
did
As c-myc
act
2 h of
stress
This
increase
have
transient
after
proteins
low cell
become
first
phase
Several
they
factors
been
and IL-l$
Gl phase[41,
tight
dishes.
transient
vivo
the
has not
hepatocytes[l61.
early
was due to
plastic
at
for
TGF-8
although in
a maximum
release
this
the
density
that
mRNA,
COMMUNICATIONS
hepatocytes[l4,151,
by cell
suppressive
The reason
shown).
From the
where
in
mRNA with
Possibly
in
completed
Gl phase.
ion
c-myc
RESEARCH
cultured
interesting
reported
expression
BIOPHYSICAL
in primary
its It
AND
is
still
Go to
the
Gl phase,
conditions. unknown,
The but
may
and cytoskeleton.
REFERENCES 1. Guillouzo, A. & Guguen-Guillouzo, C. eds (1986) Isolated and Cultured Hepatocytes, John Libbey Eurotext, London/Paris 2. Grunnet, N. & Quistorff, B. eds.(1991) Regulation of Hepatic Function, Munksgaard, Copenhagen G.K. (1990) FASEB J. 4, 176-189 3. Michalopoulos, Lu, X.P., Brenner, D.A., Fey, G.H., Martinez-Conde, 4. Koch, K.S., A. & Leffert, H.L. (1990) In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 26, loll1023 T., Tomita, Y. & Ichihara, A. (1983) J. Biochem. 94, 5. Nakamura, 1029-1035 6. Nakamura, T., Yoshimoto, K., Nakayama, Y., Tomita, Y. & Ichihara, A. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 7229-7233 7. Nakamura, T., Nakayama, Y. & Ichihara, A. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 8056-8058 8. Noda, C., Ohguri, M. & Ichihara, A. (1990) Biochem, Biophys. Res. Commun. 168, 335-342 9. Makino, R., Hayashi, K. & Sugimura, T. (1984) Nature 310., 697698 lO.Thompson, N.L., Mead, J-E., Braun, L., Goyette, M., Shank, P.R. & Fausto, N. (1986) Cancer Res. 46, 3111-3117 484
Vol.
178,
No.
2, 1991
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
ll.Tanaka, K., Sato, M., Tomita, Y. & Ichihara, A. (1978) J. Biothem. 84, 937-946 12.Nawa, K., Nakamura, T., Kumatori, A., Noda, C. & Ichihara, A. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 16883-16888 13.Feinberg, A.P. & Vogelstein, B.A. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 137, 266-267 14.He)hne, M., Becker-Rabbenstein, V., Kahl, G.F. & Taniguchi, H. (1990) FEBS Lett. 273, 219-222 15,Sawada, N. (1989) Exp. Cell Res. 181, 584-588 16.Nakamura, T., Arakaki, R. & Ichihara, A. (1988) Exp. Cell Res. 179, 488-497 17.Kato, S., Aoyama, K., Nakamura, T. & Ichihara, A. (1979) J. Biochem. 86, 1419-1425 18.Nakamura, T., Tomomura, A., Noda, C., Shimoji, M. & Ichihara, A. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 9283-9289 lg.Schetz, E.G., Li, D., Omiecinski, C.J., Muller-Eberhard, U., Kleinman, H.K., Elswick, B. & Guzelian, P.S. (1988) J. Cell. 134, 309-323 Physiol. 20.Emi, Y., Chijiwa, C. & Omura, T. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 9746-9750
485