HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08. Published in final edited form as: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 February ; 53(2): 198–207. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.022.

Caring for Dying Patients in the Nursing Home: Voices From Frontline Nursing Home Staff

Author Manuscript

John G. Cagle, PhD, MSW, Kathleen T. Unroe, MD, MHA, Morgan Bunting, BS, Brittany L. Bernard, BS, and Susan C. Miller, PhD, MBA University of Maryland (J.G.C., M.B.), Baltimore, Maryland; Indiana University Center for Aging Research (K.T.U., B.L.B.), Indianapolis, Indiana; Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (K.T.U., B.L.B.), Indianapolis, Indiana; Brown University School of Public Health (S.C.M.), Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Abstract Context—Nursing homes are an important site for end-of-life care, yet little is known about the perspectives of the frontline staff who provide a majority of this care. Objective—To describe, from the staff perspective, positive/negative experiences related to caring for dying residents. Methods—Qualitative analysis using survey data from staff working in 52 Indiana nursing homes.

Author Manuscript

Results—A total of 707 frontline staff who provide nursing, nurse aide, and social work services responded to open-ended prompts. Study data included responses to open-ended prompts asking participants to describe one positive experience and one negative experience caring for a dying patient. A thematic content analysis was conducted using the constant-comparative method. Respondents were largely female (93%), white (78%), 31–50 years (42%), and 53% had >5 years of nursing home work experience. Experiences were described from three perspectives: 1) firsthand experiences, 2) observed experiences of dying patients, and 3) observed experiences of family members. Selected themes for positive experiences include the following: creating close bonds; good patient care; involvement of hospice; being prepared; and good communication. Selected themes for negative experiences consisted of the following: challenging aspects of care; unacknowledged death; feeling helpless; uncertainty; absent family; painful emotions; and family discord.

Author Manuscript

Conclusion—Findings reveal the richness and many complexities of providing end-of-life care in nursing homes and have implications for improving staff knowledge, coordination of care with hospice, and social support for patients. Keywords Long-term care; hospice; palliative care; person-centered care; quality of dying; death Address correspondence to: John G. Cagle, PhD, MSW, School of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, 3W13, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. [email protected]. Disclosures The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cagle et al.

Page 2

Author Manuscript

Introduction Nearly 1.5 million people reside in nursing homes (NHs) in the U.S.,1 and approximately 30% of deaths among older adults (65+ years) occur within the NH setting.2 Past research has identified a number of important concerns about the quality of care for dying NH residents including inconsistent assessment and treatment of pain,3 lack of attention to resident quality of life,4 and missed opportunities for patient-centered decision making.5 The need for high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care in NHs is projected to increase in lock step with the fast growing number of older adults in the U.S.6,7

Author Manuscript

NHs rely on frontline NH staff to provide hands-on care to patients. Previous studies suggest that NH staff may not be properly trained and supported to care for dying patients.8,9 The traditional model of NH care focuses on rehabilitation and restoration.10 However, when a patient with life-threatening illness nears EOL, staff must often make a difficult shift from a restorative approach to a model more consistent with palliative care.10,11 Good communication, comprehensive training in EOL care, and staff support may help NH staff facilitate this shift.12–14 In addition to staff communication, psychosocial support7 and previous experience with death and dying13 may also influence staff members’ comfort level with providing EOL care.

Author Manuscript

There has been tremendous growth in the number of external hospice agencies providing services to dying NH patients in the U.S.15 However, among NH staff, there are mixed attitudes and receptivity regarding the value of hospice services in the NH.9 Dedicated investigation focusing on NH staff attitudes toward hospice is needed to understand the disconnect between some NH and hospice staff. Unroe et al. (2014) quantitatively analyzed NH staff perceptions about hospice and found that the majority viewed hospice as generally positive, but more beneficial for patients and families than for the NH staff themselves. The study also found that staff frequently reported poor communication between NH and hospice staff, which could contribute to poorly coordinated care,16 and ultimately lower the quality of care for dying patients.

Author Manuscript

Understanding NH staff perceptions about death and dying is critical to better understand and address the many challenges of providing high-quality EOL care in the NH environment. Although a substantial proportion of U.S. deaths occur in NHs, few studies have qualitatively explored frontline staff perceptions about EOL experiences in the NH and the various factors that contribute to quality of dying for residents. This study addresses this knowledge gap. As part of a larger study examining perceptions of staff toward palliative care and hospice,16 we conducted a qualitative content analysis to identify recurring themes related to positive and negative descriptions of experiences caring for dying patients.

Methods Design This qualitative study used open-ended survey data from frontline NH staff—including registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), certified nursing assistants

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 3

Author Manuscript

(CNAs), and social workers (SWs) —working in 52 facilities from two large NH chains in Indiana. Although survey items were identical, one chain was given hardcopies during a staff meeting while the other chain completed the same survey items using Survey Monkey, an online survey tool. Study procedures were approved by the Indiana University IRB. Measures Survey measures asked about basic demographic information; general knowledge, attitudes and opinions about EOL care in the NH; and to describe positive and negative experiences caring for a dying patient. Specifically, for this study, we focused on responses to the following two prompts: 1.

Describe a POSITIVE experience taking care of a dying patient.

2.

Describe a NEGATIVE experience taking care of a dying patient.

Author Manuscript

Analysis Sample characteristics were summarized using frequencies and percentages. The survey response rate was computed based on the number of completed surveys versus the total number of staff given an opportunity to complete the survey. Open-ended responses were initially coded for thematic content by the primary author and a working codebook was developed. The constant-comparative method17 was used to identify recurrent/emergent themes within the data. Raw data were unitized using open coding. Coded excerpts with similar themes were grouped together. After the initial round of coding and categorization, findings were reviewed by Drs. Cagle and Unroe for corroboration and peer oversight.

Author Manuscript

Responses from a subsample of randomly selected cases (N = 39, 5%) were reviewed and independently coded by three members (K. U., B. B., and M. B) of the interdisciplinary (medicine, social work, and gerontology) research team with >80% concordance. The team resolved conflicting themes/categorizations and revised the codebook accordingly. Direct quotes that encapsulated identified themes are presented as exemplars. In particular, we selected quotes that presented either multiple themes or especially rich detail about the concepts being described. All identifying content was changed or removed to preserve respondent anonymity. To ensure validity of results, preliminary themes and subthemes were reviewed and critiqued by a subsample of 15 staff members (four RNs, four LPNs, five CNAs, and two SWs) from four of the participating facilities, two from each chain.

Results Author Manuscript

As summarized in Table 1, among the 707 participants who responded to the open-ended prompts, the majority were female (93%), white (78%), and 31–50 years old (42%). Respondents were largely frontline clinical staff consisting of CNAs (40%), LPNs (30%), RNs (15%), and SWs (4%). The sample was relatively seasoned as 53% had >5 years of NH experience. A minority (4.6%) of respondents reported they had not had a negative experience when caring for a dying patient. Overall, there were slightly more responses to the positive prompt (92.8%) compared to the negative prompt (86.4%). The full survey response rate was 71%.

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 4

Author Manuscript

Staff members described experiences from one of three perspectives: 1) first-hand accounts experienced by the respondent herself/himself (i.e., the experience was positive/negative for the staff member), 2) observed experiences of dying patients (i.e., the staff member considered the experience positive/negative for the patient), and 3) observed experiences of family members (i.e., the staff member viewed the experience as positive/negative for the family). Results are presented separately based on these three perspectives. Figures 1 and 2 provide a complete summary of identified themes and subthemes stratified by perspective. Positive Experiences

Author Manuscript

First-Hand Positive Experiences—When staff members described a positive experience they had while caring for a dying patient, eight themes emerged (Fig. 1, column 1): honored to provide EOL care; creating close bonds, that is, “being like family”; learning something; feeling appreciated; making a difference; supportive hospice involvement; being prepared (intellectually, emotionally, and spiritually); and good communication. One response from a CNA exemplified a number of these themes, including feeling honored, creating close bonds, learning something, and feeling appreciated: It is an honor to be the person taking care of a dying resident. Not only do you become closer with the patient’s family, but you also learn a lot about the past. Also it is about the only time a CNA feels appreciated and noticed. The families appreciate what we do!—CNA Multiple staff members reported having learned either new clinical knowledge or carerelated skills while caring for a dying person. As one respondent phrased it:

Author Manuscript

I learned a lot about how to simultaneously bring physical comfort to the dying person and emotional comfort to the family […] it was ultimately a positive experience because I truly knew we did everything in our power to make the resident’s final moments as comfortable as possible.—RN Knowing that the care being provided had a beneficial impact on the dying patient (i.e., making a difference) was a recurring theme. Staff members reported feeling that they helped by being responsive to the patient’s need for supportive care by listening, providing a calming physical touch and presence, or “going the extra mile.” One staff member noted that acts of compassion can have a significant and beneficial impact on patient/family perceptions. I’ve learned that the smallest act of kindness is greatly observed and needed by family and the residents. I’ve learned how to show compassion under pressure and fear.—CNA

Author Manuscript

When describing positive EOL care experiences, respondents frequently mentioned hospice. An LPN respondent discussed how she was grateful for hospice involvement because dying patients require specialized attention beyond what NH staff members can routinely provide. I’m always happy when hospice steps in and takes some of the workload off the nurse. Dying patients need one-on-one care and sometimes that can be hard when you have other residents.—LPN

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 5

Author Manuscript

Being able to communicate well with patients, families, and other care providers was another prevailing positive theme mentioned by staff. In particular, open and thorough communication was cited as important to facilitate care coordination (e.g., with physicians, hospice providers) and to educate patients/families about what to expect at EOL. As one RN shared: It was a positive experience to offer comfort and education to the family when they had fears about pain medications being addictive, and questions about ‘what happens next.’ It is a comfort to me, as well as the patient and family, to provide end of life care.—RN

Author Manuscript

Positive Experiences Observed in Dying Patients—When respondents described positive dying experiences from the perspective of the patient, five major themes were identified (Fig. 1, column 2): received good care; not being alone; suffering ended with death; hospice involved; and being prepared (physically, intellectually, and emotionally). Staff consistently remarked that it is critical for NH patients to receive good care at EOL. Good care included managing pain and symptoms (ensuring patients are “at peace”), preserving dignity and autonomy, giving careful attention to hygiene and basic needs, and maintaining a calm, secure environment. One staff member summarized several of these points in her response: Keeping the patient comfortable—maintaining family involvement. Being there for family support. Maintaining the patient’s dignity—RN. Good care was often provided by, or in concert with, hospice services:

Author Manuscript

This particular patient was extremely grateful to hospice when they were able to get her pain at a sustainable level. The joy in her face from being in less pain made it a little easier for the family. The family was able to spend her last days with her in peace.—LPN Being intellectually, emotionally, and spiritually prepared also emerged as an important theme. One staff member shared how residents’ awareness and acceptance that they are dying can help to make the experience a positive one: When the resident themselves are at peace and are ready to pass. I had a resident who was very excited to meet her Lord. [She] would joke and say ‘Dang-it, I woke up again’ with a laugh.—Job Role Unspecified Also related to patients being emotionally/intellectually prepared for death and suffering that ends with death, one CNA shared an anecdote:

Author Manuscript

There was a man who was ready to die and his family had come to terms with his death. The family had been prepared for his death, and he had too, so it was not a sad experience. It was sad he was dying but it was beautiful that the family and the patient expected it. Death is something that will happen to all of us at one point in time and it is nice to see a person ready to face what we all one day will with open arms and willingness. This man lived a full happy life with a beautiful woman who had passed away a few years before and he was ready to be with her. Even his last day he talked of a happy life and better times and the pain he was in was horrible— J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 6

Author Manuscript

he was ready to go to a better place. If every person could be comforted like this man and his family the world and death would not be so scary.—CNA Related to being prepared, multiple staff respondents mentioned that, for patients, being able to say “goodbye” was an important factor at the EOL. For example, an SW respondent stated: Recently a long term resident elected hospice services at the hospital but wanted to ‘come home’ to the facility to pass away. He was able to say his goodbyes to staff, family, and friends before he passed and he and his family were at peace with the process.—SW

Author Manuscript

Positive Experiences Observed in Families—Staff members also described positive aspects of EOL care in relation to family members. From this perspective, six core themes were identified (Fig. 1, column 3): being supported (emotionally and regarding decisions); involved (e.g., increased visits); knowing their loved one was free from pain; personhood/ humanity acknowledged (by sharing stories, smiling, and laughing); hospice involvement; and being prepared (e.g., family informed of prognosis and expected decline). One staff member recounted a story illustrating the importance of family presence at the EOL, and the benefits of supporting families, both adults, and children, during their visits to see the patient in the facility.

Author Manuscript

We had a resident that was passing and there were family and small kids here in their room. It was getting late. We had just cleaned up, changed and repositioned the resident and tried to make him comfortable. After that we got refreshments for the family and I made a tent out of blankets over the back of a recliner and made an area for the kids to lay down and watch movies to keep them happy and occupied in the time of stress for the family. They all liked it and it helped the parents be able to focus on their family member passing.—CNA Negative Experiences

Author Manuscript

First-Hand Negative Experiences—When describing negative experiences caring for dying patients from their own perspective, staff member responses covered 12 themes (see Fig. 2, column 1): witnessing distressing signs and symptoms; feeling helpless; being the target of resident/family/provider criticism; unacknowledged death (i.e., patient death either not properly memorialized or altogether ignored); not being present for the patient; challenging care; bad timing (e.g., unexpected death); hospice (involvement or noninvolvement); uncertainty; poor or challenging communication; painful emotions; and family discord. Staff members were personally troubled when they witnessed distressing signs and symptoms, such as dying patients moaning in apparent discomfort. Others found physical deterioration (i.e., “withering”) upsetting. Distressing signs and symptoms also included affective responses such as seeing patients struggle with emotional pain or fear. A few respondents noted that watching a patient exsanguinate, or witnessing the death itself (i.e., “seeing last breath”), was especially disturbing. One LPN described feeling helpless while caring for a resident who had clear and observable signs of discomfort because a contentious family refused treatment:

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 7

Author Manuscript

Feeling like ‘my hands are tied’ during times when there are families in conflict over treatment or families are just not wanting anything done period. I had a family that did not want their mom given morphine despite she had every sign and symptom of pain, they refused to let us treat her. I talked to them until I cried. It was no use, they said ‘she is out of it—she probably is not in pain.’—LPN Staff members routinely reported being the target of resident, family, or provider anger, blame, and rudeness. In reference to being a target of undeserved criticism, one CNA shared: When a patient that is clearly passing soon has family that become irrational and try to blame us for what is happening and not understanding why we cannot stop the inevitable.—CNA

Author Manuscript

Family discord was observed by several respondents as part of their negative experience, particularly when disagreements result in patient care inconsistent with patient preferences. One LPN encompassed these observations by reporting: When part of the family members want to change the care from what the resident had requested.—LPN One respondent discussed how witnessing a protracted dying process or seeing residents face death alone was a negative experience: The worst experience for me is when they hang on for months and just wither away. It breaks my heart. Also, when they die with no family or anyone present—that is the ultimate worst for me. I do not think anyone deserves to die alone.—CNA

Author Manuscript

Descriptions of painful emotions frequently accompanied respondent descriptions of negative experiences. These included instances of seeing family members in emotional pain, getting too attached to patients, profound “heartache” and grief, and difficulties maintaining an emotional distance. As one CNA shared, the most difficult part of the experience for her was the grief and emotional pain: The hardest part of taking care of a dying resident is the heartache that follows. We grow attached to people, and sometimes it can cause grief.—CNA

Author Manuscript

Although most respondents described hospice support favorably, some recounted frustration and disappointment when coordinating care with hospice agencies. A few reported that hospice providers “take over” patient care, although NH staff want to remain involved—and are capable of doing so. Others reported having questions about overlapping roles with hospice providers. The importance of good communication between hospice and NH was a recurring theme, as well as the importance of smooth care coordination and being responsive to patient/family needs in a timely manner. As one LPN shared: Many times the bringing together of outside forces can make the care of the patient difficult. Even though hospice is [available] 24/7-often you have to wait for a phone call to be returned, medications to be dropped off (when the patient is in need), or an order from a physician who may not always be available. As well as the fact of having to go through hospice in order to obtain all of this can cause delay in the care of a dying person, which becomes frustrating.—LPN

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 8

Author Manuscript

Negative Experiences Observed in Dying Patients—When staff members described negative experiences they had witnessed among dying residents, nine themes were identified (Fig. 2, column 2): being alone (e.g., absent family); privacy ignored; suffering (physical/ emotional); receiving suboptimal care; untimely death (e.g., too young); hospice (noninvolvement or unresponsive); uncertainty (e.g., care preferences unknown); painful emotions; and family discord. Respondents echoed a desire for patients to not be alone when dying; and that family members should be present and involved. Watching a patient suffer in physical, emotional, or spiritual distress was often mentioned when describing negative experiences. Pain, dyspnea, agitation, and delirium, in particular, were cited as contributors to physical suffering. One LPN shared the following story, an example of spiritual or existential suffering:

Author Manuscript

My resident fought death, yelling and cursing as he was passing. He was screaming and had the look of horror on his face. I’ve never forgotten this resident as he often cursed God for the way his life turned out.—LPN Multiple respondents shared their observations about how suboptimal care can contribute to an adverse dying experience including, instances when the patient was not checked frequently enough, was left wet, or received poor oral care. Suboptimal care also included undertreatment (e.g., oxygen or pain medicine was needed, but not provided) and overtreatment. Examples of overtreatment included unnecessary nutrition and hydration, repeated hospitalizations, and futile restorative care in the patient’s last days.

Author Manuscript

Family discord also emerged as an important theme. When disagreements center around treatment options, family disputes can create uncertainty about the current course of treatment, dilemmas for staff, and care regimens that conflict with the patient’s needs or preferences. An SW described how family discord ignoring a patient’s treatment preferences and witnessing distressing symptoms created a negative experience for everyone involved in the situation: When a resident was dying and family were arguing over whether or not to place a feeding tube. When the resident was alert, before he was in the process of dying, he had made it clear that he did not want a feeding tube. Family members could not agree and one family member finally had a feeding tube placed. It was difficult to watch the pain and anxiety it caused to all involved.—SW

Author Manuscript

Conflict between family members can also distract from the supportive care that the patient needs. An LPN shared a case where family seemed more interested in divvying up the patient’s possessions, rather than being present for her in her final dying moments. The patient was taking her last breaths and the family was fighting in the patient’s room over her belongings.—LPN Nonenrollment in hospice, or absence of hospice staff when dying residents have distressing symptoms such as dyspnea and fear/anxiety, was also viewed to have a detrimental impact on the dying experience. An LPN reported:

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 9

Author Manuscript

When an alert patient on hospice had a sudden condition change. She was struggling to breathe and knew that she was dying. She was fearful and it was difficult to calm or comfort her. She died before hospice services were able to make it to the facility.—LPN

Author Manuscript

In general, the absence of hospice services contributed to negative perceptions of the resident’s dying experience. In some cases, staff members reported that residents—as well as their family members—could have benefited from hospice support, but for various reasons, such as receiving skilled care, residents did not receive its services before death. (Note: skilled care is daily care, typically rehabilitative, directed by a skilled nurse or therapy specialist. Currently, the Medicare Hospice Benefit cannot be used concurrently with the Medicare Skilled Nursing Benefit.)18–20 One LPN wrote about how reluctance to enroll in hospice services, a difficult dying process, coupled with family discord led to a poor dying experience. The family was very difficult and refused hospice services. The resident had a very slow agonizing death. The family was constantly fighting amongst themselves. It was just a terrible atmosphere and I believe the resident suffered because of it.— LPN

Author Manuscript

Negative Experiences Observed in Families—When staff respondents described negative experiences, a number of observed family experiences were reported. In all, six themes were identified from this perspective (Fig. 2, column 3): resistance to EOL care; unprepared/denial; seeing resident suffer; bad timing (e.g., unable to say “goodbye”); refusing hospice care; painful emotions; and family discord. One LPN reported seeing families who were distraught, unprepared and in need of basic education about what to expect during the dying process: Family is sometimes not prepared. I believe some families could use more education on the dying process. They are often more distressed than the patient.— LPN Related to being unprepared and having unrealistic expectations, another respondent simply remarked: When family members expect miracles.—LPN

Discussion

Author Manuscript

Our study explored the perspectives of hundreds of NH staff, providing insights into their experiences at the bedside of dying residents. Staff described caring for NH residents at the EOL from their own perspective, including sources of distress or empowerment, as well as their observations of the experiences of residents and families. Staff members reported feeling gratified to provide EOL care and that their actions had positive impacts, particularly when they felt supported to give good care. In contrast, helplessness in the face of suffering, confusion, communication problems, and a lack of support were reported to contribute to staff distress. When NH staff observed negative EOL experiences among residents and family members, they recounted unrelieved suffering, lack of preparation/acceptance, and

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 10

Author Manuscript

family discord. In contrast, residents and families with positive experiences at the EOL were seen to be “at peace,” well cared for, prepared and having strong family support. Drawing from these rich themes, we focus our discussion on three key points, which represent actionable areas of improvement: potential targets for staff education and training; the need for consistent coordination with hospice providers; and opportunities to improve social support for patients. Targets for Staff Education/Training

Author Manuscript

Given that >25% of U.S. deaths annually occur in NHs, it is imperative that frontline workers are given the training and support they need to deliver good, person-centered care at the EOL. Frontline staff consistently have lower levels of knowledge about EOL issues when compared to knowledge about physical and psychological domains of care—and the majority of staff would welcome additional education on palliative and EOL care.16 A synthesis of our qualitative findings provides potential targets for staff education on best practices for EOL care, including 1) knowledge about the dying process, 2) assessment and management of symptoms, 3) an overview of family dynamics and common affective responses, 4) strategies to facilitate communication between staff, other providers, residents, and families, 5) accurate knowledge about hospice and palliative care, 6) a review of ethical and practical dilemmas, and guidance for what to do in such situations, 7) means to preserve patient dignity, and 8) education on self-care. NH staff cope with a myriad of challenges, including compound losses, being the target of family anger and unwarranted criticism, high levels of stress and burnout, and personal discomfort with providing care to dying patients.21–23 Improved staff coping may not only help them provide better care but also reduce staff burnout and high rates of turnover in NHs.21,23

Author Manuscript

Need for Consistent Coordination With Hospice Providers

Author Manuscript

Staff comments were generally positive about involving hospice in the care of dying NH patients. Participants reported, for example, that hospice provides a welcomed layer of extra support, needed expertise in pain and symptom management, and helpful bereavement care for families. Previous studies have consistently found that hospice in the NH is linked with improved EOL outcomes (e.g., better symptom management, improved communication, and greater family satisfaction with care).24–26 However, in our study, staff reported that residents were too often not enrolled in hospice and cited instances where they believe this resulted in a resident’s undue suffering. Furthermore, they reported that residents forgo hospice enrollment for a range of reasons. In some cases, family members declined to enroll residents in hospice although the resident was eligible. In other cases, the dying resident was receiving skilled nursing care, which cannot be provided concurrently with hospice. Because the Hospice Medicare Benefit does not pay for room-and-board, unlike the Skilled Nursing Benefit and Medicaid, enrolling in hospice services may be a financial burden for some families. Medical directors and primary care providers, in particular, have a crucial role to play in identifying hospice eligible residents and facilitating timely referral for services, as well as promoting optimal coordination of care between the NH and hospice provider. In addition to previously mentioned, when residents were enrolled in hospice, respondents shared a number of noteworthy frustrations when working with hospice providers. These

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 11

Author Manuscript

findings are congruent with quantitative findings from this sample,16 whereby a majority of staff viewed hospice in the NH favorably, while significantly fewer reported favorable ratings about care coordination at the EOL. Drawing from multiple themes identified in our qualitative findings and building from an existing model for NH-hospice collaboration,27 to avoid potential lapses in care coordination when hospice is involved, providers may benefit by trying the following strategies: 1) promote a sense of “joint ownership” over patient care, 2) clearly articulate roles, potential role overlap, and delineation of care responsibilities, and 3) maintain open and reliable channels of communication, particularly after hours. Opportunities to Improve Social Support for Patients

Author Manuscript

Numerous respondents emphasized the importance of social support at the EOL. For example, dying alone or without family support were themes reported to contribute to a negative experience. Providing dying patients with a supportive presence could be facilitated through greater involvement of family members, an expansion of visitation hours, or asking trained volunteers or community members to sit with a patient in their final days or hours. The desire to have someone at the bedside in one’s final moments of life likely varies from person to person.28 Future research should explore the link between social support at the very EOL and the quality of dying and death. In this regard, some promising efforts to improve supportive EOL care in long-term care are already underway (e.g., establishing guidelines for best practice for EOL care in NHs that include strategies for involving families in resident care and decision making) in many states including Colorado, California, and Missouri.29–31 Additionally, models of care like the Green House approach32 and the culture change movement in NHs33 with their emphasis on person-centered care, promoting family involvement, and enhancing quality of life have demonstrated successful ways of delivering supportive care, including needed social support, to residents nearing death.

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Findings should be considered within the context of the study limitations. Our data were obtained from two NH chains in one state; thus, our findings may have limited generalizability to the larger population of NH staff. However, the analyses reflect responses from over 700 staff from rural, suburban, and urban settings. Staff members also provided their perspectives as part of a self-reported survey—thus, they were not asked follow-up questions that would have been possible in an interview or focus group format to obtain greater detail. Additionally, it is important to acknowledge that the perspectives provided here came exclusively from NH staff members—and not patients or family members. Thus perceptions about good and bad dying experiences for patients and families were based on entirely subjective observations from the staff members’ points of view. Future research should evaluate whether patients and family members themselves describe similar attributes about the dying experience.

Conclusion The narratives provided by frontline NH staff paint a rich portrait of what it is like to work with dying patients in NHs and their families. Our data illustrate the profound and beneficial impact that staff members report having on the lives of residents with life-limiting illness— and, related to this, how staff members themselves are affected, both positively and

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 12

Author Manuscript

negatively, by their encounters when caring for dying patients. Staff members can, and do, form close affectionate ties with patients and families. In doing so, they also grieve when patients die and struggle to cope with multiple losses while on the job. Indeed, this is the often unseen, human side of working with dying patients in the NH.

Author Manuscript

Findings reported here add to our conceptual understanding about quality of dying in the NH from the perspective of frontline staff providing hands-on care. Although we provide novel data from a large sample of seasoned staff members about their perceptions of positive and negative EOL care experiences, our findings are only one step toward describing these rich and complex interactions. For example, future research can examine the prevalence of the issues and experiences identified here, as well as explore which are most important to residents, families, and NH staff. Although many staff members described positive and personally edifying aspects of working with dying patients and their families, opportunities for improving staff knowledge, care coordination with hospice providers, communication, and patient support were also identified.

Acknowledgments This study was supported by Junior Faculty Career Development Awards from the National Palliative Care Research Center (John G. Cagle and Kathleen T. Unroe) and the National Institute on Aging, United States grant K24 AG024078 (Kathleen T. Unroe). The team acknowledges M.E. Dennis in the preparation of data for the article.

References

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

1. Center for Disease Control. Nursing home care. 2015. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/ nursing-home-care.htm. Accessed October 28, 2015 2. Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Miller SC, Mor V. A national study of the location of death for older persons with dementia. Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53:299–305. 3. Herr K. Pain assessment strategies in older patients. Pain. 2011; 12:S3–S13. 4. Forbes-Thompson S, Gessert CE. End of life in nursing homes: connections between structure, process, and outcomes. J Palliat Med. 2005; 8:545–555. [PubMed: 15992196] 5. Winzelberg GS, Hanson LC, Tulsky JA. Beyond autonomy: diversifying end of life decision making approaches to serve patients and families. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53:1046–1050. [PubMed: 15935032] 6. Froggat K, Payne S. A survey of end-of-life care in care homes: issues of definition and practice. Health Soc Care Community. 2006; 14:341–348. [PubMed: 16787485] 7. Ersek M, Wilson SA. The challenges and opportunities in providing end-of-life care in nursing homes. J Palliat Med. 2003; 6:45–57. [PubMed: 12710575] 8. Wittaker E, Kernohan W, Hasson F, Howard V, McLaughlin D. The palliative care education needs of nursing home staff. Nurs Educ Today. 2006; 26:501–510. 9. Stillman D, Strumpf N, Capezuti E, Tuch H. Staff perceptions concerning barriers and facilitator to end-of-life care in the nursing home. Geriatr Nurs. 2005; 26:259–264. [PubMed: 16109300] 10. Thompson S, Oliver DP. A new model for long-term care: balancing palliative and restorative care delivery. Hous Elderly. 2008; 22:169–194. 11. Waldrop DP, Nyquist K. The transition from routine care to end-of-life care in a nursing home: exploring staff perspectives. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011; 12:114–120. [PubMed: 21266287] 12. Zheng NT, Temkin-Greener H. End-of-life care in nursing homes: the importance of CNA staff communication. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010; 11:494–499. [PubMed: 20816337] 13. Bailey C, Murphy R, Porock D. Professional tears: developing emotional intelligence around death and dying in emergency work. J Clin Nurs. 2011; 20:3364–3372. [PubMed: 22017523]

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 13

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

14. Keene EA, Hutton N, Hall B, Rushton C. Bereavement debriefing sessions: an intervention to support health care professionals in managing their grief after the death of a patient. Pediatr Nurs. 2010; 36:185–189. [PubMed: 20860257] 15. Miller SC, Lima J, Gozalo PL, Mor V. The growth of hospice care in US nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58:1481–1488. [PubMed: 20646101] 16. Unroe KT, Cagle JG, Dennis ME, Lane KA, Callahan CM, Miller SC. Hospice in the nursing home: perspectives of front line nursing home staff. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014; 15:881–884. [PubMed: 25239013] 17. Corbin JM, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol. 1990; 13:3–21. 18. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Benefit Policy Manual: Chapter 9: Coverage of hospice services under hospital insurance website. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/ Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/bp102c09.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2016 19. Aragon K, Covinsky K, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Flint L, Smith AK. Use of the Medicare posthospitalization skilled nursing benefit in the last 6 months of life. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172:1573–1579. [PubMed: 23026981] 20. Miller SC, Lima J, Looze J, Mitchell SL. Dying in U.S. nursing homes with advanced dementia: how does health-care use differ for residents with versus without end-of-life Medicare skilled nursing facility care? J Palliat Med. 2012; 15:43–50. [PubMed: 22175816] 21. Westermann C, Kozak A, Harling M, Nienhaus A. Burnout intervention studies for inpatient elderly care nursing staff: systematic literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014; 51:63–71. [PubMed: 23273537] 22. Woodhead EL, Northrop L, Edelstein B. Stress, social support, and burnout among long-term care nursing staff. J Appl Gerontol. 2016; 35:84–105. [PubMed: 25098251] 23. Anderson KA, Ewen HH. Death in the nursing home: an examination of grief and well-being in nursing assistants. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2011; 4:87–94. [PubMed: 20669864] 24. Temkin-Greener H, Zheng NT, Mukamel DB. Rural-urban differences in end-of-life nursing home care: facility and environmental factors. Gerontologist. 2012; 52:335–344. [PubMed: 22230492] 25. Ersek M, Carpenter JG. Geriatric palliative care in long-term care settings with a focus on nursing homes. J Palliat Med. 2013; 16:1180–1187. [PubMed: 23984636] 26. Zheng NT, Mukamel DB, Friedman B, Caprio TV, Temkin-Greener H. The effect of hospice on hospitalizations of nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015; 16:155–159. [PubMed: 25304181] 27. Miller SC. A model for successful nursing home-hospice partnerships. J Palliat Med. 2010; 13:525–533. [PubMed: 20377497] 28. Kellehear A. Dying old—and preferably alone? Agency, resistance and dissent at the end of life. Int J Ageing Late Life. 2009; 4:5–21. 29. The Center for Improving Value in Health Care. Palliative care best practices: A guide for longterm care and hospice. Denver, CO: The Center for Improving Value in Health Care; 2012. Available at: http://lifequalityinstitute.org/newbuild/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Palliative-CareBest-Practices-A-guide-for-Long-Term-Care-and-Hospice.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2016 30. Coalition for Compassionate Care of California. CARE recommendations: Steps and tools to implement palliative care in nursing homes. Oakland, California: Coalition for Compassionate Care of California; Available at: http://coalitionccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ CARE_Recommendations_Final.pdf. Published February 2010. Updated July 2015. Accessed November 23, 2015 31. Missouri End of Life Coalition’s End of Life in the Nursing Home Task Force. Guidelines for endof-life care in long-term care facilities—with emphasis on developing palliative care goals. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Division of Senior Services and Regulation; 2003. Available at: http://health.mo.gov/safety/showmelongtermcare/pdf/ EndofLifeManual.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2016 32. Zimmerman NT, Bowers BJ, Cohen LW, Grabowski DC, Horn SD, Kemper P. New evidence on the green house model of nursing home care: synthesis of findings and implications for policy, practice, and research. Health Serv Res. 2016; 51:475–496. [PubMed: 26708381]

J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 14

Author Manuscript

33. Miller SC, Miller E, Hye-Young J, Sterns S, Clark M, Mor V. Nursing home organizational change: the “culture change” movement as viewed by long-term care specialists. Med Res Rev. 2010; 64:65S–81S.

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 15

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Fig. 1.

Qualitative themes: nursing home staff’s reports of positive experiences caring for dying patients. EOL = end-of-life.

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 16

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Fig. 2.

Qualitative themes: nursing home staff’s reports of negative experiences caring for dying patients. EOL = end-of-life.

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript J Pain Symptom Manage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 June 08.

Cagle et al.

Page 17

Table 1

Author Manuscript

Characteristics of Nursing Home Staff Who Provided Qualitative Responses (N = 707) Total Samplea, n (%)

Characteristic Age 18–30

259 (36.6)

31–50

295 (41.7)

51+

138 (19.5)

Missing

15 (2.1)

Gender Female

660 (93.4)

Male

33 (4.7)

Missing

14 (2.0)

Race/ethnicity

Author Manuscript

White

551 (77.9)

Black

103 (14.6)

Hispanic

16 (2.3)

Other

18 (2.6)

Missing

19 (2.7)

Position CNA

282 (39.9)

LPN

211 (29.8)

RN

107 (15.1)

SW

27 (3.8)

Other

63 (8.9)

Missing

17 (2.4)

Author Manuscript

Work experience in NHs

Caring for Dying Patients in the Nursing Home: Voices From Frontline Nursing Home Staff.

Nursing homes are an important site for end-of-life care, yet little is known about the perspectives of the frontline staff who provide a majority of ...
261KB Sizes 1 Downloads 10 Views