BCG-associated heterologous immunity, a historical perspective: intervention studies in animal models of infectious diseases
CORRIGENDUM
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2015; 109: 287 doi:10.1093/trstmh/trv021
Bridget Freyne, Arnaud Marchant and Nigel Curtis Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2015; 109: 52–61
Page 54, Table 1: first row, study by Dubos et al, the population should read ‘Mice 4 weeks Male or Female’; eighth row, study by Civil et al, the population should read ‘Mice 18–22 g Female’. Page 59: the first sentence of the Conclusions should be cited as reference 1. Page 60, Table 4: study by Parra, the results should read ‘At 2 months post BCG’. We apologise for these errors and any inconvenience caused.
# The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
287
Downloaded from http://trstmh.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on November 2, 2015
The authors regret that some errors were found in their paper. Page 53: second column, line 4, should read ‘infection in mice’ not ‘infection in neonatal mice’; second column, line 9/10, should read ‘mice’ not ‘adult mice’; second column, line 12, should read ‘mice’ not ‘adult mice’; second column, line 13, the sentence ‘Despite the different modes of administration of BCG in these two studies, it is interesting that no protective effect was found in adult mice whereas an overwhelmingly positive effect was observed in neonatal mice’ should read ‘These studies differ with respect to both the dose and the mode of administration of BCG.’
CORRIGENDUM
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2015; 109: 287 doi:10.1093/trstmh/trv021
Bridget Freyne, Arnaud Marchant and Nigel Curtis Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2015; 109: 52–61
Page 54, Table 1: first row, study by Dubos et al, the population should read ‘Mice 4 weeks Male or Female’; eighth row, study by Civil et al, the population should read ‘Mice 18–22 g Female’. Page 59: the first sentence of the Conclusions should be cited as reference 1. Page 60, Table 4: study by Parra, the results should read ‘At 2 months post BCG’. We apologise for these errors and any inconvenience caused.
# The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
287
Downloaded from http://trstmh.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on November 2, 2015
The authors regret that some errors were found in their paper. Page 53: second column, line 4, should read ‘infection in mice’ not ‘infection in neonatal mice’; second column, line 9/10, should read ‘mice’ not ‘adult mice’; second column, line 12, should read ‘mice’ not ‘adult mice’; second column, line 13, the sentence ‘Despite the different modes of administration of BCG in these two studies, it is interesting that no protective effect was found in adult mice whereas an overwhelmingly positive effect was observed in neonatal mice’ should read ‘These studies differ with respect to both the dose and the mode of administration of BCG.’
