TECHNICAL RESPONSE



ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE

Response to Comment on “Missing gas-phase source of HONO inferred from Zeppelin measurements in the troposphere” Xin Li,1* Franz Rohrer,1* Andreas Hofzumahaus,1 Theo Brauers,1† Rolf Häseler,1 Birger Bohn,1 Sebastian Broch,1 Hendrik Fuchs,1 Sebastian Gomm,1 Frank Holland,1 Julia Jäger,1 Jennifer Kaiser,2 Frank N. Keutsch,2‡ Insa Lohse,1 Keding Lu,1§ Ralf Tillmann,1 Robert Wegener,1 Glenn M. Wolfe,2|| Thomas F. Mentel,1 Astrid Kiendler-Scharr,1 Andreas Wahner1 Ye et al. have determined a maximum nitrous acid (HONO) yield of 3% for the reaction HO2·H2O + NO2, which is much lower than the yield used in our work. This finding, however, does not affect our main result that HONO in the investigated Po Valley region is mainly from a gas-phase source that consumes nitrogen oxides.

T

he self-cleansing capacity of the atmosphere is largely dependent on the concentration level of hydroxyl radicals (OH) (1). Nitrous acid (HONO) is an important precursor of OH in the troposphere (2–4). Based on observations of HONO and its budget in the Po Valley region in Italy, we concluded that HONO formation in a sunlit layer separated from the ground surface is from a gas-phase source consuming nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) and potentially hydrogen oxide (HOx = OH + HO2) radicals (5). In our work, we proposed that the reaction HO2⋅H2O + NO2 could be the HONO source if its HONO yield was 100%. Based on airborne observations in the United States, Ye et al. (6) determined an upper limit of 3% for the HONO yield in the reaction HO2⋅H2O + NO2, much less than necessary to explain our HONO observations. Ye et al. therefore imply that other HONO sources are active. As an example, they suggest photolysis of particulate nitrate and speculate that the corresponding net source of NOx may be lower than predicted in our work because of missing NOx sinks in our model calculations. The major conclusion of our paper (5) is based on the analysis of the observed NOx and HOx 1

Institut für Energie und Klimaforschung, Troposphäre (IEK-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany. 2Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (F. R.), [email protected] (X. L.) †Deceased. ‡Present address: School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. §Present address: College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China. ||Present address: Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA, and Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

1326-e

19 JUNE 2015 • VOL 348 ISSUE 6241

budgets, where we considered sources that either release HONO from stable precursors (external source) or generate HONO by consuming NOx and/or HOx [see Section 1.2 in the supplementary materials of (5)]. The important aspect is that if HONO is formed by a mechanism that consumes HOx, the net contribution of HONO photolysis to the HOx production can become small. Our sensitivity tests analyzing observed NOx and OH concentrations point to a gas-phase source that requires NOx and, at a less confident level, also HOx. At this stage, we did not make any assumption regarding the exact mechanism forming HONO, and thus this main finding is independent of the specific reaction in question. Given the availability of the measured parameters, we only considered reactions that directly consume NOx and HOx to produce HONO. Experiments still ongoing in the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR (Simulation of Atmospheric Photochemistry In a large Reaction Chamber) at our institute imply that none of these reactions (including HO2⋅H2O + NO2) can substantially contribute to the HONO formation. This is in agreement with the results by Ye et al. If the process producing HONO is not related to the consumption of HOx radicals, we agree with the conclusion by Ye et al. that HONO should remain an important net OH precursor. Furthermore, Ye et al. suggest particulate nitrate photolysis as a potential HONO source under our measurement conditions. Particulate nitrate photolysis is an external source of HONO and was therefore not considered in our work. During the Pan-European Gas-Aerosols Climate Interaction Study (PEGASOS) field campaign in the Po Valley [see Section 1.1 in the supplementary materials of (5)], the spatial distribution of aerosol

composition was measured on a number of flights. The average particulate nitrate concentration in the residual layer was ~1 to 2 mg m−3 (7). If we assume that the observed HONO was formed exclusively from photolysis of particulate nitrate, the required photolysis frequency would be ~3 × 10−4 s−1, which is an order of magnitude greater than that reported in the literature for surface adsorbed HNO3 under full sun conditions (8). Substantial HONO formation by nitrate photolysis is therefore unlikely. Regarding potentially missing NOx sinks in our model, we note that the full RACM-MIMGK mechanism (9) was applied. In addition to the OH + NO2 reaction, the formation of organic nitrates (RONO2) and peroxyacyl nitrates (PANs) is included in the mechanism as NOx sinks. Moreover, the model calculations for NOx [i.e., model scenario M2 and M3 in figure 3 of (5)] are constrained by measured OH, trace gases, relative humidity, temperature, pressure, and photolysis frequencies [see section 1.2 in the supplementary materials of (5)]. In general, our model calculations show that the NOx sinks during our observations are dominated by the OH + NO2 reaction. We did not measure alkylperoxy radicals (RO2), PANs, or bromine monoxide (BrO) during the field campaign. However, based on the model scenario assuming externally formed HONO [i.e., model scenario M2 in figure 3 of (5)], we performed additional sensitivity studies on the NOx sinks as suggested by Ye et al. To explain the discrepancy between the measured and modeled NOx concentration via formation of RONO2, precursor volatile organic compound concentrations would be required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured values. This results in modeled OH reactivities that are three times greater than measured. Note that for model calculations shown in figure 3 and 4 in (5), given the accuracy of OH reactivity measurement, good agreement is always found between the modeled and measured values. The formation of PANs shows minor influence on the NOx simulation. When we change the initial PANs concentration from 200 parts per trillion (ppt) to 0 in the model, the calculated NOx concentration only decreases by less than 10%. When we include the formation and photolysis of BrONO2 and set the BrO concentration to a constant value of 3 ppt, the modeled NOx concentration decreases by ~10% and thus still remains significantly higher than the measured values. The match between the modeled and measured NOx concentration can only be reached if the BrO concentration is higher than 30 ppt. High BrO concentrations are usually found under maritime conditions. According to (10), which is cited by Ye et al., a BrO concentration of 3 ppt is a very high value even for a coastal environment. Because our observation area is 100 km away from the Mediterranean coastline, we do not expect high BrO concentrations. In summary, we do agree with Ye et al. that the specific HO2⋅H2O + NO2 reaction is not an important HONO source, but our main conclusion that HONO is from a gas-phase source that sciencemag.org SCIENCE

Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on June 18, 2015

R ES E A RC H

R E SE A R CH | TECH NIC A L RESP O NSE

consumes NOx and is not related to processes at Earth’s surface remains valid for the investigated Po Valley region. RE FE RENCES

1. B. J. Finlayson-Pitts, J. N. Pitts, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments and Applications (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, ed. 1, 2000). 2. B. Alicke et al., J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D4), 8247 (2003).

SCIENCE sciencemag.org

3. J. Kleffmann et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L05818 (2005). 4. K. Acker et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L02809 (2006). 5. X. Li et al., Science 344, 292–296 (2014). 6. C. Ye et al., Science 348, 1326 (2015). 7. F. Rubach, Aerosol processes in the planetary boundary layer: High-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry on a Zeppelin NT airship, thesis, Universität Wuppertal, Germany (2013).

8. X. Zhou, H. Gao, Y. He, G. Huang, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2217 (2003). 9. K. D. Lu et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 1541–1569 (2012). 10. R. Grilli et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 791–796 (2013).

6 December 2014; accepted 28 April 2015 10.1126/science.aaa3777

19 JUNE 2015 • VOL 348 ISSUE 6241

1326-e

Response to Comment on ''Missing gas-phase source of HONO inferred from Zeppelin measurements in the troposphere'' Xin Li et al. Science 348, 1326 (2015); DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa3777

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.

If you wish to distribute this article to others, you can order high-quality copies for your colleagues, clients, or customers by clicking here.

The following resources related to this article are available online at www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of June 18, 2015 ): Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online version of this article at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/348/6241/1326.5.full.html A list of selected additional articles on the Science Web sites related to this article can be found at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/348/6241/1326.5.full.html#related This article cites 8 articles, 2 of which can be accessed free: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/348/6241/1326.5.full.html#ref-list-1 This article appears in the following subject collections: Atmospheric Science http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/atmos

Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2015 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.

Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on June 18, 2015

Permission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles can be obtained by following the guidelines here.

ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE. Response to Comment on "Missing gas-phase source of HONO inferred from Zeppelin measurements in the troposphere".

Ye et al. have determined a maximum nitrous acid (HONO) yield of 3% for the reaction HO2·H2O + NO2, which is much lower than the yield used in our wor...
141KB Sizes 0 Downloads 7 Views