AAC Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 20 April 2015 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00092-15 Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

1

Anti-biofilm peptides increase the susceptibility of carbapenemase-

2

producing Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates to β-lactam

3

antibiotics

4

Suzana Meira Ribeiroa, César de la Fuente-Núñezb,BeverlieBaquirb, Celio Faria-Juniorc, Octávio

5

L. Francoa#andRobert. E.W.Hancockb#

6 7 8 9 10

a

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Genômicas e Biotecnologia, Centro de Análises

Proteômicas e Bioquímicas, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brazil. b

Centre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, Department of Microbiology and

Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. c

LACEN, Laboratório Central de Saúde Pública do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil

11

Running Head: Effect of anti-biofilm peptides on K. pneumoniae biofilms

12

#Address correspondence to Robert E. W. Hancock, [email protected] or Octávio L. Franco,

13

[email protected]

14

Phone number:+1 (604) 822-2682; Fax: 604-827-5566

15 16 17 18 19 20

1

21

ABSTRACT

22

Multi-drug resistant carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KpC)are becoming

23

acommon cause of infections in health care centers.Furthermore,Klebsiellacan develop

24

multicellular biofilms, which lead to elevated adaptive antibiotic resistance. Here, we describe

25

the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities of synthetic peptides DJK-5, DJK-6 and 1018

26

against five KpC isolates.Using static microplate assays,it was observed that the concentration

27

required to prevent biofilm formation by these clinical isolates was below theminimum

28

inhibitory concentration (MIC) for planktonic cells. More sophisticated flow cell experiments

29

confirmed the anti-biofilm activity of the peptides against 2 day-old biofilms of different

30

KpCisolates and, in some cases, the peptides inducedsignificant biofilm cell death.Clinically

31

relevant combinations of DJK-6 togetherwith β-lactam antibiotics, including the carbapenem

32

meropenem, alsoprevented planktonic growth and biofilm formation of KpC strain1825971.

33

Interestingly, peptide DJK-6 was able to enhance,by at least 16-fold, the ability of meropenem to

34

eradicate pre-formedbiofilms formed by this strain. Using peptide DJK-6 to potentiate the

35

activity

36

treatinfectionscaused by KpCisolates.

37

Keywords: small cationic peptides, biofilms, carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae.

38

INTRODUCTION

of

β-lactams

including

meropenem

represents

a

promising

strategy

to

39

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative, encapsulated, opportunisticpathogen of

40

theFamilyEnterobacteriaciae(1). It has become a significant cause of infections,especially

41

pneumonia, but also meningitis,sepsis, urinary tract,device-associated and surgical wound-

42

siteinfections(2–7).The most severe clinical cases of such infections are often associated with 2

43

K.pneumoniae that produce a plasmid-borne carbapenemase(KpC).

44

The rate of fatalityfrom KpC-producing K. pneumoniaeis high (>50%) among patients with

45

bloodstream infection(2, 8, 9).The treatment of these infections is difficult since KpCstrains are

46

resistant to all β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenemsthat are typically used as a last resort

47

(10). In addition, bacteria harboringcarbapenemase genes are often resistant to other antibiotics.

48

As a consequence of this multi-drug resistance, failure in treatment contributes to increasedrates

49

of morbidity and mortality (9, 11, 12). Tigecycline, aminoglycosides and the polymyxins

50

(polymyxin B and colistin) are currently the best treatment options for carbapenemase-producing

51

strains(13). However, these strains also have the potential to develop resistance to these

52

antibiotics(14–16).

53

The treatment of infections caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria is a challengeand

54

theability of bacterial pathogens to form biofilms can further complicate this scenario. Biofilms,

55

a distinct microbial lifestyle of bacteria,aresurface-associated multicellular communities of

56

bacteriaencased in a protective polymeric matrix that can include polysaccharides, proteins and

57

DNA(17). They represent a substantial problem in the clinic, as theycan lead to the development

58

of chronic long-lived infections on body surfaces including the lung, skin, heart and bones (18–

59

21), and can also be formedon medical devices (central venous catheters, urinary tract catheters,

60

mechanical heart valve, contact lenses, endotracheal tube and implants)(18, 22–25).

61

Biofilms arehighly (adaptively) resistant to antibiotics as well as removal by host immune

62

defense mechanisms and thus are very difficult to eradicatewhen compared to their planktonic

63

(free-swimming) counterparts, leading to increased health care costs(26). Although biofilms have

64

a significant impact in public health, most research to date has focused on developing natural or

65

synthetic antimicrobial agentsthat inhibit planktonic bacteria. Cationic amphipathicantimicrobial

3

66

peptideshave emerged in recent years as an alternative strategy for the treatment of antibiotic-

67

resistant bacteria(27). Other so-called host defence peptidesfunction as immunomodulatory

68

agentswithanti-infective, anti-inflammatory and wound healing properties, independent of direct

69

antimicrobial activity(27).

70

Recently, it was shown that some cationic amphipathic peptidescould prevent and/or

71

eradicate bacterial biofilms in a manner that was independent of direct antimicrobial activity

72

against free swimming bacteria(28–30). Others studiesdemonstrated thattheanti-biofilmpeptides

73

1018 (a synthetic variant of host defence peptides), DJK-5 and DJK-6(both, designed D-

74

enantiomeric protease resistant peptides) had the ability to work synergistically with several

75

conventional antibiotics, thus uncovering a novel approach to potentiating antibiotic action

76

against bacterial biofilms(31, 32). Based on these studies, we hypothesizedthat the small cationic

77

anti-biofilm peptides 1018, DJK-5 and DJK-6could both prevent biofilm formation and target

78

pre-formed biofilmsformed by carbapenemase-producingK.pneumoniae. The objective of this

79

study was to investigate the biofilm-forming ability of KpC clinical strains isolated from patients

80

atBrasilia Hospital, and to test the activity of anti-biofilm peptides against these isolates.

81 82

MATERIALS AND METHODS

83

Bacterial strains.

84

Clinical isolates of K. pneumoniawere obtainedfrom hospitalized patients in Brasília, Brazil,

85

between 2010 and 2012. The isolate 1825971 was obtainedfromendotracheal aspirate and the

86

isolates 1789769, 2144392, 2210477 and 1450421 wereobtained from blood. The isolates were

87

suspended in Mueller Hinton broth and incubated for 18-24 h at 36ºC. They were confirmed as

88

Klebsiella pneumoniae strains using the MicroScanWalkAwayautomated system (Siemens 4

89

Healthcare Diagnostics), according to the manufacturer´s instructions. Standard biochemical

90

tests were also used to confirm the species(33). Isolates were preservedat -70ºC with the addition

91

of 8% dimethyl sulphoxide.

92

Peptide Synthesis.

93

DJK-5 (VQWRAIRVRVIR-NH2) and DJK-6 (VQWRRIRVWVIR-NH2), both D-

94

enantiomeric peptides, and the peptide 1018 (VRLIVAVRIWRR-NH2) were synthesized by CPC

95

Scientific using solid-phase 9-fluorenylmethoxy carbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry and purified to 95%

96

using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Peptide mass was

97

confirmed by mass spectrometry.

98 99 100 101

Antibiotic susceptibility of K.pneumoniae clinical isolates, screening for carbapenemases and detection of blaKPC genes. Susceptibility

testing

was

performed

susceptibility breakpoints

using

the

MicroScanWalkAwayautomated

102

method. The

103

protocols(34).Resistance to carbapenem antibiotics was due tothe production of a

104

carbapenemase, which was detected using the modified Hodge test(35). K. pneumoniae ATCC

105

700603 was used as negative control andK. pneumoniaeIOC (carbapenemase-producing strain

106

from the culture collectionof the Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil) was used as a

107

positive control. Specific primers were used under standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

108

conditions to detect and confirm the presence ofgenes encoding K. pneumoniae

109

carbapenemase,blaKPC

110

CTCAGTGCTCTACAGAAAACC)(36). The strains used as controls for the modified Hodge

111

test were also used as negative and positive controls for PCR.

genes,

were interpreted in accordance to the

(F,5’-TGTCACTGTATCGCCGTC

andR,

CLSI

5’-

5

112 113

Biofilm formation and minimal inhibitory concentration of planktonic cells and biofilms.

114

K. pneumoniae biofilm formation was assessed in both rich mediaLuria-Bertani (LB) broth

115

(BD Difco) and Todd Hewitt Broth (BD Difco) and in BM2 minimal medium (62 mM potassium

116

phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 7 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 10 μM FeSO4, 0.5% glucose).

117

Overnight cultures of K. pneumoniae strains grown in LB broth were diluted 1 in 100 in each of

118

these mediaand 100 μL per well added into 96-well round bottom microplates. Planktonic cell

119

growth was assessed by measuring absorbance at 600 nm.Non-adherent planktonic cells were

120

removed from microtitre wells and washed twice with deionized water. Adherent cells were

121

stained with 0.01% crystal violet for 20 min. The microplate wells were washed twice with

122

deionized water, air-dried and solubilized with 110 μlof 70% ethanol. Biofilm formation was

123

assessedby measuring the absorbance at 595 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments,

124

Inc., United States). Three biological replicates were performed for eachexperimentinvolving

125

eighttechnicalreplicates.Afterestablishing the bestconditions for biofilm growth, antimicrobial

126

peptideswere

127

methodforcationic peptides(37)was used to determine theMinimal Inhibitory Concentration

128

(MIC)for planktonic cellsand the minimal biofilminhibitory concentration(MBIC) to inhibit

129

biofilm formation by50% (MBIC50) or 100% (MBIC100).

evaluated

fortheir

ability

toinhibit

biofilm

formation.Themicrodilution

130 131

Checkerboard assay.

132

Synergy between DJK-6 and various antibiotics was assessedbycheckerboard titration in 96-

133

well microplates, wherein the peptide was diluted along the rows of a microtiter tray and the

134

antibiotics were diluted along the columns. Planktonic growth and biofilm formationwas 6

135

accessed as described above. The resultswere expressed as the fractional inhibitory concentration

136

index(FIC), which is determined as follows: FIC = [A]/MICA + [B]/MICB, where MICA and

137

MICB are the MICs of antibiotic A and peptide B alone and [A] and [B] are the MICs of A and B

138

when in combination. The FIC index was interpreted as follows: FIC16/8

S R R

16 >16/8

S R R

32 >16 >16/8

I R R

16 >16/8

S R R

32 >16 >16/8

I R R

>16 >16 >32 >32 >16 >32 >16 >16 >2 >4 >8 >8 >4 >8 >64 >64 >64

R R R S R R R R R R R R R R R R R

>16 >16 >32 >32 >16 >32 >16 >16 >2 >4 >8 >8 8 >64 >64 >64

R R R R R R R R R R R R S R R R R

>16 >16 >32 >32 16 >32 >16 >16 >2 >4 >8 >8 4 >8 64 >64 >64

R R R R R R R R R R R R I R I R R

>16 >16 >32 32 8 >32 >16 >16 >2 >4 >8 >8 >4 8 >64 >64 >64

R R R I I R R R R R R R R R R R R

>16 >16 >32 32 >16 >32 >16 >16 >2 >4 >8 >8 >4 >8 >64 >64 >64

R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R

>8 2/38

R S I R

8 8 2/38

I S R R

2/38

R S R R

447 448 449 450 21

451

Table 2. Assessment of biofilm formation of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates in different

452

media. The assay examined adherence to the surfaces of the wells of 96-well microtiter plates.

453

After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, the growth of planktonic cells was measured as the absorbance

454

at 600 nm (A600) while biofilm growth was assessed at 595 nm (A595) after crystal violet staining

455

and ethanol extraction. KpC isolates 1450421 1789769 1825971 2144392 2210477

Luria Broth Planktonic Biofilm

Growth Todd Hewitt Broth Planktonic Biofilm

BM2 glucose Planktonic Biofilm

1.29 ± 0.04 1.18 ± 0.05 1.30 ± 0.06 1.20 ± 0.05 1.25 ± 0.07

1.48 ± 0.04 1.53± 0.03 1.51 ± 0.04 1.52 ± 0.03 1.46 ± 0.05

1.17 ± 0.06 1.22 ± 0.06 1.15 ± 0.04 1.16 ± 0.06 1.13 ± 0.01

0.20 ± 0.05 0.05 ± 0.03 0.27 ± 0.06 0.02± 0.01 0.15± 0.03

0.17 ± 0.03 0.11 ± 0.02 0.12 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.02 0.14± 0.06

1.28 ± 0.11 0.80 ± 0.07 0.79 ± 0.02 0.62 ± 0.04 1.18 ± 0.04

456 457

Table 3. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of peptides against planktonic and biofilm cells

458

of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates using microtiter assays. Shown is the MIC for

459

planktonic cells and MBIC50 and MBIC100 for preventing 50% or 100% of biofilm formation.

460 KpC isolates 1450421 1789769 1825971 2144392 2210477

IDR 1018 (µg.mL-1) MIC MBIC50 MBIC100

MIC

32 32 >64 32 32

8 16 >64 32 16

16 4 2 1 8

32 32 64 4 32

DJK-5 (µg.mL-1) MBIC50 MBIC100 4 4 32 1 4

8 8 >64 4 8

MIC 16 8 64 8 >64

DJK-6 (µg.mL-1) MBIC50 MBIC100 8 2 4 1 8

16 4 32 2 >64

461 462 463 464 465 466 467 22

468 469

Table 4. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of conventional antibiotics in preventing

470

planktonic (MIC) and biofilm (MBIC) growth of K. pneumoniaeKpCstrain 1825971 in microtiter

471

assays, and effect of the combination of peptide DJK-6 and the conventional antibiotics by

472

checkerboard titration assessing the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FIC). Syn,

473

synergy; Ind, indifferent. All FIC calculations were determined taking the next lowest MBIC100

474

value (e.g., for >64 μg.mL-1 we used 128 μg.mL-1).

475 Antibiotics

MIC (µg.mL-1)

MBIC50 (µg.mL-1)

MBIC100 (µg.mL-1)

MBIC of antibiotic in combination with DJK-6 (µg.mL-1)

MBIC of DJK-6 in combination with antibiotic (µg.mL-1)

FIC with peptide

Interpretation

Fold reduction in antibiotic concentration at the FIC

Meropenem Imipenem Cefepime Cefotaxime Colistin Polymyxin

>64 >64 >64 >64 >64 >64

>64 >64 >64 >64 >64 >64

>64 >64 >64 >64 >64 >64

4 8 8 64 64 64

12 12 12 32 48 48

0.4 0.4 0.4 1.5 2.0 2.0

Syn Syn Syn Ind Ind Ind

32 16 16 2 2 2

476 477 478

23

Figure 1. Effect of peptides 1018 and DJK-6 against pre-formed biofilms of KpC isolates. Biofilms were grown using the flow cell system. Treatments were applied on 2 day-old biofilms for 24 h. After this time, bacteria were stained green with the all bacteria stain Syto-9 and red with the dead-bacteria stain propidium iodide (merge shows as yellow to red) prior to confocal imaging. Each panel shows reconstructions from the top in the large panel and sides in the right and bottom panels (xy, yz and xz dimensions).

Figure 2. Effect of the combination between peptide DJK-6 and meropenem on pre-formed biofilms of KpC 1825971. Biofilms were grown in the flow cell system. Treatments were applied to 2 day-old biofilms for 24 h. After this time, bacteria were stained green with the all bacteria stain Syto-9 and red with the dead-bacteria stain propidium iodide (merge shows as yellow to red) prior to confocal imaging. Each panel shows reconstructions from the top in the large panel and sides in the right and bottom panels (xy, yz and xz dimensions).

Figure 3. Effect of the combination between peptide DJK-6 and meropenem on pre-formed biofilms of KpC strains 1450421 and 2144392. Biofilms were grown in flow cell system. Treatments were applied to a 2 days-old biofilm, for 24 h. After this time, bacteria were stained green with the all bacteria stain Syto-9 and red with the dead-bacteria stain propidium iodide (merge shows as yellow to red) prior to confocal imaging. Each panel shows reconstructions from the top in the large panel and sides in the right and bottom panels (xy, yz and xz dimensions).

Antibiofilm peptides increase the susceptibility of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates to β-lactam antibiotics.

Multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KpC) strains are becoming a common cause of infections in health care centers. Furt...
967KB Sizes 0 Downloads 11 Views