FEMS Microbiology Ecology Advance Access published December 8, 2014
1
Title: Ammonia-oxidizing archaea respond positively to inorganic nitrogen addition in desert
2
soils
3
Authors: Yevgeniy Marusenko1*, Ferran Garcia-Pichel1, Sharon J. Hall1
4 5
Affiliation: 1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287
6 7
Correspondence: *Yevgeniy Marusenko, 602-703-7984,
[email protected] 8
Current address: 3312 Biological Sciences III,
9
University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
10 11
11
Abstract
12
In soils, nitrogen (N) addition typically enhances ammonia oxidation (AO) rates and increases
13
the population density of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), but not that of ammonia-oxidizing
14
archaea (AOA). We asked if long-term inorganic N addition also has similar consequences in
15
arid land soils, an understudied yet spatially ubiquitous ecosystem type. Using Sonoran Desert
16
top soils from between and under shrubs within a long-term N-enrichment experiment, we
17
determined community concentration-response kinetics of AO and measured the total and
18
relative abundance of AOA and AOB based on amoA gene abundance. As expected, N addition
19
increased maximum AO rates and the abundance of bacterial amoA genes compared to the
20
controls. Surprisingly, N addition also increased the abundance of archaeal amoA genes. We did
21
not detect any major effects of N addition on ammonia-oxidizing community composition. The
22
ammonia-oxidizing communities in these desert soils were dominated by AOA as expected (78%
23
of amoA gene copies were related to Nitrososphaera), but contained unusually high contributions
24
of Nitrosomonas (18%) and unusually low numbers of Nitrosospira (2%). This study highlights
25
unique traits of ammonia-oxidizers in arid lands, which should be considered globally in
26
predictions of AO responses to changes in N availability.
27 28
2
28
Introduction
29 30
Since the early and influential work of Sergei Winogradsky (1890), bacteria were thought to be
31
the only biological agents of ammonia oxidation (AO). However, the deployment of molecular
32
detection techniques in the last three decades has revealed that Thaumarchaeota in the Archaea
33
domain contribute to AO as well (Konneke et al., 2005). High-throughput sequencing and
34
molecular-fingerprinting studies show the presence of genes attributable to diverse groups of
35
ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB) in a wide variety of environments
36
(Purkhold et al., 2000; Leininger et al., 2006; Prosser & Nicol, 2008; Pester et al., 2012). Even
37
though AOA outnumber AOB in many ecosystems (Leininger et al., 2006; Adair & Schwartz,
38
2008; Wessen et al., 2010), this dominance does not always equate to AOA contributing to AO
39
more than AOB (Jia & Conrad, 2009; Di et al., 2009; Adair & Schwartz, 2011). It remains
40
unclear why the abundance of AOA is often unrelated to AO rates (Shen et al., 2008; Wessen et
41
al., 2010). AO fluxes may depend not only on population size, but also on community
42
composition due to differential substrate affinities and ecophysiological sensitivities among and
43
within the AOA and AOB (Kowalchuk & Stephen, 2001; Bollmann et al., 2002; Schleper &
44
Nicol, 2010).
45 46
A review of literature reveals that mixed ammonia-oxidizer communities are often dominated by
47
one particular phylotype (Prosser, 1989; Kowalchuk & Stephen, 2001; Zhalnina et al., 2012; He
48
et al., 2012). However, it is uncertain if and how this outcome is determined by environmental
49
properties. For instance, while culture work shows that Nitrosomonas strains (AOB) prefer
50
ammonia-rich conditions (Taylor & Bottomley, 2006), Nitrosospira-related clusters (AOB)
51
commonly outnumber Nitrosomonas spp. in fertilized soils and also in low-NH4+, pristine soils 3
52
(Jordan et al., 2005; Chu et al., 2007). Additionally, AOB are preferentially enriched after
53
inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilization in the ecosystems studied to date – such as in relatively low-
54
pH soils that receive high rates of precipitation or water inputs – while AOA may respond
55
positively only in cases when NH3/NH4+ is supplied through organic matter mineralization (Offre
56
et al., 2009; He et al., 2012; Hatzenpichler, 2012; Levicnik-Hofferle et al., 2012). These
57
examples suggest that indeed changes in N availability such as through N deposition or
58
fertilization may control AO rates in soils through community compositional shifts (Avrahami &
59
Bohannan, 2007; Tourna et al., 2010; Prosser & Nicol, 2012).
60 61
Arid environments are vastly underrepresented in the AO research literature (Johnson et al.,
62
2005; Marusenko et al., 2013b; Sher et al., 2013), but there is reason to believe that arid lands
63
may harbor populations with different adaptations compared to the more studied temperate soils.
64
For example, arid soils are exposed to prolonged drought and rapid pulses of precipitation and
65
nutrients (Schimel et al., 2007; Collins et al., 2008), which require complex and fast genetic
66
regulation from soil microbes (Rajeev et al., 2013). Furthermore, arid soils are often alkaline and
67
can reach up to 50°C in the summer. They are typically dry with low organic matter content and
68
low N mineralization rates especially in non-vegetated areas between shrubs (Austin et al.,
69
2004; Schade & Hobbie, 2005), which may select for the most oligotrophic of ammonia-
70
oxidizers. These ubiquitous soils also experience intensive management, including watering and
71
fertilizer inputs, both in agricultural and urban residential areas (Warren et al., 1996; Davies &
72
Hall, 2010). As a result, anthropogenic activities and atmospheric deposition are altering
73
resource availability and the N cycle in soils of water-limited environments (McCrackin et al.,
74
2008; Hall et al., 2009; Hall et al., 2011; Marusenko et al., 2013a).
4
75 76
Here we tested the effect of long-term inorganic N addition on AO processes and ammonia-
77
oxidizing microorganisms (AOM) in arid land soils, assessing the AO kinetics in bulk soil and
78
characterizing AOA and AOB by sequencing the environmental amoA gene, which encodes a
79
subunit of the ammonia-monooxygenase (AMO) enzyme. We hypothesized that N addition
80
would cause the absolute and relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizers to shift from AOA-
81
dominated in oligotrophic native (unfertilized) soils to AOB-dominated in NH4+-rich conditions,
82
as has been found in other soils. Consequently, this population replacement would enhance
83
overall AO rates and cell-specific AO rates, but decrease affinity between the enzyme and the
84
substrate. Using common patch types in arid lands, we further expected that the decline of AOA
85
relative to AOB under N addition would be less dramatic in relatively fertile soils under shrubs
86
than in areas away from plants.
87 88
Materials and Methods
89 90
Study area description
91 92
Our site is in the northern Sonoran Desert at ~620 m elevation in Lost Dutchman State Park, AZ,
93
USA (coordinates: N 33.459372 S -111.484956), located east of the Phoenix metropolitan area
94
and within boundaries of the Central Arizona–Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research area
95
(http://caplter.asu.edu). Soils are classified as Typic Haplargids, a subgroup of Aridisols. We
96
measured soil AO rates and community parameters from two randomly assigned 20 m x 20 m
97
plots, one that received N fertilizer as NH4NO3 (applied as solid by hand biannually at 60 kg N
5
98
ha-1 yr-1 from 2005-2012) and another that served as an unfertilized control (see Hall et al., 2011
99
for further description about the plots). Nitrogen deposition in this area is 7.3 kg N ha-1 yr-1
100
(Cook, 2014). Plant cover (~60%) within our study plots is dominated by the native shrubs
101
creosote bush (Larrea tridentata [DC.] Coville), bursage (Ambrosia spp.). Plots did not contain
102
any N-fixing trees. Mean annual temperature is 22.3°C, with the coldest and warmest months
103
averaging 3.7°C and 41.9°C, respectively (2005-2012; NCDC, 2013). Mean annual precipitation
104
is 272 mm but is highly variable year to year. Rainfall is bimodally distributed between summer
105
monsoon events and low-intensity winter storms (WRCC, 1985).
106 107
Sample collection
108 109
Surface soil samples were collected in late January of 2012, one month after winter storms. In
110
each of the control and N addition plots, three soil samples were collected from each of two
111
patch types to explore N treatment effects in typical desert environments: between plants
112
(hereafter called 'interplant') and under canopies of the common shrub L. tridentata ('under
113
plant'). Mature/dark soil biological crusts were low in abundance within the plot area and were
114
avoided for sampling. Early colonization by biocrust organisms is widespread in the region
115
(Rosentreter et al., 2007) but is not yet formed to visibility at our site locations. Each soil sample
116
consisted of two 0-5 cm (depth) x 7 cm (diameter) cores taken 5 cm apart. In total, we collected
117
twelve soil samples consisting of three replicate soil samples from each plot (treatment, control)
118
and patch type (interplant, under plant) (3x2x2 = 12 samples). Soil samples were processed
119
independently for all analyses (soil properties, AO rates, quantitative PCR, pyrosequencing).
120
6
121
Laboratory methods and soil properties
122 123
Following collection, samples were transported on ice to the lab, sieved to < 2 mm, and
124
homogenized. Soils were at 3-5% soil moisture upon collection and were analyzed within 24 h
125
for all soil properties and processes. Two subsamples (2 g each) from each homogenized soil
126
sample were frozen in liquid N and stored at -80oC until DNA extraction within one month.
127
Duplicate DNA extracts were combined prior to molecular processing methods to obtain one
128
determination per sample.
129 130
Soils were processed for pH (1:2 soil to DI H2O), water holding capacity (% WHC;
131
gravimetrically), organic matter content (% SOM; loss on ignition), and extractable NH4+, nitrite
132
(NO2-), and nitrate (NO3-) content (2M KCl extraction, colorimetric analysis), following standard
133
methods (Sparks et al., 1996; Marusenko et al., 2013a). Data reported for each of the three field
134
replicates is an average of laboratory triplicates.
135 136
Ammonia oxidation rates using the shaken-slurry assay
137 138
In situ net rates of potential AO were measured under various levels of N addition (see
139
“Ammonia oxidation kinetics” below) using the shaken-slurry method (hereafter as “slurry AO
140
rates”), in which oxygen and substrate diffusion is not limiting (Hart et al., 1994; Norton & Stark
141
2011). The direct product of AO was measured as NO2- accumulation after inclusion of chlorate
142
(NaClO3), a NO2--oxidation inhibitor (Belser & Mays 1980). Using NO3 - as a proxy for AO was
143
unsuitable since NO2- build-up is common in natural dryland conditions (Gelfand & Yakir 2008).
7
144
The shaken-slurry assays contained 10 g soil in 100 mL solution of 0.015 mol·L -1 NaClO3, and
145
0.2 mol·L-1 K2HPO4 and 0.2 mol·L-1 KH2PO4 to buffer pH at 7.2. Slurries and no-soil blanks
146
were continuously aerated in solution by mixing at 180 rpm on a reciprocal shaker in the dark.
147
Homogenized slurry aliquots were removed at four time points over 6 h and amended with
148
several drops of MgCl2 + CaCl2 (0.6 M) to flocculate soil particles. Aliquots were then
149
centrifuged at 3000 × g and supernatant was filtered through pre-leached Whatman #42 ashless
150
filters. The supernatants were stored at 4°C and analyzed within 24 h. Net rates of slurry AO
151
were calculated as the linear increase in NO2- content from 0 to 6 h, measured colorimetrically
152
using a Lachat Quikchem 8000 autoanalyzer. Consistent with literature showing that metabolism
153
of ammonia oxidizers can be activated and responsive to the environment at the scale of hours,
154
especially for AOB (Wilhelm et al., 1998; Placella & Firestone 2013), NO2- accumulation in our
155
assays was linear from 0 to 6 h.
156 157
Ammonia oxidation rates in static incubation
158
As a secondary method to slurry AO rates, we also measured AO following various levels of N
159
addition in a modified method using NaClO3 inhibition in static, 48 h aerobic incubations of bulk
160
soil (“static AO rates” from here on; Nishio & Fujimoto 1990; Hart et al., 1994; Low et al.,
161
1997). Although substrate diffusion may be limited in aerobic incubations to fully quantify
162
enzyme activity, we used this method to independently assess AO in conditions more
163
representative of the upland desert environment compared to the shaken-slurry assays, which
164
assesses aerated AO potential. Ten g of soil were brought to 60% WHC using water and NaClO3
165
(15 mM) in plastic cups. Soil in one cup was extracted at the onset and a second cup extracted
166
after incubation for 2 days in the dark. Soils were extracted in 50 mL of 2 M KCl followed by
8
167
shaking for 1 h and filtering through pre-leached Whatman #42 ashless filters. The extracts were
168
stored at 4°C and analyzed colorimetrically within 24 h. Net rates of static AO were calculated
169
as the increase in NO2- content between 0 and 48 h.
170 171
Ammonia oxidation kinetics
172 173
The relationship between substrate availability and reaction rate can be measured to discern
174
functional parameters of microbial communities. Although this is not a true enzyme kinetics
175
study, we applied similar calculations to our concentration-response kinetics approach to model
176
relationships for AO (slurry and static) in bulk soils based on the Michaelis-Menten equation
177
(Martens-Habbena & Stahl 2011; Prosser & Nicol 2012), as has been successfully applied to soil
178
assays (Koper et al. 2010):
179
V = (Vmax × S) / (Km + S)
180
In this equation, the NH4+ concentration (S) and AO rate (V) are used to estimate the maximum
181
AO rate (Vmax) and half-saturation constant (Km; inverse of enzyme and substrate affinity). To
182
estimate AO kinetics under oligotrophic conditions in the shaken-slurry assay, we removed pre-
183
existing NH4+ from soils to obtain the least variable and lowest residual substrate availability
184
(Widmer et al., 1989; Koper et al., 2010; Norton & Stark 2011). Prior to the shaken-slurry assay,
185
5 g soil was mixed in 45 mL of potassium phosphate solution and centrifuged at 3200 × g for 1
186
min before discarding the N-containing supernatant. The resulting soil pellet from two
187
preparations was combined to compose 10 g total soil from each plot (treatment, control), patch
188
type (interplant, under plant), and soil sample replicate (x 3). Inorganic N was then supplemented
189
as (NH4)2SO4 mixed with DI water to eight final concentrations in the slurry ranging from 0-22.5
9
190
mM. In total we evaluated AO rates using 96 different soil preparations (12 soil samples x 8
191
NH4+ concentrations) per method (shaken-slurry assay, static incubation). In the static
192
incubations, we excluded the N removal step as to minimize soil disturbance. Soils were
193
supplemented with (NH4)2SO4 in solution to produce final concentrations ranging from 0-50 µg
194
NH4+-N g-1 (0-22.5 mM). The 0 µg NH4+-N g-1 addition (only includes pre-existing NH4+) was
195
used to estimate background net rates of AO. As a rough indicator of the N addition effect on the
196
relative importance of NH4+ mineralization and nitrification, we also measured the net rate of
197
NH4+ gain (production processes dominate) and loss (consumption processes dominate) during
198
the static incubation experiment. In the assay, some of the NH4+ consumption processes are
199
likely minimized due to sieving of soil (exclusion of large NH4+-assimilating plant roots) and
200
lower laboratory temperature compared to natural conditions (reduced volatilization).
201 202
DNA extraction and purification
203 204
DNA was extracted using three freeze-thaw cycles followed by 30 min incubation at 50°C with
205
proteinase K and silica bead beating for chemical and mechanical cell lysis (Garcia-Pichel et al.,
206
2001). The lysate was purified by phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction,
207
followed by DNA precipitation in 100% ethanol for 12 h at -80°C. DNA concentration and
208
quality was assessed on an agarose gel stained in ethidium bromide and imaged using a Fluor-S
209
Multi-Imager (BioRad Laboratories, CA, USA) with an EZ Load Precision Molecular Mass
210
Standard (BioRad). Bands of DNA were excised from a low-melt agarose gel, homogenized with
211
a tip in a microcentrifuge tube, allowed to diffuse out into sterile H2O for 12 h, and followed by
212
15 min centrifugation to collect DNA in the supernatant.
10
213 214
Quantitative PCR
215 216
DNA was used for quantitative PCR (qPCR) with the following amoA primers: CrenamoA616r
217
(GCCATCCABCKRTANGTCCA; Tourna et al., 2008) and CrenamoA23f for the AOA
218
(ATGGTCTGGCTWAGACG); and amoA1f mod (GGGGHTTYTACTGGTGGT; Stephen et
219
al., 1999) and AmoA-2R’ for the AOB (CCTCKGSAAAGCCTTCTTC; Okano et al., 2004;
220
Junier et al., 2008). qPCR reactions contained 10 µL iTaq SYBRGreen Master Mix (BioRad),
221
250 nM final concentration of each primer (AOA or AOB), 1 ng of environmental DNA, and
222
molecular grade H2O to bring each reaction to a final volume of 20 µL. The reaction conditions
223
were as follows: initial denaturation for 150 s at 95°C followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s
224
at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C, and a final dissociation step to obtain the melting curve at 95°C, 60°C,
225
and 95°C for 15 s each. Standard curves were generated using templates from Nitrosomonas
226
europaea ATCC 19718 (bacterial amoA; R2 = 0.99) and a putative AOA clone (archaeal amoA;
227
R2 = 0.99) for a dilution series spanning 102-1010 gene copies per reaction. Melting curves were
228
checked to verify the quality of each reaction, and to ensure the absence of primer-dimers. We
229
report only determinations for which Ct values could be interpolated within our standard curves.
230
Each amoA abundance value (number of gene copies) reported is an average of analytical
231
triplicate qPCR reactions of the same DNA extract.
232 233
Pyrosequencing
234
11
235
Purified DNA extracts were shipped to a commercial laboratory for standard PCR and bTEFAP
236
pyrosequencing (Dowd et al., 2008). Commercial primers for PCR were amoA-1F
237
(GGGGTTTCTACTGGTGGT; Rotthauwe et al., 1997) and amoA-2R for AOB
238
(CCCCTCKGSAAAGCCTTCTTC), and Arch-amoAF (STAATGGTCTGGCTTAGACG;
239
Francis et al., 2005) and Arch-amoAR for AOA (GCGGCCATCCATCTGTATGT) used with a
240
HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA). PCR conditions were as follows: 180 s at
241
94°C followed by 28 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 40 s at 53°C, and 60 s at 72°C, and final elongation
242
for 5 min at 72°C. PCR amplicons were mixed in equal concentrations and purified using
243
Agencourt Ampure beads (Agencourt Bioscience Corporation, MA, USA). Sequencing utilized
244
Roche 454 FLX titanium instruments and reagents.
245 246
Bioinformatics and phylogenetic analyses of amoA
247 248
Pyrosequencing data were processed and analysed in Qiime (Caporaso et al., 2010b), with
249
necessary pipeline adjustments to process functional gene data (i.e., amoA) as described in detail
250
in the notes and script file (http://www.yevmarusenko.com/research/Marusenko_Qiime.txt).
251
Sequences (452 bp long) were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UClust
252
(Edgar, 2010). Representative sequences (one per OTU) were aligned with Pynast (Caporaso et
253
al., 2010a). Based on nomenclature classification for AOA in Pester et al. (2012) and for AOB in
254
Koops et al. (2006), a taxonomic assignment was made for each OTU using a template reference
255
database created from sequences of known pure isolates, enrichments, and other characterized
256
AOA and AOB from previous studies (reference database available at website mentioned above).
257
Groups of sequences were clustered at 97% nucleotide similarity to be inclusive of OTUs at fine
12
258
levels of resolution for phylogenetic and statistical analyses that otherwise may be missed at
259
lower identity thresholds. For AOA, we excluded one replicate each in the interplant control and
260
N addition samples because of their poor quality of the pyrosequencing data. The minimum
261
number of high-quality sequences after filtering was 525 for AOA and 950 for AOB, with
262
sufficient rarefied analysis producing 179 OTUs for AOA and 325 OTUs for AOB (Total
263
number of sequences >200bp prior to quality filtering: AOA, 9,830; AOB, 29,569). Phylogenetic
264
analyses were carried out on a single alignment file (separately for AOA and AOB) that included
265
sequences from our Qiime pipeline, as well as the reference sequences described above. All
266
sequences were combined and realigned using default parameters for Muscle and analyzed by
267
the tree-building module of the MEGA 5 software with the following parameters: Neighbor-
268
joining method, Jukes-Cantor nucleotide substitution model, 100 bootstrap replicates, uniform
269
rates among sites, and pairwise gap-data deletion (Tamura et al., 2011). Raw sequence reads for
270
the entire project have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at NCBI with
271
accession number SRSRX738968 for the AOA data and SRX739281 for the AOB data.
272 273
Statistics
274 275
Statistical tests were carried out using Qiime for α and β diversity measures on processed
276
pyrosequencing data, while all other analyses were in SPSS (v20.0 Windows). All soil
277
properties, AO rates, and amoA abundance data were tested for linear model assumptions in
278
SPSS using normal probability plots (for normality) and Levene’s test (for equal variance), and
279
transformed (natural log) when necessary. Individual two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
280
tests were used to evaluate the effects of plants (‘Patch’) and N addition (‘Treatment’) on the
13
281
following dependent variables: amoA gene abundance (per g soil and per ng extractable DNA,
282
separately for AOA and AOB), AOA to AOB ratio, slurry Vmax AO rates, static Vmax AO rates,
283
amoA-copy specific AO rates, net NH4+ change (averaged across supplemented NH4+
284
concentrations), and each of the soil properties. Significant interactions between patch and
285
treatment were evaluated further using one-way ANOVA (α = 0.025). The copy specific rates
286
were calculated using Vmax AO rate (slurry and static) divided by the number of amoA gene
287
copies per g soil. We used bivariate Pearson correlations to assess relationships between soil
288
properties vs. community parameters (amoA data and AO rates) across all samples. We used
289
linear regression analyses to assess relationships between amoA gene abundance at the domain
290
level vs. Vmax AO rates and also analyzed amoA gene abundance of individual OTUs vs. soil
291
properties and AO rates. In Qiime, we tested for the effect of N addition on OTU-based
292
communities separately for AOA and AOB per patch type, using only strictly relevant diversity
293
metrics (Lozupone & Knight, 2005; Caporaso et al., 2010b): α diversity (Shannon’s diversity,
294
observed richness, and phylogenetic diversity [PD]) and β diversity (weighted and unweighted
295
Unifrac, the multivariate group dispersion analogue of Levene's test [PERMDISP], and analysis
296
of similarity [ANOSIM]).
297 298
Results
299 300
Effects of N addition on the abundance of amoA genes and the kinetics of ammonia oxidation
301 302
To aid in interpretation of long-term N addition effects on amoA gene abundance and AO rates,
303
we considered the influence of soil properties and the relative importance of fertilizer N vs.
14
304
ammonification as a possible NH4+ source. Long-term N addition clearly resulted in an
305
accumulation of NO2 -, NO3-, and NH4+, regardless of patch type (Table 1). Also as expected, soil
306
organic matter was higher in soil under plants than between plants. N addition slightly acidified
307
these alkaline soils – an effect known to worsen conditions for AO (Arp & Stein, 2003) – and yet
308
AO rates still increase in these N-amended desert plots (Suppl. Table 1). Both types of AO rates
309
we measured (maximum static and slurry AO rates) were strongly predicted by pH (negative
310
correlation) and soil organic matter (positive correlation). Background AO rates measured in
311
unamended incubations, however, were most strongly and positively related to NH4+
312
concentration across all patch types and N treatments. Additionally, N addition significantly
313
increased net rates of NH4+ loss in both interplant and under plant patch types (Patch, P = 0.56;
314
Treatment, P < 0.01). These data suggest that N addition stimulated NH4+ loss from consumption
315
processes (e.g., NH3/NH4+ oxidation, microbial immobilization) relatively more than it increased
316
NH4+ concentrations from organic N mineralization.
317 318
Surprisingly, N addition increased abundance of archaeal amoA genes compared to controls,
319
regardless of the measure used (copies per g-1 soil, Fig. 1; or copies per total community DNA,
320
904 vs 548 archaeal amoA copies/ng DNA; in soils between plants). As expected from many
321
other studies, long-term N addition also increased the abundance of bacterial amoA gene copies.
322
Fertilization decreased the AOA to AOB ratio in the relatively fertile soils under plant canopies
323
(Fig. 1; Suppl. Table 2; N addition, 3.6 AOA/AOB; Control, 4.9 AOA/AOB) but generally
324
increased it in the interplant soils (N addition, 6.2 AOA/AOB; Control, 4.3 AOA/AOB).
325
15
326
Slurry maximum AO rates (i.e., at Vmax) were significantly higher after long-term N addition
327
compared to those of the control soils (Fig. 2; P < 0.05 in both cases). This trend was also
328
supported by measurements of static maximum AO rates (Suppl. Fig. 1; P < 0.05 in both cases).
329
NH4+ supplementation only enhanced AO rates in the static incubations of unfertilized soils but
330
not in fertilized soil (Suppl. Fig. 1), nor in any slurried incubations. These patterns show that
331
rates of AO under undisturbed, unamended conditions are NH4+-limited and may be influenced
332
by anthropogenic N additions. Taken together with the microbial abundance data, these results
333
suggest that at least some of the AOA and AOB are likely contributors to AO (Suppl. Fig 2) and
334
– as shown by the significant increases of AO rates as well as the abundance of archaeal and
335
bacterial amoA genes after N addition – both archaeal and bacterial ammonia-oxidizers are
336
responsive to environmental change.
337 338
To investigate the functional capacity of ammonia-oxidizing communities in bulk soils, we
339
evaluated the affinity (Km) parameter from the AO kinetics plots (Fig. 2; Suppl. Fig. 1). Km was
340
not possible to estimate formally in the shaken slurry assays since rates were always close to
341
maximum regardless of supplemental N addition, highlighting the low ammonia demand of
342
ammonia-oxidizers in desert soils. Residual NH4+ as low as 17 µM were measured in these
343
assays (Fig. 2), implying that the community Km is likely at or below this low value, which is
344
significantly lower than typical Km values for known AOB cultures (see rates compiled in
345
Martens-Habbena et al., 2009). In the intact incubations that were not continuously aerated
346
(static AO rates; Suppl. Fig. 1), the mean Km was 2.6 mM for control soils under plants and 1.2
347
mM for the control soils between plants. Effects of N addition could not be evaluated, given that
348
the long-term N addition itself prevented incubations at low enough ammonium.
16
349 350
An alternative way of looking at differential efficiency in ammonium utilization is to normalize
351
the maximum AO rate by the size of the community (Fig. 3; Suppl. Fig. 3). Here, AO was more
352
efficient (higher rates per copy of amoA gene) under plants than between plants (P < 0.05 in all
353
cases), and long-term N addition led to more efficient rates of AO compared to control soils in
354
the spaces between plants (significant for the shaken-slurry assay; Fig. 3; P < 0.001; Fig. 3;
355
Suppl. Fig. 3). These results suggest a change in community function (NH3 processed per amoA),
356
given that the ammonia-oxidizing community adapted favorably to higher nutrient soils (e.g.,
357
under plants and N addition).
358 359
Composition of the ammonia-oxidizing community
360 361
All phylotypes detected were related to either Nitrososphaera (Thaumarchaeota) or
362
Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira (both β-Proteobacteria), at a ratio of about 45:10:1, respectively
363
(Fig. 4; Fig. 5). Even though this ratio is subject to potential primer biases, choosing primers that
364
are unlikely to miss abundant AOM groups (Junier et al. 2008) helps to combine qPCR and
365
sequencing data for approximate abundance comparisons of phylotypes across domains. The
366
most abundant phylotype, belonging to the Nitrososphaera subcluster 1.1, accounted for 60% of
367
all the amoA sequences. The community composition was minimally influenced by patch type or
368
N addition treatment, when assessed at the level of OTUs, and we could not detect any
369
significant differences in the relative abundance of the dominant members (Fig. 4). In soil under
370
plants, N addition decreased AOA phylogenetic diversity (PD) (P < 0.001) but increased the
371
within-group variance for AOB (PERMDISP analysis, P = 0.037), suggesting that N addition has
17
372
distinct effects on community relatedness of the AOA than of the AOB. However, all other α and
373
β diversity metrics revealed that the structure of AOA and AOB was not influenced by N
374
addition or patch type (P > 0.1 in all cases). Together – at least as far as one can detect based on
375
the amoA gene sequences – these data suggest that long-term N addition had a minor effect, if at
376
all, on AOA and AOB community structure.
377 378
Discussion
379 380
Source of N for ammonia-oxidizers
381 382
Many studies from various non-arid ecosystems have shown that inorganic N addition either
383
does not affect AOA or allows AOB to outcompete AOA (e.g., Jia & Conrad, 2009; Di et al.,
384
2009; Stopnisek et al., 2010; Xia et al., 2011; Levicnik-Hofferle et al., 2012; and reviewed in
385
Hatzenpichler, 2012). A few studies have shown that AOA may react favorably to NH3
386
originating from organic N sources or N mineralization (Chen et al., 2008; Schauss et al., 2009;
387
Kelly et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2012; Levicnik-Hofferle et al., 2012; Daebeler et al., 2012). Studies
388
showing an increase in AOA abundance after inorganic N additions are rare (Verhamme et al.,
389
2011; Daebeler et al., 2014; current study). The positive response by AOA may be explained by
390
NH3 availability from organic N or mineralization from organic sources (He et al., 2012).
391
However, organic N inputs are relatively low in ecosystems such as deserts and other extreme
392
environments (Schimel & Bennett, 2004; Booth et al., 2005). Although N inputs to arid lands
393
significantly increase productivity and N content of seasonal herbaceous annual plants, net
394
potential N mineralization in soil does not appear to be consistently augmented by N addition –
18
395
perhaps due to the frequency of water limitation, the patchiness of plant growth, and organic
396
matter loss pathways such as photodegradation and aeolian/hydrologic transport (Hall et al.,
397
2009; Rao et al., 2009; Hall et al., 2011). Regardless of the role of organic N, our results
398
highlight the unique, positive response of AOA to long-term inorganic N addition in the low
399
organic matter plant interspaces of desert soils.
400 401
The use of inorganic N fertilizers by AOA may be plausible in arid systems. Since heterotrophs
402
are likely the first to consume organic N upon metabolic activation after drought, the typical
403
pulses of resource availability imparted by fast drying/wetting cycles may force AOA to utilize
404
NH3 from inorganic N sources (Placella & Firestone, 2013). Additionally, alkaline and hot
405
environments may enhance NH4+ deprotonation, leading to NH3-gas diffusion throughout the soil
406
matrix (McCalley & Sparks, 2009; Geisseler et al., 2010). The same strains of AOA may be
407
capable of using either NH3 from organic N or inorganic N sources depending on environmental
408
conditions (He et al., 2012), as shown in vitro for the only pure AOA isolate from soil,
409
Nitrososphaera viennensis (e.g., urea; Tourna et al., 2011), and predicted in silico based on the
410
genome of a recent enrichment culture, Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis (Spang et al.,
411
2012).
412 413
Size, structure, and function of ammonia oxidizing communities in arid land soils
414 415
We hypothesized that long-term N addition selects for ammonia-oxidizers that are more
416
copiotrophic (lower substrate affinity, higher activity per amoA gene copy) than those in
417
unfertilized soils (Martens-Habbena et al., 2009; Prosser & Nicol, 2012). Indeed, N addition
19
418
elevated the AO rate per amoA–copy, but this effect was significant for only the least fertile parts
419
of the landscape (in soil between plants; Fig. 3) where the desert-adapted ammonia oxidizers
420
may be functioning differently after fluctuations in the environment. Differences in organic
421
compounds between soils under and away from vegetation may affect function of ammonia
422
oxidizers as it does in cultures (Lehtovirta-Morley et al., 2014). However, the relative abundance
423
of dominant amoA OTUs was constant across treatments, with small changes only in the minor
424
members (Fig. 4). Of course we cannot fully discount the idea that perhaps the minor OTUs
425
represent those that are ecologically relevant, while the numerically dominant groups are less
426
efficient or inactive (Lennon & Jones, 2011). This scenario has yet to be proven experimentally
427
and is unlikely to be the case here since archaeal and bacterial amoA gene abundance – largely
428
determined by the common OTUs – was positively correlated with AO rates (Suppl. Fig. 2).
429 430
Evidence of unique ammonia oxidation patterns in deserts
431 432
Arid land soils face extreme environmental conditions that may select for unique phylogeny and
433
niche separation. Terrestrial studies worldwide have revealed that the “marine” clade AOA
434
(Group I.1a) are often the main contributors to AO and responders to changes in conditions from
435
soil incubations (Hatzenpichler, 2012), despite being outnumbered by the “soil” clade (Group
436
I.1b; Verhamme et al., 2011; Isobe et al., 2012; Long et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012; Lu & Jia,
437
2013). Here, we show that AOA within the “soil” clade responded significantly to N addition,
438
and the abundance of this group was positively related to AO rates in desert soil. We also found
439
that Nitrosomonas sequences outnumbered Nitrosospira, a rarity pattern for soil systems.
440
Wastewater discharge in a desert environment was found to harbor Nitrosomonas-like strains
20
441
(Angel et al., 2010), but is an unlikely scenario for the rural location of our soils in a protected
442
state park. Alternatively, dominance of many Nitrosomonas spp. appears to be limited to
443
alkaline, high-salt, and sometimes high-NH4+ conditions (Webster et al., 2005; Koops et al.,
444
2006; Cantera et al., 2006; Ke & Lu, 2012). Pulsed resource availability – a characteristic of arid
445
lands – may also drive this distribution, since Nitrosomonas strains have advantages over
446
Nitrosospira such as faster growth responses after starvation (Bollmann et al., 2002).
447
Additionally, in most soils studied previously, AOA outnumber AOB to a greater extent than
448
found in our study (Leininger et al., 2006). In the occasional cases where AOB outnumber AOA,
449
typically up to 10-fold in terrestrial systems (e.g., Di et al., 2009), other arid lands also have a
450
novel distribution as AOB outnumber AOA by 100-fold in cold desert biocrusts (Marusenko et
451
al., 2013b). Overall, atypical ammonia-oxidizing communities appear to occupy desert soils.
452 453
Growth and activity characteristics derived from culture experiments can be combined with
454
environmental data to explore relationships between AOA and AOB at the physiological and
455
ecosystem scale (Stark & Firestone, 1996; Schauss et al., 2009; Prosser & Nicol, 2012). For
456
example, since maximum AO activity per cell is higher for Nitrosospira and Nitrosomonas
457
strains than for AOA (10 and 35-fold, respectively), the contribution of AOB to our AO rates
458
must be much more important than could be predicted from their abundance. With a 10:1 ratio of
459
abundance between Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira in our soils, the weighted average maximum
460
cell activity for Nitrosomonas plus Nitrosospira should be 33-fold higher than that of AOA.
461
Based on the assumption that 1 amoA copy exists per AOA cell, and that a weighted average of
462
2.1 amoA copies are found per AOB cell (2 and 3 amoA copies per cell for Nitrosomonas and
463
Nitrosospira, respectively; Norton et al., 2002), we can estimate that the maximum AO activity
21
464
per amoA copy is 16-fold higher for AOB than AOA in our soils. Assuming equal number of
465
genomes and level of transcription/translation of amoA, the fact that AOA amoA copies
466
outnumber AOB in our soils by 4.3-fold still means that AOB contribute 3.7-fold more than
467
AOA to overall AO rates. These calculations are consistent with our data, which show that AOB
468
contribute on average 4.5 times more to AO rates than AOA (compare slopes in Suppl. Fig. 2).
469
Even though AOB are the dominant contributors at the ecosystem scale (e.g., total AO), the
470
doubling of AOA abundance in soils between plants of N fertilized plots means that the relative
471
importance of AOB and AOA to AO may change with N increases. This type of study refines
472
predictions of how environmental conditions affect the link between community dominance and
473
AO rates.
474 475
Conclusion
476 477
N addition affects arid land N cycling primarily through changes in community size, but less so
478
through changes in community composition. This study shows significant and positive effects of
479
inorganic N addition on abundance of Nitrososphaera-related AOA in soils. This pattern has
480
been rarely shown before, especially where N inputs from organic sources are low such as in
481
unique conditions of desert soils. Increased anthropogenic activity resulting in environmental N
482
enrichment may continue to alter ecosystem function through responses by both the AOA and
483
AOB. This work stresses the importance of research in arid lands in that results from mesic
484
systems may not be readily applicable, particularly given that agricultural and pastoral systems in
485
drylands occupy ~32% of the terrestrial land surface worldwide and often contain alkaline soil
486
that is routinely exposed to high temperatures (Koohafkan & Stewart, 2008). These systems may
22
487
contain AOM communities more similar to hot deserts than to arable lands from more mesic
488
environments.
489 490
Our results highlight the effects of N enrichment on AO rates and the community size of
491
ammonia oxidizers. We explored patterns resulting from long-term N enrichment, yet it remains
492
to be seen whether population dominance also shifts during short-term N changes associated
493
with pulsed moisture fluctuations that are characteristic of arid lands. Seasonal changes may
494
occur in AO communities (e.g. AOA abundance may dominate relative to AOB in the summer;
495
Sher et al., 2013), but it is currently unclear whether these changes are related to rates of
496
nitrification in arid and semi-arid soils following long-term N additions (Hall et al., 2011).
497
Future work is essential to investigate how our results compare to those of other arid lands and at
498
scales that were not tested here. Further research is also necessary to predict the AOM
499
contribution to ecologically and atmospherically important gases such as N2O or NO from
500
nitrifier denitrification and nitrification in these desert soils.
501 502
Acknowledgements
503 504
We would like to thank David Huber, Jennifer Learned, Brenda Ramirez, Julea Shaw and Natalie
505
Myers for assistance with lab work and training. We are grateful to Jean McLain, Egbert
506
Schwartz, Estelle Couradeau, and Elizabeth Cook for manuscript review. This work is supported
507
by NSF through the CAP LTER program (grant BCS-1026865). Funding was also provided by
508
the NSF Western Alliance to Expand Student Opportunities (WAESO) program and the GPSA at
509
ASU. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
510 23
510 511
References
512 513 514
Adair KL & Schwartz E (2008) Evidence that ammonia-oxidizing archaea are more abundant than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in semiarid soils of northern Arizona, USA. Microb Ecol 56(3):420-426.
515 516 517
Adair KL & Schwartz E (2011) Stable Isotope Probing with 18O-Water to Investigate Growth and Mortality of Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria and Archaea in Soil. In: Martin G. Klotz (ed) Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press, Oxford, pp. 155-169.
518 519 520
Angel R, Asaf L, Ronen Z & Nejidat A (2010) Nitrogen transformations and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in a desert ephemeral stream receiving untreated wastewater. Microb Ecol 59(1): 46-58.
521 522
Arp DJ & Stein LY (2003) Metabolism of inorganic N compounds by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 38(6):471-495.
523 524 525
Austin A, Yahdjian L, Stark J, Belnap J, Porporato A, Norton U, Ravetta DA & Schaeffer SM (2004) Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Oecologia 141(2):221-235.
526 527 528
Avrahami S & Bohannan BJM (2007) Response of Nitrosospira sp strain AF-Like ammonia oxidizers to changes in temperature, soil moisture content, and fertilizer concentration. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(4):1166-1173.
529 530
Belser LW & Mays EL (1980) Specific-Inhibition of Nitrite Oxidation by Chlorate and its use in Assessing Nitrification in Soils and Sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 39(3):505-510.
531 532 533
Bollmann A, Bar-Gilissen MJ & Laanbroek HJ (2002) Growth at low ammonium concentrations and starvation response as potential factors involved in niche differentiation among ammoniaoxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(10):4751-4757.
534 535
Booth M, Stark J &Rastetter E (2005) Controls on nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: A synthetic analysis of literature data. Ecol Monogr 75(2):139-157.
536 537
Cantera JJL, Jordan FL & Stein LY (2006) Effects of irrigation sources on ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in a managed turf-covered aridisol. Biol Fertility Soils 43(2):247-255.
538 539 540
Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL & Knight R (2010a) PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26(2):266-267.
541 542
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J et al. (2010b) QIIME allows analysis of highthroughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5):335-336.
24
543 544
Chen X, Zhu Y, Xia Y, Shen J & He J (2008) Ammonia-oxidizing archaea: important players in paddy rhizosphere soil? Environ Microbiol 10(8):1978-1987.
545 546 547
Chu H, Fujii T, Morimoto S, Lin X, Yagi K, Hu J & Zhang J (2007) Community structure of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria under long-term application of mineral fertilizer and organic manure in a sandy loam soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(2):485-491.
548 549
Collins SL, Sinsabaugh RL, Crenshaw C, Green L, Porras-Alfaro A, Stursova M & Zeglin LH (2008) Pulse dynamics and microbial processes in aridland ecosystems. J Ecol 96(3):413-420.
550 551
Cook EM (2014) Direct and indirect ecological consequences of human activities in urban and native ecosystems. Dissertation. Arizona State University.
552 553 554
Daebeler A, Abell GC, Bodelier PL, Bodrossy L, Frampton DM, Hefting MM & Laanbroek HJ (2012) Archaeal dominated ammonia-oxidizing communities in Icelandic grassland soils are moderately affected by long-term N fertilization and geothermal heating. Front Microbiol 3:352.
555 556 557
Daebeler A, Bodelier PLE, Yan Z, Hefting MM, Jia Z & Laanbroek HJ (2014) Interactions between Thaumarchaea, Nitrospira and methanotrophs modulate autotrophic nitrification in volcanic grassland soil. ISME J doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.81
558 559 560
Davies R & Hall SJ (2010) Direct and indirect effects of urbanization on soil and plant nutrients in desert ecosystems of the Phoenix metropolitan area, Arizona (USA). Urban Ecosystems 13:295-317.
561 562 563
Di HJ, Cameron KC, Shen JP, Winefield CS, O'Callaghan M, Bowatte S & He JZ (2009) Nitrification driven by bacteria and not archaea in nitrogen-rich grassland soils. Nat Geosci 2(9):621-624.
564 565 566
Dowd SF, Sun Y, Wolcott RD, Domingo A & Carroll JA (2008) Bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) for microbiome studies: Bacterial diversity in the ileum of newly weaned Salmonella-infected pigs. Foodborne Pathog Dis 5(4):459-472.
567 568
Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26(19):2460-2461.
569 570 571
Francis CA, Roberts KJ, Beman JM, Santoro AE & Oakley BB (2005) Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(41):14683-14688.
572 573 574
Garcia-Pichel F, Lopez-Cortes A & Nubel U (2001) Phylogenetic and morphological diversity of cyanobacteria in soil desert crusts from the Colorado Plateau. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(4):1902-1910.
575 576
Geisseler D, Horwath WR, Joergensen RG & Ludwig B (2010) Pathways of nitrogen utilization by soil microorganisms - A review. Soil Biol Biochem 42(12):2058-2067.
25
577 578 579
Gelfand I & Yakir D (2008) Influence of nitrite accumulation in association with seasonal patterns and mineralization of soil nitrogen in a semi-arid pine forest. Soil Biol Biochem 40(2):415-424.
580 581
Hall SJ, Ahmed B, Ortiz P, Davies R, Sponseller RA & Grimm NB (2009) Urbanization Alters Soil Microbial Functioning in the Sonoran Desert. Ecosystems 12(4):654-671.
582 583 584
Hall SJ, Sponseller RA, Grimm NB, Huber D, Kaye JP, Clark C & Collins SL (2011) Ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment across an urban airshed in the Sonoran Desert. Ecol Appl 21(3):640-660.
585 586 587 588
Hart SC, JM Stark, EA Davidson & MK Firestone (1994) Nitrogen mineralisation, immobilisation, and nitrification, p. 985–1018. In RW Weaver, JS Angle, PS Bottomley (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and chemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wis.
589 590
Hatzenpichler R (2012) Diversity, Physiology, and Niche Differentiation of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(21):7501-7510.
591 592
He J, Hu H & Zhang L (2012) Current insights into the autotrophic thaumarchaeal ammonia oxidation in acidic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 55:146-154.
593 594 595
Isobe K, Koba K, Suwa Y, Ikutani J, Fang Y, Yoh M, Mo J, Otsuka S & Senoo K (2012) High abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in acidified subtropical forest soils in southern China after long-term N deposition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80(1):193-203.
596 597
Jia Z & Conrad R (2009) Bacteria rather than Archaea dominate microbial ammonia oxidation in an agricultural soil. Environ Microbiol 11(7):1658-1671.
598 599
Johnson SL, Budinoff CR, Belnap J & Garcia-Pichel F (2005) Relevance of ammonium oxidation within biological soil crust communities. Environ Microbiol 7(1):1–12.
600 601 602
Jordan FL, Cantera JJL, Fenn ME & Stein LY (2005) Autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria contribute minimally to nitrification in a nitrogen-impacted forested ecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(1):197-206.
603 604 605
Junier P, Kim O, Molina V, Limburg P, Junier T, Imhoff JF & Witzel KP (2008) Comparative in silico analysis of PCR primers suited for diagnostics and cloning of ammonia monooxygenase genes from ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64(1):141-152.
606 607
Ke X & Lu Y (2012) Adaptation of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms to environment shift of paddy field soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80(1):87-97.
608 609 610
Kelly JJ, Policht K, Grancharova T & Hundal LS (2011) Distinct Responses in AmmoniaOxidizing Archaea and Bacteria after Addition of Biosolids to an Agricultural Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(18):6551-6558.
26
611 612
Konneke M, Bernhard AE, de la Torre JR, Walker CB, Waterbury JB & Stahl DA (2005) Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature 437(7058):543-546.
613 614
Koohafkan P & Stewart BA (2008) Water and cereals in drylands. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Earthscan.
615 616
Koops H, Purkhold U, Pommerening-Röser A, Timmermann G & Wagner M (2006) The lithoautotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. The Prokaryotes 5:778-811.
617 618 619
Koper TE, Stark JM, Habteselassie MY & Norton JM (2010) Nitrification exhibits Haldane kinetics in an agricultural soil treated with ammonium sulfate or dairy-waste compost. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74(2):316-322.
620 621
Kowalchuk GA & Stephen JR (2001) Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: A model for molecular microbial ecology. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:485-529.
622
Lehtovirta‐Morley LE, Ge C, Ross J, Yao H, Nicol GW & Prosser JI (2014) Characterisation of
623 624
terrestrial acidophilic archaeal ammonia oxidisers and their inhibition and stimulation by organic compounds. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12353
625 626 627
Leininger S, Urich T, Schloter M, Schwark L, Qi J, Nicol GW, Prosser JI, Schuster SC & Schleper C (2006) Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils. Nature 442(7104):806-809.
628 629
Lennon JT & Jones SE (2011) Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nature Rev Microbiol 9(2):119-130.
630 631 632
Levicnik-Hofferle S, Nicol GW, Ausec L, Mandic-Mulec I & Prosser JI (2012) Stimulation of thaumarchaeal ammonia oxidation by ammonia derived from organic nitrogen but not added inorganic nitrogen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80(1):114-123.
633 634 635
Long X, Chen C, Xu Z, Linder S & He J (2012) Abundance and community structure of ammonia oxidizing bacteria and archaea in a Sweden boreal forest soil under 19-year fertilization and 12-year warming. J Soils Sediments 12(7):1124-1133.
636 637
Low AP, Stark JM & Dudley LM (1997) Effects of soil osmotic potential on nitrification, ammonification, N-assimilation, and nitrous oxide production. Soil Sci 162(1):16-27.
638 639
Lozupone C & Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8228-8235.
640 641
Lu L & Jia Z (2013) Urease gene-containing Archaea dominate autotrophic ammonia oxidation in two acid soils. Environ Microbiol 15(6):1795-1809.
27
642 643 644
Lu L, Han W, Zhang J, Wu Y, Wang B, Lin X, Zhu J, Cai Z & Jia Z (2012) Nitrification of archaeal ammonia oxidizers in acid soils is supported by hydrolysis of urea. ISME J 6(10):19781984.
645 646 647
Martens-Habbena W & Stahl DA (2011) Nitrogen Metabolism and Kinetics of AmmoniaOxidizing Archaea. Methods in Enzymology, Vol 46: Research on Nitrification and Related Processes, Pt B, Academic Press, Oxford 496:465-487.
648 649 650
Martens-Habbena W, Berube PM, Urakawa H, de la Torre JR & Stahl DA (2009) Ammonia oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying Archaea and Bacteria. Nature 461(7266):976-979.
651 652
Marusenko Y, Huber DP & Hall SJ (2013a) Fungi mediate nitrous oxide production but not ammonia oxidation in aridland soils of the southwestern US. Soil Biol Biochem 63:24-36.
653 654 655
Marusenko Y, Bates ST, Anderson I, Johnson SL, Soule T & Garcia-Pichel F (2013b) Ammoniaoxidizing archaea and bacteria are structured by geography in biological soil crusts across North American arid lands. Ecol Proc 2(9).
656 657
McCalley CK & Sparks JP (2009) Abiotic Gas Formation Drives Nitrogen Loss from a Desert Ecosystem. Science 326(5954):837-840.
658 659
McCrackin ML, Harms TK, Grimm NB, Hall SJ & Kaye JP (2008) Responses of soil microorganisms to resource availability in urban, desert soils. Biogeochemistry 87(2):143-155.
660 661
Nishio T & Fujimoto T (1990) Kinetics of Nitrification of various Amounts of Ammonium Added to Soils. Soil Biol Biochem 22(1):51-55.
662 663
Norton JM, Alzerreca JJ, Suwa Y & Klotz MG (2002) Diversity of ammonia monooxygenase operon in autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Arch Microbiol 177(2):139-149.
664 665 666
Norton JM & Stark JM (2011) Regulation and Measurement of Nitrification in Terrestrial Systems. In: Martin G. Klotz (ed) Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press, Oxford, pp. 343368.
667 668
Offre P, Prosser JI & Nicol GW (2009) Growth of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in soil microcosms is inhibited by acetylene. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70(1):99-108.
669 670 671
Okano Y, Hristova KR, Leutenegger CM, Jackson LE, Denison RF, Gebreyesus B, Lebauer D & Scow KM (2004) Application of real-time PCR to study effects of ammonium on population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(2):1008-1016.
672
Pester M, Rattei T, Flechl S, Groengroeft A, Richter A, Overmann J, Reinhold‐Hurek B, Loy A
673
& Wagner M (2012) amoA-based consensus phylogeny of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and deep 28
674 675
sequencing of amoA genes from soils of four different geographic regions. Environ Microbiol 14(2):525-539.
676 677
Placella SA & Firestone MK (2013) Transcriptional Response of Nitrifying Communities to Wetting of Dry Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(10):3294-3302.
678
Prosser JI (1989) Autotrophic nitrification in bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol 30:125-181.
679 680
Prosser JI & Nicol GW (2012) Archaeal and bacterial ammonia-oxidisers in soil: the quest for niche specialisation and differentiation. Trends Microbiol 20(11):523-531.
681 682
Prosser JI & Nicol GW (2008) Relative contributions of archaea and bacteria to aerobic ammonia oxidation in the environment. Environ Microbiol 10(11):2931-2941.
683 684 685 686
Purkhold U, Pommerening-Roser A, Juretschko S, Schmid MC, Koops HP & Wagner M (2000) Phylogeny of all recognized species of ammonia oxidizers based on comparative 16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: Implications for molecular diversity surveys. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(12):5368-5382.
687 688
Rajeev L, da Rocha UN, Klitgord N et al. (2013) Dynamic cyanobacterial response to hydration and dehydration in a desert biological soil crust. ISME J 7:2178-2191.
689 690 691
Rao LE, Parker DR, Bytnerowicz A & Allen EB (2009) Nitrogen mineralization across an atmospheric nitrogen deposition gradient in Southern California deserts. J Arid Environ 73(10):920-930.
692 693
Rosentreter R, Bowker M & Belnap J (2007) A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands: Common Lichens and Bryophytes. Bureau of Land Management.
694 695 696
Rotthauwe JH, Witzel KP & Liesack W (1997) The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: Molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(12):4704-4712.
697 698
Schade J & Hobbie S (2005) Spatial and temporal variation in islands of fertility in the Sonoran Desert. Biogeochemistry 73(3):541-553.
699 700
Schauss K, Focks A, Leininger S et al. (2009) Dynamics and functional relevance of ammoniaoxidizing archaea in two agricultural soils. Environ Microbiol 11(2):446-456.
701 702
Schimel JP & Bennett J (2004) Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85(3):591-602.
703 704
Schimel J, Balser TC & Wallenstein M (2007) Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88(6):1386-1394.
705 706
Schleper C & Nicol GW (2010) Ammonia-Oxidising Archaea - Physiology, Ecology and Evolution. Adv Microb Physiol 57:1-41.
29
707 708 709
Shen J, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Zhang J & He J (2008) Abundance and composition of ammoniaoxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea communities of an alkaline sandy loam. Environ Microbiol 10(6):1601-1611.
710
Sher Y, Zaady E & Nejidat A (2013) Spatial and temporal diversity and abundance of ammonia
711
oxidizers in semi‐arid and arid soils: indications for a differential seasonal effect on archaeal and
712
bacterial ammonia oxidizers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 86(3):544-556.
713 714 715
Spang A, Poehlein A, Offre P et al. (2012) The genome of the ammonia-oxidizing Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis: insights into metabolic versatility and environmental adaptations. Environ Microbiol 14(12):3122-3145.
716 717 718
Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT & Sumner ME (1996) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3-Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, xxi-1390.
719 720
Stark JM & Firestone MK (1996) Kinetic characteristics of ammonium-oxidizer communities in a California oak woodland-annual grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 28(10-11):1307-1317.
721 722 723 724
Stephen J, Chang Y, Macnaughton S, Kowalchuk G, Leung K, Flemming C & White DC (1999) Effect of toxic metals on indigenous soil p-subgroup proteobacterium ammonia oxidizer community structure and protection against toxicity by inoculated metal-resistant bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(1):95-101.
725 726 727
Stopnisek N, Gubry-Rangin C, Hoefferle S, Nicol GW, Mandic-Mulec I & Prosser JI (2010) Thaumarchaeal Ammonia Oxidation in an Acidic Forest Peat Soil Is Not Influenced by Ammonium Amendment. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(22):7626-7634.
728 729 730
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M & Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28(10):2731-2739.
731 732 733
Taylor AE & Bottomley PJ (2006) Nitrite production by Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrosospira sp AV in soils at different solution concentrations of ammonium. Soil Biol Biochem 38(4):828-836.
734 735
Tourna M, Freitag TE & Prosser JI (2010) Stable Isotope Probing Analysis of Interactions between Ammonia Oxidizers. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(8):2468-2477.
736 737 738
Tourna M, Freitag TE, Nicol GW & Prosser JI (2008) Growth, activity and temperature responses of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in soil microcosms. Environ Microbiol 10(5):1357-1364.
30
739 740
Tourna M, Stieglmeier M, Spang A et al. (2011) Nitrososphaera viennensis, an ammonia oxidizing archaeon from soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(20):8420-8425.
741 742
Verhamme DT, Prosser JI & Nicol GW (2011) Ammonia concentration determines differential growth of ammonia-oxidising archaea and bacteria in soil microcosms. ISME J 5(6):1067-1071.
743
Warren A, Sud YC & Rozanov B (1996) The future of deserts. J Arid Environ 32(1):75-89.
744 745 746
Webster G, Embley T, Freitag T, Smith Z & Prosser J (2005) Links between ammonia oxidizer species composition, functional diversity and nitrification kinetics in grassland soils. Environ Microbiol 7(5):676-684.
747 748 749
Wessen E, Nyberg K, Jansson JK & Hallin S (2010) Responses of bacterial and archaeal ammonia oxidizers to soil organic and fertilizer amendments under long-term management. Appl Soil Ecol 45(3):193-200.
750 751
Widmer P, Brookes P & Parry L (1989) Microbial Biomass Nitrogen Measurements in Soils Containing Large Amounts of Inorganic Nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 21(6):865-867.
752 753 754
Wilhelm R, Abeliovich A & Nejidat A (1998) Effect of long-term ammonia starvation on the oxidation of ammonia and hydroxylamine by Nitrosomonas europaea. J Biochem 124(4):811815.
755 756
Winogradsky S (1890) Recherches sur les organismes de la Nitrification. Ann Inst Pasteur, Paris, 4:213-257, 760-771.
757 758
Xia W, Zhang C, Zeng X et al. (2011) Autotrophic growth of nitrifying community in an agricultural soil. ISME J 5(7):1226-1236.
759 760
Zhalnina K, de Quadros PD, Camargo FAO & Triplett EW (2012) Drivers of archaeal ammoniaoxidizing communities in soil. Front Microbiol 3:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00210.
761 762 763
Zhang L, Hu H, Shen J & He J (2012) Ammonia-oxidizing archaea have more important role than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in ammonia oxidation of strongly acidic soils. ISME J 6(5):1032-1045.
764
31
764
Table 1. Soil characteristics from plots used in this study.
765 pH
WHC (%)a
SOM (%)b
Soil patch Treatmentd Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD typec Interplant
Control
Interplant N addition Under plant
Control
Under plant
N addition
NO2- (µg N·g-1)
NO3- (µg N·g-1)
Mean SD
Mean 1.40
SD 0.41
NH4+ (µg N·g-1) Mean
8.39 0.07 32.0 4.5
2.02 0.57
0.13 0.08
8.21 0.08 35.1 2.8
2.45 0.44
1.58 0.71
8.25 0.11 42.1 3.3
3.26 0.37
0.03 0.01
4.50
4.63
1.06
0.04
8.11 0.06 45.2 6.9
3.59 0.55
0.16 0.19
29.12
5.11
12.77
9.39
36.10 21.37
0.42
SD 0.17
22.47 21.31
Two-way ANOVA results, P value
Patch x Treatment Treatment Patch
0.651
0.992
0.868
0.171
0.459
0.464
0.007*
0.284
0.214
0.002*
0.002*
0.036*
0.034*
0.006*
0.003*
0.002*
0.772
0.519
766 767 768 769 770
a WHC = water holding capacity. b SOM = soil organic matter. c Soils were collected from spaces between plants or under the canopy of Larrea tridentata shrubs. d N addition plots were treated with 60 kg of N (as NH4NO3) ha-1·yr-1 during 2005-2012. Significance at α = 0.05 indicated by bold and *. SD = standard deviation. n = 3.
771 772
32
772
Figure legends
773 774
Figure 1. Quantification of amoA gene copy numbers for AOB and AOA from Sonoran Desert
775
soil in N addition and control plots. Error bars are standard errors of independent field triplicates.
776
33
776 777
Figure 2. Concentration-response kinetics of ammonia oxidation using the shaken-slurry assay
778
for net potential rates. To test the effect of long-term N addition on ammonia oxidation rates,
779
soils were supplemented with a range of NH4+ concentrations in the short-term laboratory
780
methods to measure kinetics of ammonia oxidation. NO2- accumulation is measured after sodium
781
chlorate inhibition as a proxy for ammonia oxidation. Bi-directional error bars are standard
782
deviations of independent field triplicates to show variation in supplemented NH4+ and measured
783
ammonia oxidation rates.
784
34
784 785
Figure 3. Effects of N addition on the function of the amoA gene-containing community using
786
estimates of copy-specific ammonia oxidation rates. Specific rates were calculated as maximum
787
ammonia oxidation rate (Vmax) from the shaken-slurry assay, divided by amoA gene copy
788
number per g soil. Error bars are standard errors of Vmax and amoA calculations for independent
789
field triplicates.
790
35
790 791
Figure 4. Community composition of OTUs (clustered at 97% nucleotide similarity) based on
792
bioinformatics of amoA gene pyrosequences. Diversity measures were analyzed separately for
793
AOA and AOB. Brackets include taxonomic classifications and percent of phylotype out of
794
AOA or AOB as an average across all treatment and patch replicates. The remaining 2% of AOB
795
were unclassified to the species-level. The remaining 2% of AOA are identified under
796
Nitrososphaera subclusters 2, 8, and 9. Despite biases with qPCR and pyrosequencing
797
technologies, the AOB and AOA bars are drawn at scale (about 25 and 75% of total amoA,
798
respectively). Each bar is the average of independent field and pyrosequencing triplicates
799
(excluding one replicate each in the interplant control and N addition samples for the AOA).
800
36
800 801
Figure 5. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of archaeal and bacterial amoA gene sequences.
802
Sequences for this study were obtained from pyrosequencing of the amoA gene. Sequences of
803
known strains and subclusters are used as reference groups. OTUs were clustered at 97%
804
nucleotide similarity and taxonomy classified at multiple phylogenetic levels within the
805
Thaumarchaeota (formerly named Crenarchaeota) as proposed by Pester et al. (2012) and
806
within the AOB (Purkhold et al., 2000). The relative abundance of phylogenetic groups within
807
the AOA or AOB detected in this study is shown in parentheses next to the clade name. Height
808
of clades is proportional to the OTU richness. Bootstrap support is represented by full (75-99%)
809
and empty (50-75%) markers at the nodes.
810
37