This article was downloaded by: [York University Libraries] On: 13 August 2014, At: 01:46 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Natural Product Research: Formerly Natural Product Letters Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gnpl20

Alnuheptanoid A: a new diarylheptanoid derivative from Alnus japonica ab

c

cd

Sabrin R.M. Ibrahim , Mostafa A. Fouad , Ahmed Abdel-Lateff , e

Tatsufumi Okino & Gamal A. Mohamed

df

a

Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawwarah 30078, Saudi Arabia b

Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt c

Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, 61519 Minia, Egypt d

Department of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia e

Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan f

Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut 71524, Egypt Published online: 12 Aug 2014.

To cite this article: Sabrin R.M. Ibrahim, Mostafa A. Fouad, Ahmed Abdel-Lateff, Tatsufumi Okino & Gamal A. Mohamed (2014): Alnuheptanoid A: a new diarylheptanoid derivative from Alnus japonica, Natural Product Research: Formerly Natural Product Letters, DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2014.947489 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2014.947489

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content

should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/termsand-conditions

Natural Product Research, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2014.947489

Alnuheptanoid A: a new diarylheptanoid derivative from Alnus japonica

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

Sabrin R.M. Ibrahimab*, Mostafa A. Fouadc, Ahmed Abdel-Lateffcd, Tatsufumi Okinoe and Gamal A. Mohameddf a Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawwarah 30078, Saudi Arabia; bDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt; cDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, 61519 Minia, Egypt; dDepartment of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; eFaculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan; fDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut 71524, Egypt

(Received 23 May 2014; final version received 19 July 2014) Extensive chromatographic investigation of the ethanolic extract of Alnus japonica Steud stem bark led to the isolation of a new diarylheptanoid named alnuheptanoid A [(5S)-7-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methoxyheptan-3-one] (8), together with seven known diarylheptanoid derivatives: platyphyllenone (5), (5S)1,7-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methoxyheptan-3-one (6), 1-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7-(4hydroxyphenyl)-4-hepten-3-one (7), hirsutenone (9), (5R)-O-methylhirsutanonol (10), hirsutanonol (11) and oregonin (13), three triterpenes: a-amyrin (1), betulinaldehyde (3) and betulinic acid (4), and two sterols: b-sitosterol (2) and daucosterol (12). Compound 6 was isolated for the first time from natural source. The structures of the isolated compounds were determined on the basis of spectroscopic measurements (UV, IR, HR-ESI-MS, 1D and 2D NMR). Keywords: Alnus japonica; Betulaceae; alnuheptanoid A; diarylheptanoids; triterpenoids; sterols

1. Introduction The genus Alnus (family Betulaceae) comprises 30 species of alder trees which ranges from large size to shrubs. The species of Alnus were used in oriental traditional medicine as remedies for fever, haemorrhage, burn injuries, diarrhoea and alcoholism. This genus is considered as a potential source of different triterpenes, tannins, flavonoids and diarylheptanoids (Karchesy et al. 1974; Nomura et al. 1981; Aoki et al. 1990; Lee et al. 1992, 1999; Tori et al. 1995; Kuroyanagi et al. 2005). Alnus japonica Steud is a deciduous tree, which is indigenous in the damp parts of the fields and forests of Japan. Hannoki (Japanese name) is a common tree in low mountainous areas of Japan (Nomura et al. 1981; Lee et al. 1992; Wada et al. 1998; Kuroyanagi et al. 2005). Diarylheptanoid is a class of compounds, which bears 1,7-diphenylheptane skeleton. They were isolated from different sources such as Zingiber, Curcuma, Alpinia, Alnus and Myrica. About 400 diarylheptanoids were published and recognised as potential therapeutic agents with different biological activities: anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antitumour, oestrogenic, leishmanicidal, hepatoprotective and neuro-protective (Lee, Kim, et al. 2000; Lee, Park, et al. 2000; Shin et al. 2002; Agarwal et al. 2003; Kang et al. 2004; Jin et al. 2007; Park et al. 2010; Lv & She 2012). Many diarylheptanoid derivatives isolated from A. japonica

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] q 2014 Taylor & Francis

2

S.R.M. Ibrahim et al.

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

exhibited interesting biological properties including hepatoprotective, antioxidant (Lee et al. 2003, 2005; Kim et al. 2004), antitumour (Joo et al. 2002; Choi et al. 2008), antiviral against avian influenza virus (Tung et al. 2010) and protease inhibitor in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (Park et al. 2012). Moreover, hirsutenone isolated from the bark of A. japonica acts by mimicking calcineurin inhibitor. So, it may be a new topical drug candidate for treatment of atopic dermatitis (Joo et al. 2009). We report herein the isolation and identification of the metabolites from A. japonica stem bark (Figure 1). The different chromatographic techniques and final purification using HPLC led to isolation of 13 compounds including three triterpenes (1, 3 and 4), two sterols (2 and 12) and eight diarylheptanoids (6– 11 and 13) one of them is new, alnuheptanoid A (8), and another one (6) isolated for the first time from natural source. Their structures were elucidated using different spectral methods (UV, IR, HR-ESI-MS, 1D and 2D NMR). 2. Results and discussion Compound 6 was isolated as a brown residue. It had a molecular formula C20H24O4 based on HR-ESI-MS pseudo-molecular ion peak at m/z ¼ 327.1677 [M –H]þ, requiring nine degrees of unsaturation: eight for two phenyl moieties and one for ketone carbonyl group. The presence of ketone carbonyl was confirmed by the IR absorption band at 1712 cm21 and 13C NMR signal at dC 210.7 (C-3). Also, the IR spectrum showed characteristic absorption bands due to a hydroxyl group (3395 cm21) and phenyl (1608 and 1521 cm21) moieties. Compound 6 had UV absorption maxima at 280 and 222 nm characteristic for the presence of aromatic moiety (Itokawa et al. 1985; Uehara et al. 1985). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra showed signals at dH 6.96 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2 and 2.2 Hz, H-20 , 60 )/dC 129.9 (C-20 , 60 ), 6.98 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-200 , 600 )/130.0 (C-200 , 600 ), 6.66 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-30 , 50 )/115.8 (C-30 , 50 ), 6.69 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-300 , 500 )/115.9 (C-300 , 500 ), 132.7 (C-10 ), 133.6 (C-100 ), 156.4 (C-40 ) and 156.5 (C-400 ) characteristic for the presence of two 4-oxyphenyl moieties (Ohta et al. 1984; Wada et al 1998;

R

H R 2 H 12 Glu

HO 1

RO

O

R1

R2

HO

1` 1

R2 3` A

HO 5 7 9

1

HO 3`

1`

HO 4`

6`

R1 H H OH

R2 H OH OH

O

OCH3

3

5

10

OH

HO 4`

6 CH3 8 CH3 11 H 13 Xyl 3``OH

6``

4`` OH

Figure 1. Structures of the isolated compounds (1 – 13).

OR1

3

5

7 1``

3``R3

B

6` R1

7 1``

O

R 3 CHO 4 COOH

6`` R2

R3

H H OH OH

H OH OH OH

4`` OH

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

Natural Product Research

3

Lee, Kim, et al. 2000; Lee, Park, et al. 2000; Park et al. 2010) (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). They were established by the observed 1H – 1H COSY cross peaks of H-20 , H-60 /H-30 , H-50 and H-200 , H-600 /H-300 , H-500 . They were further confirmed by the HMBC correlations of H-20 and H-60 to C-10 , C-30 , C-40 and C-50 , H-30 and H-50 with C-10 , C-20 , C-40 and C-60 , H-200 and H-600 to C-100 and C-400 , and H-300 and H-500 with C-100 , C-200 , C-400 and C-600 (Supplementary Figure S4). Moreover, the 1H – 1H COSY showed two coupled methylene groups at dH 2.79 (2H, t, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, H-1) and 2.72 (2H, t, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, H-2), which correlated with the carbon signals resonating at dC 30.4 (C-1) and 46.2 (C-2), respectively, to give ZCH2ZCH2Z moiety. In the 1H and 13C NMR spectra, signals for three methylene groups at dH 2.66 (1H, m, H-4A) and 2.46 (1H, m, H-4B)/dC 48.0 (C-4), 1.71 (1H, m, H-6A) and 1.66 (1H, m, H-6B)/37.0 (C-6) and 2.52 (2H, m, H-7)/31.3 (C-7) and an oxymethine at dH 3.62 (1H, pintet, 6.6 Hz, H-5)/77.7 (C-5) were observed. The correlations observed in the 1H – 1H COSY displayed the connectivity from H-4 to H-7 to give ZCH2ZCHOHZCH2ZCH2Z moiety. The 3J HMBC correlations of H-1 and H-5 to C-3, H-2 and H-6 to C-4, and H-7 to C-5 confirmed the presence of 5-hydroxy heptan-3-one moiety (Ohta et al. 1984; Wada et al 1998; Lee, Kim, et al. 2000; Lee, Park, et al. 2000; Park et al. 2010; El-Halawany & Hattori 2012). Signals for methoxy group at dH 3.25/dC 56.9 were observed. The location of methoxy group was established by its HMBC cross peak to C-5 of the 5-hydroxy heptan-3-one moiety. The linkages of the two 4-oxyphenyl moieties on the alkyl group at C-1 and C-7 were confirmed by HMBC correlations from H-1 to C-10 , C-20 and C-60 , H20 and H-60 to C-10 , H-7 to C-100 , C-200 and C-600 , and H-200 and H-600 to C-7. The absolute stereochemistry at position C-5 was suggested to be S-form on the basis of positive sign optical rotation of 6 compared to negative sign optical rotations in the R-form of a series of analogous compounds (Giang et al. 2006; Park et al. 2010). This was further secured by the comparison 1 H NMR chemical shift of H-5 (dH 3.62) in 6 with those of related compounds in the literature [R-form (H-5 at dH 3.99– 4.10) and S-form (H-5 at dH 3.62)] (Itokawa et al. 1985; Li et al. 2003; Kuroyanagi et al. 2005; Park et al. 2010). On the basis of the NMR spectral data, 6 was identified as (5S)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methoxyheptan-3-one. Compound 6 was available from a commercial source and this is the first report for its isolation and structural characterisation from a natural source. Compound 8 was isolated as a brown residue. Its molecular formula C20H24O5 was supported by the presence of a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z ¼ 343.1625 [M 2 H]þ in HRESI-MS. Compound 8 is 16 mass units more than 6, indicating the presence of an additional hydroxyl group in 8. It had UV absorption maxima at 284 and 225 nm characteristic for the presence of aromatic moiety (Itokawa et al. 1985; Uehara et al. 1985). The IR spectrum of 8 showed absorption bands for a hydroxyl at 3394 cm21, ketone carbonyl at 1710 cm21 and an aromatic ring at 1606 and 1524 cm21. The 13C and DEPT NMR spectra showed resonances for 20 carbons including 1 methoxy, 5 methylenes, 8 methines and 6 quaternary carbons; one of them for ketone carbonyl at dC 211.5 (C-3) and three for oxygen-bonded aromatic carbons at dC 156.4 (C-40 ), 146.2 (C-300 ) and 144.5 (C-400 ). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 8 were quite similar to those of 6, but the signals associated with one of the 4-oxyphenyl moieties were absent. Instead, new signals for 1,3,4-tri-substituted phenyl moiety at dH 6.65 (d, J ¼ 2.2 Hz, H-200 )/dC 116.4 (C-200 ), 6.73 (d, J ¼ 8.2 Hz, H-500 )/116.5 and 6.64 (dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-600 )/120.6, 134.0 (C-100 ), 146.2 (C-300 ) and 144.5 (C-400 ) were observed. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra revealed the presence of 5-methoxy heptan-3-one moiety in 8 (Supplementary Figures S5 and S6). The resonances at dH 7.05 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-20 , 60 )/dC 130.3, 6.71 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-30 , 50 )/116.2 (C-30 , 50 ), 133.2 (C-10 ), and 156.4 (C-40 ) in 1H and 13C NMR spectra indicated the presence of a 1,4-di-substituted phenyl moiety. The S configuration at position 5 was assigned based on positive optical rotation value of 8 (Giang et al. 2006; Park et al. 2010), as well as the comparison of the 1H shifts of H-5 with those reported in related diarylheptanoids (Itokawa et al. 1985; Li et al. 2003; Kuroyanagi et al. 2005; Park et al. 2010). On the basis of the above pieces of

4

S.R.M. Ibrahim et al.

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

evidence and by comparison of the spectral data with the literature, the structure of 8 was elucidated as (5S)-7-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methoxyheptane-3-one (8) and named alnuheptanoid A. The known compounds were identified through the analysis of their spectroscopic data (Supplementary material) and comparison of these data with the literature as a-amyrin (1) (Fingolo et al. 2013), b-sitosterol (2) (Sayed et al. 2007), betulinaldehyde (3) (Mahato & Kundu 1994), betulinic acid (4) (Mahato & Kundu 1994), platyphyllenone (5) (Fuchino et al. 1996), 1-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-hepten-3-one (7) (Ohta et al. 1984; Chen et al. 1998), hirsutenone (9) (Ohta et al. 1984), (5R)-O-methylhirsutanonol (10) (Kuroyanagi et al. 2005), hirsutanonol (11) (Ohta et al. 1984), daucosterol (12) (Sayed et al. 2007) and oregonin (13) (Lee, Kim, et al. 2000; Lee, Park, et al. 2000). 3. Experimental 3.1. General experimental procedures Melting points were carried out using an Electrothermal 9100 Digital Melting Point apparatus (Electrothermal Engineering Ltd, Essex, England). The UV spectra were determined using Perkin Elmer double beam spectrophotometer Model 550S (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), attached to a Hitachi recorder Model 561, using 1 cm quartz cell. The IR spectra were measured on a Shimadzu Infrared-400 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Optical rotations were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Model 341 LC Polarimeter (Perkin-Elmer). Electron impact mass spectra were recorded on a Finnigan MAT TSQ 7000 mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan, Bremen, Germany). ESI-MS were obtained with an LCQ DECA mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan) coupled to an Agilent 1100 HPLC system equipped with a photodiode array detector. HR-ESI-MS were recorded on an LTQ Orbitrap (Thermo Finnigan). 1D (1H and 13C) and 2D (COSY, HSQC and HMBC) NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker ARX 400 NMR spectrometers (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA). Semi-preparative HPLC (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) coupled with UV detector L7400 (UV detection at 280 nm) was used. Separation column (250 £ 8 mm, i.d.) pre-packed with Eurosphere 100-C18 (Knauer, Berlin, Germany). Separation was achieved by applying a linear gradient from 80% H2O (pH 2.0) and 20% MeOH to 100% MeOH over 45 min. Solvents were distilled prior spectroscopic measurements. Column chromatographic separations were performed on silica gel 60 (0.04 – 0.063 mm, Merck). TLC analysis was performed on pre-coated TLC plates with silica gel 60 F254 (0.2 mm, Merck). The compounds were detected by UV absorption at lmax 255 and 366 nm followed by spraying with p-anisaldehyde –H2SO4 reagent and heating at 1108C for 1 –2 min. 3.2. Plant material A. japonica stem bark was collected in March 2005 from the authorised trees growing in the Botanical Garden, Hieinrich-Heine University, Du¨sseldorf, Germany. The plant was taxonomically identified by Prof. Dr Peter Westhoff (Professor of Development and Molecular Biology of Plants, Hieinrich-Heine University, Du¨sseldorf, Germany). A voucher specimen has been deposited at the Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt (Registration code AJB-2005). 3.3. Extraction and isolation The dried powdered stem bark of A. japonica (200 g) was exhaustively extracted with 70% EtOH (4 £ 2 L). The combined extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a dark brown residue (12 g). The EtOH extract was subjected to vacuum liquid chromatography

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

Natural Product Research

5

(VLC) using 50% n-hexane –CHCl3 (4 £ 500 mL) and EtOAc (4 £ 500 mL), which were separately concentrated to give 2.6 and 4.1 g, respectively. The 50% n-hexane –CHCl3 fraction (2.6 g) was subjected to repeated silica gel chromatographic columns (120 g £ 50 cm £ 3 cm) using n-hexane –EtOAc in order of increasing polarity to afford compounds 1 (5.9 mg, white fine needles), 2 (15 mg, white fine needles), 3 (8 mg, white crystals) and 4 (6.5 mg, white crystals). The EtOAc fraction (4.1 g) was subjected to VLC using CHCl3 –MeOH gradient elution to give six sub-fractions (A to F). Sub-fraction B (340 mg) was chromatographed on silica gel column (60 g £ 50 cm £ 2 cm) and eluted with CHCl3, followed by CHCl3 –MeOH gradient to obtain compound 5 (5.2 mg, brown residue). Silica gel column chromatography (80 g £ 50 cm £ 3 cm) of sub-fraction C (911 mg) using CHCl3 – MeOH gradient as an eluent gave impure compounds 6, 7 and 8. They were further purified by semi-preparative HPLC to yield 6 (4.5 mg, brown residue), 7 (3.7 mg, brown residue) and 8 (2.6 mg, brown residue). Subfraction D (760) was treated similarly as sub-fraction C to obtain semi-pure compounds 9, 10 and 11, which were further purified by semi-preparative HPLC to give 9 (2.9 mg, brown residue), 10 (2.3 mg, brown residue) and 11 (4.6 mg, brown residue). Sub-fraction E (1.2 g) was chromatographed on silica gel column (120 g £ 50 cm £ 3 cm) and eluted with CHCl3, followed by CHCl3 – MeOH gradient to obtain compounds 12 (14 mg, brown residue) and 13 (11 mg, white powder). 3.4. Spectral data (5S)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methoxyheptan-3-one (6): brown residue (4.5 mg); ½a22 D þ 21.6 (c ¼ 1.0, MeOH); UV (MeOH) lmax (log 1): 280 (3.96), 222 (4.35) nm; IR (KBr) gmax: 3395, 2986, 1712, 1608, 1521, 1418, 1145, 1050, 980 cm21; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz): dH 2.79 (2H, t, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, H-1), 2.72 (2H, t, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, H-2), 2.66 (1H, m, H-4A), 2.46 (1H, m, H-4B), 3.62 (1H, pintet, J ¼ 6.6 Hz, H-5), 1.71 (1H, m, H-6A), 1.66 (1H, m, H-6B), 2.52 (2H, m, H-7), 6.96 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-20 , 60 ), 6.66 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-30 , 50 ), 6.98 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-200 , 600 ), 6.69 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-300 , 500 ), 3.25 (3H, s, 5-OCH3); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz): dC 30.4 (t, C-1), 46.2 (t, C-2), 210.7 (s, C-3), 48.0 (t, C-4), 77.7 (d, C-5), 37.0 (t, C-6), 31.3 (t, C-7), 132.7 (s, C-10 ), 129.9 (d, C-20 , 60 ), 115.8 (d, C-30 , 50 ), 156.4 (s, C-40 ), 133.6 (s, C-100 ), 130.0 (d, C-200 , 600 ), 115.9 (d, C-300 , 500 ), 156.5 (s, C-400 ), 56.9 (q, 5-OCH3); HR-ESI-MS m/z 327.1677 (calcd for C20H23O4 [M 2 H]þ, 327.1675). Alnuheptanoid A (8): brown residue (2.6 mg); ½a22 D þ 19.1 (c ¼ 1.0, MeOH); UV (MeOH) lmax (log 1): 284 (4.11), 225 (4.52) nm; IR (KBr) gmax: 3394, 2980, 1710, 1606, 1524, 1285, 1127, 1052, 952 cm21; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz): dH 2.80 (2H, t, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, H-1), 2.75 (2H, t, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, H-2), 2.68 (1H, m, H-4A), 2.52 (1H, m, H-4B), 3.65 (1H, pintet, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 1.77 (1H, m, H-6A), 1.70 (1H, m, H-6B), 2.55 (2H, m, H-7), 7.05 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-20 , 60 ), 6.71 (2H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-30 , 50 ), 6.65 (1H, d, J ¼ 2.2 Hz, H- 200 ), 6.73 (1H, d, J ¼ 8.2 Hz, H-500 ), 6.64 (1H, dd, J ¼ 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-600 ), 3.30 (3H, s, 5-OCH3); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz): dC 29.8 (t, C-1), 45.3 (t, C-2), 211.5 (s, C-3), 47.3 (t, C-4), 77.9 (d, C-5), 36.2 (t, C-6), 30.7 (t, C-7), 133.2 (s, C-10 ), 130.3 (d, C-20 , 60 ), 116.2 (d, C-30 , 50 ), 156.4 (s, C-40 ), 134.0 (s, C-100 ), 116.4 (d, C-200 ), 146.2 (s, C-300 ), 144.5 (s, C-400 ), 116.5 (d, C-500 ), 120.6 (d, C-600 ), 57.1 (q, 5-OCH3); HR-ESI-MS m/z 343.1625 (calcd for C20H23O5 [M 2 H]þ, 343.1623). 4. Conclusions A new diarylheptanoid, alnuheptanoid A (8), and 12 known compounds, one of them isolated for the first time from natural source (6), were isolated from the stem bark of A. japonica. Their structures were elucidated using different spectroscopic methods including UV, IR, HR-ESIMS, 1D (1H and 13C) and 2D (1H – 1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC) NMR.

6

S.R.M. Ibrahim et al.

Supplementary material Experimental details relating to this paper are available online.

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

References Agarwal BB, Kumar A, Bharti AC. 2003. Anticancer potential of curcumin: preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer Res. 23:363–398. Aoki T, Ohta S, Suga T. 1990. Triterpenoids, diarylheptanoids and their glycosides in the flowers of Alnus species. Phytochemistry. 29:3611–3614. Chen J, Karchesy JJ, Gonza´lez-Laredo RF. 1998. Phenolic diarylheptenones from Alnus rubra bark. Planta Med. 64:74–75. Choi SE, Kim KH, Kwon JH, Kim SB, Kim HW, Lee MW. 2008. Cytotoxic activities of diarylheptanoids from Alnus japonica. Arch Pharm Res. 31:1287–1289. El-Halawany AM, Hattori M. 2012. Anti-oestrogenic diarrylheptanoids from Aframomum melegueta with in silico oestrogen receptor alpha binding conformation similar to enterodiol and enterolactone. Food Chem. 134:219 –226. Fingolo CE, Santos Td, Vianna Filho MDM, Kaplan MAC. 2013. Triterpene esters: natural products from Dorstenia arifolia (Moraceae). Molecules. 18:4247–4256. Fuchino H, Konishi S, Satoh T, Yagi A, Saitsu K, Tatsumi T, Tanaka N. 1996. Chemical evaluation of Betula species in Japan. II. Constituents of Betula platyphylla var. japonica. Chem Pharm Bull. 44:1033– 1038. Giang PM, Son PT, Matsunami K, Otsuka H. 2006. New diarylheptanoids from Amomum muricarpum Elmer. Chem Pharm Bull. 54:139–140. Itokawa H, Morita H, Midorikawa I, Aiyawa R, Morita M. 1985. Diarrylheptanoids from the rhizome of Alpinia officinarum Hance. Chem Pharm Bull. 33:4889 –4893. Jin W, Cai XF, Na M, Lee JJ, Bae K. 2007. Diarylheptanoids from Alnus hirsuta inhibit the NF-k B activation and NO and TNF-a production. Biol Pharm Bull. 30:810–813. Joo SS, Kim SG, Choi SE, Kim YB, Park HY, Seo SJ, Choi YW, Lee MW, Lee do I. 2009. Suppression of T cell activation by hirsutenone, isolated from the bark of Alnus japonica, and its therapeutic advantages for atopic dermatitis. Eur J Pharmacol. 614:98–105. Joo SS, Kim MS, Oh WS, Lee DI. 2002. Enhancement of NK cytotoxicity, antimetastasis and elongation effect of survival time in B16-F10 melanoma cells by oregonin. Arch Pharm Res. 25:493–499. Kang GI, Kong PJ, Yuh YJ, Lim SY, Yim SV, Chun W, Kim SS. 2004. Curcumin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression by inhibiting activator protein 1 and nuclear factor kappa B bindings in BV2 microglial cells. J Pharmacol Sci. 94:325–328. Karchesy JJ, Laver ML, Barofsky DF, Barofsky E. 1974. Structure of oregonin, a natural diarylheptanoid xyloside. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 16:649– 650. Kim ST, Kim JD, Ahn SH, Ahn GS, Lee YI, Jeong YS. 2004. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of Alnus japonica extracts on acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Phytother Res. 18:971–975. Kuroyanagi M, Shimomae M, Nagashima Y, Muto N, Okuda T, Kawahara N, Nakane T, Sano T. 2005. New diarylheptanoids from Alnus japonica and their antioxidative activity. Chem Pharm Bull. 53:1519–1523. Lee JH, Yeom SH, Kim MK, Kim HJ, Shim JG, Lee MW. 2003. Antioxidant activities of diarylheptanoids from Alnus japonica and their structural relationship. Korean J Pharmacogn. 34:190–192. Lee M, Park M, Jeong D, Kim K, Kim H, Toh S. 2000. Diarylheptanoids from the leaves of Alnus hirsuta Turcz. Arch Pharm Res. 23:50–53. Lee MW, Jeong DW, Lee YA, Park MS, Toh SH. 1999. Flavonoids from the leaves of Alnus hirsuta. Yakhak Hoechi. 43:547–552. Lee MW, Kim JH, Jeong DW, Ahn KH, Toh SH, Surh YJ. 2000. Inhibition of cyclooxigenase-2 expression by diarrylheptanoids from the bark of Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica. Biol Pharm Bull. 23:517–518. Lee MW, Tanaka T, Nonaka GI, Nishioka I. 1992. Dimeric ellagitannins from Alnus japonica. Phytochemistry. 31:2835–2839. Lee WS, Kim JR, Im KR, Cho KH, Sok DE, Jeong TS. 2005. Antioxidant effects of diarylheptanoid derivatives from Alnus japonica on human LDL oxidation. Planta Med. 71:295–299. Li G, Xu M, Choi H, Lee S, Jahng Y, Lee C, Moon D, Woo M, Son J. 2003. Four new diarylheptanoids from the roots of Juglans mandshurica. Chem Pharm Bull. 51:262–264. Lv H, She G. 2012. Naturally occurring diarylheptanoids-A supplementary version. Rec Nat Prod. 6:321– 333. Mahato SB, Kundu AP. 1994. 13C NMR spectra of pentacyclic triterpenoids-A compilation and some salient features. Phytochemistry. 37:1517–1575. Nomura M, Tokoroyama T, Kubotat T. 1981. Biarylheptanoids and other constituents from wood of Alnus japonica. Phytochemistry. 20:1097–1104. Ohta S, Aoki T, Hirata T, Suga T. 1984. The structures of four diarylheptanoid glycosides from the female flowers of Alnus serrulatoides. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans I. :1635– 1642.

Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 01:46 13 August 2014

Natural Product Research

7

Park D, Kim HJ, Jung SY, Yook C, Jin Ch, Lee YS. 2010. A new diarylheptanoid glycoside from the stem bark of Alnus Hirsuta and protective effects of diarylheptanoid derivatives in human HepG2 cells. Chem Pharm Bull. 58:238–241. Park J, Jeong HJ, Kim JH, Kim YM, Park S, Kim D, Park KH, Lee WS, Ryu YB. 2012. Diarylheptanoids from Alnus japonica inhibit papain-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Biol Pharm Bull. 35:2036–2042. Sayed HM, Mohamed MH, Farag SF, Mohamed GA, Proksch P. 2007. A new steroid glycoside and furochromones from Cyperus rotundus L. Nat Prod Res. 21:343–350. Shin D, Kinoshita K, Koyama K, Takahashi K. 2002. Antiemetic principles of Alpinia officinarum. J Nat Prod. 65:1315–1318. Tori M, Hashimoto A, Hirose K, Asakawa Y. 1995. Diarylheptanoids, flavonoids, stilbenoids, sesquiterpenoids and a phenanthrene from Alnus maximowiczii. Phytochemistry. :1263–1264. Tung NH, Kwon HJ, Kim JH, Ra JC, Ding Y, Kim JA, Kim YH. 2010. Anti-influenza diarylheptanoids from the bark of Alnus japonica. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 20:1000–1003. Uehara S, Yasuda I, Akiyama K, Morita H, Takeya K, Itokawa. 1985. Diarrylheptanoids from the rhizomes of Cucuma xanthorrhiza and Alpinia officinarum. Chem Pharm Bull. 35:3298–3304. Wada H, Tachibana H, Fuchino H, Tanaka N. 1998. Three new diarrylheptanoid glycosides from Alnus japonica. Chem Pharm Bull. 46:1054–1055.

Alnuheptanoid A: a new diarylheptanoid derivative from Alnus japonica.

Extensive chromatographic investigation of the ethanolic extract of Alnus japonica Steud stem bark led to the isolation of a new diarylheptanoid named...
190KB Sizes 5 Downloads 6 Views