AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 20 March 2015 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.04257-14 Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Nugent SL et al.

1

Title: Acquisition of iron is required for growth of Salmonella in tomato fruit.

2 3

Staci L. Nugent,1 Fanhong Meng,2* Gregory B. Martin,2, 3 and Craig Altier1#

4 5

1

6

Ithaca, NY, USA

7

2

Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, NY, USA

8

3

Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca,

9

NY, USA

Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University,

10

* Present address: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M

11

University, College Station, TX

12

#For Correspondence. E-mail [email protected]; Tel. (+1) 607 253 4136; Fax (+1) 607

13

253 3907

14 15

Running title: Salmonella in tomato fruit

16 17

Key Words: Salmonella, iron, Fur, Montevideo, fepDGC

1

Nugent SL et al.

18

ABSTRACT

19

Salmonella remains a leading cause of bacterial foodborne disease, sickening millions

20

each year. Although outbreaks of salmonellosis have traditionally been associated with

21

contaminated meat products, recent years have seen numerous disease cases caused

22

by the consumption of produce. Tomatoes have been specifically implicated, due to the

23

ability of Salmonella to enter the tomato fruit and proliferate within, making the

24

decontamination of the raw product impossible. To investigate the genetic means by

25

which Salmonella is able to survive and proliferate within tomatoes, we conducted a

26

screen for bacterial genes of Salmonella enterica serovar Montevideo specifically

27

induced after inoculation into ripe tomato fruit. Among these genes, we found 17

28

members of the previously described anaerobic Fur (ferric uptake regulator) regulon.

29

Fur is a transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulator known to sense iron,

30

suggesting the importance of this mineral to Salmonella within tomatoes. To test

31

whether iron acquisition is essential for Salmonella growth in tomatoes, we tested a

32

ΔfepDGC mutant, which lacks the ability to import iron-associated siderophores. This

33

mutant grew significantly more poorly within tomatoes than did the wild type, but the

34

growth defect of the mutant was fully reversed by the addition of exogenous iron,

35

demonstrating the need for bacterial iron scavenging. Further, dependence upon iron

36

was not apparent for Salmonella growing in filtered tomato juice, implicating the cellular

37

fraction of the fruit as an important mediator of iron acquisition by the bacteria.

2

Nugent SL et al.

38 39

INTRODUCTION Salmonellae are ubiquitous pathogens present in a wide variety of warm- and

40

cold-blooded hosts. Non-typhoidal salmonellosis is second to only campylobacterosis

41

in illness numbers, some 1.4 million each year. It is, however, the leading cause of

42

death among foodborne bacterial diseases (28). Because of this association with

43

animals, outbreaks of salmonellosis have traditionally been caused by the consumption

44

of contaminated meat and poultry products. It has become increasingly common,

45

however, for human disease to be caused by Salmonella-contaminated vegetables and

46

produce. In the past decades tomatoes have been the source of several outbreaks (1,

47

2, 13, 18, 19, 22). The Salmonella serovars implicated in these infections have been

48

varied, including Montevideo, Newport, Javiana, and Braenderup. In some cases, the

49

sources of infection have been found, often being contaminated water sources, while in

50

others the sources are unknown (13, 18, 19).

51

A mechanism of penetration of Salmonella into the tomato pulp has been

52

proposed; exposing tomatoes to contaminated water lower in temperature than the

53

tomato itself significantly increased penetration of the fruit (43). In addition, Salmonella

54

has been shown to contaminate tomatoes via soil and from crop debris from previous

55

harvests (4, 5). The bacterium, when either applied to the surface of the fruit or

56

inoculated into the stem scar or the pulp itself, can survive and proliferate (8, 23, 24, 32,

57

38). It can also survive on leaves in the absence of desiccation (37), and proliferates

58

significantly better when co-inoculated with a bacterial plant pathogen (29, 32-34). Also

59

important to our work is the finding that Salmonella serovar Montevideo, which has

60

been the cause of human outbreaks and is used in our studies, survives well in ripe

3

Nugent SL et al.

61

tomatoes (23, 24, 37). It is, in fact, a serovar that proliferates highly under experimental

62

conditions (38).

63

Although the basis of infection of animal hosts by Salmonella has been well

64

defined, much less is known about the genetic determinants of this pathogen required

65

for colonization of produce plants, and specifically of tomatoes. A genome-wide screen

66

using Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium identified a number of metabolic and

67

regulatory genes induced during growth in tomatoes, but did not demonstrate genes

68

required for bacterial survival in this environment (31). Further work in this area showed

69

that the O-antigen portion of bacterial lipopolysaccharide is importance for Salmonella

70

survival in tomatoes (27), as it is in animal hosts.

71

A method that has been extensively used in the study of bacterial-host

72

interactions is in vivo expression technology (IVET). The basis of the method is the

73

identification of bacterial genes that are selectively expressed when bacteria live in

74

association with the host as a means of both understanding the host environment faced

75

by the pathogen and identifying bacterial genes essential for survival within hosts. This

76

method has been used for a number of bacteria pathogenic in several plant species,

77

including tomato (6, 9, 10, 14, 17, 31, 35, 39, 42). Recombinase IVET (RIVET) is a

78

variation on the technique that induces a permanent selectable change in the bacterial

79

phenotype in response to gene expression (40). Although plants can be considered

80

opportunistic hosts for this bacterium, and thus specific infection mechanisms are

81

unlikely to have evolved, it is clear that Salmonella survives and grows for prolonged

82

periods within produce plants, likely in the face of anti-bacterial responses by the plant

83

(29). It is therefore reasonable to assume that the pathogen invokes metabolic

4

Nugent SL et al.

84

pathways for the utilization of available nutrients and the response to plant defenses. In

85

this work, we describe the use of a RIVET screen to identify Salmonella genes

86

expressed specifically when bacteria live within tomato fruit to gain insight into the

87

requirements for survival and growth of the pathogen in this environment. We

88

demonstrate that components of the bacterial iron acquisition system are selectively

89

expressed, and that this system is required for the prolonged survival within this

90

important produce plant.

91

MATERIALS AND METHODS

92

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions. Salmonella enterica serovar

93

Montevideo strain ATCC BAA710 and isogenic mutants thereof were used for assays of

94

function and for generation of DNA libraries. A derivate of S. enterica serovar

95

Typhimurium strain ATCC 14028s was used as the vehicle for the RIVET screen,

96

described below. Gene deletions were created using the previously described one-step

97

inactivation method (15). Briefly, PCR products were generated from the

98

chloramphenicol or kanamycin resistance genes of pKD3 or pKD4, respectively, using

99

primers carrying at their 5′ ends 40 bp of homology to the regions flanking the start and

100

stop codons of the gene to be deleted. A derivative of strain BAA710 carrying pKD46,

101

containing the λ Red recombinase for allelic exchange, was transformed with the

102

resultant PCR products. All deletion mutants were checked for the loss of genes by

103

PCR. The recD::lacZ fusion was constructed by first deleting recD and then integrating

104

lacZ at the site of the disruption as previously described (16).

105 106

The fepDGC complementing plasmid was made by PCR amplifying from BAA710 a 2898 bp region that includes the fepDGC ORFs along with 110 bp of 5’ upstream

5

Nugent SL et al.

107

promoter region using the primers 5′-

108

TAAATAGGATCCCTATCGCCGCCCCAGCGGTA -3′ and 5′-

109

TCGGGAAAGCTTTACAACGCCTTAATGCGAGT -3′, and cloning the amplified region

110

into pGB2 cut with HindIII and BamHI (11). The plasmid was maintained by growth in

111

streptomycin (20 μg/ml) and spectinomycin (100 μg/ml).

112

Screen for genes expressed within tomatoes. We created a library of Salmonella

113

genomic DNA fragments by partial digestion of total genomic DNA from S. enterica

114

serovar Montevideo BAA710, with HaeIII, AluI, or RsaI and then size fractionated the

115

DNA to isolate fragments of 1 to 2 kb. These three libraries were pooled and fragments

116

were cloned into the PmlI site of the ampicillin-marked plasmid pCA19, placing them

117

upstream of a promoterless derivative of the phage P1 recombinase cre, which lies

118

upstream from a promoterless lacZ (3). A derivative of strain S. Typhimurium 14028s

119

carrying a chloramphenicol resistance marker and a pair of chromosomal loxP sites

120

flanking npt (kanamycin resistance) and sacB (sucrose susceptibility) were P22

121

transduced with this library, with an initial selection on either M9 minimal media with

122

0.2% glycerol or LB agar, supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (50

123

μg/ml), chloramphenicol (25 μg/ml), and EGTA (10 mM). S. Typhimurium was used for

124

these experiments as it exhibited a marked sensitivity to sucrose, due to the presence

125

of sacB, that was required for selection.

126

Approximately 104 independent library transductants were pooled for inoculation

127

into tomatoes. Red-vine tomato fruit from a local grocer were inoculated with 104 to 105

128

bacteria, representing this pool of 104 clones, in 20 μl of phosphate-buffered saline

129

(PBS). A total of 40 tomatoes were inoculated with 40 independent library pools. For 20

6

Nugent SL et al.

130

of these tomatoes the initial selection was on LB agar containing the appropriate

131

antibiotics, and for the remaining 20 tomatoes selection was on M9 minimal agar with

132

0.2% glycerol and the appropriate antibiotics. For inoculation, stems were removed,

133

and an 18 gauge blunt needle was used to create four channels into the tomato core

134

tissue located immediately around the stem scar. The 20 μl inoculum was divided

135

evenly among the four channels and to a depth within 1.5 cm of the stem scar. After 48

136

h, the tomato core tissue segment from 0 to 25 mm below the stem scar was harvested.

137

The cores were placed in a Whirl-pak filter bag (Nasco) with 1.5 ml LB or M9 0.2%

138

glycerol media, crushed with a glass bottle, and the liquid collected through the bag

139

filter. The tomato core liquid was serially diluted, plated onto either LB or M9 agar plates

140

with added chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and 5% sucrose. From each tomato, 10

141

sucrose-resistant colonies were saved, for a total of 200 clones derived from each

142

medium.

143

Of the 400 clones, 397 clones were successfully amplified by PCR and Sanger

144

sequenced. The three remaining clones were isolated by preparation of plasmid DNA

145

and sequenced. Inserts were sequenced using a primer from within the cre coding

146

region that allowed for sequencing across the insert junction. The average length of

147

useable sequence reads was 1077 bp. We confirmed the size of all induced fragments

148

to be in the range of 1 to 4.5 kb by PCR amplification using primers homologous to

149

sequence that flanks the inserted fragment. The average insert size was approximately

150

2 kb. Cloned fragments that induced expression of cre non-specifically (i.e. while

151

bacteria were growing outside tomatoes) were identified through expression of the

7

Nugent SL et al.

152

fused lacZ by β-galactosidase expression assays in either LB or M9 minimal media with

153

0.2% glycerol.

154

Sequencing. Sequences were obtained using an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA)

155

Automated 3730xl DNA Analyzer by the Biotechnology Resource Center Genomics

156

Facility at Cornell University. The sequencing primer was 5’-

157

AGGCAAATTTTGGTGTGACC, which is located in cre. The location of each of the

158

cloned fragments was determined by comparison to 50 draft genomes of S. enterica

159

Montevideo (available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information,

160

submitted by the US Food and Drug Administration) and to the sequenced genomes of

161

S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain LT2 (GenBank accession number NC_003197)

162

and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain SL1344 (GenBank accession number

163

NC_016810).

164

Competition assays. The two strains to be compared were grown separately

165

overnight at 37°C with aeration, sub-cultured to exponential growth phase, washed

166

twice with PBS, mixed at a 1:1 ratio, and diluted 1:9 in PBS for inoculation. The number

167

of bacteria in the inoculum was determined by serial dilution and plating onto LB agar

168

supplemented with X-gal (80 μg/ml) and ferric chloride (100 μM FeCl3). For assays in

169

tomato fruit, red-vine tomatoes from a local grocer were inoculated in replicates of five

170

with ~106 cfu of the mixture of stains in 20 μl of PBS. For inoculation, stems were

171

removed, and an 18 gauge blunt needle was used to create four channels into the

172

tomato core tissue located immediately around the stem scar. The 20 μl inoculum was

173

divided evenly among the four channels and to a depth within 1.5 cm of the stem scar.

8

Nugent SL et al.

174

Tomatoes were harvested either immediately or after 7 days of incubation at

175

room temperature, and the tomato core tissue segment from 0 to 25 mm below the stem

176

scar was processed. The cores were placed in a Whirl-pak filter bag with 10 ml LB

177

media, crushed with a glass bottle, and the liquid collected through the bag filter. The

178

tomato core liquid was serially diluted, and aliquots plated onto LB agar supplemented

179

with X-gal (80 μg/ml) and ferric chloride (100 μM FeCl3). The iron supplement was

180

added to plates to reverse an observed slow growth phenotype of the ΔfepDGC mutant

181

on LB agar plates without additional iron. Competitive index (CI) values were calculated

182

as the mean ratio of cfu of the two strains, with CI>1 indicating the presence of more of

183

the wild type strain. Growth of strains within tomatoes was determined by comparing the

184

mean cfu per tomato recovered at 7 days to that recovered immediately after

185

inoculation. For the tests of statistical significance, replica plates were averaged and

186

ratio values were converted logarithmically, while cfu values were divided by 1000 and

187

converted logarithmically. Data were modelled using ANOVA, and significance was

188

determined using the LSMeans Tukey HSD test.

189

For assays using tomato juice, tomatoes of the same variety as that used for the

190

fruit assays were cut into quarters, the sections placed in the Whirl-pak filter bags and

191

crushed using a glass bottle. We then collected the juice through the bag filters and

192

centrifuged to remove solid material. Supernatants were recovered, centrifuged again,

193

and then filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. The wild type and the ΔfepDGC mutant were

194

inoculated together into 5 ml of juice at a final concentration of ~1x106 per assay in a

195

tightly capped tube sealed with Parafilm and incubated standing. Bacteria were

196

recovered immediately after inoculation and again after 7 days of incubation at room

9

Nugent SL et al.

197

temperature for enumeration on LB agar plates supplemented with 80 μg/ml X-gal and

198

100 μM FeCl3. Assays were performed in replicates of five. All experiments were

199

performed using disposable plastic supplies throughout to reduce the possible

200

contamination of reagents with iron. Iron concentrations were measured using a

201

colorimetric Iron Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) in comparison to a generated standard

202

curve.

203

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

204

Iron-regulated genes are selectively expressed by Salmonella growing in

205

tomatoes. To identify bacterial functions required for the survival and growth of

206

Salmonella within tomato fruit, we employed a recombinase in vivo expression

207

technology (RIVET) screen. As the Montevideo serovar has frequently been associated

208

with disease outbreaks derived from tomatoes, we introduced a plasmid library of

209

genomic DNA derived from S. enterica serovar Montevideo fused to the recombinase

210

cre into a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium test strain carrying a chromosomal

211

antibiotic resistance cassette flanked by loxP sites (3). After incubation in red ripe

212

tomatoes, bacteria that had undergone recombination of the loxP cassette, indicating

213

selective activation of the cre fusion due to the induction of promoter activity, were

214

obtained by selection on sucrose-containing media (see Materials and Methods for

215

complete experimental details). This selection yielded S. Montevideo genes encoding

216

numerous predicted functions, including energy metabolism, surface proteins, and gene

217

regulation, that might plausibly be required for survival of the bacterium in this

218

environment.

10

Nugent SL et al.

219

Conspicuous among the genes identified were those known to be required for the

220

direct acquisition of iron (Table 1). iroC and iroE, located within a single operon,

221

encode proteins utilized for the binding of iron and for the production of the iron

222

siderophore salmochelin, respectively, while sitC encodes an additional iron transporter.

223

In addition, the screen identified several genes with expression known to be controlled

224

by Fur, the ferric uptake regulator. Fur is a transcriptional and post-transcriptional

225

regulator that senses iron concentration and redox state. Recent work with Salmonella

226

Typhimurium has shown it to control expression of genes in classes that include

227

carbohydrate and nucleotide metabolism, and bacterial adhesion (41). All of the genes

228

derived from our screen of S. Montevideo in tomatoes that are shown in Table 1 are

229

members of this previously described Fur regulon.

230

Interestingly, the Fur regulon was defined in S. Typhimurium using bacteria

231

grown under anaerobic conditions, and this analysis identified regulated genes not

232

known to be controlled by Fur when bacteria were grown in the presence of oxygen

233

(41). That work was conducted specifically to replicate the conditions present in an

234

animal host, where oxygen is limiting. The oxygen tension within tomato fruits under

235

normal storage conditions, however, has been shown to be near that of ambient air (7),

236

suggesting some additional environmental signal for the induction of the Fur regulon in

237

our experiments. These results thus suggest that within tomato fruit Salmonella senses

238

and responds to an environment of restricted iron concentration. It is further plausible

239

that the acquisition of exogenous iron in this environment is important for the survival of

240

Salmonella while within tomato fruit.

11

Nugent SL et al.

241

Genes used for the transport of iron are required for the proliferation of

242

Salmonella in tomatoes. As iron is a limiting resource in many organisms, and as its

243

acquisition has been shown to be essential for the persistence and virulence of

244

Salmonella in animals (12, 25), we examined further the importance of iron acquisition

245

to bacterial survival in tomatoes. Salmonella uses a pair of siderophores, enterobactin

246

and salmochelin, the C-glycosylated derivative of enterobactin, to scavenge iron from

247

the environment. Enterobactin can be captured by two distinct outer membrane

248

receptors, FepA and IroN, while salmochelin is transported primarily by IroN (20, 36).

249

Both siderophores, however, share a single mechanism of transport through the inner

250

membrane, utilizing the FepDGC transporter (12). To investigate the importance of iron

251

acquisition, we therefore constructed a ΔfepDGC mutant of S. enterica serovar

252

Montevideo, eliminating the ability of this strain to import iron using both enterobactin

253

and salmochelin, and tested its ability to proliferate in tomato fruit.

254

We used competitive index (CI) assays to compare the survival of the ΔfepDGC

255

mutant in tomatoes to that of the wild type. Our experiments used as the wild type an

256

isogenic strain carrying a recD::lacZY insertion, which allowed the rapid enumeration of

257

the two strains by color on agar medium containing the chromogenic substrate X-gal.

258

We had determined previously that the recD::lacZY insertion had no effect on bacterial

259

survival in tomatoes compared to that of the S. Montevideo parent strain (data not

260

shown). We inoculated 2-3x105 cfu per tomato of the ΔfepDGC mutant together with a

261

similar number of the wild type into the stem end of tomato fruit and used competition

262

assays to assess its ability to proliferate over time, assessing bacterial numbers

263

immediately after inoculation and then again seven days later. As shown in Figure 1A,

12

Nugent SL et al.

264

our inoculation consisted of slightly more of the ΔfepDGC mutant than the wild type

265

(CI1 on day zero. Seven days later, the CI was

292

significantly lower (Fig. 2C), indicating that the plasmid-borne copy of fepDGC could

293

restore the mutant to a growth phenotype superior to that of the wild type. This

294

improved growth of the complemented mutant can be seen in Figure 2D; although the

295

total number of complemented mutants remained lower than the wild type at 7 days, the

296

growth rate of the complemented mutant (75-fold change) surpassed that of the wild

297

type (65-fold change). A subsequent analysis of plasmid retention by selective plating

298

demonstrated no detectable loss of plasmids during the course of these experiments

299

(data not shown), indicating that any fitness burden imparted by the plasmid was not

300

sufficient to select for its loss. Thus, these results demonstrate that the loss of

301

Salmonella proliferation in tomatoes can be attributed solely to the absence of the iron

302

transporter FepDGC. They show also that multicopy expression of FepDGC can

303

enhance Salmonella growth, suggesting that the acquisition of iron is a limiting factor to

304

growth within tomato fruit.

305

Iron is required for the proliferation of Salmonella in tomatoes. Although FepDGC

306

is known to be a transporter of iron, it remained possible that other, uncharacterized

307

functions of this transporter might make it important for the survival or growth of

308

Salmonella in tomatoes. To ensure that the observed survival defect of this mutant was

309

attributable specifically to the failure of Salmonella to acquire iron within tomato fruit, we

14

Nugent SL et al.

310

next tested the phenotypic complementation of the mutation by the addition of

311

exogenous iron. We again performed competition assays using the wild type and the

312

ΔfepDGC mutant strains, but added to the inoculum 800 μM FeCl3, a concentration that

313

we had previously determined not to inhibit the growth or affect recovery of either strain

314

on laboratory media (data not shown). We found that this addition of iron did not

315

appreciably change the ability of the wild type strain to proliferate within tomatoes;

316

numbers of this strain harvested after seven days were not significantly different with or

317

without added iron. Specifically, the wild type grew by ~200-fold in the absence of

318

exogenous iron and by ~160-fold with iron added (Fig. 3A). This result indicates that

319

the iron concentration naturally present in tomatoes does not limit the growth of wild

320

type Salmonella, and therefore provides sufficient iron in the presence of intact bacterial

321

iron-scavenging systems. Importantly, however, including FeCl3 in the inoculum did

322

eliminate the growth defect of the ΔfepDGC mutant, restoring numbers of this mutant to

323

those of the wild type (Fig. 3A). Without iron added, the ΔfepDGC mutant demonstrated

324

the expected growth defect in tomatoes, with a CI at 7 days significantly higher than that

325

at the day of inoculation (Fig. 3B). With added iron, however, the wild type and the

326

ΔfepDGC mutant strain had a CI of near 1 at both the time of inoculation and seven

327

days later, with the CI at the two times being not significantly different from each other

328

(Fig. 3B). These results thus demonstrate that the known function of FepDGC,

329

transport of iron into the bacterium, is that which is required for the normal growth of

330

Salmonella within the tomato. Further, our data show that iron acquisition is required for

331

the growth of the pathogen in this fruit, as it is known to be in animal tissues. Our

15

Nugent SL et al.

332

results also support previous work in plants that demonstrated siderophores and iron to

333

be important for Salmonella colonization of alfalfa roots (21).

334

Proliferation of Salmonella in tomato juice is not affected by the ability to acquire

335

iron. The internal environment of the tomato fruit is comprised of a complex milieu of

336

liquid and cellular material. To determine whether iron concentration in the liquid

337

fraction of this environment alone dictated the survival of Salmonella, we further tested

338

bacterial survival in tomato juice. Filtered juice extracts obtained from the same variety

339

of tomato used in the fruit survival assays were employed in competition assays

340

identical to those described above. We found that the proliferation of Salmonella in

341

tomato juice was similar to that in intact tomatoes (Fig. 4A). The inoculation of ~7x105

342

wild type bacteria yielded 70-fold bacterial growth after 7 days of incubation.

343

Importantly, the ΔfepDGC mutant survived and grew 65-fold, not significantly different

344

from the wild type, demonstrating no loss of viability, in contrast to that observed in

345

whole fruit (Fig. 4A). The CI calculation further demonstrated this parity of growth

346

between the two strains; there was no significant difference in the ratios of the wild type

347

and ΔfepDGC mutant at inoculation and 7 days afterwards (Fig. 4B). To further

348

investigate the discrepancy in iron-dependent growth between tomato fruit and juice, we

349

measured the concentration of iron in filtered juice extracts. Iron concentration varied

350

within the single μM range among juice samples. Although this is far less than the

351

concentration we used to supplement iron in tomatoes, it greatly exceeds the

352

concentration know to be required to support the growth of Salmonella. In defined

353

laboratory medium, wild type Salmonella has been shown to grow in concentrations of

354

iron as low as 0.1 μM (30), thus indicating that the iron concentration present in our

16

Nugent SL et al.

355

juice samples was sufficiently great to permit bacterial growth even by the ΔfepDGC

356

mutant, with its diminished capacity to acquire iron.

357

These findings have important implications for understanding the interaction of

358

Salmonella with tomatoes. They demonstrate that the acquisition of iron is essential for

359

the growth of this pathogen within the tomato fruit; a ΔfepDGC mutant, unable to

360

efficiently scavenge iron, grew significantly less well than did the isogenic wild type.

361

Importantly, we also found that the concentration of iron in extracted juice was sufficient

362

to support the growth of strains both competent and deficient for iron-acquisition,

363

demonstrating that the ability to salvage iron from within the fluid milieu does not alone

364

dictate the survival and growth of this pathogen within tomatoes. These results, taken

365

together, thus suggest that some factor or factors present within the tomato fruit reduce

366

the ability of the pathogen to acquire the iron that should be available to it in this

367

environment. We are tempted to speculate that the fruit itself harbors means to chelate

368

iron, thus sequestering it from the bacteria. It has long been known that animal tissues

369

readily capture free iron, and that Salmonella must compete for this nutrient, through the

370

production of siderophores, to establish infections in animal hosts (12). Some plants

371

are similarly known to chelate iron through the production of phytosiderophores,

372

molecules secreted into the rhizosphere through the roots by graminaceous plants as a

373

means to acquire environmental iron (26). Although the existence of such iron chelators

374

in tomatoes is thus plausible, we know of no similar example in any fruit. Alternatively, it

375

remains possible that the environment within the tomato represses Salmonella functions

376

essential for the acquisition or use of iron. We think this explanation unlikely, however,

377

as our work stems from the identification of components of the iron regulon specifically

17

Nugent SL et al.

378

induced within the tomato fruit (Table 1), implicating an active role in iron acquisition by

379

the bacterium. Thus, the work presented here, taken together, shows that Salmonella

380

uses the iron stores that exist in the tomato fruit to survive and proliferate within this

381

important produce crop, and suggests that the tomato itself acts to limit the availability

382

of iron to the pathogen.

383 384

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

385

This work was supported by Grant No. 2011-67017-3023 from the USDA National

386

Institute of Food and Agriculture Program in Food Safety, Nutrition, and Health: Food-

387

borne Plant-Pathogen Interactions. We thank Francoise Vermeylen and Erika Louise

388

Mudrak of the Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit for their assistance in the statistical

389

analysis.

18

Nugent SL et al.

390

REFERENCES

391

1.

392 393

in restaurants--United States, 2005-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 56:909-911. 2.

394 395

2005. Outbreaks of Salmonella infections associated with eating Roma tomatoes--United States and Canada, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54:325-328.

3.

396 397

2007. Multistate outbreaks of Salmonella infections associated with raw tomatoes eaten

Altier, C., and M. Suyemoto. 1999. A recombinase-based selection of differentially expressed bacterial genes. Gene 240:99-106.

4.

Barak, J. D., A. Liang, and K. E. Narm. 2008. Differential attachment to and

398

subsequent contamination of agricultural crops by Salmonella enterica. Appl Environ

399

Microbiol 74:5568-5570.

400

5.

401 402

Barak, J. D., and A. S. Liang. 2008. Role of soil, crop debris, and a plant pathogen in Salmonella enterica contamination of tomato plants. PLoS One 3:e1657.

6.

Barr, M., A. K. East, M. Leonard, T. H. Mauchline, and P. S. Poole. 2008. In vivo

403

expression technology (IVET) selection of genes of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar

404

viciae A34 expressed in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Lett 282:219-227.

405

7.

Berry, A. D., and S. A. Sargent. 2009. Real-time microsensor measurement of internal

406

oxygen partial pressure in tomato fruit under hypoxic conditions. Postharvest Biology

407

and Technology 52:240-242.

408

8.

Beuchat, L. R., and D. A. Mann. 2008. Survival and growth of acid-adapted and

409

unadapted Salmonella in and on raw tomatoes as affected by variety, stage of ripeness,

410

and storage temperature. Journal of food protection 71:1572-1579.

411

9.

Boch, J., V. Joardar, L. Gao, T. L. Robertson, M. Lim, and B. N. Kunkel. 2002.

412

Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato genes induced during infection of

413

Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Microbiol 44:73-88.

414 415

10.

Brown, D. G., and C. Allen. 2004. Ralstonia solanacearum genes induced during growth in tomato: an inside view of bacterial wilt. Mol Microbiol 53:1641-1660. 19

Nugent SL et al.

416

11.

Churchward, G., D. Belin, and Y. Nagamine. 1984. A pSC101-derived plasmid which

417

shows no sequence homology to other commonly used cloning vectors. Gene 31:165-

418

171.

419

12.

Crouch, M. L., M. Castor, J. E. Karlinsey, T. Kalhorn, and F. C. Fang. 2008.

420

Biosynthesis and IroC-dependent export of the siderophore salmochelin are essential for

421

virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 67:971-983.

422

13.

Cummings, K., E. Barrett, J. C. Mohle-Boetani, J. T. Brooks, J. Farrar, T. Hunt, A.

423

Fiore, K. Komatsu, S. B. Werner, and L. Slutsker. 2001. A multistate outbreak of

424

Salmonella enterica serotype Baildon associated with domestic raw tomatoes. Emerg

425

Infect Dis 7:1046-1048.

426

14.

Czelleng, A., Z. Bozso, P. G. Ott, E. Besenyei, G. J. Varga, A. Szatmari, L. Kiraly,

427

and Z. Klement. 2006. Identification of virulence-associated genes of Pseudomonas

428

viridiflava activated during infection by use of a novel IVET promoter probing plasmid.

429

Curr Microbiol 52:282-286.

430

15.

431 432

Datsenko, K. A., and B. L. Wanner. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640-6645.

16.

Ellermeier, C. D., A. Janakiraman, and J. M. Slauch. 2002. Construction of targeted

433

single copy lac fusions using lambda Red and FLP-mediated site-specific recombination

434

in bacteria. Gene 290:153-161.

435

17.

Giddens, S. R., R. W. Jackson, C. D. Moon, M. A. Jacobs, X. X. Zhang, S. M. Gehrig,

436

and P. B. Rainey. 2007. Mutational activation of niche-specific genes provides insight

437

into regulatory networks and bacterial function in a complex environment. Proc Natl

438

Acad Sci U S A 104:18247-18252.

439 440

18.

Greene, S. K., E. R. Daly, E. A. Talbot, L. J. Demma, S. Holzbauer, N. J. Patel, T. A. Hill, M. O. Walderhaug, R. M. Hoekstra, M. F. Lynch, and J. A. Painter. 2008.

20

Nugent SL et al.

441

Recurrent multistate outbreak of Salmonella Newport associated with tomatoes from

442

contaminated fields, 2005. Epidemiol Infect 136:157-165.

443

19.

Gupta, S. K., K. Nalluswami, C. Snider, M. Perch, M. Balasegaram, D. Burmeister,

444

J. Lockett, C. Sandt, R. M. Hoekstra, and S. Montgomery. 2007. Outbreak of

445

Salmonella Braenderup infections associated with Roma tomatoes, northeastern United

446

States, 2004: a useful method for subtyping exposures in field investigations. Epidemiol

447

Infect 135:1165-1173.

448

20.

Hantke, K., G. Nicholson, W. Rabsch, and G. Winkelmann. 2003. Salmochelins,

449

siderophores of Salmonella enterica and uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, are

450

recognized by the outer membrane receptor IroN. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:3677-

451

3682.

452

21.

Hao, L. Y., D. K. Willis, H. Andrews-Polymenis, M. McClelland, and J. D. Barak.

453

2012. Requirement of siderophore biosynthesis for plant colonization by Salmonella

454

enterica. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4561-4570.

455

22.

Hedberg, C. W., F. J. Angulo, K. E. White, C. W. Langkop, W. L. Schell, M. G.

456

Stobierski, A. Schuchat, J. M. Besser, S. Dietrich, L. Helsel, P. M. Griffin, J. W.

457

McFarland, and M. T. Osterholm. 1999. Outbreaks of salmonellosis associated with

458

eating uncooked tomatoes: implications for public health. The Investigation Team.

459

Epidemiol Infect 122:385-393.

460

23.

Iturriaga, M. H., E. F. Escartin, L. R. Beuchat, and R. Martinez-Peniche. 2003. Effect

461

of inoculum size, relative humidity, storage temperature, and ripening stage on the

462

attachment of Salmonella Montevideo to tomatoes and tomatillos. Journal of food

463

protection 66:1756-1761.

464

24.

Iturriaga, M. H., M. L. Tamplin, and E. F. Escartin. 2007. Colonization of tomatoes by

465

Salmonella montevideo is affected by relative humidity and storage temperature. Journal

466

of food protection 70:30-34. 21

Nugent SL et al.

467

25.

Kirby, M. F., B. Devoy, R. J. Law, A. Ward, and J. Aldridge. 2008. The use of a

468

bioassay based approach to the hazard/risk assessment of cargo derived toxicity during

469

shipping accidents: a case study--the MSC Napoli. Mar Pollut Bull 56:781-786.

470

26.

Kobayashi, T., H. Nakanishi, and N. K. Nishizawa. 2010. Recent insights into iron

471

homeostasis and their application in graminaceous crops. Proceedings of the Japan

472

Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences 86:900-913.

473

27.

Marvasi, M., C. E. Cox, Y. Xu, J. T. Noel, J. J. Giovannoni, and M. Teplitski. 2013.

474

Differential regulation of Salmonella typhimurium genes involved in O-antigen capsule

475

production and their role in persistence within tomato fruit. Molecular plant-microbe

476

interactions : MPMI 26:793-800.

477

28.

Mead, P. S., L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L. F. McCaig, J. S. Bresee, C. Shapiro, P. M.

478

Griffin, and R. V. Tauxe. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States.

479

Emerg Infect Dis 5:607-625.

480

29.

Meng, F., C. Altier, and G. B. Martin. 2013. Salmonella colonization activates the plant

481

immune system and benefits from association with plant pathogenic bacteria.

482

Environmental microbiology.

483

30.

484 485

Neidhardt, F. C., P. L. Bloch, and D. F. Smith. 1974. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol 119:736-747.

31.

Noel, J. T., N. Arrach, A. Alagely, M. McClelland, and M. Teplitski. 2010. Specific

486

responses of Salmonella enterica to tomato varieties and fruit ripeness identified by in

487

vivo expression technology. PLoS One 5:e12406.

488

32.

Noel, J. T., J. Joy, J. N. Smith, M. Fatica, K. R. Schneider, B. M. Ahmer, and M.

489

Teplitski. Salmonella SdiA recognizes N-acyl homoserine lactone signals from

490

Pectobacterium carotovorum in vitro, but not in a bacterial soft rot. Molecular plant-

491

microbe interactions : MPMI 23:273-282.

22

Nugent SL et al.

492

33.

Pollard, S., J. Barak, R. Boyer, M. Reiter, G. Gu, and S. Rideout. 2014. Potential

493

Interactions between Salmonella enterica and Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato plants.

494

Journal of food protection 77:320-324.

495

34.

Potnis, N., J. P. Soto-Arias, K. N. Cowles, A. H. van Bruggen, J. B. Jones, and J. D.

496

Barak. 2014. Xanthomonas perforans colonization influences Salmonella enterica in the

497

tomato phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3173-3180.

498

35.

499 500

Preston, G. M., N. Bertrand, and P. B. Rainey. 2001. Type III secretion in plant growthpromoting Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25. Mol Microbiol 41:999-1014.

36.

Rabsch, W., W. Voigt, R. Reissbrodt, R. M. Tsolis, and A. J. Baumler. 1999.

501

Salmonella typhimurium IroN and FepA proteins mediate uptake of enterobactin but

502

differ in their specificity for other siderophores. J Bacteriol 181:3610-3612.

503

37.

504 505

Rathinasabapathi, B. 2004. Survival of Salmonella Montevideo on tomato leaves and mature green tomatoes. Journal of food protection 67:2277-2279.

38.

Shi, X., A. Namvar, M. Kostrzynska, R. Hora, and K. Warriner. 2007. Persistence and

506

growth of different Salmonella serovars on pre- and postharvest tomatoes. Journal of

507

food protection 70:2725-2731.

508

39.

Silby, M. W., P. B. Rainey, and S. B. Levy. 2004. IVET experiments in Pseudomonas

509

fluorescens reveal cryptic promoters at loci associated with recognizable overlapping

510

genes. Microbiology 150:518-520.

511

40.

Slauch, J. M., and A. Camilli. 2000. IVET and RIVET: use of gene fusions to identify

512

bacterial virulence factors specifically induced in host tissues. Methods Enzymol 326:73-

513

96.

514

41.

Troxell, B., R. C. Fink, S. Porwollik, M. McClelland, and H. M. Hassan. 2011. The Fur

515

regulon in anaerobically grown Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium: identification of

516

new Fur targets. BMC microbiology 11:236.

23

Nugent SL et al.

517

42.

Zhang, X. X., A. K. Lilley, M. J. Bailey, and P. B. Rainey. 2004. The indigenous

518

Pseudomonas plasmid pQBR103 encodes plant-inducible genes, including three

519

putative helicases. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:9-17.

520

43.

Zhuang, R. Y., L. R. Beuchat, and F. J. Angulo. 1995. Fate of Salmonella montevideo

521

on and in raw tomatoes as affected by temperature and treatment with chlorine. Appl

522

Environ Microbiol 61:2127-2131.

523

24

Nugent SL et al.

524 525

Table 1. Salmonella genes selectively expressed within tomato fruit that are also constituents of the Fur regulon.

526

Gene

Independent

Function

Isolates from Library fimA

5

Type-1 fimbrial protein

STM4305

5

Putative anaerobic dimethyl sulfoxide reductase

yjjI

3

Putative glycine radical enzyme

hrpA

2

ATP-dependent RNA helicase

tdcE

2

Pyruvate formate-lyase

bglJ

1

DNA-binding transcriptional activator

crr

1

Glucose-specific phosphotransferase

dfp

1

Bifunctional phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase/phosphopantothenate synthase

dmsA

1

Anaerobic dimethyl sulfoxide reductase

eutK

1

Ethanolamine utilization protein

fmt

1

Methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase

iroC

1

Putative ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter

iroE

1

Salmochelin siderophore system protein

nrdB

1

Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase

sitC

1

Iron/manganese ABC transporter

STM3547

1

Putative transcriptional regulator of sugar metabolism

25

Nugent SL et al.

527

FIGURE LEGENDS

528

Figure 1. Mutation of fepDGC reduces Salmonella viability in tomato fruit. Wild

529

type and ΔfepDGC mutant strains were inoculated together in approximately equal

530

numbers into red ripe tomatoes. Bacteria were enumerated by harvesting tomato juice

531

and tissue either immediately after inoculation (Day 0) or one week later (Day 7) with

532

plating onto selective agar. A) The competitive index (CI) was measured as a ratio of

533

wild type to ΔfepDGC mutant, with a CI>1 indicating a greater number of the wild type.

534

B) Numbers of each bacterial strain were determined by colony-forming units per

535

tomato, with white bars indicating the wild type, and grey bars the ΔfepDGC mutant.

536

Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean, based on five independent

537

biological replicates. Independent axes are used for the two time points for clarity.

538

Significance was determined through ANOVA using the LSMeans Tukey HSD test at

539

p1 indicating a greater number of the wild type. Numbers of each bacterial strain

548

were determined by colony-forming units per tomato, with white bars indicating the wild

549

type, and grey bars the ΔfepDGC mutant, both with the cloning vector. In a separate 26

Nugent SL et al.

550

experiment, C) and D) The wild type carrying the cloning vector was inoculated with the

551

ΔfepDGC mutant carrying a fepDGC complementing plasmid and similarly treated. In

552

both cases, CI>1 indicates a greater number of the wild type than the ΔfepDGC mutant.

553

Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean, based on five independent

554

biological replicates. Independent axes are used for the two time points for clarity. For

555

each experiment, significance was determined through ANOVA using the LSMeans

556

Tukey HSD test at p1 indicating a

568

greater number of the wild type. Significance was determined through ANOVA using

569

the LSMeans Tukey HSD test at p1 indicating a

581

greater number of the wild type. Significance was determined through ANOVA using

582

the LSMeans Tukey HSD test at p

Acquisition of Iron Is Required for Growth of Salmonella spp. in Tomato Fruit.

Salmonella remains a leading cause of bacterial food-borne disease, sickening millions each year. Although outbreaks of salmonellosis have traditional...
704KB Sizes 2 Downloads 8 Views