AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 20 March 2015 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.04257-14 Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Nugent SL et al.
1
Title: Acquisition of iron is required for growth of Salmonella in tomato fruit.
2 3
Staci L. Nugent,1 Fanhong Meng,2* Gregory B. Martin,2, 3 and Craig Altier1#
4 5
1
6
Ithaca, NY, USA
7
2
Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, NY, USA
8
3
Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca,
9
NY, USA
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University,
10
* Present address: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M
11
University, College Station, TX
12
#For Correspondence. E-mail
[email protected]; Tel. (+1) 607 253 4136; Fax (+1) 607
13
253 3907
14 15
Running title: Salmonella in tomato fruit
16 17
Key Words: Salmonella, iron, Fur, Montevideo, fepDGC
1
Nugent SL et al.
18
ABSTRACT
19
Salmonella remains a leading cause of bacterial foodborne disease, sickening millions
20
each year. Although outbreaks of salmonellosis have traditionally been associated with
21
contaminated meat products, recent years have seen numerous disease cases caused
22
by the consumption of produce. Tomatoes have been specifically implicated, due to the
23
ability of Salmonella to enter the tomato fruit and proliferate within, making the
24
decontamination of the raw product impossible. To investigate the genetic means by
25
which Salmonella is able to survive and proliferate within tomatoes, we conducted a
26
screen for bacterial genes of Salmonella enterica serovar Montevideo specifically
27
induced after inoculation into ripe tomato fruit. Among these genes, we found 17
28
members of the previously described anaerobic Fur (ferric uptake regulator) regulon.
29
Fur is a transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulator known to sense iron,
30
suggesting the importance of this mineral to Salmonella within tomatoes. To test
31
whether iron acquisition is essential for Salmonella growth in tomatoes, we tested a
32
ΔfepDGC mutant, which lacks the ability to import iron-associated siderophores. This
33
mutant grew significantly more poorly within tomatoes than did the wild type, but the
34
growth defect of the mutant was fully reversed by the addition of exogenous iron,
35
demonstrating the need for bacterial iron scavenging. Further, dependence upon iron
36
was not apparent for Salmonella growing in filtered tomato juice, implicating the cellular
37
fraction of the fruit as an important mediator of iron acquisition by the bacteria.
2
Nugent SL et al.
38 39
INTRODUCTION Salmonellae are ubiquitous pathogens present in a wide variety of warm- and
40
cold-blooded hosts. Non-typhoidal salmonellosis is second to only campylobacterosis
41
in illness numbers, some 1.4 million each year. It is, however, the leading cause of
42
death among foodborne bacterial diseases (28). Because of this association with
43
animals, outbreaks of salmonellosis have traditionally been caused by the consumption
44
of contaminated meat and poultry products. It has become increasingly common,
45
however, for human disease to be caused by Salmonella-contaminated vegetables and
46
produce. In the past decades tomatoes have been the source of several outbreaks (1,
47
2, 13, 18, 19, 22). The Salmonella serovars implicated in these infections have been
48
varied, including Montevideo, Newport, Javiana, and Braenderup. In some cases, the
49
sources of infection have been found, often being contaminated water sources, while in
50
others the sources are unknown (13, 18, 19).
51
A mechanism of penetration of Salmonella into the tomato pulp has been
52
proposed; exposing tomatoes to contaminated water lower in temperature than the
53
tomato itself significantly increased penetration of the fruit (43). In addition, Salmonella
54
has been shown to contaminate tomatoes via soil and from crop debris from previous
55
harvests (4, 5). The bacterium, when either applied to the surface of the fruit or
56
inoculated into the stem scar or the pulp itself, can survive and proliferate (8, 23, 24, 32,
57
38). It can also survive on leaves in the absence of desiccation (37), and proliferates
58
significantly better when co-inoculated with a bacterial plant pathogen (29, 32-34). Also
59
important to our work is the finding that Salmonella serovar Montevideo, which has
60
been the cause of human outbreaks and is used in our studies, survives well in ripe
3
Nugent SL et al.
61
tomatoes (23, 24, 37). It is, in fact, a serovar that proliferates highly under experimental
62
conditions (38).
63
Although the basis of infection of animal hosts by Salmonella has been well
64
defined, much less is known about the genetic determinants of this pathogen required
65
for colonization of produce plants, and specifically of tomatoes. A genome-wide screen
66
using Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium identified a number of metabolic and
67
regulatory genes induced during growth in tomatoes, but did not demonstrate genes
68
required for bacterial survival in this environment (31). Further work in this area showed
69
that the O-antigen portion of bacterial lipopolysaccharide is importance for Salmonella
70
survival in tomatoes (27), as it is in animal hosts.
71
A method that has been extensively used in the study of bacterial-host
72
interactions is in vivo expression technology (IVET). The basis of the method is the
73
identification of bacterial genes that are selectively expressed when bacteria live in
74
association with the host as a means of both understanding the host environment faced
75
by the pathogen and identifying bacterial genes essential for survival within hosts. This
76
method has been used for a number of bacteria pathogenic in several plant species,
77
including tomato (6, 9, 10, 14, 17, 31, 35, 39, 42). Recombinase IVET (RIVET) is a
78
variation on the technique that induces a permanent selectable change in the bacterial
79
phenotype in response to gene expression (40). Although plants can be considered
80
opportunistic hosts for this bacterium, and thus specific infection mechanisms are
81
unlikely to have evolved, it is clear that Salmonella survives and grows for prolonged
82
periods within produce plants, likely in the face of anti-bacterial responses by the plant
83
(29). It is therefore reasonable to assume that the pathogen invokes metabolic
4
Nugent SL et al.
84
pathways for the utilization of available nutrients and the response to plant defenses. In
85
this work, we describe the use of a RIVET screen to identify Salmonella genes
86
expressed specifically when bacteria live within tomato fruit to gain insight into the
87
requirements for survival and growth of the pathogen in this environment. We
88
demonstrate that components of the bacterial iron acquisition system are selectively
89
expressed, and that this system is required for the prolonged survival within this
90
important produce plant.
91
MATERIALS AND METHODS
92
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions. Salmonella enterica serovar
93
Montevideo strain ATCC BAA710 and isogenic mutants thereof were used for assays of
94
function and for generation of DNA libraries. A derivate of S. enterica serovar
95
Typhimurium strain ATCC 14028s was used as the vehicle for the RIVET screen,
96
described below. Gene deletions were created using the previously described one-step
97
inactivation method (15). Briefly, PCR products were generated from the
98
chloramphenicol or kanamycin resistance genes of pKD3 or pKD4, respectively, using
99
primers carrying at their 5′ ends 40 bp of homology to the regions flanking the start and
100
stop codons of the gene to be deleted. A derivative of strain BAA710 carrying pKD46,
101
containing the λ Red recombinase for allelic exchange, was transformed with the
102
resultant PCR products. All deletion mutants were checked for the loss of genes by
103
PCR. The recD::lacZ fusion was constructed by first deleting recD and then integrating
104
lacZ at the site of the disruption as previously described (16).
105 106
The fepDGC complementing plasmid was made by PCR amplifying from BAA710 a 2898 bp region that includes the fepDGC ORFs along with 110 bp of 5’ upstream
5
Nugent SL et al.
107
promoter region using the primers 5′-
108
TAAATAGGATCCCTATCGCCGCCCCAGCGGTA -3′ and 5′-
109
TCGGGAAAGCTTTACAACGCCTTAATGCGAGT -3′, and cloning the amplified region
110
into pGB2 cut with HindIII and BamHI (11). The plasmid was maintained by growth in
111
streptomycin (20 μg/ml) and spectinomycin (100 μg/ml).
112
Screen for genes expressed within tomatoes. We created a library of Salmonella
113
genomic DNA fragments by partial digestion of total genomic DNA from S. enterica
114
serovar Montevideo BAA710, with HaeIII, AluI, or RsaI and then size fractionated the
115
DNA to isolate fragments of 1 to 2 kb. These three libraries were pooled and fragments
116
were cloned into the PmlI site of the ampicillin-marked plasmid pCA19, placing them
117
upstream of a promoterless derivative of the phage P1 recombinase cre, which lies
118
upstream from a promoterless lacZ (3). A derivative of strain S. Typhimurium 14028s
119
carrying a chloramphenicol resistance marker and a pair of chromosomal loxP sites
120
flanking npt (kanamycin resistance) and sacB (sucrose susceptibility) were P22
121
transduced with this library, with an initial selection on either M9 minimal media with
122
0.2% glycerol or LB agar, supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (50
123
μg/ml), chloramphenicol (25 μg/ml), and EGTA (10 mM). S. Typhimurium was used for
124
these experiments as it exhibited a marked sensitivity to sucrose, due to the presence
125
of sacB, that was required for selection.
126
Approximately 104 independent library transductants were pooled for inoculation
127
into tomatoes. Red-vine tomato fruit from a local grocer were inoculated with 104 to 105
128
bacteria, representing this pool of 104 clones, in 20 μl of phosphate-buffered saline
129
(PBS). A total of 40 tomatoes were inoculated with 40 independent library pools. For 20
6
Nugent SL et al.
130
of these tomatoes the initial selection was on LB agar containing the appropriate
131
antibiotics, and for the remaining 20 tomatoes selection was on M9 minimal agar with
132
0.2% glycerol and the appropriate antibiotics. For inoculation, stems were removed,
133
and an 18 gauge blunt needle was used to create four channels into the tomato core
134
tissue located immediately around the stem scar. The 20 μl inoculum was divided
135
evenly among the four channels and to a depth within 1.5 cm of the stem scar. After 48
136
h, the tomato core tissue segment from 0 to 25 mm below the stem scar was harvested.
137
The cores were placed in a Whirl-pak filter bag (Nasco) with 1.5 ml LB or M9 0.2%
138
glycerol media, crushed with a glass bottle, and the liquid collected through the bag
139
filter. The tomato core liquid was serially diluted, plated onto either LB or M9 agar plates
140
with added chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and 5% sucrose. From each tomato, 10
141
sucrose-resistant colonies were saved, for a total of 200 clones derived from each
142
medium.
143
Of the 400 clones, 397 clones were successfully amplified by PCR and Sanger
144
sequenced. The three remaining clones were isolated by preparation of plasmid DNA
145
and sequenced. Inserts were sequenced using a primer from within the cre coding
146
region that allowed for sequencing across the insert junction. The average length of
147
useable sequence reads was 1077 bp. We confirmed the size of all induced fragments
148
to be in the range of 1 to 4.5 kb by PCR amplification using primers homologous to
149
sequence that flanks the inserted fragment. The average insert size was approximately
150
2 kb. Cloned fragments that induced expression of cre non-specifically (i.e. while
151
bacteria were growing outside tomatoes) were identified through expression of the
7
Nugent SL et al.
152
fused lacZ by β-galactosidase expression assays in either LB or M9 minimal media with
153
0.2% glycerol.
154
Sequencing. Sequences were obtained using an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA)
155
Automated 3730xl DNA Analyzer by the Biotechnology Resource Center Genomics
156
Facility at Cornell University. The sequencing primer was 5’-
157
AGGCAAATTTTGGTGTGACC, which is located in cre. The location of each of the
158
cloned fragments was determined by comparison to 50 draft genomes of S. enterica
159
Montevideo (available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information,
160
submitted by the US Food and Drug Administration) and to the sequenced genomes of
161
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain LT2 (GenBank accession number NC_003197)
162
and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain SL1344 (GenBank accession number
163
NC_016810).
164
Competition assays. The two strains to be compared were grown separately
165
overnight at 37°C with aeration, sub-cultured to exponential growth phase, washed
166
twice with PBS, mixed at a 1:1 ratio, and diluted 1:9 in PBS for inoculation. The number
167
of bacteria in the inoculum was determined by serial dilution and plating onto LB agar
168
supplemented with X-gal (80 μg/ml) and ferric chloride (100 μM FeCl3). For assays in
169
tomato fruit, red-vine tomatoes from a local grocer were inoculated in replicates of five
170
with ~106 cfu of the mixture of stains in 20 μl of PBS. For inoculation, stems were
171
removed, and an 18 gauge blunt needle was used to create four channels into the
172
tomato core tissue located immediately around the stem scar. The 20 μl inoculum was
173
divided evenly among the four channels and to a depth within 1.5 cm of the stem scar.
8
Nugent SL et al.
174
Tomatoes were harvested either immediately or after 7 days of incubation at
175
room temperature, and the tomato core tissue segment from 0 to 25 mm below the stem
176
scar was processed. The cores were placed in a Whirl-pak filter bag with 10 ml LB
177
media, crushed with a glass bottle, and the liquid collected through the bag filter. The
178
tomato core liquid was serially diluted, and aliquots plated onto LB agar supplemented
179
with X-gal (80 μg/ml) and ferric chloride (100 μM FeCl3). The iron supplement was
180
added to plates to reverse an observed slow growth phenotype of the ΔfepDGC mutant
181
on LB agar plates without additional iron. Competitive index (CI) values were calculated
182
as the mean ratio of cfu of the two strains, with CI>1 indicating the presence of more of
183
the wild type strain. Growth of strains within tomatoes was determined by comparing the
184
mean cfu per tomato recovered at 7 days to that recovered immediately after
185
inoculation. For the tests of statistical significance, replica plates were averaged and
186
ratio values were converted logarithmically, while cfu values were divided by 1000 and
187
converted logarithmically. Data were modelled using ANOVA, and significance was
188
determined using the LSMeans Tukey HSD test.
189
For assays using tomato juice, tomatoes of the same variety as that used for the
190
fruit assays were cut into quarters, the sections placed in the Whirl-pak filter bags and
191
crushed using a glass bottle. We then collected the juice through the bag filters and
192
centrifuged to remove solid material. Supernatants were recovered, centrifuged again,
193
and then filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. The wild type and the ΔfepDGC mutant were
194
inoculated together into 5 ml of juice at a final concentration of ~1x106 per assay in a
195
tightly capped tube sealed with Parafilm and incubated standing. Bacteria were
196
recovered immediately after inoculation and again after 7 days of incubation at room
9
Nugent SL et al.
197
temperature for enumeration on LB agar plates supplemented with 80 μg/ml X-gal and
198
100 μM FeCl3. Assays were performed in replicates of five. All experiments were
199
performed using disposable plastic supplies throughout to reduce the possible
200
contamination of reagents with iron. Iron concentrations were measured using a
201
colorimetric Iron Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) in comparison to a generated standard
202
curve.
203
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
204
Iron-regulated genes are selectively expressed by Salmonella growing in
205
tomatoes. To identify bacterial functions required for the survival and growth of
206
Salmonella within tomato fruit, we employed a recombinase in vivo expression
207
technology (RIVET) screen. As the Montevideo serovar has frequently been associated
208
with disease outbreaks derived from tomatoes, we introduced a plasmid library of
209
genomic DNA derived from S. enterica serovar Montevideo fused to the recombinase
210
cre into a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium test strain carrying a chromosomal
211
antibiotic resistance cassette flanked by loxP sites (3). After incubation in red ripe
212
tomatoes, bacteria that had undergone recombination of the loxP cassette, indicating
213
selective activation of the cre fusion due to the induction of promoter activity, were
214
obtained by selection on sucrose-containing media (see Materials and Methods for
215
complete experimental details). This selection yielded S. Montevideo genes encoding
216
numerous predicted functions, including energy metabolism, surface proteins, and gene
217
regulation, that might plausibly be required for survival of the bacterium in this
218
environment.
10
Nugent SL et al.
219
Conspicuous among the genes identified were those known to be required for the
220
direct acquisition of iron (Table 1). iroC and iroE, located within a single operon,
221
encode proteins utilized for the binding of iron and for the production of the iron
222
siderophore salmochelin, respectively, while sitC encodes an additional iron transporter.
223
In addition, the screen identified several genes with expression known to be controlled
224
by Fur, the ferric uptake regulator. Fur is a transcriptional and post-transcriptional
225
regulator that senses iron concentration and redox state. Recent work with Salmonella
226
Typhimurium has shown it to control expression of genes in classes that include
227
carbohydrate and nucleotide metabolism, and bacterial adhesion (41). All of the genes
228
derived from our screen of S. Montevideo in tomatoes that are shown in Table 1 are
229
members of this previously described Fur regulon.
230
Interestingly, the Fur regulon was defined in S. Typhimurium using bacteria
231
grown under anaerobic conditions, and this analysis identified regulated genes not
232
known to be controlled by Fur when bacteria were grown in the presence of oxygen
233
(41). That work was conducted specifically to replicate the conditions present in an
234
animal host, where oxygen is limiting. The oxygen tension within tomato fruits under
235
normal storage conditions, however, has been shown to be near that of ambient air (7),
236
suggesting some additional environmental signal for the induction of the Fur regulon in
237
our experiments. These results thus suggest that within tomato fruit Salmonella senses
238
and responds to an environment of restricted iron concentration. It is further plausible
239
that the acquisition of exogenous iron in this environment is important for the survival of
240
Salmonella while within tomato fruit.
11
Nugent SL et al.
241
Genes used for the transport of iron are required for the proliferation of
242
Salmonella in tomatoes. As iron is a limiting resource in many organisms, and as its
243
acquisition has been shown to be essential for the persistence and virulence of
244
Salmonella in animals (12, 25), we examined further the importance of iron acquisition
245
to bacterial survival in tomatoes. Salmonella uses a pair of siderophores, enterobactin
246
and salmochelin, the C-glycosylated derivative of enterobactin, to scavenge iron from
247
the environment. Enterobactin can be captured by two distinct outer membrane
248
receptors, FepA and IroN, while salmochelin is transported primarily by IroN (20, 36).
249
Both siderophores, however, share a single mechanism of transport through the inner
250
membrane, utilizing the FepDGC transporter (12). To investigate the importance of iron
251
acquisition, we therefore constructed a ΔfepDGC mutant of S. enterica serovar
252
Montevideo, eliminating the ability of this strain to import iron using both enterobactin
253
and salmochelin, and tested its ability to proliferate in tomato fruit.
254
We used competitive index (CI) assays to compare the survival of the ΔfepDGC
255
mutant in tomatoes to that of the wild type. Our experiments used as the wild type an
256
isogenic strain carrying a recD::lacZY insertion, which allowed the rapid enumeration of
257
the two strains by color on agar medium containing the chromogenic substrate X-gal.
258
We had determined previously that the recD::lacZY insertion had no effect on bacterial
259
survival in tomatoes compared to that of the S. Montevideo parent strain (data not
260
shown). We inoculated 2-3x105 cfu per tomato of the ΔfepDGC mutant together with a
261
similar number of the wild type into the stem end of tomato fruit and used competition
262
assays to assess its ability to proliferate over time, assessing bacterial numbers
263
immediately after inoculation and then again seven days later. As shown in Figure 1A,
12
Nugent SL et al.
264
our inoculation consisted of slightly more of the ΔfepDGC mutant than the wild type
265
(CI1 on day zero. Seven days later, the CI was
292
significantly lower (Fig. 2C), indicating that the plasmid-borne copy of fepDGC could
293
restore the mutant to a growth phenotype superior to that of the wild type. This
294
improved growth of the complemented mutant can be seen in Figure 2D; although the
295
total number of complemented mutants remained lower than the wild type at 7 days, the
296
growth rate of the complemented mutant (75-fold change) surpassed that of the wild
297
type (65-fold change). A subsequent analysis of plasmid retention by selective plating
298
demonstrated no detectable loss of plasmids during the course of these experiments
299
(data not shown), indicating that any fitness burden imparted by the plasmid was not
300
sufficient to select for its loss. Thus, these results demonstrate that the loss of
301
Salmonella proliferation in tomatoes can be attributed solely to the absence of the iron
302
transporter FepDGC. They show also that multicopy expression of FepDGC can
303
enhance Salmonella growth, suggesting that the acquisition of iron is a limiting factor to
304
growth within tomato fruit.
305
Iron is required for the proliferation of Salmonella in tomatoes. Although FepDGC
306
is known to be a transporter of iron, it remained possible that other, uncharacterized
307
functions of this transporter might make it important for the survival or growth of
308
Salmonella in tomatoes. To ensure that the observed survival defect of this mutant was
309
attributable specifically to the failure of Salmonella to acquire iron within tomato fruit, we
14
Nugent SL et al.
310
next tested the phenotypic complementation of the mutation by the addition of
311
exogenous iron. We again performed competition assays using the wild type and the
312
ΔfepDGC mutant strains, but added to the inoculum 800 μM FeCl3, a concentration that
313
we had previously determined not to inhibit the growth or affect recovery of either strain
314
on laboratory media (data not shown). We found that this addition of iron did not
315
appreciably change the ability of the wild type strain to proliferate within tomatoes;
316
numbers of this strain harvested after seven days were not significantly different with or
317
without added iron. Specifically, the wild type grew by ~200-fold in the absence of
318
exogenous iron and by ~160-fold with iron added (Fig. 3A). This result indicates that
319
the iron concentration naturally present in tomatoes does not limit the growth of wild
320
type Salmonella, and therefore provides sufficient iron in the presence of intact bacterial
321
iron-scavenging systems. Importantly, however, including FeCl3 in the inoculum did
322
eliminate the growth defect of the ΔfepDGC mutant, restoring numbers of this mutant to
323
those of the wild type (Fig. 3A). Without iron added, the ΔfepDGC mutant demonstrated
324
the expected growth defect in tomatoes, with a CI at 7 days significantly higher than that
325
at the day of inoculation (Fig. 3B). With added iron, however, the wild type and the
326
ΔfepDGC mutant strain had a CI of near 1 at both the time of inoculation and seven
327
days later, with the CI at the two times being not significantly different from each other
328
(Fig. 3B). These results thus demonstrate that the known function of FepDGC,
329
transport of iron into the bacterium, is that which is required for the normal growth of
330
Salmonella within the tomato. Further, our data show that iron acquisition is required for
331
the growth of the pathogen in this fruit, as it is known to be in animal tissues. Our
15
Nugent SL et al.
332
results also support previous work in plants that demonstrated siderophores and iron to
333
be important for Salmonella colonization of alfalfa roots (21).
334
Proliferation of Salmonella in tomato juice is not affected by the ability to acquire
335
iron. The internal environment of the tomato fruit is comprised of a complex milieu of
336
liquid and cellular material. To determine whether iron concentration in the liquid
337
fraction of this environment alone dictated the survival of Salmonella, we further tested
338
bacterial survival in tomato juice. Filtered juice extracts obtained from the same variety
339
of tomato used in the fruit survival assays were employed in competition assays
340
identical to those described above. We found that the proliferation of Salmonella in
341
tomato juice was similar to that in intact tomatoes (Fig. 4A). The inoculation of ~7x105
342
wild type bacteria yielded 70-fold bacterial growth after 7 days of incubation.
343
Importantly, the ΔfepDGC mutant survived and grew 65-fold, not significantly different
344
from the wild type, demonstrating no loss of viability, in contrast to that observed in
345
whole fruit (Fig. 4A). The CI calculation further demonstrated this parity of growth
346
between the two strains; there was no significant difference in the ratios of the wild type
347
and ΔfepDGC mutant at inoculation and 7 days afterwards (Fig. 4B). To further
348
investigate the discrepancy in iron-dependent growth between tomato fruit and juice, we
349
measured the concentration of iron in filtered juice extracts. Iron concentration varied
350
within the single μM range among juice samples. Although this is far less than the
351
concentration we used to supplement iron in tomatoes, it greatly exceeds the
352
concentration know to be required to support the growth of Salmonella. In defined
353
laboratory medium, wild type Salmonella has been shown to grow in concentrations of
354
iron as low as 0.1 μM (30), thus indicating that the iron concentration present in our
16
Nugent SL et al.
355
juice samples was sufficiently great to permit bacterial growth even by the ΔfepDGC
356
mutant, with its diminished capacity to acquire iron.
357
These findings have important implications for understanding the interaction of
358
Salmonella with tomatoes. They demonstrate that the acquisition of iron is essential for
359
the growth of this pathogen within the tomato fruit; a ΔfepDGC mutant, unable to
360
efficiently scavenge iron, grew significantly less well than did the isogenic wild type.
361
Importantly, we also found that the concentration of iron in extracted juice was sufficient
362
to support the growth of strains both competent and deficient for iron-acquisition,
363
demonstrating that the ability to salvage iron from within the fluid milieu does not alone
364
dictate the survival and growth of this pathogen within tomatoes. These results, taken
365
together, thus suggest that some factor or factors present within the tomato fruit reduce
366
the ability of the pathogen to acquire the iron that should be available to it in this
367
environment. We are tempted to speculate that the fruit itself harbors means to chelate
368
iron, thus sequestering it from the bacteria. It has long been known that animal tissues
369
readily capture free iron, and that Salmonella must compete for this nutrient, through the
370
production of siderophores, to establish infections in animal hosts (12). Some plants
371
are similarly known to chelate iron through the production of phytosiderophores,
372
molecules secreted into the rhizosphere through the roots by graminaceous plants as a
373
means to acquire environmental iron (26). Although the existence of such iron chelators
374
in tomatoes is thus plausible, we know of no similar example in any fruit. Alternatively, it
375
remains possible that the environment within the tomato represses Salmonella functions
376
essential for the acquisition or use of iron. We think this explanation unlikely, however,
377
as our work stems from the identification of components of the iron regulon specifically
17
Nugent SL et al.
378
induced within the tomato fruit (Table 1), implicating an active role in iron acquisition by
379
the bacterium. Thus, the work presented here, taken together, shows that Salmonella
380
uses the iron stores that exist in the tomato fruit to survive and proliferate within this
381
important produce crop, and suggests that the tomato itself acts to limit the availability
382
of iron to the pathogen.
383 384
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
385
This work was supported by Grant No. 2011-67017-3023 from the USDA National
386
Institute of Food and Agriculture Program in Food Safety, Nutrition, and Health: Food-
387
borne Plant-Pathogen Interactions. We thank Francoise Vermeylen and Erika Louise
388
Mudrak of the Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit for their assistance in the statistical
389
analysis.
18
Nugent SL et al.
390
REFERENCES
391
1.
392 393
in restaurants--United States, 2005-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 56:909-911. 2.
394 395
2005. Outbreaks of Salmonella infections associated with eating Roma tomatoes--United States and Canada, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54:325-328.
3.
396 397
2007. Multistate outbreaks of Salmonella infections associated with raw tomatoes eaten
Altier, C., and M. Suyemoto. 1999. A recombinase-based selection of differentially expressed bacterial genes. Gene 240:99-106.
4.
Barak, J. D., A. Liang, and K. E. Narm. 2008. Differential attachment to and
398
subsequent contamination of agricultural crops by Salmonella enterica. Appl Environ
399
Microbiol 74:5568-5570.
400
5.
401 402
Barak, J. D., and A. S. Liang. 2008. Role of soil, crop debris, and a plant pathogen in Salmonella enterica contamination of tomato plants. PLoS One 3:e1657.
6.
Barr, M., A. K. East, M. Leonard, T. H. Mauchline, and P. S. Poole. 2008. In vivo
403
expression technology (IVET) selection of genes of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar
404
viciae A34 expressed in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Lett 282:219-227.
405
7.
Berry, A. D., and S. A. Sargent. 2009. Real-time microsensor measurement of internal
406
oxygen partial pressure in tomato fruit under hypoxic conditions. Postharvest Biology
407
and Technology 52:240-242.
408
8.
Beuchat, L. R., and D. A. Mann. 2008. Survival and growth of acid-adapted and
409
unadapted Salmonella in and on raw tomatoes as affected by variety, stage of ripeness,
410
and storage temperature. Journal of food protection 71:1572-1579.
411
9.
Boch, J., V. Joardar, L. Gao, T. L. Robertson, M. Lim, and B. N. Kunkel. 2002.
412
Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato genes induced during infection of
413
Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Microbiol 44:73-88.
414 415
10.
Brown, D. G., and C. Allen. 2004. Ralstonia solanacearum genes induced during growth in tomato: an inside view of bacterial wilt. Mol Microbiol 53:1641-1660. 19
Nugent SL et al.
416
11.
Churchward, G., D. Belin, and Y. Nagamine. 1984. A pSC101-derived plasmid which
417
shows no sequence homology to other commonly used cloning vectors. Gene 31:165-
418
171.
419
12.
Crouch, M. L., M. Castor, J. E. Karlinsey, T. Kalhorn, and F. C. Fang. 2008.
420
Biosynthesis and IroC-dependent export of the siderophore salmochelin are essential for
421
virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 67:971-983.
422
13.
Cummings, K., E. Barrett, J. C. Mohle-Boetani, J. T. Brooks, J. Farrar, T. Hunt, A.
423
Fiore, K. Komatsu, S. B. Werner, and L. Slutsker. 2001. A multistate outbreak of
424
Salmonella enterica serotype Baildon associated with domestic raw tomatoes. Emerg
425
Infect Dis 7:1046-1048.
426
14.
Czelleng, A., Z. Bozso, P. G. Ott, E. Besenyei, G. J. Varga, A. Szatmari, L. Kiraly,
427
and Z. Klement. 2006. Identification of virulence-associated genes of Pseudomonas
428
viridiflava activated during infection by use of a novel IVET promoter probing plasmid.
429
Curr Microbiol 52:282-286.
430
15.
431 432
Datsenko, K. A., and B. L. Wanner. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640-6645.
16.
Ellermeier, C. D., A. Janakiraman, and J. M. Slauch. 2002. Construction of targeted
433
single copy lac fusions using lambda Red and FLP-mediated site-specific recombination
434
in bacteria. Gene 290:153-161.
435
17.
Giddens, S. R., R. W. Jackson, C. D. Moon, M. A. Jacobs, X. X. Zhang, S. M. Gehrig,
436
and P. B. Rainey. 2007. Mutational activation of niche-specific genes provides insight
437
into regulatory networks and bacterial function in a complex environment. Proc Natl
438
Acad Sci U S A 104:18247-18252.
439 440
18.
Greene, S. K., E. R. Daly, E. A. Talbot, L. J. Demma, S. Holzbauer, N. J. Patel, T. A. Hill, M. O. Walderhaug, R. M. Hoekstra, M. F. Lynch, and J. A. Painter. 2008.
20
Nugent SL et al.
441
Recurrent multistate outbreak of Salmonella Newport associated with tomatoes from
442
contaminated fields, 2005. Epidemiol Infect 136:157-165.
443
19.
Gupta, S. K., K. Nalluswami, C. Snider, M. Perch, M. Balasegaram, D. Burmeister,
444
J. Lockett, C. Sandt, R. M. Hoekstra, and S. Montgomery. 2007. Outbreak of
445
Salmonella Braenderup infections associated with Roma tomatoes, northeastern United
446
States, 2004: a useful method for subtyping exposures in field investigations. Epidemiol
447
Infect 135:1165-1173.
448
20.
Hantke, K., G. Nicholson, W. Rabsch, and G. Winkelmann. 2003. Salmochelins,
449
siderophores of Salmonella enterica and uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, are
450
recognized by the outer membrane receptor IroN. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:3677-
451
3682.
452
21.
Hao, L. Y., D. K. Willis, H. Andrews-Polymenis, M. McClelland, and J. D. Barak.
453
2012. Requirement of siderophore biosynthesis for plant colonization by Salmonella
454
enterica. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4561-4570.
455
22.
Hedberg, C. W., F. J. Angulo, K. E. White, C. W. Langkop, W. L. Schell, M. G.
456
Stobierski, A. Schuchat, J. M. Besser, S. Dietrich, L. Helsel, P. M. Griffin, J. W.
457
McFarland, and M. T. Osterholm. 1999. Outbreaks of salmonellosis associated with
458
eating uncooked tomatoes: implications for public health. The Investigation Team.
459
Epidemiol Infect 122:385-393.
460
23.
Iturriaga, M. H., E. F. Escartin, L. R. Beuchat, and R. Martinez-Peniche. 2003. Effect
461
of inoculum size, relative humidity, storage temperature, and ripening stage on the
462
attachment of Salmonella Montevideo to tomatoes and tomatillos. Journal of food
463
protection 66:1756-1761.
464
24.
Iturriaga, M. H., M. L. Tamplin, and E. F. Escartin. 2007. Colonization of tomatoes by
465
Salmonella montevideo is affected by relative humidity and storage temperature. Journal
466
of food protection 70:30-34. 21
Nugent SL et al.
467
25.
Kirby, M. F., B. Devoy, R. J. Law, A. Ward, and J. Aldridge. 2008. The use of a
468
bioassay based approach to the hazard/risk assessment of cargo derived toxicity during
469
shipping accidents: a case study--the MSC Napoli. Mar Pollut Bull 56:781-786.
470
26.
Kobayashi, T., H. Nakanishi, and N. K. Nishizawa. 2010. Recent insights into iron
471
homeostasis and their application in graminaceous crops. Proceedings of the Japan
472
Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences 86:900-913.
473
27.
Marvasi, M., C. E. Cox, Y. Xu, J. T. Noel, J. J. Giovannoni, and M. Teplitski. 2013.
474
Differential regulation of Salmonella typhimurium genes involved in O-antigen capsule
475
production and their role in persistence within tomato fruit. Molecular plant-microbe
476
interactions : MPMI 26:793-800.
477
28.
Mead, P. S., L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L. F. McCaig, J. S. Bresee, C. Shapiro, P. M.
478
Griffin, and R. V. Tauxe. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States.
479
Emerg Infect Dis 5:607-625.
480
29.
Meng, F., C. Altier, and G. B. Martin. 2013. Salmonella colonization activates the plant
481
immune system and benefits from association with plant pathogenic bacteria.
482
Environmental microbiology.
483
30.
484 485
Neidhardt, F. C., P. L. Bloch, and D. F. Smith. 1974. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol 119:736-747.
31.
Noel, J. T., N. Arrach, A. Alagely, M. McClelland, and M. Teplitski. 2010. Specific
486
responses of Salmonella enterica to tomato varieties and fruit ripeness identified by in
487
vivo expression technology. PLoS One 5:e12406.
488
32.
Noel, J. T., J. Joy, J. N. Smith, M. Fatica, K. R. Schneider, B. M. Ahmer, and M.
489
Teplitski. Salmonella SdiA recognizes N-acyl homoserine lactone signals from
490
Pectobacterium carotovorum in vitro, but not in a bacterial soft rot. Molecular plant-
491
microbe interactions : MPMI 23:273-282.
22
Nugent SL et al.
492
33.
Pollard, S., J. Barak, R. Boyer, M. Reiter, G. Gu, and S. Rideout. 2014. Potential
493
Interactions between Salmonella enterica and Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato plants.
494
Journal of food protection 77:320-324.
495
34.
Potnis, N., J. P. Soto-Arias, K. N. Cowles, A. H. van Bruggen, J. B. Jones, and J. D.
496
Barak. 2014. Xanthomonas perforans colonization influences Salmonella enterica in the
497
tomato phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3173-3180.
498
35.
499 500
Preston, G. M., N. Bertrand, and P. B. Rainey. 2001. Type III secretion in plant growthpromoting Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25. Mol Microbiol 41:999-1014.
36.
Rabsch, W., W. Voigt, R. Reissbrodt, R. M. Tsolis, and A. J. Baumler. 1999.
501
Salmonella typhimurium IroN and FepA proteins mediate uptake of enterobactin but
502
differ in their specificity for other siderophores. J Bacteriol 181:3610-3612.
503
37.
504 505
Rathinasabapathi, B. 2004. Survival of Salmonella Montevideo on tomato leaves and mature green tomatoes. Journal of food protection 67:2277-2279.
38.
Shi, X., A. Namvar, M. Kostrzynska, R. Hora, and K. Warriner. 2007. Persistence and
506
growth of different Salmonella serovars on pre- and postharvest tomatoes. Journal of
507
food protection 70:2725-2731.
508
39.
Silby, M. W., P. B. Rainey, and S. B. Levy. 2004. IVET experiments in Pseudomonas
509
fluorescens reveal cryptic promoters at loci associated with recognizable overlapping
510
genes. Microbiology 150:518-520.
511
40.
Slauch, J. M., and A. Camilli. 2000. IVET and RIVET: use of gene fusions to identify
512
bacterial virulence factors specifically induced in host tissues. Methods Enzymol 326:73-
513
96.
514
41.
Troxell, B., R. C. Fink, S. Porwollik, M. McClelland, and H. M. Hassan. 2011. The Fur
515
regulon in anaerobically grown Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium: identification of
516
new Fur targets. BMC microbiology 11:236.
23
Nugent SL et al.
517
42.
Zhang, X. X., A. K. Lilley, M. J. Bailey, and P. B. Rainey. 2004. The indigenous
518
Pseudomonas plasmid pQBR103 encodes plant-inducible genes, including three
519
putative helicases. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:9-17.
520
43.
Zhuang, R. Y., L. R. Beuchat, and F. J. Angulo. 1995. Fate of Salmonella montevideo
521
on and in raw tomatoes as affected by temperature and treatment with chlorine. Appl
522
Environ Microbiol 61:2127-2131.
523
24
Nugent SL et al.
524 525
Table 1. Salmonella genes selectively expressed within tomato fruit that are also constituents of the Fur regulon.
526
Gene
Independent
Function
Isolates from Library fimA
5
Type-1 fimbrial protein
STM4305
5
Putative anaerobic dimethyl sulfoxide reductase
yjjI
3
Putative glycine radical enzyme
hrpA
2
ATP-dependent RNA helicase
tdcE
2
Pyruvate formate-lyase
bglJ
1
DNA-binding transcriptional activator
crr
1
Glucose-specific phosphotransferase
dfp
1
Bifunctional phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase/phosphopantothenate synthase
dmsA
1
Anaerobic dimethyl sulfoxide reductase
eutK
1
Ethanolamine utilization protein
fmt
1
Methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase
iroC
1
Putative ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter
iroE
1
Salmochelin siderophore system protein
nrdB
1
Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase
sitC
1
Iron/manganese ABC transporter
STM3547
1
Putative transcriptional regulator of sugar metabolism
25
Nugent SL et al.
527
FIGURE LEGENDS
528
Figure 1. Mutation of fepDGC reduces Salmonella viability in tomato fruit. Wild
529
type and ΔfepDGC mutant strains were inoculated together in approximately equal
530
numbers into red ripe tomatoes. Bacteria were enumerated by harvesting tomato juice
531
and tissue either immediately after inoculation (Day 0) or one week later (Day 7) with
532
plating onto selective agar. A) The competitive index (CI) was measured as a ratio of
533
wild type to ΔfepDGC mutant, with a CI>1 indicating a greater number of the wild type.
534
B) Numbers of each bacterial strain were determined by colony-forming units per
535
tomato, with white bars indicating the wild type, and grey bars the ΔfepDGC mutant.
536
Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean, based on five independent
537
biological replicates. Independent axes are used for the two time points for clarity.
538
Significance was determined through ANOVA using the LSMeans Tukey HSD test at
539
p1 indicating a greater number of the wild type. Numbers of each bacterial strain
548
were determined by colony-forming units per tomato, with white bars indicating the wild
549
type, and grey bars the ΔfepDGC mutant, both with the cloning vector. In a separate 26
Nugent SL et al.
550
experiment, C) and D) The wild type carrying the cloning vector was inoculated with the
551
ΔfepDGC mutant carrying a fepDGC complementing plasmid and similarly treated. In
552
both cases, CI>1 indicates a greater number of the wild type than the ΔfepDGC mutant.
553
Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean, based on five independent
554
biological replicates. Independent axes are used for the two time points for clarity. For
555
each experiment, significance was determined through ANOVA using the LSMeans
556
Tukey HSD test at p1 indicating a
568
greater number of the wild type. Significance was determined through ANOVA using
569
the LSMeans Tukey HSD test at p1 indicating a
581
greater number of the wild type. Significance was determined through ANOVA using
582
the LSMeans Tukey HSD test at p