Volume 5 Number 2 February 1978

Nucleic Acids Research

A rapid method for the isolation of circular DNA using an aqueous two-phase partition system R. OhIsson+, C.C. Hentschel* and J.G. Williams*

+National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London, NW7 1 AA and *Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Burtonhole Lane, Mill Hill, London, NW7 1AD, UK Received 23 December 1977 ABSTRACT A method of isolating circular plasmid DNA from cleared lysates of E.coli is described. Purification is achieved by virtue of the rapid re-annealing kinetics of supercoiled DNA. After a brief denaturation step, double stranded plasmid DNA is separated from denatured chromosomal DNA and RNA in a two-phase partition system using dextran and polyethylene glycol. The method is much more rapid than the conventional dyecentrifugation technique and plasmid DNA of comparable purity and yield is obtained.

INTRODUCTION

Mojecular cloning has become a widely used technique for the isolation of specific nucleic acid sequences and bacterial plasmids are the vector of choice for many cloning experiments. However, methods of preparing plasmid DNA have evolved very little since the development of caesium

chloride-ethidium bromide centrifugation of cleared bacterial lysates (1). While this technique provides a high degree of purification it is expensive in both centrifuge time and materials and there is a clear application for a rapid method of purification. We have developed a technique which yields essentially pure plasmid DNA within minutes of obtaining a phenolized cleared bacterial lysate: The technique depends on the fact that plasmid DNA, being a closed circular molecule, displays mono-molecular re-annealing kinetics (2). After denaturation of a mixture of plasmid and E.coli chromosomal DNA, plasmid DNA renatures very rapidly while chromosomal DNA remains single stranded. A two phase partition system is then used to purify duplex plasmid DNA away from single stranded chromosomal DNA and bacterial RNA. This technique has proved particularly useful in the screening of large numbers of transformed clones to determine the restriction enzyme pattern of their plasmid DNA. Since there is no inherent limitations on the scale of the procedure

C Information Retrieval Limited 1 Falconberg Court London WI V 5FG England

583

Nucleic Acids Research it

may

also

prove

useful in the preparation of

very

large quantities of

plasmid DNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Poly-ethylene glycol 6000 (PEG)

was

(England) and Dextran 500 (lot No. 3447)

obtained from BDH Chemicals was

Fine Chemicals (Sweden). E. Coli ribosomal RNA, transfer

chromosomal DNA The

restriction

were

RNA and

obtained from Miles Laboratories Ltd.

enzyme

Hae III

was a

Ltd.

purchased from Pharmacia

(England).

gift from Dr. B. Griffin (Imperial

Cancer Research Fund, London, England) and SV40 DNA

was

a

gift from

Dr. R. Kamen (Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, England). Plasmid

DNA

prepared from late exponential phase cultures treated for 16 hr

was

with chloramphenicol at 170 pg/ml to amplify the plasmid DNA. Cleared lysates

(3).

were

The

prepared by the Triton X-100 lysis procedure of Katz et al.

cleared lysates

for 30' at 37 C.

were

then treated with Proteinase K at 100 ig/ml

Finally, they

were

extracted twice with phenol and twice

with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (99 to 1) and precipitated with 2 volumes of ethanol. (Chloramphenicol In

a

was

obtained from Sigma and Proteinase K from Merck)

typical experiment to purify plasmid DNA for restriction

analysis, the phenolized cleared lysate of

5 ml culture

a

was

enzyme

resuspended

(after ethanol precipitation) in 0.2 ml of TE-buffer (10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) in

a

Microfuge tube.

roughly 25 lig/ml.

The

sample

was

This gives

a

plasmid DNA concentration of

heated for 2 minutes at 1000C to denature

chromosomal DNA and rapidly cooled in dry ice-ethanol. Then 500 pl of dextran 500 (16.8% W/W), 250 pl of PEG (18.4% W/W) and 20

sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.8,

were

added at 40C.

The

adjusted to 1 ml with water and the whole stirred with

a

il

of 0.5 M

volume was then

vortex mixer. It

is important to note that the exact concentrations of the components of the two-phase system (this was determined by freeze druing

a

weighed aliquot

of the stock solution), the pH of the buffer and the temperature (4 C) are

critical factors in determining the separation achieved (for reviews

of two-phase separation techniques the polymer phase

fuge for

1

was

see references 4 and 5).

accelerated by centrifugation

minute at 4 C.

Then 450

Separation of

in a Beckman Micro-

4l of the upper, PEG rich, phase was

recovered and transferred to a fresh tube. After addition of NaCl to 0.2 M, DNA

was

collected by precipitation with two volumes of ethanol. This

procedure also precipitates the phosphate and a small amount of PEG but this does not interfere with subsequent restriction enzyme analysis. (An alternative procedure which avoids co-precipitation of phosphate and PEG

584

Nucleic Acids Research is cetyl trimethyl asnonium bromide (CTAB) precipitation (8)). Pellets were

washed twice in 100% ethanol, dried and taken

Restriction analysis

was

performed using the

subsequent electrophoresis scopy

was

performed

on

on

up

in

a

small volume of

enzyme Hae III

3.5% acrylamide gels (6).

DNA spread by the

aqueous

H20.

with

Electron micro-

procedure of Davies

et al. (7).

RESULTS

The principal components in

a

phenol extracted, cleared lysate of

ribosomal RNA and transfer RNA; plasmid DNA, when

E. coli

are

forms

relatively small fraction of the total nucleic acid.

a

plasmid DNA there is normally DNA. This depending

on

a

present,

In addition to

roughly equivalent amount of chromosomal

the efficiency of the chloramphenicol amplification

step and the effectiveness of the final centrifugation step in the lysis

procedure.

In order to determine the potential purification of plasmid

DNA achievable in

a

two phase partition system,

a

model experiment

was

performed using purified E. coli RNA and DNA. The two phase system was optimized as described by Alberts (5) and the results are presented in Table la. As would be expected from previous results (5,6) only double stranded nucleic acids

were

found to

any

significant extent in the

upper

PEG rich phase. Thus partition under these conditions should produce

substantial purification of plasmid DNA

away

a

from the principal

contaminant E. coli ribosomal RNA. We reasoned that additional purification would result from heat

denaturation of the nucleic acids prior to the partition, since the closed circular plasmid DNA will re-anneal rapidly under these conditions (2),

and hence remain in the PEG phase. (A similar approach has been used to purify other rapidly re-annealing species (9,10). This proved to be correct (Table la) and, after heat treatment, chromosomal DNA was almost totally removed from the PEG phase. A significant amount of transfer RNA remains in the PEG phase, irrespective of heat treatment, presumably because of the large amount of intramolecular base pairing which causes rapid reannealing. For most purposes the presence of transfer RNA presents

no

problem and we decided to attempt plasmid purification using this procedure. an

Table lb shows the degree of purification that can be achieved when artifical mixture of plasmid DNA, chromosomal DNA and ribosomal RNA are

subjected to phase separation. Using one cycle of purification a

17-fold

585

Nucleic Acids Research enrichment was obtained, and after a second partition of the PEG phase with dextran this was increased to 35 fold. The yield of plasmid

DNA was

79% after one cycle of purification and 61% after two cycles. For restriction analysis the degree of purity and yield of plasmid DNA after a single phase extraction was more than adequate, and all subsequent

preparations were purified in this way.

The use of this technique to purify plasmid DNA from bacterial lysates is illustrated in Fig. 1.

A series of bacterial clones, each

containing PMB9 plasmid with a different eukaryotic DNA sequence inserted at the ECoRI site, were grown up and chloramphenicol amplified. Phenol TABLE la

Distribution of various E.coli nucleic acids after two-phase partition % of input in upper phase (PEG)

Sample Native

After heating at 1060C for 2 minutes

1.8

Ribosomal RNA

Transfer RNA

37

Chromosomal DNA

61

3H

79

Plasmid (PMB9) DNA

1.6 37

2.5 78

A 1 ml phase partition system was used (see Materials and Methods) and the input of each, non-isotopically labelled, nucleic acid was about six 0D260 units. The 3H labelled PMB9 DNA was prepared by standard dyecentrifugation procedure and had a specific activity of 200 cpm per jig; 1,000 cpm was used in each partition. TABLE lb Distribution of an artifical mixture of nucleic acids after two-phase partition - fold purificatio

% of total OD units recoverea in upper polymer phase

% recovery of 3H PMB9

single two-phase partition

4.7

79

16.7

The same samples after a second two-phase partition

1.7

61

35.1

Samples subjected to a

The artificial mixture contained, by weight 50 parts chromosomal DNA, 50 parts ribosomal RNA and 1.4 parts 3H PMB9 (comprising 5 jig). A 1 ml phase partition system was used and the second partition was performed by adding 450 pl of dextran and 20 jil of phosphate buffer to the PEG phase. The theoretical maximum purification is 72.3 fold.

586

Nucleic Acids Research

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

hi

Figure 1. The total nucleic acid from phenolized, cleared lysates of eight bacterial cultures (20 ml), each containing a fragment of eukaryotic DNA of undetermined length, was resuspended in 1 ml of distilled H20. Two hundred microlitre aliquots of each preparation were subjected to a single two phase partition and ethanol precipitated. Each pellet was then dissolved in 20 4l of H20, restricted with Hae III and run on 3.5% acrylamide gel (slots b to h). One hundred microlitre aliquots of the preparations run in slots b and h were ethanol precipitated and restricted without purification (slots a and i). The outside slots were loaded with an SV40 marker DNA digested to completion with Hin III.

587

Nucleic Acids Research

Figure 2. A phenolized cleared lysate of E.coli containing the plasmid PMB9 was subjected to a single two phase partition. Samples removed before and after purification were prepared for electron microscopy under the aqueous conditions of Davies et al. (8). The sample removed before purification showed a large amount of granular material, assumed to be RNA, which completely obscured DNA molecules (results not shown). The field shown is quite typical of the purified preparation. extracted cleared lysates were then prepared and an aliquot of each preparation was subjected to aqueous two-phase partition, restricted with Hae III and analyzed by electrophoresis on 3.5% acrylamide gels. For two of the preparations, an aliquot of unpurified nucleic acid was

similarly analyzed (Fig. 1). The majority of the nucleic acid in the unpurified samples is RNA, which totally obscures the smaller Hae III restriction fragments of the plasmid DNA. There is also a significant amount of chromosomal DNA, giving rise to a restriction enzyme pattern which partially obscures the large restriction enzyme fragments of the plasmid DNA. After two-phase partition plasmid DNA appears to be pure except for a significant amount of tRNA which runs near the end of the gel. Gel electrophoresis, however, is not sensitive enough to detect a low level contaminant of heterogeneous size (such as restriction fragments of chromosomal DNA). Therefore, similar samples were analyzed by electron microscopy. Before phase partition the presence of large amounts of RNA made it impossible to quantitate the various species. After phase 588

Nucleic Acids Research partition (Fig. 2), in a total of 95 molecules examined, there were 92 supercoils, and 3 linear molecules of lengths different from that of the

plasmid DNA, this indicates a very high degree of purification with respect to chromosomal DNA. DISCUSSION

The great virtue of the aqueous two-phase separation technique presented here is the speed with which a quite highly purified preparation

of plasmid DNA can be prepared with a minimum expense in materials and equipment. Once a phenolized cleared lysate has been obtained, the

entire procedure takes less than one hour.

This compares with two or

three days of centrifugation to obtain caesium chloride purified plasmid, which subsequently has to be purified to remove ethidium bromide and other components of the lysis and centrifugation solutions. The small scale on which the procedure can be performed means that plasmid DNA can be prepared from a few ml. of E.coli and this reduces the potential hazards associated with growing large amounts of an uncharacterized eukaryote cloned DNA. Another small scale plasmid enrichment procedure has been reported (11)

but this requires an RNAase step and contaminating chromosomal DNA is not removed.

Our technique can easily be scaled up to prepare very large

quantities of plasmid DNA in which case the alkali denaturation procedure of Sunmmers and Szybalski (9) is convenient since no boiling step is

required. The procedure is of course very suitable for dealing with large numbers

of samples. We have found this particularly useful when screening individual "cDNA" clones to determine the size of the eukaryotic DNA insert. This

being a common requirement of the cloning procedure, even if size selected cDNA is used for the cloning. (Fig. 1 illustrates such a screen). However, the technique clearly has application in all situations where contamination by E.coli tRNA and a small amount of E.coli chromosomal DNA

constitutes no problem.

The data in Table lb is particularly impressive

in view of the very high ratio of chromosomal DNA to plasmid DNA in these This is much higher than that actually found in

samples (49 to 1.4).

chloramphenicol amplified cleared lysates (which we estimate as being about 1 to 1). This indicates that the method can probably be used to purify plasmids, which cannot be chloramphenicol amplified (especially if two cycles of phase separation are used). Also of course it is applicable to any closed circular or spontaneously

re-annealing DNA and

we have

recently used this technique to purify mitochondrial DNA (C.J. Coote and

589

Nucleic Acids Research R. Ohlsson, unpublished results).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We

are

grateful for the excellent technical assistance of Mrs Rita

Harris and Mrs M. Lloyd. Mrs Rita Tilly.

Electron microscopy analysis

We also wish to express

providing valuable advice and-laboratory

our

was

performed by

gratitude to Dr. J. Tata for

space.

Valuable advice has also

been given by Professor P.A. Albertsson. Dr. R. Ohlsson is

an

EMBO fellow.

REFERENCES

2

Radloff, R., Bauer, W. and Vinograd, J. (1967) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 57: 1514-1522 Helinski, D.R. and Clewell, D.B. (1971) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 40:

3

Katz, L., Kingsbury, D.K. and Helinski, D.R. (1973) J. Bacteriol.

4

Albertsson, P.A. (1971) In: Partition of cell particles and macromolecules. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 151-159 Alberts, B. (1967) In: Methods in Enzymology. Vol 12A (ed. S.P. Colowick and N.O. Kaplan) Academic Press, New York, 566 Maniatis, T., Jeffrey, A. and van de Sande, H. (1975) Biochemistry

1

899-942 114:577 5 6

14:3787-3794 7

8

9 10 11

Davies, R.W., Simon, M. and Davidson, N. (1971) In: Methods in Enzymology, vol 21, Part D 413-428 Stehelin, D., Guntaka, R.V., Varmus, H.E. and Bishop, J.M. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 101:349 Summers, W.C. and Szybalski, W. (1967) J. Mol. Biol. 26:107-122 Patterson, J.B. and Stafford, D.W. (1971) Biochemistry 9:1278 Meagher, R.D., Tait, R.D., Betlack, M. and Boyer, H.W. (1977) Cell

10:521-536

590

A rapid method for the isolation of circular DNA using an aqueous two-phase partition system.

Volume 5 Number 2 February 1978 Nucleic Acids Research A rapid method for the isolation of circular DNA using an aqueous two-phase partition system...
1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views