Accepted Manuscript A new direct transfer protocol for cryopreserved IVF embryos Bruno Valente Sanches, Paula Alvares Lunardelli, Juliana Hayashi Tannura, Bruna Lopes Cardoso, Marcos Henrique Colombo, Douglas Gaitkoski, Andrea Cristina Basso, Daniel Robert Arnold, Marcelo Marcondes Seneda PII:

S0093-691X(15)00667-6

DOI:

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.029

Reference:

THE 13435

To appear in:

Theriogenology

Received Date: 8 September 2015 Revised Date:

25 November 2015

Accepted Date: 30 November 2015

Please cite this article as: Sanches BV, Lunardelli PA, Tannura JH, Cardoso BL, Colombo MH, Gaitkoski D, Basso AC, Arnold DR, Seneda MM, A new direct transfer protocol for cryopreserved IVF embryos, Theriogenology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.029. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT REVISED A new direct transfer protocol for cryopreserved IVF embryos

Bruno Valente Sanches1; Paula Alvares Lunardelli2; Juliana Hayashi Tannura1; Bruna

Basso1; Daniel Robert Arnold1; Marcelo Marcondes Seneda3.

RI PT

Lopes Cardoso1; Marcos Henrique Colombo1; Douglas Gaitkoski1; Andrea Cristina

In Vitro Brasil S/A. SP 340 Road, km 166, ZIP code: 238, Mogi-Mirim – SP, Brazil.

2

State University of Londrina (UEL), Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, DCV, CCA,

3

Corresponding author:

Marcelo Marcondes Seneda:

M AN U

ZIP code: 10.011, Londrina – PR, Brazil.

SC

1

State University of Londrina (UEL), Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, DCV, CCA.

TE D

Celso Garcia Cid Road, Pr 445, km 380. Londrina, PR, Brazil, zip-code: 86051-990 Phone: +55 43 3371-5622

AC C

EP

Email: [email protected]

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT

2

The global demand for in vitro produced (IVP) embryos of determined sex has greatly

3

increased over the last decade. Efficient protocols for the direct transfer of IVP embryos

4

are lacking. This study aimed to compare the pregnancy rates for fresh, vitrified or

5

frozen/directly transferred IVP dairy cow embryos. Oocytes (n = 3171) recovered by

6

ovum pick-up (n = 112) from Girolando (Holstein-Gir) females (n = 36) were selected

7

and submitted to in vitro maturation (IVM) for 24 hours at 38.5°C with 5% CO2 in air

8

with saturated humidity. In vitro fertilization (IVF) was performed with the thawed,

9

sexed semen from 5 Holstein bulls. After IVF, presumptive zygotes were denuded and

SC

RI PT

1

cultured for seven days under the same IVM and IVF conditions of temperature and

11

humidity, except with 5% CO2 and 5% O2. Grade I blastocysts were randomly assigned

12

for either the transferred fresh, vitrified/thawing or frozen/directly embryo transfer into

13

previously synchronized recipient females. Conception rates were analyzed by binomial

14

logistic regression, and a probability level of P < 0.05 was considered significant. The

15

conception rates were 51.35±1.87% (133/259) for the fresh embryos, 35.89±3.87%

16

(84/234) for the vitrified embryos and 40.19±4.65% (125/311) for the frozen directly

17

transferred embryos. These data demonstrate that in vitro produced embryos with sexed

18

semen could be directly transferred into recipient cows with similar conception rates to

19

vitrified embryos. The comparison showed that the use of frozen embryos in direct

20

transfer provides easier logistics and a more practical approach for the transfer of IVP

21

embryos on dairy farms.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

10

22 23

Keywords: Bovine, Pregnancy, Direct Transfer, IVP Embryos.

24 25

1. INTRODUCTION

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 26 27

The global demand for in vitro produced (IVP) embryos of determined sex has increased greatly over the last decade, primarily due to the higher effectiveness of

29

genetic improvement in dairy herds [1]. However, cryopreserved IVP embryos are less

30

resistant to injuries than their in vivo counterparts are, and this has hindered the

31

international genetic trade and the management of embryo banks [2].

32

RI PT

28

The culture media in which the embryos are grown may directly influence their cryosensitivity [3]. Many efforts have been made to improve the production of the IVP

34

industry, with a major focus on media supplementation. The addition of components

35

such as fetal bovine serum (FBS) to the culture medium may increase blastocyst

36

development rates [4], yet it may also cause controversial effects to the quality of the

37

blastocysts and the establishment of pregnancy [5], thereby influencing the outcome of

38

the cryopreservation.

M AN U

The cryopreservation technique predominantly used for IVP embryos is

TE D

39

SC

33

vitrification [6] because of its simplicity, speed and low cost. However, this technique

41

uses high concentrations of cryoprotectants and requires a laboratory and trained

42

personnel to evaluate the embryos before transfer [7], which restricts the use of this

43

technique on a large scale. On the other hand, slow freezing of embryos for subsequent

44

direct transfer, despite having slightly higher operating costs, is more practical because

45

it eliminates evaluation before the transfer. In addition, lower cryoprotectant

46

concentrations can be used, reducing toxicity to the embryos [8].

47

AC C

EP

40

Since the 1990s, direct transfer has been applied to simplify the post-thawing

48

rehydration step of in vivo embryos, so that the direct transfer technique is more

49

accessible [8]. No data exist in the literature to report the use of direct transfer of frozen

50

IVP embryos. In addition, data on direct transfer of vitrified IVP embryos are scarce,

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 51

and report on the utilization of small numbers of embryos, which could be the reason

52

for the contradictory pregnancy results reported [9; 10].

53

Thus, the aim of this study was to 1) determine the effect of serum on conception rates from in vitro culture and 2) compare the conception rates of IVP

55

embryos that were transferred fresh, vitrified or frozen/directly transferred in a large

56

commercial dairy herd.

RI PT

54

57 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

SC

58 59

This study was performed in accordance with the Animal Experimentation

61

Ethics Committee at the State University of Londrina based on Federal Law 11.794

62

from October 8, 2008.

65 66 67

MO, USA) unless otherwise specified.

TE D

64

Reagents used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,

2.1. Collection of oocytes and in vitro maturation (IVM)

EP

63

M AN U

60

A total of 112 ovum pick-up (OPU) procedures were conducted with

69

ultrasound guidance in 36 female Girolando donors (1/2 Gir and 1/2 Holstein) ages 2-8

70

years old, with an average milk yield of 5,000 kg per lactation.

71

AC C

68

Prior to OPU, females received a caudal epidural anesthesia (5 ml of 2%

72

lidocaine; Anestésico L, Pearson, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). The rectum was emptied, and

73

the vulva and perineal area were cleaned. Subsequently, the transducer was fitted in the

74

intravaginal device (Pie Medical, The Netherlands) and placed in the vagina, while

75

ovaries were manipulated and positioned per rectum for performance of the OPU.

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 76

After the aspiration sessions, the oocytes were washed in TCM-199 (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) buffered with HEPES, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine

78

serum (FBS; Gibco BRL; Grand Island, NY), 0.20 mM sodium pyruvate and 83.4

79

mg/mL amikacin (Biochimico Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The oocytes were pre-

80

selected and classified in a mobile laboratory at the farm. Oocytes were transported to

81

the laboratory in 5-mL polystyrene Falcon tubes containing 400 µL of TCM-199

82

medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mg/mL FSH (Folltropin, Bioniche Animal

83

Health, Belleville, ON, Canada), 50 mg/mL hCG (Profasi, Serono, São Paulo, Brazil)

84

and estradiol (1 mg/mL), 2.2 µg of sodium pyruvate and 83.4 mg/mL amikacin, covered

85

by 350 µL of mineral oil. In the laboratory, the oocytes were maintained in the same

86

tube in which they were transported, with the IVM medium being maintained at 38.5°C

87

with 5% CO2 in air for 24 hours from the moment of the OPU.

88

90 91

2.2. In vitro fertilization (IVF)

TE D

89

M AN U

SC

RI PT

77

In vitro fertilization was performed with female sexed semen from five Holstein bulls. Semen was thawed (at 35°C for 30 sec) and washed twice by

93

centrifugation (200 x g for 5 minutes) in 1 mL of TALP supplemented with 2.2 µg of

94

pyruvate and 83.4 g/mL amikacin, buffered with 2.3 g/mL of HEPES. The semen

95

concentration was adjusted to 2x106 mobile spermatozoa (sptz)/mL. An insemination

96

dose of 10 µL (105 sptz) was added to each 50-uL drop of TALP-IVF (TALP

97

supplemented with 10 µg/mL heparin and 160 µL of penicillamine, hypotaurine and

98

epinephrine solution) under mineral oil. Later, 25-30 oocytes were added in each drop.

99

Oocytes and sptz were co-incubated for 20-24 hours at 38.5°C in an incubator with 5%

100

AC C

EP

92

CO2 in air and saturated humidity.

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 101 102

2.3. In vitro culture (IVC) of the embryos

103 104

After IVF, presumptive zygotes were co-cultured (groups of 25 oocytes per drop) in the incubator (38.5°C with 5% CO2, 5% O2 and saturated humidity) with

106

granulosa cells.

107

RI PT

105

Embryos were cultured in 100-µL drops of SOF [11] supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; frozen/direct transfer) or BSA + 2.5% FBS (fresh and

109

vitrified) under mineral oil. The cleavage rate was evaluated on the third day of culture.

110

“Feeding” was performed on the third and fifth day of IVC. On day seven of the culture

111

period, Grade 1 expanded blastocysts were randomly assigned to the experimental

112

treatments.

113

115 116

2.4. Embryo Vitrification

TE D

114

M AN U

SC

108

Embryos were cryopreserved following the vitrification protocol as previously described by SANCHES et al. [3]. Briefly, expanded blastocysts were exposed for 1

118

minute in the equilibration solution (ES) of 10% ethylene glycol (EG) + 10% dimethyl

119

sulfoxide (DMSO) in TCM-HEPES medium (25 mM HEPES) + 10% FBS and then for

120

20 seconds in the vitrification solution (VS = 20% EG + 20% DMSO in TCM-HEPES +

121

0.5 M sucrose). During the 20 seconds of exposure to VS, three to five embryos were

122

place in a Cryotop® (Kitazato, Shizuoka, Japan) and immediately placed in liquid

123

nitrogen (-196°C) as previously described by Kuwayama et al. [12]. Vitrified embryos

124

were stored in liquid nitrogen until thawed for embryo transfer.

125

AC C

EP

117

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 126

2.5. Thawing of the vitrified embryos

127 128

For thawing of the vitrified embryos, the Cryotops containing the embryos were exposed to air for four seconds and then dipped in the warming solution (TCM-

130

HEPES + sucrose 0.3 M) at approximately 35°C. The vitrification solution was

131

removed by two washes with 0.3 M sucrose and 0.15 M sucrose for 5 minutes each,

132

before proceeding to the application of the maintenance medium TCM-HEPES [13; 14].

RI PT

129

134

2.6. Slow freezing of the embryos

M AN U

135 136

SC

133

Embryos were cryopreserved by the slow freezing method previously described for in vivo embryos [7]. Briefly, blastocysts and expanded blastocysts were

138

exposed to the freezing solution (FS), which consisted of 1.5 M EG at 35°C for 10

139

minutes. Embryos were loaded into 0.25-mL straws, placed on a central column of a 1.5

140

M solution of EG, surrounded by four columns of the thawing solution (TS; 0.75 M EG

141

diluted in DPBS; Nutricell, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil), and separated by air columns

142

from each other (Figure 1). After being loaded, the straws were placed in a freezing

143

machine (TK 1000®; Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil) that had been previously

144

stabilized at -6°C. Two minutes after being placed in the machine, crystallization

145

("seeding") of the columns immediately above and below the embryo column was

146

conducted. Embryos remained at -6°C for 10 minutes.

147

AC C

EP

TE D

137

The freezing curve was initiated, lowering the temperature 0.5°C per minute to

148

-32°C. At the end of the freezing curve, the embryos were immersed directly in liquid

149

nitrogen, where they were stored until being transferred into the recipients.

150

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 151

2.7. Thawing of frozen embryos and Direct Transfer

152 153

At the time of direct transfer, the frozen embryos were removed from the liquid nitrogen, exposed to the air at room temperature for 10 seconds and immersed in water

155

at 35°C for 30 seconds. The straw was dried with paper towels and gently agitated to

156

mix solutions inside the straw to initiate rehydration. Embryos were then transferred

157

into the uterine horn of the recipients.

159

SC

158

RI PT

154

2.8. Synchronization of recipients for embryo transfer and pregnancy diagnosis

M AN U

160 161

All recipients were in the 45-90 day interval after calving during the first trimester of lactation and located on the same farm under identical management

163

conditions (food, water, and facilities). The synchronization protocol was as follows: on

164

day 0, administration of 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (Sincrodiol®, Ouro Fino, Cravinhos,

165

São Paulo, Brazil) and placement of an intravaginal implant (CIDR®, Pfizer, Hamilton,

166

New Zealand); on day 7, administration of 25 mg of prostaglandin F2α (Lutalyse®,

167

Pfeizer, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil); on day 9, removal of CIDR and application of 1

168

mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP®, Pfizer, Hamilton, New Zealand). On day 18, each

169

recipient was subjected to a transrectal ovarian examination (Aloka SSD 500, 5

170

MHz linear transducer, Tokyo, Japan) to confirm the presence and size of the

171

CLs.

172

AC C

EP

TE D

162

After epidural anesthesia using 5 ml of 2% lidocaine (Anestésico L, Pearson,

173

São Paulo, SP, Brazil), and after the rectum had been emptied and the vulva and

174

perineal area cleaned, a single embryo was nonsurgically transferred into the ipsilateral

175

horn of the CL of each recipient.

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 176 177

Pregnancy diagnosis was carried out by ultrasonography on days 30 and 60.

178 179

2.9. Experimental design

RI PT

180 181

Experiment I – Comparison of the conception rates of in the vitro embryos cultured in

182

the presence or absence of Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)

184

SC

183

This experiment was conducted to determine if the presence of FBS in the culture media affects conception rates. Oocytes were collected by OPU from the

186

Girolando donors and submitted to in vitro fertilization with sexed semen from the same

187

Holstein bull. Presumptive zygotes were randomly assigned to be cultured in 100-µL

188

drops of SOF [10] supplemented with either 8 mg/mL of BSA (no FBS group) or 2.5%

189

FBS + 8 mg/mL of BSA (FBS group) under mineral oil. In vitro culture and media

190

replacement were conducted as described above. After seven days in culture, the

191

embryos from both groups were freshly transferred into previously synchronized

192

recipient cows.

TE D

EP

193

M AN U

185

Experiment II - Comparison of the conception rates with the IVP embryos transferred

195

fresh, vitrified or frozen/directly transferred

196 197

AC C

194

After the OPU and in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture, as described

198

above, Grade 1 expanded blastocysts were randomly assigned to groups for use as either

199

freshly transferred, vitrified or frozen for a later direct transfer on day 7. Synchronized

200

recipients were utilized for the fresh, vitrified and frozen/direct transferred embryos.

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 201 202

2.10. Statistical Analysis

203 204

The conception rates at 30 and 60 days of pregnancy were analyzed by binomial logistic regression with IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 22 [15]. For

206

experiment I, the serum was considered a fixed variable. For experiment II, the embryo

207

treatment (fresh, vitrified, or frozen), technician and bull were used as fixed variables.

208

Significance was considered when P < 0.05.

SC

209 3. RESULTS

M AN U

210 211 212

RI PT

205

In Experiment I, 665 oocytes from 25 cows were matured, fertilized and randomly assigned to be cultured in media supplemented without (n = 362) or with (n =

214

303) 2.5% FBS. No difference in blastocyst rates was detected between the two groups

215

(P = 0.791). Conception rates were not different at day 30 or day 60, regardless of the

216

absence or presence of FBS (P = 0.269; Table 1).

TE D

213

EP

217

Table 1. Embryo development of IVP embryos cultured in serum with or without 2.5%

219

FBS supplementation

AC C

218

Group

Oocytes (n)

Blastocysts n (%)

Transferred embryos (n)

Pregnancies n (%) Day 30

Day 60

With FBS

303

84 (27.06±4.26%)a

82

38 (46.34±6.22%)a

30 (36.59±6.10%)a

Without FBS

362

88 (24.31±2.56%)a

88

33 (37.50±5.65%)a

31 (35.23±5.70%)a

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 220

a

221

0.05).

Same letters in the same column indicate no significant difference between lines (P >

222 223

In Experiment II, 112 OPUs were carried out in 36 cows. A total of 804 embryos were produced from 2,506 oocytes and randomly assigned to either be

225

transferred fresh (n = 259), transferred after being vitrified/thawed-cultured (n = 234) or

226

frozen/directly transferred (n = 311), and conception rates were compared after 30 and

227

60 days of pregnancy (Table 2). The embryo transfer technician and bull did not affect

228

the conception rates (P > 0.10). Conception rates of fresh embryos (51.35±1.87% and

229

43.24±1.23%, days 30 and 60, respectively) were significantly different from both

230

vitrified and frozen embryos on days 30 and 60 (Table 2). The conception rates of the

231

vitrified embryos (35.89±3.87% and 31.19±4.01%, days 30 and 60, respectively) were

232

not different (P > 0.10) from those of directly transferred embryos (40.19±4.65% and

233

34.72±4.15%, days 30 and 60, respectively; Table 2).

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

224

234

Table 2. Comparison of the conception rates at 30 and 60 days after transferring fresh,

236

vitrified or directly transferring the frozen IVP embryos.

EP

235

Pregnancies at day 30 n (%)

Pregnancies at day 60 n (%)

Fresh

259

133 (51.35±1.87%)a

112 (43.24±1.23%)a

Vitrified

234

84 (35.89±3.87%)b

73 (31.19±4.01%)b

Frozen

311

125 (40.19±4.65%)b

108 (34.72±4.15%)b

AC C

Group

Transferred embryos (n)

237

a, b

Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05).

238 239

4. DISCUSSION

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 240 241

This study evaluated the conception rates of IVP embryos that had been transferred fresh, vitrified or frozen by a direct transfer protocol. To the best of our

243

knowledge, this study is the first of its kind, particularly regarding the use of sexed

244

semen in frozen IVP embryos subjected to the direct transfer in a commercial setting.

245

RI PT

242

In addition to the increasing efficiency of using female-sexed semen in IVP

embryos, thereby providing more female cows for the dairy industry [16], research on

247

cryopreservation of these embryos and transfer methods has become more promising

248

because of the recent feasibility and the experiments regarding conception. In that

249

context, fetal bovine serum as a supplement to the culture media has previously been

250

considered responsible for decreasing the survival rate of embryos [17]. However, in

251

our experimental conditions, there was no difference in conception rates between the

252

two groups, allowing us to conclude that FBS is dispensable in in vitro culture.

253

The most widely used method for cryopreservation of IVP embryos is

TE D

M AN U

SC

246

vitrification, primarily because of the speed and lower costs of freezing. Vitrification

255

ensures that embryo transfer is a much more efficient technique that is no longer

256

dependent on the availability of synchronized recipients. The disadvantage of

257

vitrification is that a qualified person is required to reheat the embryos, which

258

complicates its field application and large-scale use [18]. In addition, a sufficient

259

number of recipients must be arranged according to the number of embryos that might

260

survive cryopreservation.

261

AC C

EP

254

Another important aspect to be considered is the cryoprotectant used in the

262

procedure. Cryopreservation protocols should prevent the formation of intracellular ice

263

crystals and attempt to minimize toxic and osmotic stress to the cells during freezing

264

[19]. Decreasing exposure time of the embryos to toxic cryoprotective agents such as

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

glycerol and ethylene glycol (EG) [20] before freezing and after thawing could reduce

266

the toxic effects and allow higher post-thaw embryo viability [21].

267

The direct transfer method enables rehydration of embryonic cells after thawing. In the

268

early 1990s, Voelkel and Hu [7] demonstrated that the use of EG as a cryoprotectant

269

could be an alternative to the direct transfer of frozen-thawed embryos, with slightly

270

lower conception rates than those achieved with fresh embryos [7;22], ensuring that the

271

technique is the most accessible and practical for use in the field. In addition, the direct

272

transfer method allows for more flexibility in the number of recipients available,

273

whether from synchronized or naturally cycling.

274

SC

RI PT

265

M AN U

In this study, direct transfer was performed after the embryos were slowly frozen in EG to 0.75 Molar, arranged in four columns beside the embryo. In that

276

manner, the water inflow into the embryonic cells could occur more slowly, maintaining

277

the integrity of the cells. A similar strategy was presented by other researchers for

278

freezing in vivo embryos, using lateral columns consisting of a solution called the

279

"holding medium," composed of EG to 0.37 Molar [7]. In that work, the pregnancy rate

280

was not different from that of the control group (50%). Our pregnancy rates were lower;

281

however, it is important to consider that in vivo produced embryos are subjected to

282

lower stress levels during development, and they frequently achieve higher pregnancy

283

rates.

EP

AC C

284

TE D

275

In our study, conception rates on days 30 and 60 with fresh IVP embryos

285

(51.35±1.87% and 43.24±1.23%, respectively) were higher (P > 0.05) than those

286

obtained from vitrified IVP embryos (35.89±3.87% and 31.19±4.01%, respectively) and

287

frozen directly transferred (40.19±4.65% and 34.72±4.15%, respectively) IVP embryos.

288

These results are significantly higher than reported by LIM et al. [23] regarding

289

transferred IVP embryos cultured in the absence of FBS and cryopreserved by slow

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 290

freezing (22.9%). Additionally, these results were higher than reported by other

291

researchers utilizing vitrified IVP embryos and the Open Pulled Straw Technique [6].

292

The combination of the culture of the embryos in the absence of FBS and the strategy of

293

loading in the straw might have determined the success of our protocol.

295

RI PT

294 CONCLUSION

296

The data from our study demonstrate that in vitro produced embryos with

SC

297

sexed semen after slow freezing and direct transfer utilizing the method we describe

299

result in pregnancy rates as satisfactory as those achieved by vitrification, allowing

300

greater efficiency and practicality in advanced genetic dairy farming.

301 302

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

304 305

TE D

303

The authors appreciated the commitment of the employees of Vitro Brazil S/A and the Cape Verde Group - Fazenda Santa Luzia.

REFERENCES

AC C

308

EP

306 307

M AN U

298

309

[1] Pontes JHF, Silva KCF, Basso AC, Rigo AG, Ferreira CR, Santos GMG, et al.

310

Large-scale in vitro embryo production and pregnancy rates from Bos taurus, Bos

311

indicus, and indicus-taurus dairy cows using sexed sperm. Theriogenology

312

2010;74:1349–55.

313

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 314

[2] Sudano MJ, Paschoal DM, Rascado TS, Magalhães LCO, Crocomo LF, Lima-Neto

315

JF, et al. Lipid content and apoptosis of in vitro-produced bovine embryos as

316

determinants of susceptibility to vitrification. Theriogenology 2011;75:1211-20.

317 [3] Sanches BV, Marinho LSR, Filho BDO, Pontes JHF, Basso AC, Meirinhos MLG, et

319

al. Cryosurvival and pregnancy rates after exposure of IVF-derived Bos indicus

320

embryos to forskolin before vitrification. Theriogenology 2013;80:372-7.

322

[4] Leivas FG, Brum DS, Fialho SS, Saliba WP, Alvim MTT, Bernardi Ml, et al. Fetal

323

calf serum enhances in vitro production of Bos taurus indicus embryos. Theriogenology

324

2011;75:429-33.

M AN U

SC

321

RI PT

318

325

[5] Garcia SM, Marinho LSR, Lunardelli PA, Seneda MM, Meirelles FV.

327

Developmental Block and Programmed Cell Death in Bos indicus Embryos: Effects of

328

Protein Supplementation Source and Developmental Kinetics. PLoS ONE 2015;10:

329

e0119463.

EP

330

TE D

326

[6] Dode MAN, Leme LO, Spricigo JFW. Criopreservação de embriões bovinos

332

produzidos in vitro. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 2013;37:145-50.

333

AC C

331

334

[7] Vajta G, Holm P, Kuwayama M, Booth PJ, Jacobsen H, Greve T, et al. Open Pulled

335

Straw (OPS) Vitrification: A New Way to Reduce Cryoinjuries of Bovine Ova and

336

Embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1998;51:53–8.

337 338

[8] Voelkel SA, Hu YX. Direct transfer of frozen-thawed bovine embryos.

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 339

Theriogenology, 1992;37:23-37.

340 [9] Pugha PA, Tervita HR, Niemannb H. Effects of vitrification medium composition

342

on the survival of bovine in vit. Ro produced embryos, following in straw-dilution, in

343

vitro and in vivo following transfer. Anim Reprod Sci 2000;58:9-22.

RI PT

341

344

[10] Vieira AD, Forell F, Feltrin C, Rodrigues JL. In-straw cryoprotectant dilution of

346

IVP bovine blastocysts vitrified in hand-pulled glass micropipettes. Anim Reprod Sci

347

2007;99:377–83.

SC

345

M AN U

348 349

[11] Wells DN, Misica PM, Tervit HR. Production of cloned calves following nuclear

350

transfer with cultured adult mural granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:996-1005.

351

[12] Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O. Highly efficient vitrification method for

353

cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod BioMed Online 2005;11:300-8.

TE D

352

354

[13] Vieira AD, Mezzalira A, Barbieri DP, Lehmkuhl RC, Rubin MIB, Vajta G. Calves

356

born after open pulled straw vitrification of immature bovine oocytes. Cryobiology

357

2002;45:91-4.

AC C

358

EP

355

359

[14] Mezzalira A, Mezzalira JC, Moraes AN, Thaler Neto A, Vieira AD, Barreta MH, et

360

al. Vitrification of bovine IVP embryos: age of embryos and exposure time to

361

cryoprotectant influence viability. Arch Vet Sci 2004;9:107-11.

362 363

[15] IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22, IBM Inc, Armonk, NY.

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 364 365

[16] Xu J, Guo Z, Su L, Nedambale TL, Zhang J, Schenk J, et al. Developmental

366

potential of vitrified Holstein cattle embryos fertilized in vitro with sex-sorted sperm. J

367

Dairy Sci 2006;89:2510–8.

RI PT

368 [17] Lonergan P, Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adán A, Moreira MB, Pintado B, De La Fuente J.

370

Temporal divergence in the pattern of messenger RNA expression in bovine embryos

371

cultured from the zygote to blastocyst stage in vitro or in vivo. Biol Reprod

372

2003;69:1424–31.

SC

369

M AN U

373 374

[18] Morató R, Mogas T. New device for the vitrification and in-straw warming of in

375

vitro produced bovine embryos. Cryobiology 2014;68:288–93.

376

[19] Campos-Chillon LF, Walker DJ, De La Torre-Sanchez JF, Seidel Jr GE. In vitro

378

assessment of a direct transfer vitrification procedure for bovine embryos.

379

Theriogenology 2006;65:1200-1214.

TE D

377

EP

380

[20] Dochi O, Yamamoto Y, Saga H, Yoshiba N, Kano N, Maeda J, et al. Direct

382

transfer of bovine embryos frozen-thawed in the presence of propylene glycol or

383

ethylene glycol under on-farm conditions in an integrated embryo transfer program.

384

Theriogenology 1988;49:1051-8.

AC C

381

385 386

[21] Sommerfield V, Niemann H. Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro produced

387

embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled feezing or vitrification. Cryobiology

388

1999;38:95-105

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 389 390

[22] Leibo SP, Mapletoft ERJ. Direct transfer of cryopreserved cattle embryos in North

391

America. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Convention of AETA. San Antonio, TX;

392

1998, p. 91-8.

RI PT

393 [23] Lim KT, Lang G, Ko KH, Lee WW, Park HJ, Kim JJ, et al. Improved

395

cryopreservation of bovine preimplantation embryos cutured in chemically defined

396

médium. Anim reprod Sci 2008;103-239-48.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

394

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Figure 1 - Loading scheme for frozen embryo direct transfer.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT • With a consistent number of pregnancies, we describe a method for direct transfer of frozen IVF embryos;

RI PT

• Directly transferred frozen embryos provided the same pregnancy rates as vitrified embryos, even though vitrifying is the most currently used method of cryopreservation for IVP embryos;

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

• Since we combine direct transfer with sexed semen, we provide a useful option for genetic enhancing, mainly for dairy cattle.

A new direct transfer protocol for cryopreserved IVF embryos.

The global demand for in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos of determined sex has greatly increased over the last decade. Efficient protocols for the direct...
564B Sizes 0 Downloads 37 Views