Page 1 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

1

A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration Seong-Seo Noh1,#, Suk Ho Bhang2,#, Wan-Geun La3, Seahyoung Lee1, Jung-Youn Shin1, Yoon-Ji Ma4, Hyeon-Ki Jang4, Seokyung Kang1, Min Jin1, Byung-Soo Kim1,4,5,*

1

School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744,

Republic of Korea 2

School of Chemical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Republic of Korea

3

Department of Nanobiomedical Science, Dankook University, Cheonan-Si 330-714, Republic of Korea

4

Interdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744,

Republic of Korea 5

Institute of Bioengineering, Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University,

Seoul 151-744, Republic of Korea Running title: In situ bone regeneration by dual delivery of substance P and BMP-2 *Corresponding author: Byung-Soo Kim, Ph.D. Tel: +82-2-880-1509, Fax: +82-2-888-1604, E-mail: [email protected] #

These two authors contributed equally.

1

Page 2 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

2 Implantation of ex vivo expanded and osteogenically differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for bone regeneration has drawbacks for clinical applications, such as poor survival of implanted cells and increased treatment expenses. As a new approach for bone regeneration that can circumvent these limitations, we propose dual delivery of substance P (SP) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) to facilitate endogenous stem cell recruitment to bone defects by SP and subsequent in situ osteogenic differentiation of those cells by BMP-2. A heparin-conjugated fibrin (HCF) gel enabled dual delivery with fast release of SP and slow release of BMP-2, which would be ideal for prompt recruitment of endogenous stem cells in the first stage and time-consuming osteogenic differentiation of the recruited stem cells in the second stage. The HCF gels with SP and/or BMP-2 were implanted into mouse calvarial defects for 8 weeks. Local delivery of SP to the calvarial defects using HCF gel was more effective in recruiting MSCs to the calvarial defects than intraperitoneal or intravenous administration of SP. Many of the cells recruited by SP underwent osteogenic differentiation through local delivery of BMP-2. The efficacy of in vivo bone regeneration was significantly higher in the SP/BMP-2 dual delivery group. The dual delivery of SP and BMP-2 using the HCF gel therefore has potential as an effective bone regeneration strategy.

2

Page 3 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

3 Introduction Adult stem cell therapy for bone regeneration has been extensively studied for treating bone diseases caused by trauma, tumor resection, arthrodesis, and osteoporosis.1 Among the adult stem cells used for bone regeneration, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most frequently used because of their self-renewal ability and multipotency.2 To obtain the large number of transplantable cells required for effective bone regeneration by cell transplantation and enhance in vivo bone regeneration efficacy of MSCs, ex vivo expansion and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs prior to cell transplantation have been attempted previously.3 However, ex vivo manipulation of MSCs has drawbacks for clinical applications such as poor cell survival,4 and safety of culture medium supplements.5 Therefore, a new approach without such drawbacks should be developed for effective repair of bone defects. Previous studies have reported that local delivery of growth factors or cytokines using scaffolds resulted in the regeneration of various tissues, including dental pulp-like tissue and muscle.6,7 These studies suggested the possibility of tissue regeneration via the recruitment of endogenous stem cells to damaged regions, without transplantation of exogenous stem cells. Such bone regeneration requires two main events, i.e., endogenous stem cell mobilization/homing to a bone defect and subsequent osteogenic differentiation of the recruited stem cells. Therefore, we designed a dual delivery system that can release a stem cell recruiting factor first, followed by an osteogenic differentiation inducer. For the stem cell mobilization/homing step, we used substance P (SP), a small peptide that is known to function as a chemotactic factor for mobilizing MSCs to the circulation.8 SP has been reported to be effective in tissue regeneration by promoting recruitment of MSCs to damaged tissues,9,10 which makes it an ideal candidate agent for promoting endogenous stem cell 3

Page 4 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

4 mobilization/migration in our system. For the osteogenic differentiation inducer, we used bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2), which is a well-known growth factor that induces osteogenic differentiation of stem cells.11 However, the in vivo half-life of BMP-2 is relatively short,12 and in vitro osteogenic differentiation of stem cells by BMP-2 requires several weeks.13 To address these issues, we used a heparin-conjugated fibrin (HCF) gel to achieve sustained delivery of BMP-2 for effective bone regeneration. We had previously developed the HCF gel and found it to be effective in achieving sustained release of BMP2.14 The sustained release of BMP-2 from the HCF gel appeared to be based on an interaction between the heparin in the HCF gel and the heparin-binding motif of BMP-2.15 However, because SP is a short peptide that lacks a heparin-binding motif, we expected the release profile of SP from the HCF to be different from that of BMP-2. In the present study, we locally delivered SP and BMP-2 to calvarial defects in mice by using the HCF gel to determine whether the dual delivery of the stem cell recruiting factor (SP) and the osteogenic differentiation inducer (BMP-2) would facilitate bone regeneration even without exogenous stem cell transplantation. The bone regeneration efficacy was compared among experimental groups by various analytical methods.

Materials and methods Synthesis of the HCF gel Heparin (molecular weight, 4000-6000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was covalently bonded to bovine fibrinogen (Sigma, F8630) as previously described.14 Briefly, heparin (100 mg) was dissolved in a buffer (100 ml, pH 6) composed of 0.05 M 24

Page 5 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

5 morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (Sigma). N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, 0.04 mM; Sigma) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide hydrochloride (0.08 mM; Sigma) were added to the solution to activate the carboxylic acid groups of the heparin. After 12 h of reaction at 4 °C, the solution was stirred to homogeneity, and the product was precipitated with excess anhydrous acetone and lyophilized. Fibrinogen (100 mg; Sigma) was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 20 ml, pH 7.4) at 4 °C and reacted with activated carboxyl acid groups of the lyophilized heparin (60 mg) under the same conditions for 3 h. The product was precipitated with a large excess of acetone and lyophilized. The resultant white powder was completely dissolved in PBS and dialyzed through a porous membrane bag (molecular weight cutoff, 12,000-14,000 Da; Spectrum Lab, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA) at 4 °C for 24 h to remove residual heparin. Finally, heparin-conjugated fibrinogen was lyophilized for 48 h. The HCF gel was formed by mixing heparin-conjugated fibrinogen (40 mg/ml) and normal fibrinogen (60 mg/ml) with factor XIII (88 U/ml), aprotinin (100 KIU/ml), calcium chloride (6 mg/ml), and thrombin (500 IU/mg). The ratio of heparin-conjugated fibrinogen and normal fibrinogen was 1:1 (v/v), and the final fibrinogen concentration of the HCF gel was 15 mg/ml. To form HCF, normal fibrinogen, in addition to heparin-conjugated fibrinogen, was also added for enhancing mechanical properties of the formed HCF.

Release profiles of SP and BMP-2 from the HCF gel in vitro The release profiles of SP (Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA, USA) and BMP-2 (Cowell Medi Co., Busan, Korea) from the HCF gel were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). SP- and BMP5

Page 6 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

6 2 were added in the heparin-conjugated fibrinogen solution (2 µg SP and/or 2 µg BMP-2 per 1 ml of HCF) and mixed with normal fibrinogen (60 mg/ml) with factor XIII (88 U/ml), aprotinin (100 KIU/ml), calcium chloride (6 mg/ml), and thrombin (500 IU/mg). BMP-2 was dissolve in heparin-conjugated fibrinogen solution at 4 °C for 2 h and then mixed with thrombin solution for gelation. The final volume of the hydrogels used for in vitro release test was 1 ml. The SP- and BMP-2-loaded HCF gel was immersed in a 2-ml microcentrifuge tube containing 1.5 ml of PBS, and the tubes were incubated at 37 °C with continuous agitation to minimize the concentration gradients of the released SP or BMP-2 in the PBS.16,17 At various time points, the supernatant was collected and fresh buffer was added to the microcentrifuge tubes. The concentrations of SP and BMP-2 in the supernatants were determined by ELISA.

MSC culture Prior to cell migration assay, MSCs were cultured in a growth medium consisting of highglucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco BRL), 100 units/ml of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin.

In vitro cell migration assay To test the effect of SP on in vitro cell migration, 1 × 104 human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMMSCs, Lonza Inc., Allendale, NJ, USA, passage number = 5) were seeded in the upper chamber of a collagen-coated transwell with a pore size of 3.0 µm (Corning Inc., NY, USA), and SP (2.0 µg/ml), BMP-2 (2.0 µg/ml), or both was added to the 6

Page 7 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

7 lower chamber.18 The culture medium was DMEM (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10 % FBS (Gibco BRL) and 1 % penicillin/streptomycin. After 3 days of culture, the cells that remained on the top surface of the porous membrane of the upper chamber were removed using a cotton swab, and the migrated cells that moved through the pores of the porous membrane and attached on the bottom surface of the porous membrane were fixed with methanol for 5 min and stained with crystal violet (Sigma) for 30 min.19 The stained cells were counted at high magnification (×20). Cells were counted in four fields per sample, and the counts were averaged.

Mouse calvarial defect model for evaluating SP-induced MSC migration in vivo The mouse calvarial defect model was as previously described.20 Six-week-old Institute of Cancer Research mice (Koatech, Kyunggi-do, Korea) were anesthetized with xylazine (20 mg/kg) and ketamine (100 mg/kg). After the scalp hair was shaved, a longitudinal incision was made in the midline of the cranium from the nasal bone to the posterior nuchal line, and the periosteum was elevated to expose the surface of the parietal bones. Using a surgical trephine burr (Ace Surgical Supply Co., Brockton, MA, USA) and a low-speed micromotor, 2 circular transosseous defects (diameter, 4 mm) per mouse were produced in the skull. The defect size corresponded to the critical defect size for the mouse calvarial defect model.20 The drilling site was irrigated with saline, and the bleeding points were electrocauterized. The animals were divided into 4 groups with 5 mice per group: no SP, SP (intraperitoneal [i.p.]), SP (intravenous [i.v.]), and SP (HCF, 100 µL). The no SP group received HCF gel implantation only, the SP (i.p) group received i.p. injection of SP (0.2 g/mouse), the SP (i.v.) 7

Page 8 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

8 group received i.v. injection of SP (0.2 g/mouse), and the SP (HCF) group received SP (0.2 g)-loaded HCF gel ((2 x 0.2 µg/gel)/mouse). The dose of SP was proven to be optimal for MSC recruitment and bone regeneration, respectively.8 The skin was then closed with resorbable 6-0 Vicryl sutures (Ethicon, Edinburgh, UK). The animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Seoul National University (#120305-5).

Flow cytometric analysis The implanted HCF gel was retrieved 3 days after implantation for analysis of the infiltrated cells. The retrieved HCF gel was digested with 1.25 mg/ml collagenase type I (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ, USA) at 37 °C for 2 h to isolate the infiltrated cells. After blocking with 3 % (w/v) BSA in PBS at room temperature for 30 min, the cells were treated with FITC-labeled anti-CD29 antibody (1:100 dilution; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, UK), PE-labeled anti-CD45 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), PE/Cy7-labeled anti-CD44 antibody (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and APC-labeled anti-CD90 antibody (Biolegend) on an ice bath for 30 min. After washing with 0.1 % BSA/PBS, the cells were analyzed with a flow cytometer (FACS Calibur, BD Biosciences) equipped with the ImageQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Western blot analysis The retrieved tissue samples at 3 days after implantation were lysed using a Dounce homogenizer (50 strokes, 4 °C) in ice-cold lysis buffer (15 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0), 0.25 M 8

Page 9 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

9 sucrose, 15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM NaPPi, 1 μg/ml pepstatin A, 2.5 μg/ml aprotinin, 5 μg/ml leupeptin, 0.5 mM phenymethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.125 mM Na3VO4, 25 mM NaF, and 10 μM lactacystin). Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Equal protein concentrations from each sample were mixed with Laemmli sample buffer, loaded, and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 10 % (v/v) resolving gel. Proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred to a Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA, USA) and then probed with antibodies against CD29 (Abcam), Runx2 (Abcam), osteocalcin (Abcam), PPARγ (Abcam), Collagen type II (Abcam), and Ly6G (neutrophils, Abcam) for 1h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1h at room temperature. The blots were developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Luminescence was recorded on X-ray film (Fuji super RX, Fujifilm Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) and bands were imaged using a densitometer (Model GS-690, BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for cells infiltrating into the HCF gel To characterize the cells that infiltrated into the HCF gel, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed. Total RNA extracted from the cells was reverse-transcribed into cDNA. The expression of CD29, CD140b, and CD45 was 9

Page 10 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

10 examined to determine whether the cells had characteristics of MSCs. Since the CD45 is an hematopoietic stem cell marker, we considered that CD29+/CD45- and CD140b+ cells were considered as MSCs.21,22 The expression of osteocalcin (osteogenic differentiation), PPARγ (adipogenic differentiation), and collagen type II (chondrogenic differentiation) was examined to evaluate the multipotency difference of recruited MSCs. qRT-PCR was performed using the Step One Plus RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with FAST SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). The primers used are listed in Table 1.

In vitro multipotency of the cells infiltrating into the implanted HCF gel For further analyses, cells infiltrating into the implanted HCF gel were retrieved and cultured as previously reported.23 The implanted HCF gels were harvested 3 days after implantation and digested in 1.25 mg/ml collagenase type I for 2 h at 37 °C to release the cells within the scaffold. The cells were then resuspended in culture medium and plated on tissue culture dishes. One hour later, the medium was changed to obtain adherent semipurified stromal cells. The cells were grown to confluence in 5 % CO2 and 95 % humidity at 37 °C. After securing the cell amount, the differentiation capability of the cells that infiltrated into the implanted HCF gel was evaluated by culturing the cells in 3 different (adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic) differentiation media. The optimal seeding densities for differentiating MSCs into 3 different lineages were based on a previous report.24 For adipogenic differentiation, the cells (2 × 105 cells/well) were cultured in DM-2 (ZenBio, Inc., NC, USA) medium for 14 days and then stained with oil red O to visualize cellular 10

Page 11 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

11 lipid accumulation.25 For osteogenic differentiation, the cells (4 × 104 cells/well) were cultured for 14 days in DMEM-high glucose that was supplemented with 1 μM dexamethasone (Sigma), 0.05 mM ascorbic acid (Sigma), 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma), and 10 % FBS and then subjected to von Kossa staining for detecting mineralization.26 For chondrogenic differentiation, the cells (5 × 105 cells/well) were incubated in chondrogenic medium consisting of low-glucose DMEM (Gibco), 10 ng/ml transforming growth factor-β3 (R&D systems), dexamethasone (100 nM, Sigma), insulintransferrin-selenium + 1 premix (ITS, 1 % (v/v), Sigma), proline (40 mg/ml, Sigma), and ascorbate-2-phosphate (25 mg/ml, Sigma) in 15-ml polystyrene tubes for 4 weeks and stained with Weigert’s iron hematoxylin and with safranin O for visualizing proteoglycans.25

Measurement of pro-inflammatory factors in blood after delivering SP The mouse calvarial defects were produced and the animals received SP (0.2 g/mouse) in 3 different ways (i.p., i.v., and HCF loading ((2 x 0.2 µg/gel)/mouse)). The animals that received HCF implantation without SP loading served as untreated control. Three days after SP delivery, animals were sacrificed and blood samples were collected from the heart before euthanized. Blood samples were centrifuged at 1800 g for 20 min, and supernatants (100 l) were subjected to cytokine array. Among the various cytokines that can be detected by the assay, those showing obvious differences between groups were selected and relative amounts were determined. The amount of pro-inflammatory factors in the blood was measured using Proteome Profiler Mouse Cytokine Array, Panel A (ARY006, R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Western blot analysis for a neutrophils marker (Ly6G) was also 11

Page 12 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

12 performed to confirm the inflammatory status of the i.v. injection of SP.

Mouse calvarial defect model for evaluating bone regeneration After calvarial defects were created, the animals were treated with SP and/or BMP-2. The animals were divided into 8 groups (5 mice/group, 2 calvarial defects/mouse): the control group (HCF gel only (100 μl), no BMP-2, or SP), SP delivery groups with 3 different modes of delivery, the BMP-2/HCF delivery group, and 3 groups that received SP in combination with BMP. SP delivery (0.2 g/mouse) was performed intraperitoneally, intravenously, and via the HCF gel ((2 x 0.2 µg/gel)/mouse). For all BMP-2 delivery groups, BMP-2 (0.2 g/100 μl HCF gel) was loaded into the HCF gel before implantation.

Bone formation analysis Eight weeks after the implantation, the mice were sacrificed and the implants were retrieved and fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde. Bone formation was evaluated using soft X-ray radiography (Softex; Sofron, Tokyo, Japan), microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scanning

(SkyScan-1172;

Skyscan, Kontich,

Belgium), histological

analysis, and

immunohistochemical analysis. Radiograms of the implants were obtained using a soft X-ray apparatus. CT images were obtained with a micro-CT system. The CT system was operated at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 250 mA. After examination with soft X-ray radiography and micro-CT, the HCF implants were retrieved (5 mice/group = 10 HCFs/group) and then used for histological analysis (5 HCFs/group) and immunohistochemical analysis and H&E staining (5 HCFs/group). The bone formation volumes were measured by micro CT analyzer 12

Page 13 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

13 program (Skyscan). The specimens were embedded in paraffin and sectioned transversely to obtain 4-μm-thick sections; the sections were examined after Goldner’s trichrome staining. The bone formation area was measured using an image analysis system coupled to a light microscope. The bone formation area was expressed as the percentage of bone area in the total

cross-sectional

area

[(bone

area/total

area) × 100%].

The

specimens

for

immunohistochemical analysis were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek; Sakura Finetek, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands) at -20 °C and transversely sectioned to obtain 10-μm-thick sections. The tissue sections were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies against mouse-specific osteocalcin (Abcam). Immunoreactivity was visualized using a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA). The slides were counterstained with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) to stain the nuclei of cells and photographed using a fluorescence microscope (IX71 inverted microscope; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis All of the quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least 4 independent experiments. For the two-group comparisons, two-sided t-tests were used, whereas one-way ANOVA tests with Bonferroni corrections were performed for the comparison of more than 3 groups (OriginPro 8 SR4 software, ver. 8.0951, OriginLab Corporation Northampton, MA, USA). p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

13

Page 14 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

14 Results In vitro release profiles of BMP-2 and SP The 14 days in vitro release profiles of BMP-2 and SP from the HCF gel were compared. BMP-2 showed sustained release from the HCF gel, compared to SP (Fig. 1). BMP-2 was consistently released from the HCF gel for 14 days. During the first 3 days, most of the SP (89.9 % ± 1.5 %) was released from the HCF gel, whereas a relatively small amount of BMP2 (15.8 % ± 8.3 %) was released. After 14 days, SP was almost completely released from the HCF gel, whereas more than 50 % (57.8 % ±5.9 %) of the loaded BMP-2 remained in the gel.

SP stimulated hBMMSC migration in vitro The potency of SP for inducing migration of hBMMSCs that are known to be CD29+21 was evaluated. The test scheme is depicted in figure 2A. BMP-2 treatment was included to determine the possible positive or negative effects of using BMP-2 with SP in terms of cell migration. After 3 days, SP induced obvious cell migration regardless of BMP-2 treatment (Fig. 2B). The number of cells that migrated in the SP-alone treated group (122.8  15.6 cells/field) or the SP/BMP-2 treated group (121.5  12.2 cells/field) was significantly higher than that in the control group (no treatment, 35.9  7.5 cells/field) or the BMP-2-only treated group (54.6  9.7 cells/field) (Fig. 2C).

Flow cytometric analysis of cells that infiltrated into HCF scaffolds

14

Page 15 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

15 To determine whether SP stimulates MSC recruitment, cells retrieved from the HCF gel implanted in mice, treated with SP via 3 different methods, were analyzed (Fig. 3). FACS analysis of CD29, an MSC marker, and CD45, a hematopoietic stem cell marker,22 showed that the percentage of CD29+/CD45- cells in the SP(HCF) group (0.96  0.73 %) was significantly higher than that of the other groups (0.04  0.03 %, 0.04  0.03 %, and 0.32  0.40 % for the no-SP, SP (i.p.), and SP (i.v.) groups, respectively) (Fig. 3B). Additionally, most of the CD29+/CD45- cells were also positive for CD90 and CD44, both of which are MSC markers,28 and the portion of the CD90+/CD44+ cells was considerably higher in the SP(HCF) group (Fig. 3C). Western blot analysis performed at 3 days after implantation confirmed that recruitment of CD29+ cells was enhanced in the SP (HCF) group compared to groups of no SP, SP (i.p.), and SP (i.v.) (Fig. 3D).

Characterization of HCF-infiltrated cells: qRT-PCR and in vitro multipotency test Cells isolated from the HCF were cultured for 1 week, and the expression of MSC-related markers was examined. CD140b was used as an MSC marker.22 The SP (HCF) group showed significantly higher expression of both CD29 and CD140b than the control group, whereas the expression of CD45 was significantly lower in the SP (HCF) group (Fig. 3E). To determine whether the cells that infiltrated into the HCF gel had differentiation potency, differentiation into three different lineages (osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic) was induced using specific differentiation media (Fig. 4A and B). The degree of differentiation was estimated based on the results of staining for calcium deposition (osteogenic), lipid accumulation (adipogenic), and proteoglycan deposition (chondrogenic). The cells in the 15

Page 16 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

16 control group (no SP) did not differentiate into any of the lineages, and the cells in the SP (i.p.) and SP (i.v.) groups showed relatively low adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation potency. The extent of differentiation was highest in the SP (HCF) group in all three cases (Fig 4A and B). Before inducing the differentiation of the recruited cells, the cells did not express the osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic markers (Fig. 4C).

Effect of different modes of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status According to our data, i.v. injection of SP resulted in obvious increase of serum proinflammatory factors known to recruit inflammation-related cells and immune cells, compared to other groups (Fig. 5). The pro-inflammatory factors that showed prominent increase after i.v. injection of SP were chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 and 9 (CXCL129 and CXCL930), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 1, 2, and 12 (CCL131, CCL232, and CCL1233), and IL-16.34 Western blot analysis for a neutrophils marker (Ly6G) confirms the inflammatory status of the i.v. injection of SP (Fig. 5B).

BMP-2 induced in vivo osteogenic differentiation of cells that infiltrated into the HCF Eight weeks after implantation, HCF was retrieved and cross-sectioned for immunohistochemical analysis. The sections were stained for osteocalcin, an osteogenic marker, and the resulting images were merged with images of DAPI staining (Fig. 6). Without BMP-2 treatment, SP alone did not induce obvious osteocalcin expression regardless of how it was delivered. In contrast, when BMP-2 was used, the expression of osteocalcin 16

Page 17 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

17 increased in all groups, and the SP (HCF gel)/BMP-2 group showed the highest osteocalcin expression relative to the other groups.

In vivo bone regeneration Eight weeks after implantation, calvarial defects were examined by soft X-ray radiography (Fig. 7A) and micro-CT (Fig. 7B), showing significantly higher bone regeneration in the SP (HCF gel)/BMP-2 treatment group than the other groups. This was further verified by histological analysis using Goldner’s trichrome staining (Fig. 7).

Discussion In the present study, dual delivery of SP and BMP-2 using the HCF gel significantly enhanced bone regeneration in a mouse calvarial model. Although stem cell implantation can be used to induce bone regeneration, laborious ex vivo cell manipulation and culture processes make it costly and inconvenient for clinical use. The in situ tissue regeneration we envisioned in the present study involves endogenous stem cell mobilization/homing and subsequent differentiation into appropriate lineages for the regeneration or replacement of damaged tissues. Thus, the first requirement for in situ tissue regeneration is to provide an appropriate stimulus for recruitment of endogenous stem/progenitor cells into the target area for tissue regeneration.35,36 Substance P has been reported as a systemically acting injuryinducible wound messenger that can accelerate wound healing.8 A previous study reported that SP recruits CD29+ stromal-like cells from the periphery to the site of injury, resulting in 17

Page 18 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

18 accelerated wound healing.8 In the present study, SP, which is known to recruit MSCs from bone marrow to circulation,37 was used as a chemotactic agent. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are representative factors that can recruit endogenous cells such as stromal-like cells in vivo. However, the use of G-CSF and GM-CSF is discouraged due to their association with toxicity (i.e., thrombocytopenia).38 Unlike G-CSF and GM-CSF, SP has been shown to elicit lower toxicity within a dose range that shows similar effectiveness at recruiting progenitors.39 A Previous report has shown that the tissue regeneration efficacy is dependent on the SP dose. 8 Therefore, in our study, we used the identical dose of SP that was previously optimized for tissue regeneration.8 Additionally, BMP-2, which has been reported to induce osteogenic differentiation of stem cells, was used to induce osteogenic differentiation of endogenous stem cells recruited by SP to the bone defects. We have previously reported that local delivery of BMP-2 to a site transplanted with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs), which are known to contain osteogenic progenitors,40 induced in situ osteogenic differentiation of the transplanted PBMNCs.41 For the sufficient osteogenic differentiation of MSC, the release period of BMP-2 is important.9 BMP-2 should be released at a sufficiently high level for a long period to ensure osteoprogenitor migration to the defect site and osteogenic differentiation.3,42 Additionally, higher dose of BMP-2 showed higher amount of in vivo bone formation, however side effects of BMP-2 also increased.12 The high dose of BMP-2 contributes to several side effects including bone formation with spinal cord impingement, bone resorption, cervical swelling, and cyst-like bone void formation.43 Therefore, optimal dose and BMP-2 delivery system are required. Our data showed that SP treatment significantly increased hBMMSC migration in vitro 18

Page 19 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

19 (Fig. 2) and that local delivery of SP in vivo using the HCF gel significantly increased the number of MSCs that infiltrated into the implanted HCF gel, relative to other SP delivery groups (Fig. 3). These data indicate that if the same amount of SP is used, local delivery of SP to the target area is advantageous over systemic delivery in inducing endogenous stem cell recruitment. There may be a threshold concentration of SP for inducing stem cell homing that may be reached at the target area through systemic delivery of SP. However, systemic delivery of SP would require a relatively higher amount of SP to reach the same local concentration, which may produce a serious inflammatory response.20 In fact, i.v. injection of SP resulted in obvious increase of the blood pro-inflammatory factor level compared to other groups that received same amount of SP by either i.p. injection of HCF loading (Fig. 3). Since these increased factors are known to recruit various types of cells involved in inflammatory process and immune response, including, but not limited to, neutrophils, monocytes, T cells, lymphocytes,29-34 this data support our speculation and local delivery appears to be a logical choice for delivering SP for tissue regeneration. Because the recruitment and in situ osteogenic differentiation of endogenous stem cells should occur in sequence in the system we designed, we chose the HCF gel as a carrier for both SP and BMP-2. For fast bone regeneration, SP should be released quickly from the HCF gel after implantation to attract endogenous stem cells to the HCF implanted in bone defects. In contrast, BMP-2 should be released in a slow sustained manner for weeks because longterm delivery of BMP-2 promotes efficient osteogenic differentiation of stem cells.20 We had previously reported that the HCF gel utilizes the interaction between heparin and BMP-2 to provide sustained release of BMP-2 over several weeks.14 A previous report has shown that the degradation period of HCF was appropriate for bone regeneration.44 The volume of HCF 19

Page 20 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

20 gel was maintained more than 9 days after in vivo implantation.44 Sustained release of BMP-2 from HCF can be explained by two main reasons. One is that BMP-2 is released mechanically through degradation of HCF gel.20 The other is that the interaction between heparin and protein. Two contiguously identical amino acid sequences present in heparinbinding proteins, i.e., XBBXBX and XBBBXXBX (B is a basic amino acid and X is a hydropathic amino acid),15 induce folding of the proteins to spatially place the basic amino acids for binding with heparin.45 Because SP, which is composed of 11 amino acids (Arg Pro Lys Pro Gln Gln Phe Phe Gly Leu Met),46 does not fulfill the condition, we expected the release profile of SP from HCF to be different from that of BMP-2. The different release profiles of SP and BMP-2 from HCF (Fig. 1) demonstrate that HCF is an optimal carrier for achieving dual differentiated release of SP and BMP-2 for bone regeneration as we intended. Additionally, the gel-type nature of HCF makes it possible to fill irregularly shaped bone defects. Other BMP-2 delivery carriers for calvarial defect regeneration include PLGA scaffold, chitosan-poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel,47 and poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogel.48 These carriers showed faster release of BMP-2 than HCF or need further modification to control the BMP-2 release. Compared to the previous carriers, our HCF showed significantly enhanced bone formation volume (approximately 70 % and 63 % versus 80 %). To improve the low mechanical properties of the HCF gels, compared with the other BMP-2 delivery carriers, such as β-tricalcium phosphate or ceramics, HCF gels would have to be further modified for bone defects that are subjected to high mechanical stresses. The efficacy of SP/BMP-2 dual delivery using the HCF gel in bone regeneration was higher than that of conventional BMP-2 treatment (Fig. 7), probably because the osteogenic effect of BMP-2 applied without a stem cell recruiting agent was not sufficient for inducing 20

Page 21 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

21 full-scale bone regeneration when the size of the bone defect is critical. Consequently, the endogenous stem cell recruitment/in situ differentiation approach can be a powerful alternative, not only to exogenous stem cell implantation but also to conventional BMP-2 treatment. The dual delivery of SP and BMP-2 was effective for bone formation in criticalsized bone-defects in this study. SP promotes MSC migration (Fig. 2) to tissue regeneration site.8 BMP-2 has an osteoinductive potential for inducing MSCs to differentiate into osteoblast lineage.49 MSCs recruited to the bone defect sites by SP would be induced to regenerate bone by BMP-2. The delivery of BMP-2 only resulted in less bone formation than the dual delivery (Fig. 7). This could be due to limitation in osteoblast migration from the defect margin, which was induced by BMP-2, in critical-sized defects in the BMP-2 (HCF) group. MSC migration to the bone defect site by SP would be necessary for bone regeneration.

Conclusions We propose dual delivery of SP and BMP-2 to enhance endogenous stem cell recruitment to bone defects by SP and subsequent in situ osteogenic differentiation of those cells by BMP-2. The bone regeneration efficacy was significantly enhanced by SP/BMP-2 dual delivery. The dual delivery of SP and BMP-2 using the HCF gel therefore has potential as an effective bone regeneration strategy.

Acknowledgements

21

Page 22 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

22 This work was supported by a grant (HI12C0199) from the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs, the Republic of Korea, and a grant (2010-0020352) from the National Research Foundation of Korea.

References 1. Marolt, D., Knezevic, M., and Novakovic, G.V. Bone tissue engineering with human stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 1, 10, 2010. 2. Caplan, A.I. Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 9, 641, 1991. 3. Quarto, R., Mastrogiacomo, M., Cancedda, R., Kutepov, S.M., Mukhachev, V., Lavroukov, A., Kon, E., and Marcacci, M. Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells. N Engl J Med 344, 385, 2001. 4. Modo, M., Rezaie, P., Heuschling, P., Patel, S., Male, D.K., and Hodges, H. Transplantation of neural stem cells in a rat model of stroke: assessment of short-term graft survival and acute host immunological response. Brain Res 958, 70, 2002. 5. Shahdadfar, A., Fronsdal, K., Haug, T., Reinholt, F.P., and Brinchmann, J.E. In vitro expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells: choice of serum is a determinant of cell proliferation, differentiation, gene expression, and transcriptome stability. Stem Cells 23, 1357, 2005. 6. Kim, J.Y., Xin, X., Moioli, E.K., Chung, J., Lee, C.H., Chen, M., Fu, S.Y., Koch, P.D., and Mao, J.J. Regeneration of dental-pulp-like tissue by chemotaxis-induced cell homing. Tissue Eng Part A 16, 3023, 2010. 7. Borselli, C., Storrie, H., Benesch-Lee, F., Shvartsman, D., Cezar, C., Lichtman, J.W., Vandenburgh, H.H., and Mooney, D.J. Functional muscle regeneration with combined 22

Page 23 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

23 delivery of angiogenesis and myogenesis factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 3287, 2010. 8. Hong, H.S., Lee, J., Lee, E., Kwon, Y.S., Lee, E., Ahn, W., Jiang, M.H., Kim, J.C., and Son, Y. A new role of substance P as an injury-inducible messenger for mobilization of CD29(+) stromal-like cells. Nat Med 15, 425, 2009. 9. Carlsson, O., Schizas, N., Li, J., and Ackermann, P.W. Substance P injections enhance tissue proliferation and regulate sensory nerve ingrowth in rat tendon repair. Scand J Med Sci Sports 21, 562, 2011. 10. Kohara, H., Tajima, S., Yamamoto, M., and Tabata, Y. Angiogenesis induced by controlled release of neuropeptide substance P. Biomaterials 31, 8617, 2010. 11. Mostafa, N.Z., Fitzsimmons, R., Major, P.W., Adesida, A., Jomha, N., Jiang, H., and Uludağ, H. Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells cultued with dexamethasone, vitamin D3, basic fibroblast growth factor, and bone morphogenetic protein-2. Connect Tissue Res 53, 117, 2012. 12. Yamamoto, M., Takahashi, Y., and Tabata, Y. Controlled release by biodegradable hydrogels enhances the ectopic bone formation of bone morphogenetic protein. Biomaterials 24, 4375, 2003. 13. Meijer, G.J., de. Bruijin, J.D., Koole, R., and van. Blitterswijk, C.A., Cell based bone tissue engineering in jaw defects. Biomaterials 29, 3053, 2008. 14. Yang, H.S., La, W.G., Bhang, S.H., Jeon, J.Y., Lee, J.H., and Kim, B.S. Heparinconjugated fibrin as an injectable system for sustained delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2. Tissue Eng Part A 16, 1225, 2010. 15. Cardin, A.D., and Weintraub, H.J. Molecular modeling of protein-glycosaminoglycan 23

Page 24 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

24 interactions. Arteriosclerosis 9, 21, 1989. 16. Moioli, E.K., Hong, L., Guardado, J., Clark, P.A., and Mao, J.J. Sustained release of TGFbeta3 from PLGA microspheres and its effect on early osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng 12, 537, 2006 17. Yang, H.S., Shin, J., Bhang, S.H., Shin, J.Y., Park, J., Im, G.I., Kim, C.S., and Kim, B.S. Enhanced skin wound healing by a sustained release of growth factors contained in platelet-rich plasma. Exp Mol Med 43, 622, 2011. 18. Thibault, M.M., Hoemann, C.D., and Buschmann, M.D. Fibronectin, vitronectin, and collagen I induce chemotaxis and haptotaxis of human and rabbit mesenchymal stem cells in a standardized transmembrane assay. Stem Cells Dev 16, 489, 2007. 19. Yang, H.S., La, W.G., Park, J., Kim, C.S., Im, G.I., and Kim, B.S. Efficient bone regeneration induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2 released from apatite-coated collagen scaffolds. J Biomater Sci 23, 1659, 2012. 20. La, W.G., Kwon, S.H., Lee, T.J., Yang, H.S., Park, J., and Kim, B.S. The effect of the delivery carrier on the quality of bone formed via BMP-2. Artif Organs 36, 642, 2012. 21. Falanga, V., Iwamoto, S., Chartier, M., Yufit, T., Butmarc, J., Kouttab, N., Shrayer, D., and Carson, P. Autologous bone marrow-derived cultured mesenchymal stem cells delivered in a fibrin spray accelerate healing in murine and human cutaneous wounds. Tissue Eng 13, 1299, 2007. 22. Miernik, K., and Karasinski, J. Porcine uterus contains a population of mesenchymal stem cells. Reproduction 143, 203, 2012. 23. Ko, I.K., Ju, Y.M., Chen, T., Atala, A., Yoo, J.J., and Lee, S.J. Combined systemic and 24

Page 25 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

25 local delivery of stem cell inducing/recruiting factors for in situ tissue regeneration. FASEB J 26, 158, 2012. 24. Zhu, H., Guo, Z.K., Jiang, X.X., Li, H., Wang, X.Y., and Yao, H.Y. A protocol for isolation and culture of mesenchymal stem cells from mouse compact bone. Nat Protoc 5, 550, 2010. 25. Koopman, R., Schart, G., and Hesselink, M.K. Optimisation of oil red O staining permits combination with immunofluorescence and automated quantification of lipids. Histochem Cell Biol 116, 63, 2001. 26. Meloan, S.N., and Puchtler, H. Chemical mechanisms of staining methods: von Kossa’s technique: What von Kossa really wrote and a modified reaction for selective demonstration of inorganic phosphate. J Histotechnol 8, 11, 1985. 27. Kiviranta, I., Jurvelin, J., Tammi, M., Säämänen, A.M., and Hclminen, H.J. Microspectrophotometric quantitation of glycosaminoglycans in articular cartilage sections stained with Safranin O. Histochemistry 82, 249, 1985. 28. Lee, D.H., Joo, S.D., Han, S.B., Im, J., Lee, S.H., Sonn, C.H., and Lee, K.M. Isolation and expansion of synovial CD34(-)CD44(+)CD90(+) mesenchymal stem cells: comparison of an enzymatic method and a direct explant technique. Connect Tissue Res 52, 226, 2011. 29. Ritzman, A.M., Hughes-Hanks, J.M., Blaho, V.A., Wax, L.E., Mitchell, W.J., and Brown, C.R. The chemokine receptor CXCR2 ligand KC (CXCL1) mediates neutrophil recruitment and is critical for development of experimental Lyme arthritis and crditis. Infect Immun 78, 4593, 2010. 25

Page 26 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

26 30. Ogawa, N., Ping, L., Zhenjun, L., Takada, Y., and Sugai, S. Involvement of the interferon-gamma-induced T cell-attracting chemokines, interferon-gamma-inducible 10kd protein (CXCL10) and monokine induced by interferon-gamma (CXCL9), in the salivary gland lesions of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 46, 2730, 2002. 31. Miller, M.D., and Krangel, M.S. The human cytokine I-309 is a monocyte chemoattractant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89, 2950, 1992. 32. Qian, B.Z., Li, J., Zhang, H., Kitamura, T., Zhang, J., Campion, L.R., Kaiser, E.A., Snyder, L.A., and Pollard, J.W. CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumor metastasis. Nature 475, 222, 2011. 33. Cruikshank, W.W., Kornfeld, H., and Center, D.M. Interleukin-16. J Leukoc Biol 67, 757, 1996. 34. Hong, H.S., Kim, D.Y., Yoon, K.J., and Son, Y. A new paradigm for stem cell therapy: substance-P as a stem cell-stimulating agent. Arch Pharm Res 34, 2003, 2011. 35. Abbott, J.D., Huang, Y., Liu, D., Hickey, R., Krause, D.S., and Giordano, F.J. Stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha plays a critical role in stem cell recruitment to the heart after myocardial infarction but is not sufficient to induce homing in the absence of injury. Circulation 110, 3300, 2004. 36. Bhakta, S., Hong, P., and Koc, O. The surface adhesion molecule CXCR4 stimulates mesenchymal stem cell migration to stromal cell-derived factor-1 in vitro but does not decrease apoptosis under serum deprivation. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 7, 19, 2006. 37. Kuwana, M., Okazaki, Y., Kodama, H., Izumi, K., Yasuoka, H., and Ogawa, Y. Human circulating CD14+ monocytes as a source of progenitors that exhibit mesenchymal cell 26

Page 27 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

27 differentiation. J Leukoc Biol 74, 833, 2003. 38. Momin, F., Kraut, M., Lattin, P., and Valdivieso, M. Thrombocytopenia in patients receiving chemoradiotherapy and G-CSF for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 11, 1632, 1992. 39. Sio, S.W., Puthia, M.K., Lu, J., Moochhala, S., and Bhatia, M. The neuropeptide substance P is a critical mediator of burn-induced acute lung injury. J Immunol 180, 8333, 2008. 40. Yang, H.S., Kim, G.H., La, W.G., Bhang, S.H., Lee, T.J., Lee, J.H., and Kim, B.S. Enhancement of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell transplantation-mediated bone formation. Cell Transplant 20, 1445, 2011. 41. O’Connor, T.M., O’Connell, J., O’Brien, D.I., Goode, T., Bredin, C.P., and Shanahan, F. The role of substance P in inflammatory disease. J Cell Physiol 201, 167, 2004. 42. Wang, H., Zou, Q., Boerman, O.C., Nijhuis, A.W., Jansen, J.A., Li, Y., and Leeuwenburgh, S.C. Combined delivery of BMP-2 and bFGF from nanostructured colloidal gelatin gels and its effect on bone regeneration in vivo. J Control Release 166, 172, 2013. 43. Zara, J.N., Siu, R.K., Zhang, X., Shen, J., Ngo, R., Lee, M., Li, W., Chiang, M., Chung, J., Kwak, J., Wu, B.M., Ting, K., and Soo, C. High doses of bone morphogenetic protein 2 induce structurally abnormal bone and inflammation in vivo. Tissue Eng Part A 17, 1389, 2011. 44. Yang, H.S., La, W.G., Bhang, S.H., Kim, H.J., Im, G.I., Lee, H., Park, J.H., and Kim, B.S. Hyaline cartilage regeneration by combined therapy of microfracture and long-term bone 27

Page 28 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

28 morphogenetic protein-2 delivery. Tissue Eng Part A 17, 1809, 2011. 45. Huntington, J.A., Olson, S.T., Fan, B., and Gettins, P.G. Mechanism of heparin activation of antithrombin. Evidence for reactive center loop preinsertion with expulsion upon heparin binding. Biochemistry 35, 8495, 1996. 46. Chang, M.M., Leeman, S.E., and Niall, H.D. Amino-acid sequence of substance P. Nat New Biol 232, 86, 1971. 47. Jo, S., Kim, S., Cho, T.H., Shin, E., Hwang, S.J., and Noh, I. Effects of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 and human bone marrow-derived stromal cells on in vivo bone regeneration of chitosan-poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel. J Biomed Mater Res A 101, 892, 2013. 48. Lutolf, M.P., Weber, F.E., Schmoekel, H.G., Schense, J.C., Kohler, T., Müller, R., and Hubbell, J.A. Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices. Nat Biotechnol 21,513, 2003. 49. Lochmann, A., Nitzsche, H., von. Einem, S., Schwarz, E., and Mäder, K. The influence of covalently linked and free polyethylene glycol on the structural and release properties of rhBMP-2 loaded microspheres. J Control Release 147, 92, 2010.

Figure legends

28

Page 29 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

29

Figure 1. In vitro release profiles of BMP-2 and SP from the HCF gel. The SP- and BMP-2loaded HCF gel was immersed in PBS at 37 °C with continuous agitation. At various time points, the supernatant was collected and the concentrations of SP and BMP-2 in the supernatants were determined by ELISA. SP and BMP-2 were released relatively quickly and slowly, respectively, which is relevant for stem cell recruitment to the HCF scaffolds and in situ osteogenic differentiation of the recruited stem cells. The percentage was calculated by dividing the measured amounts by the initially loaded amounts. Quantitative data have been provided as the mean ±SD values of 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus BMP-2. 29

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Page 30 of 47

30

30

Page 31 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

31

Figure 2. In vitro hBMMSC migration stimulated by SP. (A) Schematic diagram of the cell migration assay. (B) After 3 days of incubation, cells that migrated to the bottom surface of the transwell membrane were stained with crystal violet (purple). Scale bars = 100 μm. (C) The stained cells in B at day 3 were counted at a magnification of ×20. Cells were counted in four fields per sample and averaged. *p < 0.05 compared to groups without SP.

31

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Page 32 of 47

32

32

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof. Page 33 of 47

33

33

Page 34 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

34

Figure 3. In vivo MSC recruitment stimulated by SP. (A) Diagram for the characterization of cells recruited to the HCF gels that were implanted into mouse calvarial defects and explanted at day 3. Cells infiltrating into the HCF gel were analyzed using various methods. (B) Quantification of the number of CD29+/CD45- cells in the HCF gel, normalized by the total number of recruited cells in the HCF gel. Flow cytometric analysis showed that local delivery of SP [SP(HCF)] significantly enhanced CD29+/CD45- cell recruitment to HCF relative to that for the other groups (n = 5, *p < 0.05 compared to other groups). CD29+/CD45- cells were further analyzed for the presence of CD90+/CD44+ cells (C). (D) In vivo recruitment of CD29+ cells to the mouse calvarial 34

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof. Page 35 of 47

35

defects at 3 days after treatment stimulated by SP, as evaluated by western blot analysis.

(E) Cells were isolated from the explanted HCF gel at 3 days after implantation into

calvarial defects. After in vitro culture of the collected cells, the cells were characterized

by qRT-PCR analysis for CD29, CD140b, and CD45 expression.

35

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Page 36 of 47

36

36

Page 37 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

37

Figure 4. Multipotency of the cells recruited by SP to the implanted HCF gel. Cells were isolated from the explanted HCF gel at 3 days after implantation into calvarial defects. After in vitro culture of the collected cells, the cells were evaluated for osteogenic (von Kossa staining and osteocalcin), adipogenic (oil red O staining and PPARγ), and chondrogenic (safranin O staining and collagen type II) differentiation by (A) chemical staining and (B) qRT-PCR analysis of cells cultured with appropriate induction media. Scale bars = 100 μm. *p < 0.05 compared to SP (HCF). SP (i.v.): intravenous SP delivery. SP (i.p.): intraperitoneal SP delivery. SP (HCF): local SP delivery using the HCF gel. (C) Western blot analysis to show the migrated cells did not express the osteogenic, 37

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Page 38 of 47

38

adipogenic, and chondrogenic markers before the differentiation.

38

Page 39 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

39

Figure 5. Effect of different modes of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status. The relative amount of pro-inflammatory factors present in blood. (A) Among the various cytokines that can be detected by the assay, those showing obvious differences between groups were selected and relative amounts were determined. Since the data represent the average values from a single test, which yielded 2 test values for each individual cytokine, statistical significance was not determined. (B) Western blot analysis for a neutrophils marker (Ly6G).

39

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Page 40 of 47

40

40

Page 41 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

41

Figure 6. Osteogenic differentiation of cells infiltrating into the HCF gel that was implanted in calvarial defects for 8 weeks. The tissue regenerated in the defects was immunostained for osteocalcin (red). Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Dual delivery of SP and BMP-2 induced an apparent increase in osteocalcin expression relative to that for all the other groups. Scale bars = 100 μm. Above the fluorescence staining, H&E staining images were added for showing more details about regenerated bone tissue.

41

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Page 42 of 47

42

42

Page 43 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

43

Figure 7. Evaluation of in vivo bone formation following implantation of HCF into mouse calvarial defects for 8 weeks. (A) Soft X-ray radiography images. Scale bars = 5 mm. (B) Micro-CT images. Scale bars = 5 mm. White color indicates mineralization. Bone regeneration volumes were quantified from the micro-CT results. *p < 0.05 between the two designated groups. **p < 0.05 versus any group. (C) Goldner’s trichrome staining of histological sections of tissues regenerated in the defects and quantification of the bone formation area based on histological analysis. Green color indicates bone tissue. The arrows indicate the bone defect margin. Scale bars = 2 mm. *p < 0.05 between the two designated groups. **p < 0.05 versus any group. ***p < 0.05 versus any group except SP 43

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Page 44 of 47

44

(HCF).

44

Page 45 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

45 Table 1. Primers used for qRT-PCR

Forward (5’ to 3’)

Reverse (5’ to 3’)

β-actin

TGAGACCTTCAACACCCCAGC

GATGTCACGCACGATTTCCCT

CD29

CTGGAA AATTCTGCG AGTGT

ATGGACCAGTGTCCAAAG AA

CD140b

CAGCCAGAAGTAGCGAGAAG

AGATCACCGTATCGGCAGTA

CD45

ACCACAAACGATGTCCTGAT

GAAGTTTGAGGAGCAGGTGA

ACACTCCTCGCCCTATTG

GATGTGGTCAGCCAACTC

GATACACTGTCTGCAAACATATCAC AA

CCACGGAGCTGATCCCAA

CAGGACCAAAGGGACAGAAA

TTGGTCCTTGCATTACTCCC

Gene

Osteocalcin PPARγ

Collagen type II

45

Page 46 of 47

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

46 Table 2. Overview of markers used in experiments

Markers

Analysis

Target

CD29

FACS, Western blot analysis, qRT-PCR (In vivo MSC recruitment)

MSC

CD45

FACS, qRT-PCR (In vivo MSC recruitment)

MSC ,HSC

CD90

FACS (In vivo MSC recruitment)

MSC

CD44

FACS (In vivo MSC recruitment)

MSC

CD140b

qRT-PCR (In vivo MSC recruitment)

MSC

Osteocalcin

qRT-PCR, Western blot analysis (Osteogenic differentiation of the cells recruited by SP to the implanted HCF gel)

Osteogenic marker

Runx2

Western blot analysis (Osteogenic differentiation of the cells recruited by SP to the implanted HCF gel)

Osteogenic marker

PPARγ

qRT-PCR, Western blot analysis (Adipogenic differentiation of the cells recruited by SP to the implanted HCF gel)

Adipogenic marker

Collagen type II

qRT-PCR, Western blot analysis (Chondrogenic differentiation of the cells recruited by SP to the implanted HCF gel)

Chondrogenic marker

CXCL1

Cytokine assay (Effect of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status)

Macrophage, Neutrophils

CCL1

Cytokine assay (Effect of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status)

T cell marker

CCL2

Cytokine assay (Effect of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status)

Monocyte, Macrophage

CCL12

Cytokine assay (Effect of SP delivery

Monocyte

46

+

-

+

+

+

+

Tissue Engineering Part A A Dual Delivery of Substance P and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Bone Regeneration (doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0182) This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof. Page 47 of 47

47

on systemic inflammation status)

CXCL9 Cytokine assay (Effect of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status) T cell marker

IL-5 Cytokine assay (Effect of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status) T-helper-2 cell, Mast cell

Ly6G Western blot analysis (Effect of SP delivery on systemic inflammation status) Neutrophils

47

A dual delivery of substance P and bone morphogenetic protein-2 for mesenchymal stem cell recruitment and bone regeneration.

Implantation of ex vivo expanded and osteogenically differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for bone regeneration has drawbacks for clinical appl...
2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 7 Views