Vol. 168, No. 1, 1990 April 16, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL

A DNA-BINDING Riitta-Maaria

Received

February

HOMRODOHAIN IN HISTONS Hl

Hannermaa

Unit, Research University

Collagen Biochemistry,

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 254-260

23,

and

Jouko

Oikarinen

Biocenter and Oulu, Rajaanintie Finland

of

Department 52A,

of Medical SF-90220 Oulu,

1990

The structure of the globular domain of chicken histone Hl was compared here with that of the DNA-binding homeodomain in the Drosophila Antp protein, and they were observed to display considerable similarity. Both of them consist of three or four a-helices separated by well-defined turns _ Charged residues in the aminoterminal end of a3 are therefore suggested to be responsible for sequence-specific recognition of DNA by the histone. In addition, a2 of Hl, with a short leucine zipper in it, may be capable of protein-protein interaction in a similar manner to the other homeodomains. Q1990 Academic Press, Inc.

Homeotic

genes,

requirement

for

the

adequate

criptional

regulators

function

has to date

mouse,

but

firmed

primarily been

which

they

recognition

of DNA and consists

most

cases

located

folds

into

(4,5). of

A

or four

end

action

in

the major

other

hand,

a2

specific The of

DNA

histones externally

H2A, (10).

0006-291X/90

$1.50

It

is

around H3

hinge is

of the

with into

nucleosomes that

region

0 1990 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in any form reserved.

where to interact

254

while the

the

in the

aminointer-

(6).

On

be

the

capable

proteins

in which

consists

three

a number

specific to

of the

enter

in and

turns

a3,

Hl binds all

is

those

shown

DNA strands with

homeotic

well-defined

regulatory

structure

and H4 (8,9),

thought

other

con-

molecules

structure been

been

residues,

with for

and

sequence-specific

by a2 and

DNA secondary

packed

a core

formed

Their

of

the

by

trans-

development.

acid

of

for

has also

the

70 amino parts

crucial

Drosophila

number

for

some cases

interaction

H2B,

to the

complex

Copyright All rights

twined

a

a (l-3).

in

embryonal

in

responsible

HD has in

DNA in eukaryotes

nucleus

comparable is

is code

proteins

separated

being

groove

protein-protein are

of about

proteins

of the

the

responsible

a-helices

of a3 probably

in

control

structure

DNA-binding

eukaryotes,

(HD)

aminoterminal

helix-turn-helix

bacterial

terminal

in the

in

ubiquitous

may similarly

presumably

of which

in most detail

homeodomain

is

three

located

elucidated

of these

well-conserved

proteins,

expression

body development

the presence

in man, where

The

sequential

two

(7). turns

pairs

of

nucleosome

and leave

DNA strands

the it

is

Vol.

168,

No.

1, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL

Interaction

surrounded

by.

the

of the

bottom

experiments, Polypeptide helical

length

of

takes

a-helices

of nucleosomes

to be a crucial

step

differentiated is

cells, recently

chromatography

produced

in

E. coli

(unpublxshed

results).

Hl isolated

suggesting a determinant

contradictory

sequence-specific Primary,

manner secondary

compared

here

contain

an HD-like

for

with

sequence-specific

solenoid

of certain process

with

areas

those

of the

may be triggered

the

by Hl

rat

that groove

structures

of the DNA-binding presumably with

MATERIALS The computer programs described used for DNA and protein sequence Sequence Data Bank to search for Molecular Modeller Program from visualize 3D structures of various

HD,

(14),

We have

liver

by

DNA

protein motif

been confirmed the

results

DNA sequence

These

proposals

interaction

(18),

specific

(19).

a DNA minor

structure,

the

chromatin

(15,16).

from

PCA extraction

tertiary

a-

of

appears

has also

positioning

and

composed

recognition

of interaction

earlier

the

structures

repressor

of Hl with

to the

DNA

kind

of nucleosome

for and its

H1.03-1acZ fusion 5'-TTGGCAnnnTGCCAA-3'

interaction

35 a-

domain

in which

and a histone

by conventional

that

data,

DNA-binding

to the

This

of

mostly

of Hl is

Hl binds

(17)

on

(13).

as a eukaryotic

that

and

accounting

domain

by means of Hl isolated

affinity

ever,

and this

to act

an N tail

these

order

repression

it

(11).

comprise

(CRP),

structure to higher

in the

thought

demonstrated

using

protein

an a-turn-a

opposite by cross-linking

crystallographic on the

COMMUNICATIONS

just

to 120 residues

The globular

from

is

structure

of 70 residues,

(12).

AMP-receptor

the

110

superimposable

through

Aggregation in

domain

which

Hl subtypes

as deduced is

cyclic places

which

various

RESEARCH

be demonstrated

to seal

of approximately

globular

backbone

bacterial

serve

of 220 residues

three

carbon

H3,

can also

of

C tail

central

total

nucleosome,

chains a

BIOPHYSICAL

of Hl with

and may thus

residues,

AND

results

thus may be

are,

Hl interacts

how-

in a non-

(20,21). of the

Hl

and

Hl is

conferring

it

subtypes the

observed

are to

capability

DNA.

AND METHODS by Pustell and Kafatos (22-24) were analysis, and the GeneBank' Genetic the various sequences. The Desktop Oxford University Press was used to regions of the Hl globular domain.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The

primary

protein unit,

(1,5),

and secondary structures of an HD from the which is regarded as a model for this unique

were

compared

the

globular

domain

the

two

sequences

with

those

of Hl

of the histone displaying

The primary

(12,13).

may be aligned

12% identity

255

with

that

and 34% similarity

Antennapedia functional structure

of

of the

HD, the

when

Vol.

166, No. 1, 1990

helix 2

helix 1 globular

domain of

chicken Fig-l.

Alignment with that for amino alignment. Residues

H1.O1

of the of the acids

primary structure globular domain and are used, identical or similar

domain codes

helix 3

of w

of the Antennapedia histone Hl. Single introduced for

homeoletter optimal

to those in the homeodomain are hatched, the amino acids being grouped (V, I, M, L), (P, A, G, S, T), of the three a-helices CD, E, N, Q), (K, R, H) and (F, Y, W). Positions and the homeodomain secondary in H5, representing Hl here, structures are depicted.

amino

acids

primary similar

were

structure function

noted

that

domain avian

as generally

homologous

only

that

secondary

area

of

almost

H5 consists

tallographic between

a2

folds

between becomes

1).

in

two polypeptide

interaction

with of

the

domain

in a similar

It various

should HDs

be (1)

The degree

the

or four

a-helices

together

by al,

whole

the

chains

DNA then

of be

globular

being

noted are

that not

the

residues

256

in

the

two. the

assumed

the

Hl

to

turn globular

sites The

for

tertiary

Hl/H5

CRP DNA-binding

HD

The helices

putative

on

crys-

structures

of

the

lie

structure

above.

in the

the

from The model

structures

aligned,

an

a2 and a3

secondary

superimposed

conserved

globular

a-turn-a

as described

of the

The

by a well-defined

of the

be superimposed

to that

of

DNA recognition.

primary also

of that

1).

(21).

separated

aligned

are

HD may also manner

from

basis

as deduced

to CRP,

a-helices

HD are

on the H5 (Fig.

The similarity

when Antp

known

By analogy

or four

illustrative, and

principally

called

may be deduced

three

of H1.O1

structure

held

2).

a2 and a3 (Fig.

domain the

of three

(Fig.

and a3 into

comprises

1).

enough to substantiate although it should

however,

of Hl is

and are data

convincing

Hl variant

antiparallel

(Fig.

in Hl.

structure

erythrocyte-specific

domain

approved

homology is not of the two domains,

the

and

The

also

grouped

globular

domain. be

subtypes.

conserved

Hydropathy

in

Vol.

168,

No.

1, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

DNA

ATP helix

a

I i9

P

Leu zipper -.Fig.2. Helices

A schematic

representation

of

the

histone

ii1

tertiary

structure.

are depicted by the cylinders, and the putative sites for sequence-specific interaction with DNA and recognition of ATP by the arrows. A short leucine zipper in a2 that may capable of protein-protein interaction

analysis

is

however,

similar

exception

charge

of a3 (Fig.

structures, but

of

similar

Residues

in The

chicken

H1.O1

the

distribution 3).

the

analysis

suggests with part

in recognition project

to the

thus

been

interactions

well-conserved

H1.01

globular

along

They may

the N-terminal

Hl to be involved groove.

that

as has already

experiments, capable

depicted.

revealed,

share order

also

their

to similar

by the

the

with

the higher

crystallographic

two domains

be suggested

may even be

bases

on the

in

bottom

Asn77 and Ser'l' residues in side

of the helix

facing

the

case of

of the

the

the

major

case of

DNA

groove

helix 2

15

helix 1

10

helix 3

n

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

of the homeodomain-like Fig.3. Hydropathy analysis. Hydropathy plot structure in Hl (thick line) and that of the Antennapedia homeodomain are depicted by horizontal (thin line). Positions of a-helices in Hl lines.

257

HD

molecules such as DNA.

other

DNA

fold

easily

of a3 may of

and Antp

a-helices,

confirmed that

domain

Vol.

168,

No.

1, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

-

H1.O1

LSLAALKKALAAG

0

---Ii-i+

COMMUNICATIONS

_

l

A A w

Fig.4 A leucine zipper in histone 131. Alignment of the Primary structure of a2 in the globular domain of chicken H1.O1 with the consensus for leucine zippers. The helical structure of H5 is shown below, and the helical wheel on the right, to demonstrate the projection of hydrophobic residues to one side of the helix.

when

a

model

computer of

using

H5

not

in 59

66

is

domain

of

to DNA. is

in

globular

domain

nucleotides

binding interesting When

the

angles

monomers

in and

solenoid primary A been

be

DNA-binding

identified kind

Hl

case

resides

leucine taken

N tails

and the

in

the

unit,

narrow C tail

called

minor

groove

may occur of HI/H5

in

a

DNA

the N-terminal results

most

aggregation. the of

Hl

nucleothe

two

downstream per

has very

in an A+T rich These

the

of a continuous

taking

and DNA.

in

recently

results).

latter

interaction

258

importance very

to successive

former

in

between

consideration,

formation

between

HDs.

hinge

nucleosome

the

DNA

sites

in Hl,

an SPKK-repeat,

a primary

globular with

of ATP stimulate

zipper

a2 in

Hl

such as protein be of

into

the

other

in the

and bound

through

is

the

of the

concentrations

may mediate

dimer

result

in histones,

of interaction

and H2B and the

the

the

both

with approximately six nucleosomes of repressed heterochromatin.

constituent novel

it

staggered

would

structure

that

that

on DNA (unpublished

of the

a2 and a3 are

through

an upstream this

exceptionally This

between

easily

may

dimer,

is

dimerized

motif

function

possibility

molecules somes

recognition

of the

suggest

we have demonstrated low

to zipper

even when

and may therefore

to Hl and that

of Hl to its

proteins

be

model,

respect leucine

substrates,

region

Actually,

bind

When thinking

This

and C tail,

DNA binding.

with

may

nucleotide-binding

nucleotide

(26).

side

a

3D structure

computer

of interacting

with

by

zipper

to the

in the

homology

of using

the

added

thus

capable

previously

from a leucine

other

results is

displays

capable

and G,-proteins

modulating that

These

constructed

and the

DNA,

with

an HD that

HI/H5

enzymes

kinases

with

as demonstrated

A region various

hand,

to the opposite

of interacting

Hl/H5

and proteins,

other

When a2 is

(25).

interact

bound

is

and coordinates

On the 4)

to

capable

molecule

Gly 69 to LYSS'

from

project

thought

obviously

the

shown).

a2 (Fig.

and

residues

region

energy-minimization

(data

identified Leu

of the

place

Hl 30

turn,

nm the

recently with

an

region ends

(27-29). of H2A

suggest,

there-

Vol.

168,

No.

fore,

1, 1990

that

action,

BIOCHEMICAL

the

C tail

in addition

action

of

together

the

It

model

gather

chromatosome.

some

occur.

may

serve

as

spacing into

the

of

nucleosomes

the

in

a dimer

but

as

for

the

above

no direct

In

contrast,

it

nucleosome

(32).

that homodimers elucidated in the recently fusion

inter-

rich

regions

the

core

DNA and proteins irregular

and tight

in

Hl

be responsible

nucleothus

constant of the

to

for

this seal

may

but

packaging of

HI-directed

hinge

serve

Hl

and thereby

of Hl with

aggregation

may

nucleosome of

DNA strands

in vivo

and inter-

DNA

homopolymers

the

aggregation

of

eukaryotic

repression

is

model

for

evidence generally There

the

HI function

exists

to date

believed are

that

that

some hints,

to

only

HI binds confirm

one HI

however,

to this

monomer

suggesting

of HI may be formed (17,33). It remains to be future in more detail how the higher order aggregates

of HI are

HI-1acZ -

HI-DNA

(14,31).

per

we have

A+T

of the

ordered in a2 may

fact.

dimers

COMMUNICATIONS

domain

C tails

of HI with

observed

exists

and

with the

generation

while

globular

of Hl to the

that

and consequent

assumed

DNA

binding

interactions

zipper

It

C tail

interaction

leucine

activity

is

the

HI/H5

In addition, forces

chromatin

in the

and leaving

(30),

through

be involved

entering

of nucleosomes

nucleosomes

in the

for

These

driving

RESEARCH

domain.

be envisaged

the

BIOPHYSICAL

of the

SPKK-repeats

may easily

to

globular

interaction

be responsible

region. the

of HI may also

to the

Sequence-specific

AND

formed.

introduced protein

In order various

produced

in

to study

deletions

the

interactions

and point

mutations

of HI, to the

E. coli.

REFERENCES

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 6.

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

Scott, M.P., Tamkun, J.W., and Hartzell, III, G.W. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 969, 25-48. Wright, C.V.E., Cho, K.W.Y., Oliver, G., and Derobertis, E.M. (1989) TIES 14, 52-56. Cell 55, 537-540. Levine, M., and Hoey, T. (1988) Otting, G., Qian, Y.-Q., Miiller, M., Affolter, M., Gehring, W., and Wiithrich, K. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 4305-4309. Qian, Y.-Q., Billeter, M., Otting, G., Muller, M., Gehring, W.J., and Wuthrich, K. (1989) Cell 59, 573-580. Brennan, R.G., and Matthews, B.W. (1989) TIBS 14, 286-290. Stern, S., Tanaka, M., and Herr, W. (1989) Nature 341, 624-630. Smith, J., Finch, J.T., and Thomas, J.O. Klug, A., Rhodes, D., (1980) Nature 267, 509-516. Morse, R.H., and Simpson, R.T. (1988) Cell 54, 285-287. C. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 3685-3691. Staynov, Z., and Crane-Robinson, Nikolaev, L.G., and Severin, E.S. (1978) Glotov, B.O., Itkes, A.V., FEBS Lett. 91, 149-152. C. (1989) Nucl. Acids Res. 17, R311-R346. Wells, D., and McBride, Clore, G-M., Gronenborn, A.M., Nilges, M., Sukumaran, D.K., and Zarbock, J. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 1833-1842. Weintraub, H. (1985) Cell 42, 705-711. Wolffe, A.P. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 527-538. 259

Vol.

168,

16. 17.

No.

1, 1990

Sun,

J.-M.,

245,

68-11.

BIOCHEMICAL

Wiaderkiewicz,

Ristiniemi,

J.,

AND

II.,

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

and Ruiz-Carrillo,

and Oikarinen,

J.

(1988)

Biochemistry and Hager, G.L. C., and Ptitsyn,

27,

H.,

(1987)

Satchwell,

and Travers,

(1989)

J.

A. Biol.

COMMUNICATIONS

Science

(1989)

Chem. 264,

2164-

2114. 18. 19.

20.

Sevall, J.S. Richard-Foy, Crane-Robinson,

5038-5044. EMBO J. 6, 2321-2328. O.B. (1989) Protein Engineering

2,

511-582. 21.

Turnell, 232,

W.G.,

22. Pustell, J., 23. Pustell, J., 24. Pustell, J., 25. Landschulz, 240, 26.

27. 28. 29.

S.C.,

A.A.

(1988)

FEBS Lett.

263-268.

and Kafatos, F.C. (1982) and Kafatos, F.C. (1984) and kafatos, F.C. (1986) W.H., Johnson, P.F., and

Nucl. Acids Res. 10, 51-59. Nucl. Acids Res. 12, 643-655. Nucl. Acids Res. 14, 479-488. McKnight, S.L. (1988) Science

1759-1764.

(1988) Biochem. Biophys. Ristiniemi, J., and Oikarinen, J. Commun. 153, 783-791. Suzuki, M. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 797-804. Churchill, M.E.A., and Suzuki, M. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 4189-4195. Izaurralde, E., Kas, E., and Laemmli, U.K. (1989) J. Mol. Biol.

Res.

210,

573-585.

Rodriguez-Campos, A., Shimamura, A., and Worcel, A. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 209, 135-150. 31. Shimamura, A., Sapp, M., Rodriguez-Campos, A., and Worcel, A. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 5573-5584. 32. Ring, D., and Cole, R.D. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 15361-15364. 33. Nilsson, P., Hallberg, B., Thornell, A., and Grundstrijm, T. (1989) Nucl. Acids Res. 17, 4061-4075. 30.

260

A DNA-binding homeodomain in histone H1.

The structure of the globular domain of chicken histone H1 was compared here with that of the DNA-binding homeodomain in the Drosophila Antp protein, ...
401KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views