ARTICLE Received 29 Jul 2014 | Accepted 23 Jan 2015 | Published 4 Mar 2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
10.5% efficient polymer and amorphous silicon hybrid tandem photovoltaic cell Jeehwan Kim1,*, Ziruo Hong2,*, Gang Li2, Tze-bin Song2, Jay Chey1, Yun Seog Lee1, Jingbi You2, Chun-Chao Chen2, Devendra K. Sadana1 & Yang Yang2
Thin-film solar cells made with amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) or organic semiconductors are considered as promising renewable energy sources due to their low manufacturing cost and light weight. However, the efficiency of single-junction a-Si:H or organic solar cells is typically o10%, insufficient for achieving grid parity. Here we demonstrate an efficient doublejunction photovoltaic cell by employing an a-Si:H film as a front sub-cell and a low band gap polymer:fullerene blend film as a back cell on planar glass substrates. Monolithic integration of 6.0% efficienct a-Si:H and 7.5% efficient polymer:fullerene blend solar cells results in a power conversion efficiency of 10.5%. Such high-efficiency thin-film tandem cells can be achieved by optical management and interface engineering of fully optimized highperformance front and back cells without sacrificing photovoltaic performance in both cells.
1 IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA. 2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. * These authors equally contributed to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.K. (email: [email protected]) or to Z.H. (email: [email protected]) or to Y.Y. (email: [email protected]).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
1
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
C
onjugated polymer and hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) have been considered as excellent candidate materials for fabricating low-cost, light weight and flexible photovoltaic devices, as ultrathin absorbers (hundreds of nanometre scale) are capable of harvesting the most of photons within the spectral range allowed by the band gap1–3. Both techniques feature relatively short energy-payback time, ranging from 1–2 years4. Polymer solar cells based on conjugated polymers as electron-donor materials blended with [6,6]phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester as an electron acceptor have achieved 7%B9% power conversion efficiency using a single bulk heterojunction structure5–8. The efficiency of single-junction a-Si:H solar cells is typically o10% even with highly textured configuration2,3. These efficiencies of polymer and a-Si:H cells are not acceptable for achieving grid parity. To maximize the efficiency of such kind of low-efficiency solar cells, a solar cell made by stacking the multiple absorbers with complementary absorption spectra, so called a tandem cell, is considered as one of the most effective approaches3,9–14. In this work, we demonstrate the combination of a-Si:H and polymer is capable of forming a tandem cell with a power conversion efficiency above 10%. We apply a 200-nm-thick a-Si:H as a front cell and a 120-nm-thick PDTP-DFBT:fullerene bulk heterojunction as a back cell, where PDTP-DFBT is an acronym for poly[2,7-(5,5-bis-(3,7-dimethyloctyl)-5H-dithieno [3,2-b:20 ,30 -d]pyran)-alt-4,7-(5,6-difluoro-2,1,3-benzothia diazole). The band gaps of a-Si:H and polymer absorbers are 1.80 (ref. 15) and 1.38 eV16, respectively, and a conversion efficiency of a standalone single junction of both cells is 6%B7.5%. From this ultrathin polymer/a-Si:H tandem cell made on a flat surface substrate, respectable conversion efficiency of 10.5% is obtained, which is an 84% improvement over the previous record hybrid organic/inorganic tandem cell (5.7% reported for the best case)17,18. We also demonstrate that the key elements to achieve such high efficiency tandem cells are as follows: (i) the high-quality fabrication of each cell component, (ii) the engineering of the interface between a-Si:H and polymer, which allows ideal charge recombination without any electrical loss, and (iii) optical management in the multilayer structure for efficient light harvesting and a photocurrent balance. Our result also promises up to 40% improved efficiency when the cells are formed on a textured surface with no degradation. Results Single-junction optimization. For the fabrication of a highperformance polymer/a-Si:H tandem solar cell, we have
a
b
8
optimized each single junction cell individually. For light trapping on the a-Si:H front cells, ZnO:Al films on the glass substrates were textured before a-Si:H deposition by dipping into diluted HCl solution (DI water:HCl ¼ 100:1). Figure 1a shows the performance of a-Si:H single junction on flat and textured ZnO:Al by the function of an absorber thickness. The maximum efficiency of a-Si:H single junction was achieved at the absorber thickness of 200 nm, because photocurrent starts saturating and fill factor (FF) degradation occurs for the cell with an absorber thickness 4200 nm. Therefore, it can be expected that the best performance of the tandem device with a polymer cell is achievable if the photocurrent is controlled by the front cell at the a-Si:H absorber thickness of 200 nm. We customized a polymer back cell to ensure sufficient photocurrent generation so that the back cell does not limit the photocurrent in the tandem cell. First, we have adjusted the ratio of PDTP-DFBT:fullerene blend film to obtain the highest photoresponse in the near-infrared range in external quantum efficiency (EQE) and to maximize FF. The most desirable performance was achieved at a polymer:fullerene ratio of 1:2 (ref. 11). Second, we have optimized the thickness of polymer single-junction cells, as carrier mobility in organic photovoltaic materials is severely limited by the short conjugated length and large energetic disordering11. Figure 1b shows the performance of the optimized polymer:fullerene single-junction solar cells by the function of absorber thicknesses. The maximum efficiency was achieved at the absorber thickness of 120 nm. Further increasing the film thickness resulted in substantial FF degradation due to the strong field-dependent charge recombination in the bulk film19, while reducing the film thickness results in severe decrease in short circuit current (JSC) and slight gain in FF. As JSC is more important to match with that of the front cell, 120-nm-thick polymer:fullerene film was used to construct the tandem cells. Engineering of a-Si:H/polymer interfaces. The photovoltaic parameters of a reference flat 200-nm a-Si:H and 120-nm polymer single-junction solar cells are summarized in Table 1 and J–V curves are shown in Fig. 1c. We have attempted to form series connection of these two optimized cells with minimized series resistance at the junction, which is essential to obtain the best-performing tandem devices3,9–14. Typically in thin-film tandem cells, ultrathin doped layers are employed to form tunnel junctions between the sub-cells with extremely high doping2,13,14. Although ultrathin heavily n-doped a-Si:H film can be obtained, hole collection layer (HCL) for polymer cells such as MoO3 and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene
c
8
6
7
J (mA cm–2)
7
5 0
Efficiency (%)
Efficiency (%)
Flat Textured
6
–5 –10 –15 PDTP-DFBT:fullerene (=7.8%) a-Si:H (=6.1%) Tandem (=10.5%)
–20 5
–25
5 100
150 200 250 300 a-Si:H absorber thickness (nm)
100 120 140 160 180 200 Polymer absorber thickness (nm)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
V (V )
Figure 1 | Optimization results for a-Si:H and polymer single-junction solar cells. (a) Efficiency versus film thickness of a-Si:H p-i-n single-junction cells on flat and textured substrates. (b) Efficiency versus film thickness of polymer single-junction photovoltaic cells. For single-junction reference cells, we noticed that the optimal thickness to reach maximal photovoltaic conversion efficiency is 200 nm for a-Si:H and 120 nm for polymer, reaching efficiency of B6.0% and B7.5%, respectively. Smaller film thickness limits the photocurrent, while larger thickness causes reduction in FF. (c) J–V characteristics of a-Si:H/polymer hybrid tandem solar cell, together with single-junction references. 2
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) can be neither ultrathin nor highly doped20–22. Therefore, we applied ZnO:Al or indium tin oxide (ITO) as interfacial conducting layers (ICLs) between a-Si:H and polymer cells, to promote electrical conduction. They work as a cathode for the front sub-cell and as an anode for the back one. ITO was paired with PEDOT:PSS, while ZnO:Al was employed for MoO3, as the strong acidic PEDOT:PSS etches ZnO:Al during a deposition process. The transparent conducting oxide (TCO) middle layer easily connects the two sub-cells together in series without a tunnel junction. In addition, as the charge transport is along the vertical direction within the 100-nm-thick TCO, it causes negligible electrical resistance. Fabrication of tandem cells. Figure 2a–c show schematics and cross-sectional scanning electron microscopic images of all tandem devices studied here. The photovoltaic performances of these tandem cells are summarized in Table 1. The performance of the cells varies significantly depending on the surface morphology,
HCLs and ICLs. The best-performing device was obtained when the fully optimized single-junction a-Si:H and polymer cells were deposited on planar surface and connected through the following stacks; 40-nm PEDOT:PSS / 100-nm ITO (marked as Tandem I in Table 2 and Fig. 2). Unprecedented level of efficiency, 10.5%, was demonstrated for Tandem I, owing to the excellent open circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.54 V, which reaches 97% of the VOC of 1.61 V combined from the front and back cells, and due to maintained good FF of 70% implying that ICL offered an excellent series connection between front and back sub-cells (see Table 2 and Fig. 1c). Calculated JSC by integrating EQE curves for the front and back cells are 9.2 and 9.6 mA cm 2, respectively (see Fig. 3a and Table 2). In addition, measured JSC of 9.2 mA cm 2 by the J–V curve is identical to that of front cell, implying reasonable current matching between the front and back cells with the photocurrent control by the front cell as aimed. The obtained efficiency of 10.5% is respectable when considering the 10%B12% efficiency of thin-film silicon tandem cells (a-Si:H/mc-Si:H micromorph) obtained on highly textured
Table 1 | Summary of structural and photovoltaic parameters of the single-junction and tandem cells studied in this work. Cell a-Si:H ingle junction Polymer single junction Tandem I (Flat) Tandem II (mildly textured) Tandem III (heavily textured) Tandem IV (flat)
Interlayer NA NA ITO/PEDOT:PSS ITO/PEDOT:PSS ITO/PEDOT:PSS ZnO:Al/MoO3
Efficiency (%) 6.1 (6.0) 7.8 (7.1) 10.5 (10.2) 6.6 (6.5) 5.9 (5.6) 7.9 (7.4)
VOC 920 690 1544 1559 1510 1475
(mV) (918) (675) (1511) (1492) (1506) (1491)
JSC (mA cm 2) 9.2 (9.1) 17.3 (17.1) 9.8 (9.8) 11.5 (11.0) 12.5 (12.7) 8.0 (7.5)
FF (%) 71.5 (71.4) 64.7 (61.6) 69.2 (69.3) 36.8 (39.6) 31.3 (29.1) 67.3 (65.4)
FF, fill factor; ITO, indium tin oxide; NA, not applicable; PEDOT:PSS, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate. *Average values in parenthesis were obtained from data of eight individual devices.
a
Tandem I
Tandem II, Tandem III
Al/Ca
Al/Ca
Al/Ca
PDTP-DFBT:fullerene
PDTP-DFBT:fullerene
PEDOT:PSS
PEDOT:PSS
Tandem IV PDTP-DFBT:fullerene MoO3
ITO
ITO
ZnO:Al
a-Si:H pin
a-Si:H pin
a-Si:H pin
ZnO:Al
ZnO:Al
ZnO:Al
Glass Glass
Glass Glass
Glass Glass
c
b Al/Ca Polymer HCL TCO
Al/Ca Polymer HCL/TCO a-Si:H
a-Si:H ZnO:Al
200 nm
ZnO:Al
500 nm
Figure 2 | The structures of polymer-a-Si:H tandem cells studied in this work. (a) The schematic of tandem architectures constructed in this work. Tandem I and IV have flat surface morphology, whereas Tandem II and III have textured morphology. Tandem I, II and II used ITO/PEDOT:PSS to connect the two sub-cells, while Tandem IV employed ZnO:Al/MoO3. (b) Typical cross-sectional scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of a tandem cell made on a flat surface such as Tandem I and IV. (c) Typical cross-sectional SEM images of a tandem cell made on a textured surface such as Tandem II and III. In the flat tandem structure, the layer-by-layer structure can be clearly seen, while the thickness of polymer:fullerene film is not uniform in the textured tandem cell. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
3
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
Table 2 | JSC of Tandem I and IV and JSC of sub-cells calculated from EQE curves. Cell Tandem I Tandem IV
Interlayer ITO/PEDOT:PSS ZnO:Al/MoO3
JSC tandem (mA cm 2) 9.8 7.9
JSC,a-Si:H front (mA cm 2) 9.8 8.0
JSC,a-Si:H reference (mA cm 2) 9.2 9.2
JSC,polymer back (mA cm 2) 9.9 8.1
JSC,Polymer reference (mA cm 2) 17.3 17.3
ITP, indium tin oxide; PEDOT:PSS, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate.
a
b
5
Front cell (JSC = 9.8 mA cm–2)
80 60 40
Tandem II (HCl 10 s, =6.6%)
J (mA cm –2)
Back cell (JSC = 9.9 mA cm ) Front reference (JSC = 9.2 mA cm–2) Back reference (JSC = 17.3 mA cm–2)
100
EQE (%)
Tandem I (No HCl, =10.5%)
–2
400
c
0.0
900
d
1.0
1.5
60 40
5 Tandem I (=10.5%, PEDOT) Tandem IV (=8.3%, MoO3)
J (mA cm –2)
80
0.5 V (V )
Back cell (JSC = 8.1 mA cm–2) Front reference (JSC = 9.2 mA cm–2) Back reference (JSC =16.5 mA cm–2)
100 EQE (%)
500 600 700 800 Wavelength (nm)
Front cell (JSC = 8.0 mA cm–2)
0
−5
−10
20 0 300
−5
−10
20 0 300
Tandem III (HCl 1m, =5.9%)
0
400
500 600 700 800 Wavelength (nm)
900
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
V (V )
Figure 3 | The EQE and J–V curves of polymer-a-Si:H tandem cells studied in this work. (a) EQE curves of sub-cells in Tandem I and respective single-junction reference cells. (b) J–V characteristics of tandem I, II and III. Textured Tandem II and III give higher photocurrent at short circuit point compared with Tandem I, due to the light trapping effect. (c) EQE of sub cells in Tandem IV and respective single-junction reference cells. (d) J–V characteristics of Tandem I and IV.
ZnO:B/glass substrates by applying significantly thick mc-Si:H back cells (few microns)3,13,14. As the surface texturing of thin-film Si solar cells typically results in an efficiency boost up to 20%B40% compared with the cells made on a flat surface, we have fabricated our polymer/a-Si:H tandem cells on textured ZnO:Al/glass substrates. The ZnO:Al film on the glass substrate was textured by dipping into diluted HCl solution. Figure 3b and Table 1 show the J–V curves and photovoltaic parameters of polymer/a-Si:H tandem cells on ZnO:Al films with different HCl treatment time, respectively (Tandem I, Tandem II and Tandem III). As expected, increasing HCl treatment time resulted in substantial enhancement of JSC of the tandem cell with maintained high VOC. However, FF was substantially degraded due to a device shunt as seen in the J–V curves in Fig. 3b, which is more severe for the heavily textured tandem cell (Tandem III). As evidenced by a cross-sectional scanning electron microscopic image in Fig. 2b, this device shunt of Tandem II and Tandem III could be attributed to non-conformal deposition of PDTPDFBT:fullerene on the rough-textured surface, resulting in the formation of short path between the top contact to the HCL/ TCO. Therefore, the overall efficiency of the textured device is not greater than that of the planar cell. However, considering high JSC and VOC product of Tandem II and Tandem III, tandem cell efficiency beyond the record efficiency of micromorphs (12%)12 4
or pure polymer tandem cells (10.6%)11 may be obtainable once the conformal deposition of low band gap polymer on the textured surface can be realized via the innovation of coating techniques in the future work. Role of interfacial layers. As mentioned earlier, an appropriate choice of ICL/HCL is essential to obtain high efficiency a-Si:H/ polymer tandem cells. As indicated in Tables 1 and 2, there is a performance gap between the tandem cells fabricated with a PEDOT/ITO interlayer (Tandem I) and MoO3/ZnO:Al interlayer (Tandem IV). Although the difference in FF and VOC between two cells is o5%, JSC of Tandem I is 18% greater than that of Tandem IV (see Table 1). This suggests that the performance of the tandem cell is mainly varied by an optical effect of the interfacial layer between two subcells and partially varied by an electrical effect of the interlayers. For Tandem IV with a MoO3/ ZnO:Al interlayer, the photocurrent calculated from EQE of the a-Si:H front cell is smaller than that from the a-Si:H singlejunction reference (see EQE in Fig. 3c and Table 2). For Tandem I with a PEDOT/ITO interlayer, on the other hand, the photoresponse was enhanced compared with that of the a-Si:H singlejunction reference (see EQE in Fig. 3a and Table 2). This enhanced front cell performance resulted in increased JSC of the
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
entire tandem cell with a PEDOT/ITO interlayer (see J–V curves in Fig. 3d) as the a-Si:H front cell controls the photocurrent for both Tandem I and Tandem IV (JSC of the front cells calculated from EQE curves of Tandem I and IV in Fig. 3a,c are smaller than those of the polymer back cell). As we measured the EQE of an a-Si:H single-junction reference cell without applying any back reflectors (TCO/a-Si:H p-i-n/TCO), photoresponse enhancement on Tandem I may be associated with enhanced back reflection from the PEDOT/ITO stack. When comparing EQE of singlejunction a-Si:H cells with different back contacts such as ITO, ITO/PEDOT, ZnO:Al and ZnO:Al/MoO3, the cell with a ITO/ PEDOT back contact outperforms over the other cells (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Therefore, enhanced cell performance by using a ITO/PEDOT interlayer in our tandem configuration can be partially attributed to enhanced back reflection from the ITO/ PEDOT stack. However, such effect could not be simply discussed by the effect of back reflection based on obtained EQE curves from the single-junction cells, because EQE curves can be varied by an electrical effect and, more importantly, because all seven layers comprising the tandem cell optically affect each other. Therefore, we have performed an optical simulation by using a transfer matrix method23,24 to understand a pure optical effect in the tandem cell by having an optical field distribution and a light absorption profile under AM1.5G solar light illumination. The calculation of absorbed photon flux distribution showed that B15% higher photon absorption occurred in the a-Si:H front cell of Tandem I with PEDOT/ITO compared with Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al (see Supplementary Fig. 2a), which is consistent with our experimental results described above. The calculation of an optical field at a visible light by the function of depth in a tandem cell confirmed that the visible light is absorbed more in Tandem I with PEDOT/ITO compared with Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al (see Supplementary Fig. 3a). Interestingly, this calculation showed that infrared spectra are also absorbed more in Tandem I with PEDOT/ITO compared with Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al, which is consistent with our experimental results (see Supplementary Fig. 3b). However, optical degradation in the polymer back subcell in Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al is more severe than the predicted amount by the optical simulation (see an EQE curve in Fig. 3c and calculation result in Supplementary Fig. 2b). This could be attributed to electrical degradation at a MoO3/polymer interface as MoO3 film is known to be an exciton quencher and recombination site for the polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunction25. Discussion Our polymer/a-Si:H tandem cells address the following shortcomings from pure Si or organic-based tandem cells: (i) extremely thick (2–3 mm) microcrystalline Si back cells required for the pure Si-based tandem cell was replaced by the 120-nm-thick low band gap polymer3,11,12 and (ii) replacing a high band gap polymer cell in polymer tandem cells with thermally stable a-Si:H allows necessary thermal treatment required for connecting two polymer cells, as many efficient wide band gap polymer systems are not stable against thermal annealing over 120 °C (ref. 8). In summary, we have demonstrated record efficiency of a hybrid inorganic/organic double-junction tandem cell with B2 power conversion efficiency improvement from the previous record. Such record efficiency of 10.5% could be obtained by the structural optimization of a-Si:H front/polymer back cells and, more importantly, by the optimized HCL/ICL between two sub-cells. Methods Solar-cell fabrication. A 1.5-mm-thick ZnO:Al film was sputtered on a glass substrate as the bottom electrode. a-Si:H front cells were first formed on ZnO:Al by
depositing boron- and carbon-doped p þ (window layer), undoped i (absorber) and phosphorus-doped n þ a-Si:H films at 250 °C in a plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition system with the following thicknesses: 10 nm p, 200 nm i and 15 nm n þ (see ref. 14 for details about a-Si:H cell fabrication). One hundred-nmthick TCO, ITO or ZnO:Al, was deposited on a-Si:H p-i-n. MoO3 (15 nm) or PEDOT:PSS (40 nm) was deposited as an anode buffer for a subsequently deposited polymer back cell, serving as HCL for the back cell and as a charge recombination zone for electrons from the front cell and holes from back cell20–22. A 120-nm-thick PDTP-DFBT:fullerene blend film was deposited on the HCLs via spin coating (see ref. 10 for details about polymer cell fabrication). The tandem cell was completed by evaporating 20 nm Ca/150 nm Al with the definition of an active area of 2.5 mm2. Solar-cell characterization. The efficiency measurement was carried out under standard AM1.5G solar simulator illumination at the light intensity of 100 mW cm 2. The light intensity is calibrated by a KG-5 Si photodiode, which has been previously calibrated by National renewable energy laboratory. EQE of photovoltaic cells was measured using a standard system from Enli Tech and PVmeasurements. Solar-cell optical simulation. Optical simulation based on the transfer matrix method was carried out using an in-house-built software tool to calculate the optical field distribution and light absorption profile under AM1.5G solar light illumination. The optical parameters of all involved layers were measured by using an ellipsometer. The calculation was carried out under the assumption of ideal thin-film quality, which may cause slight deviation from the real case.
References 1. Brabec, C., Scherf, U. & Dyakonov, Y. Organic Photovoltaics: Materials, Device Physics, and Manufacturing Technologies, 2nd Edition (Wiley-VCH, 2014). 2. Luque, A. & Hegedus, S. Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering (Wiley, 2003). 3. Shah, A. Thin-film Silicon Solar Cells (EPFL Press, 2010). 4. Darling, S. B. & You, F. Q. The case for organic photovoltaics. RSC Advances 3, 17633–17648 (2013). 5. Small, C. E. et al. High-efficiency inverted dithienogermolethienopyrrolodione-based polymer solar cells. Nat. Photon. 6, 115–120 (2012). 6. Chen, H. Y. et al. Polymer solar cells with enhanced open-circuit voltage and efficiency. Nat. Photon. 3, 649–653 (2009). 7. Liang, Y. Y. et al. For the bright future—bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%. Adv. Mater. 22, E135–E138 (2010). 8. He, Z. et al. Enhanced power-conversion efficiency in polymer solar cells using an inverted device structure. Nat. Photon. 6, 591–595 (2012). 9. Kim, J. Y. et al. Efficient tandem polymer solar cells fabricated by all-solution processing. Science 317, 222–225 (2007). 10. Dou, L. T. et al. Tandem polymer solar cells featuring a spectrally matched low bandgap polymer. Nat. Photon. 6, 180–185 (2012). 11. You, J. B. et al. A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Commun. 4, 1446–1455 (2013). 12. Green, M., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. & Dunlop, E. D. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 43). Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 22, 1–9 (2014). 13. Meillaud, F. et al. Limiting factors in the fabrication of microcrystalline silicon solar cells and microcrystalline/amorphous (’micromorph’) tandems. Phil. Mag. 89, 1–22 (2009). 14. Biron, R. et al. New progress in the fabrication of n–i–p micromorph solar cells for opaque substrates. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 114, 147–155 (2013). 15. Kim, J. et al. Efficiency enhancement of a-Si:H single junction solar cells by a-Ge:H incorporation at the p1 a-SiC:H/transparent conducting oxide interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 062102 (2011). 16. Dou, L. T. et al. Synthesis of 5H-Dithieno[3,2-b:2’,3’-d]pyran as an electron-rich building block for donor–acceptor type low-bandgap polymers. Macromolecules 46, 3384–3390 (2013). 17. Seo, J. H. et al. High efficiency inorganic/organic hybrid tandem solar cells. Adv. Mater. 24, 4523–4527 (2012). 18. Pattnaik, S., Xiao, T., Shinar, R., Shinar, J. & Dalal, V. L. Novel hybrid amorphous/organic tandem junction solar cell. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 3, 295–299 (2013). 19. Blom, P. W. M., Mihailetchi, V. D., Koster, L. J. A. & Markov, D. E. Device physics of polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 19, 1551–1566 (2007). 20. Albrecht, S. et al. Efficient hybrid inorganic/organic tandem solar cells with tailored recombination contacts. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 127, 157–162 (2014). 21. Shrotriya, V., Li, G., Yan, Y., Chu, C. W. & Yang, Y. Transition metal oxides as the buffer layer for polymer photovoltaic cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 073508 (2006).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
5
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
22. Brabec, C. J. et al. Origin of the open circuit voltage of plastic solar cells. Adv. Func. Mater. 11, 374–380 (2001). 23. Peumans, P., Yakimov, A. & Forrest, S. R. Small molecular weight organic thin-film photodetectors and solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 3693 (2003). 24. Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Pergamon Press, 1964). 25. Subbiah, J. et al. High-efficiency inverted polymer solar cells with double interlayer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 866–870 (2012).
Author contributions J.K. and Y.Y. participated in a concept generation. J.K., Z.H. and G.L. conceived the experimental plan. J.K. fabricated a-Si:H top cells and Z.H. manufactured polymer back cells. J.K. and Z.H. fabricated tandem cells by combing both a-Si:H and polymer cellsd, an wrote the manuscript. Z.H. and Y.S.L. performed optical design and simulation. J.K., Z.H., G.L., T.-b.S., J.C., Y.S.L., J.Y. and C.-C.C. performed characterization of solar cells. J.K., Z.H., G.L., D.K.S. and Y.Y. participated in data analysis.
Additional information Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/ naturecommunications
Acknowledgements J.K. thanks Hongsik Park of IBM for fruitful discussions. Z.H. thanks Dr Daisuke Yokoyama of Yamagata University for assistance with optical simulation and Dr Zheng Xu of UCLA for helping with sample preparation. Y.Y. thanks NSF and AFOSR for financial support by NSF ECCS-1202231 (Programme Director Dr George N. Maracas) and AFSOR: FA9550-09-1-0610 (Programme Manager Dr Charles Lee), respectively.
6
Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/ reprintsandpermissions/ How to cite this article: Kim, J. et al. 10.5% efficient polymer and amorphous silicon tandem photovoltaic cell. Nat. Commun. 6:6391 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7391 (2015).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
10.5% efficient polymer and amorphous silicon hybrid tandem photovoltaic cell Jeehwan Kim1,*, Ziruo Hong2,*, Gang Li2, Tze-bin Song2, Jay Chey1, Yun Seog Lee1, Jingbi You2, Chun-Chao Chen2, Devendra K. Sadana1 & Yang Yang2
Thin-film solar cells made with amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) or organic semiconductors are considered as promising renewable energy sources due to their low manufacturing cost and light weight. However, the efficiency of single-junction a-Si:H or organic solar cells is typically o10%, insufficient for achieving grid parity. Here we demonstrate an efficient doublejunction photovoltaic cell by employing an a-Si:H film as a front sub-cell and a low band gap polymer:fullerene blend film as a back cell on planar glass substrates. Monolithic integration of 6.0% efficienct a-Si:H and 7.5% efficient polymer:fullerene blend solar cells results in a power conversion efficiency of 10.5%. Such high-efficiency thin-film tandem cells can be achieved by optical management and interface engineering of fully optimized highperformance front and back cells without sacrificing photovoltaic performance in both cells.
1 IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA. 2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. * These authors equally contributed to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.K. (email: [email protected]) or to Z.H. (email: [email protected]) or to Y.Y. (email: [email protected]).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
1
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
C
onjugated polymer and hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) have been considered as excellent candidate materials for fabricating low-cost, light weight and flexible photovoltaic devices, as ultrathin absorbers (hundreds of nanometre scale) are capable of harvesting the most of photons within the spectral range allowed by the band gap1–3. Both techniques feature relatively short energy-payback time, ranging from 1–2 years4. Polymer solar cells based on conjugated polymers as electron-donor materials blended with [6,6]phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester as an electron acceptor have achieved 7%B9% power conversion efficiency using a single bulk heterojunction structure5–8. The efficiency of single-junction a-Si:H solar cells is typically o10% even with highly textured configuration2,3. These efficiencies of polymer and a-Si:H cells are not acceptable for achieving grid parity. To maximize the efficiency of such kind of low-efficiency solar cells, a solar cell made by stacking the multiple absorbers with complementary absorption spectra, so called a tandem cell, is considered as one of the most effective approaches3,9–14. In this work, we demonstrate the combination of a-Si:H and polymer is capable of forming a tandem cell with a power conversion efficiency above 10%. We apply a 200-nm-thick a-Si:H as a front cell and a 120-nm-thick PDTP-DFBT:fullerene bulk heterojunction as a back cell, where PDTP-DFBT is an acronym for poly[2,7-(5,5-bis-(3,7-dimethyloctyl)-5H-dithieno [3,2-b:20 ,30 -d]pyran)-alt-4,7-(5,6-difluoro-2,1,3-benzothia diazole). The band gaps of a-Si:H and polymer absorbers are 1.80 (ref. 15) and 1.38 eV16, respectively, and a conversion efficiency of a standalone single junction of both cells is 6%B7.5%. From this ultrathin polymer/a-Si:H tandem cell made on a flat surface substrate, respectable conversion efficiency of 10.5% is obtained, which is an 84% improvement over the previous record hybrid organic/inorganic tandem cell (5.7% reported for the best case)17,18. We also demonstrate that the key elements to achieve such high efficiency tandem cells are as follows: (i) the high-quality fabrication of each cell component, (ii) the engineering of the interface between a-Si:H and polymer, which allows ideal charge recombination without any electrical loss, and (iii) optical management in the multilayer structure for efficient light harvesting and a photocurrent balance. Our result also promises up to 40% improved efficiency when the cells are formed on a textured surface with no degradation. Results Single-junction optimization. For the fabrication of a highperformance polymer/a-Si:H tandem solar cell, we have
a
b
8
optimized each single junction cell individually. For light trapping on the a-Si:H front cells, ZnO:Al films on the glass substrates were textured before a-Si:H deposition by dipping into diluted HCl solution (DI water:HCl ¼ 100:1). Figure 1a shows the performance of a-Si:H single junction on flat and textured ZnO:Al by the function of an absorber thickness. The maximum efficiency of a-Si:H single junction was achieved at the absorber thickness of 200 nm, because photocurrent starts saturating and fill factor (FF) degradation occurs for the cell with an absorber thickness 4200 nm. Therefore, it can be expected that the best performance of the tandem device with a polymer cell is achievable if the photocurrent is controlled by the front cell at the a-Si:H absorber thickness of 200 nm. We customized a polymer back cell to ensure sufficient photocurrent generation so that the back cell does not limit the photocurrent in the tandem cell. First, we have adjusted the ratio of PDTP-DFBT:fullerene blend film to obtain the highest photoresponse in the near-infrared range in external quantum efficiency (EQE) and to maximize FF. The most desirable performance was achieved at a polymer:fullerene ratio of 1:2 (ref. 11). Second, we have optimized the thickness of polymer single-junction cells, as carrier mobility in organic photovoltaic materials is severely limited by the short conjugated length and large energetic disordering11. Figure 1b shows the performance of the optimized polymer:fullerene single-junction solar cells by the function of absorber thicknesses. The maximum efficiency was achieved at the absorber thickness of 120 nm. Further increasing the film thickness resulted in substantial FF degradation due to the strong field-dependent charge recombination in the bulk film19, while reducing the film thickness results in severe decrease in short circuit current (JSC) and slight gain in FF. As JSC is more important to match with that of the front cell, 120-nm-thick polymer:fullerene film was used to construct the tandem cells. Engineering of a-Si:H/polymer interfaces. The photovoltaic parameters of a reference flat 200-nm a-Si:H and 120-nm polymer single-junction solar cells are summarized in Table 1 and J–V curves are shown in Fig. 1c. We have attempted to form series connection of these two optimized cells with minimized series resistance at the junction, which is essential to obtain the best-performing tandem devices3,9–14. Typically in thin-film tandem cells, ultrathin doped layers are employed to form tunnel junctions between the sub-cells with extremely high doping2,13,14. Although ultrathin heavily n-doped a-Si:H film can be obtained, hole collection layer (HCL) for polymer cells such as MoO3 and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene
c
8
6
7
J (mA cm–2)
7
5 0
Efficiency (%)
Efficiency (%)
Flat Textured
6
–5 –10 –15 PDTP-DFBT:fullerene (=7.8%) a-Si:H (=6.1%) Tandem (=10.5%)
–20 5
–25
5 100
150 200 250 300 a-Si:H absorber thickness (nm)
100 120 140 160 180 200 Polymer absorber thickness (nm)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
V (V )
Figure 1 | Optimization results for a-Si:H and polymer single-junction solar cells. (a) Efficiency versus film thickness of a-Si:H p-i-n single-junction cells on flat and textured substrates. (b) Efficiency versus film thickness of polymer single-junction photovoltaic cells. For single-junction reference cells, we noticed that the optimal thickness to reach maximal photovoltaic conversion efficiency is 200 nm for a-Si:H and 120 nm for polymer, reaching efficiency of B6.0% and B7.5%, respectively. Smaller film thickness limits the photocurrent, while larger thickness causes reduction in FF. (c) J–V characteristics of a-Si:H/polymer hybrid tandem solar cell, together with single-junction references. 2
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) can be neither ultrathin nor highly doped20–22. Therefore, we applied ZnO:Al or indium tin oxide (ITO) as interfacial conducting layers (ICLs) between a-Si:H and polymer cells, to promote electrical conduction. They work as a cathode for the front sub-cell and as an anode for the back one. ITO was paired with PEDOT:PSS, while ZnO:Al was employed for MoO3, as the strong acidic PEDOT:PSS etches ZnO:Al during a deposition process. The transparent conducting oxide (TCO) middle layer easily connects the two sub-cells together in series without a tunnel junction. In addition, as the charge transport is along the vertical direction within the 100-nm-thick TCO, it causes negligible electrical resistance. Fabrication of tandem cells. Figure 2a–c show schematics and cross-sectional scanning electron microscopic images of all tandem devices studied here. The photovoltaic performances of these tandem cells are summarized in Table 1. The performance of the cells varies significantly depending on the surface morphology,
HCLs and ICLs. The best-performing device was obtained when the fully optimized single-junction a-Si:H and polymer cells were deposited on planar surface and connected through the following stacks; 40-nm PEDOT:PSS / 100-nm ITO (marked as Tandem I in Table 2 and Fig. 2). Unprecedented level of efficiency, 10.5%, was demonstrated for Tandem I, owing to the excellent open circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.54 V, which reaches 97% of the VOC of 1.61 V combined from the front and back cells, and due to maintained good FF of 70% implying that ICL offered an excellent series connection between front and back sub-cells (see Table 2 and Fig. 1c). Calculated JSC by integrating EQE curves for the front and back cells are 9.2 and 9.6 mA cm 2, respectively (see Fig. 3a and Table 2). In addition, measured JSC of 9.2 mA cm 2 by the J–V curve is identical to that of front cell, implying reasonable current matching between the front and back cells with the photocurrent control by the front cell as aimed. The obtained efficiency of 10.5% is respectable when considering the 10%B12% efficiency of thin-film silicon tandem cells (a-Si:H/mc-Si:H micromorph) obtained on highly textured
Table 1 | Summary of structural and photovoltaic parameters of the single-junction and tandem cells studied in this work. Cell a-Si:H ingle junction Polymer single junction Tandem I (Flat) Tandem II (mildly textured) Tandem III (heavily textured) Tandem IV (flat)
Interlayer NA NA ITO/PEDOT:PSS ITO/PEDOT:PSS ITO/PEDOT:PSS ZnO:Al/MoO3
Efficiency (%) 6.1 (6.0) 7.8 (7.1) 10.5 (10.2) 6.6 (6.5) 5.9 (5.6) 7.9 (7.4)
VOC 920 690 1544 1559 1510 1475
(mV) (918) (675) (1511) (1492) (1506) (1491)
JSC (mA cm 2) 9.2 (9.1) 17.3 (17.1) 9.8 (9.8) 11.5 (11.0) 12.5 (12.7) 8.0 (7.5)
FF (%) 71.5 (71.4) 64.7 (61.6) 69.2 (69.3) 36.8 (39.6) 31.3 (29.1) 67.3 (65.4)
FF, fill factor; ITO, indium tin oxide; NA, not applicable; PEDOT:PSS, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate. *Average values in parenthesis were obtained from data of eight individual devices.
a
Tandem I
Tandem II, Tandem III
Al/Ca
Al/Ca
Al/Ca
PDTP-DFBT:fullerene
PDTP-DFBT:fullerene
PEDOT:PSS
PEDOT:PSS
Tandem IV PDTP-DFBT:fullerene MoO3
ITO
ITO
ZnO:Al
a-Si:H pin
a-Si:H pin
a-Si:H pin
ZnO:Al
ZnO:Al
ZnO:Al
Glass Glass
Glass Glass
Glass Glass
c
b Al/Ca Polymer HCL TCO
Al/Ca Polymer HCL/TCO a-Si:H
a-Si:H ZnO:Al
200 nm
ZnO:Al
500 nm
Figure 2 | The structures of polymer-a-Si:H tandem cells studied in this work. (a) The schematic of tandem architectures constructed in this work. Tandem I and IV have flat surface morphology, whereas Tandem II and III have textured morphology. Tandem I, II and II used ITO/PEDOT:PSS to connect the two sub-cells, while Tandem IV employed ZnO:Al/MoO3. (b) Typical cross-sectional scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of a tandem cell made on a flat surface such as Tandem I and IV. (c) Typical cross-sectional SEM images of a tandem cell made on a textured surface such as Tandem II and III. In the flat tandem structure, the layer-by-layer structure can be clearly seen, while the thickness of polymer:fullerene film is not uniform in the textured tandem cell. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
3
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
Table 2 | JSC of Tandem I and IV and JSC of sub-cells calculated from EQE curves. Cell Tandem I Tandem IV
Interlayer ITO/PEDOT:PSS ZnO:Al/MoO3
JSC tandem (mA cm 2) 9.8 7.9
JSC,a-Si:H front (mA cm 2) 9.8 8.0
JSC,a-Si:H reference (mA cm 2) 9.2 9.2
JSC,polymer back (mA cm 2) 9.9 8.1
JSC,Polymer reference (mA cm 2) 17.3 17.3
ITP, indium tin oxide; PEDOT:PSS, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate.
a
b
5
Front cell (JSC = 9.8 mA cm–2)
80 60 40
Tandem II (HCl 10 s, =6.6%)
J (mA cm –2)
Back cell (JSC = 9.9 mA cm ) Front reference (JSC = 9.2 mA cm–2) Back reference (JSC = 17.3 mA cm–2)
100
EQE (%)
Tandem I (No HCl, =10.5%)
–2
400
c
0.0
900
d
1.0
1.5
60 40
5 Tandem I (=10.5%, PEDOT) Tandem IV (=8.3%, MoO3)
J (mA cm –2)
80
0.5 V (V )
Back cell (JSC = 8.1 mA cm–2) Front reference (JSC = 9.2 mA cm–2) Back reference (JSC =16.5 mA cm–2)
100 EQE (%)
500 600 700 800 Wavelength (nm)
Front cell (JSC = 8.0 mA cm–2)
0
−5
−10
20 0 300
−5
−10
20 0 300
Tandem III (HCl 1m, =5.9%)
0
400
500 600 700 800 Wavelength (nm)
900
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
V (V )
Figure 3 | The EQE and J–V curves of polymer-a-Si:H tandem cells studied in this work. (a) EQE curves of sub-cells in Tandem I and respective single-junction reference cells. (b) J–V characteristics of tandem I, II and III. Textured Tandem II and III give higher photocurrent at short circuit point compared with Tandem I, due to the light trapping effect. (c) EQE of sub cells in Tandem IV and respective single-junction reference cells. (d) J–V characteristics of Tandem I and IV.
ZnO:B/glass substrates by applying significantly thick mc-Si:H back cells (few microns)3,13,14. As the surface texturing of thin-film Si solar cells typically results in an efficiency boost up to 20%B40% compared with the cells made on a flat surface, we have fabricated our polymer/a-Si:H tandem cells on textured ZnO:Al/glass substrates. The ZnO:Al film on the glass substrate was textured by dipping into diluted HCl solution. Figure 3b and Table 1 show the J–V curves and photovoltaic parameters of polymer/a-Si:H tandem cells on ZnO:Al films with different HCl treatment time, respectively (Tandem I, Tandem II and Tandem III). As expected, increasing HCl treatment time resulted in substantial enhancement of JSC of the tandem cell with maintained high VOC. However, FF was substantially degraded due to a device shunt as seen in the J–V curves in Fig. 3b, which is more severe for the heavily textured tandem cell (Tandem III). As evidenced by a cross-sectional scanning electron microscopic image in Fig. 2b, this device shunt of Tandem II and Tandem III could be attributed to non-conformal deposition of PDTPDFBT:fullerene on the rough-textured surface, resulting in the formation of short path between the top contact to the HCL/ TCO. Therefore, the overall efficiency of the textured device is not greater than that of the planar cell. However, considering high JSC and VOC product of Tandem II and Tandem III, tandem cell efficiency beyond the record efficiency of micromorphs (12%)12 4
or pure polymer tandem cells (10.6%)11 may be obtainable once the conformal deposition of low band gap polymer on the textured surface can be realized via the innovation of coating techniques in the future work. Role of interfacial layers. As mentioned earlier, an appropriate choice of ICL/HCL is essential to obtain high efficiency a-Si:H/ polymer tandem cells. As indicated in Tables 1 and 2, there is a performance gap between the tandem cells fabricated with a PEDOT/ITO interlayer (Tandem I) and MoO3/ZnO:Al interlayer (Tandem IV). Although the difference in FF and VOC between two cells is o5%, JSC of Tandem I is 18% greater than that of Tandem IV (see Table 1). This suggests that the performance of the tandem cell is mainly varied by an optical effect of the interfacial layer between two subcells and partially varied by an electrical effect of the interlayers. For Tandem IV with a MoO3/ ZnO:Al interlayer, the photocurrent calculated from EQE of the a-Si:H front cell is smaller than that from the a-Si:H singlejunction reference (see EQE in Fig. 3c and Table 2). For Tandem I with a PEDOT/ITO interlayer, on the other hand, the photoresponse was enhanced compared with that of the a-Si:H singlejunction reference (see EQE in Fig. 3a and Table 2). This enhanced front cell performance resulted in increased JSC of the
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
entire tandem cell with a PEDOT/ITO interlayer (see J–V curves in Fig. 3d) as the a-Si:H front cell controls the photocurrent for both Tandem I and Tandem IV (JSC of the front cells calculated from EQE curves of Tandem I and IV in Fig. 3a,c are smaller than those of the polymer back cell). As we measured the EQE of an a-Si:H single-junction reference cell without applying any back reflectors (TCO/a-Si:H p-i-n/TCO), photoresponse enhancement on Tandem I may be associated with enhanced back reflection from the PEDOT/ITO stack. When comparing EQE of singlejunction a-Si:H cells with different back contacts such as ITO, ITO/PEDOT, ZnO:Al and ZnO:Al/MoO3, the cell with a ITO/ PEDOT back contact outperforms over the other cells (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Therefore, enhanced cell performance by using a ITO/PEDOT interlayer in our tandem configuration can be partially attributed to enhanced back reflection from the ITO/ PEDOT stack. However, such effect could not be simply discussed by the effect of back reflection based on obtained EQE curves from the single-junction cells, because EQE curves can be varied by an electrical effect and, more importantly, because all seven layers comprising the tandem cell optically affect each other. Therefore, we have performed an optical simulation by using a transfer matrix method23,24 to understand a pure optical effect in the tandem cell by having an optical field distribution and a light absorption profile under AM1.5G solar light illumination. The calculation of absorbed photon flux distribution showed that B15% higher photon absorption occurred in the a-Si:H front cell of Tandem I with PEDOT/ITO compared with Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al (see Supplementary Fig. 2a), which is consistent with our experimental results described above. The calculation of an optical field at a visible light by the function of depth in a tandem cell confirmed that the visible light is absorbed more in Tandem I with PEDOT/ITO compared with Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al (see Supplementary Fig. 3a). Interestingly, this calculation showed that infrared spectra are also absorbed more in Tandem I with PEDOT/ITO compared with Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al, which is consistent with our experimental results (see Supplementary Fig. 3b). However, optical degradation in the polymer back subcell in Tandem IV with MoO3/ZnO:Al is more severe than the predicted amount by the optical simulation (see an EQE curve in Fig. 3c and calculation result in Supplementary Fig. 2b). This could be attributed to electrical degradation at a MoO3/polymer interface as MoO3 film is known to be an exciton quencher and recombination site for the polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunction25. Discussion Our polymer/a-Si:H tandem cells address the following shortcomings from pure Si or organic-based tandem cells: (i) extremely thick (2–3 mm) microcrystalline Si back cells required for the pure Si-based tandem cell was replaced by the 120-nm-thick low band gap polymer3,11,12 and (ii) replacing a high band gap polymer cell in polymer tandem cells with thermally stable a-Si:H allows necessary thermal treatment required for connecting two polymer cells, as many efficient wide band gap polymer systems are not stable against thermal annealing over 120 °C (ref. 8). In summary, we have demonstrated record efficiency of a hybrid inorganic/organic double-junction tandem cell with B2 power conversion efficiency improvement from the previous record. Such record efficiency of 10.5% could be obtained by the structural optimization of a-Si:H front/polymer back cells and, more importantly, by the optimized HCL/ICL between two sub-cells. Methods Solar-cell fabrication. A 1.5-mm-thick ZnO:Al film was sputtered on a glass substrate as the bottom electrode. a-Si:H front cells were first formed on ZnO:Al by
depositing boron- and carbon-doped p þ (window layer), undoped i (absorber) and phosphorus-doped n þ a-Si:H films at 250 °C in a plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition system with the following thicknesses: 10 nm p, 200 nm i and 15 nm n þ (see ref. 14 for details about a-Si:H cell fabrication). One hundred-nmthick TCO, ITO or ZnO:Al, was deposited on a-Si:H p-i-n. MoO3 (15 nm) or PEDOT:PSS (40 nm) was deposited as an anode buffer for a subsequently deposited polymer back cell, serving as HCL for the back cell and as a charge recombination zone for electrons from the front cell and holes from back cell20–22. A 120-nm-thick PDTP-DFBT:fullerene blend film was deposited on the HCLs via spin coating (see ref. 10 for details about polymer cell fabrication). The tandem cell was completed by evaporating 20 nm Ca/150 nm Al with the definition of an active area of 2.5 mm2. Solar-cell characterization. The efficiency measurement was carried out under standard AM1.5G solar simulator illumination at the light intensity of 100 mW cm 2. The light intensity is calibrated by a KG-5 Si photodiode, which has been previously calibrated by National renewable energy laboratory. EQE of photovoltaic cells was measured using a standard system from Enli Tech and PVmeasurements. Solar-cell optical simulation. Optical simulation based on the transfer matrix method was carried out using an in-house-built software tool to calculate the optical field distribution and light absorption profile under AM1.5G solar light illumination. The optical parameters of all involved layers were measured by using an ellipsometer. The calculation was carried out under the assumption of ideal thin-film quality, which may cause slight deviation from the real case.
References 1. Brabec, C., Scherf, U. & Dyakonov, Y. Organic Photovoltaics: Materials, Device Physics, and Manufacturing Technologies, 2nd Edition (Wiley-VCH, 2014). 2. Luque, A. & Hegedus, S. Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering (Wiley, 2003). 3. Shah, A. Thin-film Silicon Solar Cells (EPFL Press, 2010). 4. Darling, S. B. & You, F. Q. The case for organic photovoltaics. RSC Advances 3, 17633–17648 (2013). 5. Small, C. E. et al. High-efficiency inverted dithienogermolethienopyrrolodione-based polymer solar cells. Nat. Photon. 6, 115–120 (2012). 6. Chen, H. Y. et al. Polymer solar cells with enhanced open-circuit voltage and efficiency. Nat. Photon. 3, 649–653 (2009). 7. Liang, Y. Y. et al. For the bright future—bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%. Adv. Mater. 22, E135–E138 (2010). 8. He, Z. et al. Enhanced power-conversion efficiency in polymer solar cells using an inverted device structure. Nat. Photon. 6, 591–595 (2012). 9. Kim, J. Y. et al. Efficient tandem polymer solar cells fabricated by all-solution processing. Science 317, 222–225 (2007). 10. Dou, L. T. et al. Tandem polymer solar cells featuring a spectrally matched low bandgap polymer. Nat. Photon. 6, 180–185 (2012). 11. You, J. B. et al. A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Commun. 4, 1446–1455 (2013). 12. Green, M., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. & Dunlop, E. D. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 43). Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 22, 1–9 (2014). 13. Meillaud, F. et al. Limiting factors in the fabrication of microcrystalline silicon solar cells and microcrystalline/amorphous (’micromorph’) tandems. Phil. Mag. 89, 1–22 (2009). 14. Biron, R. et al. New progress in the fabrication of n–i–p micromorph solar cells for opaque substrates. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 114, 147–155 (2013). 15. Kim, J. et al. Efficiency enhancement of a-Si:H single junction solar cells by a-Ge:H incorporation at the p1 a-SiC:H/transparent conducting oxide interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 062102 (2011). 16. Dou, L. T. et al. Synthesis of 5H-Dithieno[3,2-b:2’,3’-d]pyran as an electron-rich building block for donor–acceptor type low-bandgap polymers. Macromolecules 46, 3384–3390 (2013). 17. Seo, J. H. et al. High efficiency inorganic/organic hybrid tandem solar cells. Adv. Mater. 24, 4523–4527 (2012). 18. Pattnaik, S., Xiao, T., Shinar, R., Shinar, J. & Dalal, V. L. Novel hybrid amorphous/organic tandem junction solar cell. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 3, 295–299 (2013). 19. Blom, P. W. M., Mihailetchi, V. D., Koster, L. J. A. & Markov, D. E. Device physics of polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 19, 1551–1566 (2007). 20. Albrecht, S. et al. Efficient hybrid inorganic/organic tandem solar cells with tailored recombination contacts. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 127, 157–162 (2014). 21. Shrotriya, V., Li, G., Yan, Y., Chu, C. W. & Yang, Y. Transition metal oxides as the buffer layer for polymer photovoltaic cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 073508 (2006).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
5
ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391
22. Brabec, C. J. et al. Origin of the open circuit voltage of plastic solar cells. Adv. Func. Mater. 11, 374–380 (2001). 23. Peumans, P., Yakimov, A. & Forrest, S. R. Small molecular weight organic thin-film photodetectors and solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 3693 (2003). 24. Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Pergamon Press, 1964). 25. Subbiah, J. et al. High-efficiency inverted polymer solar cells with double interlayer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 866–870 (2012).
Author contributions J.K. and Y.Y. participated in a concept generation. J.K., Z.H. and G.L. conceived the experimental plan. J.K. fabricated a-Si:H top cells and Z.H. manufactured polymer back cells. J.K. and Z.H. fabricated tandem cells by combing both a-Si:H and polymer cellsd, an wrote the manuscript. Z.H. and Y.S.L. performed optical design and simulation. J.K., Z.H., G.L., T.-b.S., J.C., Y.S.L., J.Y. and C.-C.C. performed characterization of solar cells. J.K., Z.H., G.L., D.K.S. and Y.Y. participated in data analysis.
Additional information Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/ naturecommunications
Acknowledgements J.K. thanks Hongsik Park of IBM for fruitful discussions. Z.H. thanks Dr Daisuke Yokoyama of Yamagata University for assistance with optical simulation and Dr Zheng Xu of UCLA for helping with sample preparation. Y.Y. thanks NSF and AFOSR for financial support by NSF ECCS-1202231 (Programme Director Dr George N. Maracas) and AFSOR: FA9550-09-1-0610 (Programme Manager Dr Charles Lee), respectively.
6
Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/ reprintsandpermissions/ How to cite this article: Kim, J. et al. 10.5% efficient polymer and amorphous silicon tandem photovoltaic cell. Nat. Commun. 6:6391 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7391 (2015).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6391 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7391 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
